OCCC AtD Meeting, September 16, 2009 Mr. Stuart Harvey 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HART RESEARCH P e t e r D ASSOTESCIA How Should Colleges Assess & Improve College Learning? Employers Views on the Accountability Challenge Key findings.
Advertisements

Operation XcelPromoting Excellent Communities Education & Leadership.
Entering Students Have a Lot to Tell Us: Are We Listening? NISOD Monday, May 31, :15AM – 12:15PM Room 13A.
Disaggregate to Appreciate Making SENSE of Texas’ Entering Community College Students 2012 TAIR Conference Corpus Christi, TX.
2006 Student Opinion Survey Summary November 2006 GUSTO Town Meeting on Accreditation & Assessment Genesee Community College Presented by: Carol Marriott.
1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
2003 Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) SVC Office of Institutional Research Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director Leslie Croot, M.S., Analyst.
Engagement By Design: Focus on Developmental Education Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2004 Findings.
The Faculty Said… (pt.3) Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – September 14, 2006.
LFCC SENSE 09 Data Dave Urso John Milam March 23, 2010.
Law School Survey of Student Engagement Users’ Workshop November 4, 2011 Seton Hall Law School 1.
Mind the Gap: Overview of FSSE and BCSSE Jillian Kinzie NSSE.
Executive Summary 2009 Findings November 16, 2009.
Benchmarking Effective Educational Practice Community Colleges of the State University of New York April, 2005.
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Faculty Said/Students Said Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenters: LaSylvia Pugh & Pamela G. Senegal – February 17, 2006.
Entering Community College Students: Consciously Creating Critical Connections 2012 FYE Conference San Antonio, TX.
CCSSE Houston Community College System Presented by Margaret Drain June 19, 2007.
1 This CCSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
The Students Said… (pt.2) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – August 29, 2006.
Student Engagement: Comparing Community College Students in the US and Canada Maureen Pettitt, Ph.D. Skagit Valley College, WA Karen Grigoleit Douglas.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Corning CC and CCSSE: What We Experienced and How We Handled It Maren N. Hess Director of Institutional Research AIRPO Winter Conference Syracuse – January.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
In this session, participants will learn what assessment of student engagement has shown St. Louis Community College (STLCC) about transfer success and.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
The Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Pilot Test Results (Fall 2001) May 6, 2003 Expanded Dean’s Council.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Topic #1 – COMPLETERS (Graduation and Transfer) Key AC Evidence Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
Data You Can Bank On What can OIR do for you?. Fall 2007 Student Demographics 13,217 students 69% Female 52% Minority Average age is 27 18% are First-time.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IU KOKOMO Administrative Council 26 September 2007.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
2009 Pitt Community College CCSSE Results September 21, 2009 Report to the Campus College CCSSE Results Pitt Community College Dr. Brian Miller, Assistant.
NSSE 2005 CSUMB Report California State University at Monterey Bay Office of Institutional Effectiveness Office of Assessment and Research.
Topic #2 – FIRST-GENERATION Students Key AC Evidence Provided by Amarillo College Offices of Institutional Research and Outcomes Assessments.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
Ready or Not, Here I Am! League Innovations Conference 2010.
Law School Survey of Student Engagement (LSSSE) Results June Scores range from one to four.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
CCSSE 2012 Findings for Southern Crescent Technical College.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
This SENSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s SENSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
2009 C OMMUNITY C OLLEGE S URVEY OF S TUDENT E NGAGEMENT & F ACULTY S URVEY OF S TUDENT E NGAGEMENT RESULTS FOR IVCC (CCSSE AND CCFSSE) Cathy Bangert &
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2013 Presented by: November 2013 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
Jackson College CCSSE & CCFSSE Findings Community College Survey of Student Engagement Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Administered:
The University of Texas-Pan American
Surprise. Look who’s engaged
The Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE)
North Seattle College All College Meeting
Closing the Loop on Student Feedback
Student Equity Planning August 28, rd Meeting
The Heart of Student Success
SENSE: Survey of New Student Engagement
Faculty In-Service Week
Presentation transcript:

OCCC AtD Meeting, September 16, 2009 Mr. Stuart Harvey 1

CCSSE Designed to determine students’ commitment to their educational experience, students’ view of the College’s student services, and support from family Developed by the Community College Leadership Program at the University of Texas at Austin Limitation of the survey: The 2007 population included students who completed 30 or more credits. The 2009 population included a cross section of all students. 2

Methodology A random sample of courses were selected for the survey implementation Students from 59 of the 60 courses selected completed the survey 829 students responded 3

Demographics 56% female 60% white 62% full-time 40% started college elsewhere 5% earned a bachelor’s or higher 4

General Results 96% would recommend OCCC to another individual 87% indicated their educational experience was excellent or good 46% intend to complete an internship (an increase from 34%) 5

Statistical Significance 36 items increased at OCCC from 2007 to items decreased at OCCC from 2007 to 2009 Compared to Achieving the Dream (AtD) colleges, OCCC was above in one item and below in two items Compared to Other Large Colleges, OCCC was up in three areas and down in one 6

Statistical Significance 7 Item OCCC AtD Other Large Colleges Made a class presentation---  Prepared two or more drafts of a paper  --- Used the Internet to work on an assignment  --- Used to communicate with an instructor  --- Talked about career plans with an instructor or advisor  --- Had conversations with students who differ from you  --- Memorized facts  --- Examinations challenged me to do my best work  --- Encourages me to spend time studying  --- Provides support to succeed  --- Encourages contact with students from different backgrounds  --- Provide the support to thrive socially  --- Provides financial support needed to afford an education  --- Using computers in academic work  --- Hours spent on preparing for class  ---

Statistical Significance 8 Item OCCC AtD Other Large Colleges These areas contributed to my knowledge, skills, and personal development Acquiring a broad general education  --- Writing clearly and effectively  --- Speaking clearly and effectively  --- Thinking critically and analytically  --- Solving numerical problems  --- Working effectively with others  --- Learning effectively on your own  --- Understanding yourself  --- Developing a personal code of values and ethics  --- Contributing to the welfare of your community  --- Developing clearer career goals  --- Gaining information about career opportunities  ---

Statistical Significance 9 Item OCCC AtD Other Large Colleges Frequency: Academic advising/planning  --- Frequency: Career counseling  --- Frequency: Peer or other tutoring  --- Frequency: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.)  Frequency: Child care  --- Frequency: Financial aid advising  --- Frequency: Computer lab ---  Frequency: Services to students with disabilities  --- Satisfaction: Academic advising/planning  --- Satisfaction: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.)---  Satisfaction: Financial aid advising  --- Importance: Academic advising/planning  --- Importance: Peer or other tutoring  --- Importance: Skill labs (writing, math, etc.)  ---  Importance: Financial aid advising  --- Importance: Computer lab  --- Transfer to a 4-year college would cause me to withdraw  ---

Benchmarks Comparison of OCCC with AtD 10

Special Focus Questions – Social Networking Instant messaging, text messaging, Twitter, MySpace and/or Facebook 61% students use multiple times a day 16% students use multiple times a day to discuss coursework 28% students were somewhat or much more connected to the college because of social networking tools 11

Additional Questions - OCCC 83% sometimes or often evaluated their own efforts to attain learning objectives and made changes to improve performance 83% of faculty were extremely or somewhat effective in their teaching 72% said midterm grade would help to be more successful 68% said Success in College and Life course was effective 54% of developmental courses were very or somewhat helpful in preparing for subsequent courses 12

Summary Significant increases in areas contributing to students’ knowledge and skills, i.e., writing, speaking, thinking critically, solving numerical problems, etc. Significant use of support services, i.e., academic advising, tutoring, skill labs, financial aid Communication has improved Need for more class presentations Significant opportunity to use social networking technology to communicate with students Responses were similar to OCCC’s Achieving the Dream comparison group 13

14