Division of Geoinformatics, Cartography and Visualization Lecture 4: Information analysis and Web users Elective module 10: Web sites for spatial data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WEBSITE EVALUATION Deciding if this is the correct website for your research.
Advertisements

Evaluation and Quality Of electronic journals and related information resources.
Evaluation of electronic resources. Review of Internet quality issues Nearly anyone can publish information on the Internet so –academic journals sit.
Courtesy of Purdue University Writing Lab Research and the Internet.
Terri Ottosen, MLIS, AHIP Consumer Health Coordinator
1 Design a Web Page Five steps for creating a content-rich, visually appealing webpage 1. Gather information 2. Determine the Intended Audience 3. Create.
Evaluating Information
Internet Research Evaluating Information. People are seeking information Statistics show steady increases each year in the number of people using the.
Evaluating Websites. Why is it so important to evaluate websites ? Think about these differences… Print Books or Magazine Articles  Checked for accuracy.
Purdue University Writing Lab Research and the Internet A workshop brought to you by the Purdue University Writing Lab.
Verifying the Validity of Websites By: Group One.
Evaluation of web sites. 2 Quality of Web resources varies a lot! Criteria needed to evaluate Web resources We need to evaluate: Accuracy Authority Objectivity.
By Fitri Ramadhani 12250/ K1-09. Teaching a new language to non-native speakers may be one of the most challenging educational jobs out there, so teachers.
Evaluating Educational Technology and Integration Strategies By: Dakota Tucker, Derrick Haney, Demi Ford, and Kent Elmore Chapter 7.
Evaluating Websites.
Information Lecture 2 – Evaluating Information Sources CSC Introduction to Computers and Their Applications.
TECHNICAL SEMINAR REPORT Presented by :-SHIBA NARAYAN SARANGI THINKING CRITICALLY ABOUT WWW RESOURCES By SHIBA NARAYAN SARANGI CS Under the guidance.
Evaluating Internet Sources
Using the Internet as a Research Tool. Group Work Why is it important to evaluate web sources? Why is it important to evaluate web sources? How do you.
Purdue University Writing Lab Research and the Internet A workshop brought to you by the Purdue University Writing Lab.
RESEARCH Checking Reliable Sources. Why do I need to check if a website is reliable? Unlike most traditional written information, no one has to approve.
Evaluating Sources Write-n-Cite Research Skills Objectives: To evaluate sources. Essential Questions: How can you evaluate a source?
Sara Memmott Social Work Librarian EMU Library
EVALUATING WEBSITES. Introduction  Do you believe everything you read?  How gullible are you?  There are people who believe that we never walked on.
MEDIA INFLUENCES. WEBSITE RELIABILITY No one should assume that information on the Internet is accurate, timely, clear, and important. Many of us have.
 We live in an information age where it's very easy to publish on the Internet. The average person can write their own blog and add to Wikipedia. Anything.
Evaluating Websites… The truth is out there - but so is the lie..
How to evaluate sources on the World Wide Web Credible Sources.
Internet Sources An Introduction to evaluating information on the Internet.
Purdue University Writing Lab Research and the Internet Adopted from a presentation by the Purdue University Writing Lab.
Purdue University Writing Lab Research and the Internet A workshop brought to you by The Purdue University Writing Lab.
© 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Longman Publishers Chapter 12: Reading and Evaluating Internet Sources Efficient and Flexible Reading, 8/e.
Navigating the Internet Appropriate Internet Use in the Classroom.
The CRAAP Test Your guide to website evaluation Ms. Mitchell Ms. Mitchell English 9H.
NATIONAL AGENCY FOR EDUCATION Check the Source! - Web Evaluation
Research Skills Did You Know?. How are you searching now? Google and Ask.com allow you to type natural language search strings, in other words, you type.
Research and the Internet Finding and evaluating the credibility of internet resources.
Evaluating a Web Site. Student Objectives  Student will compile a web site evaluation folder to use for reference use. All assignments will be placed.
Web Research Guide Evaluating Websites Mrs. Roesler September 2012.
Research and the Internet A workshop brought to you by the Purdue University Online Writing Lab.
Evaluating Websites 1. Authority Writer qualifications, “publisher” reputation 2. Accuracy Reliable, free from error, checked by editors 3. Objectivity.
Internet Literacy Evaluating Web Sites. Objective The Student will be able to evaluate internet web sites for accuracy and reliability The Student will.
Website Assessment TEC July 2008 By: Randy Allen Monica Flores Mary Gore Kimberly Powell.
Evaluating Sources. Evaluation During Reading After you have asked yourself some questions about the source and determined that it's worth your time to.
Terri Ottosen, MLIS, AHIP Consumer Health Coordinator National Network of Libraries of Medicine, Southeastern Atlantic Region From Snake Oil to Penicillin:
Evaluating Online Health Information. Using the internet to find health information is alike going on a treasure hunt… You could find some real gems…
Guidelines For Evaluating Web Sites. The web is a lot like a flea market--- a large selection of sites to choose from--- but not a lot of order to it.
Evaluating Internet Web Sites Remember: 1.Anyone can create an Internet web site. 2. Not all information you find on the Internet is accurate or objective.
Suzan Skaar, South High School Library Media Specialist.
Evaluating Web Resources
Evaluating Internet Sources
Evaluating Sources.
6 Criteria for Evaluating a Website!
Evaluating Web Resources
FATMA ISMED K1-09 Websites in ELT.
WEB PAGE REMINDERS.
Evaluating Sources.
Evaluating Websites.
Evaluating Internet Sources
Evaluating a Web Site.
Web Resource Evaluation Techniques Wolfgram Memorial Library
Authority Why should we evaluate an article for Authority?
Source evaluation criteria
Safe and Effective Web searchING
Evaluating Websites Using CRAAP 
Evaluating web sites Authority Accuracy Objectivity Currency Coverage
Searching for Information Without Losing Your Cool!
Website Evaluation.
How do you find relevant and reliable information?
Presentation transcript:

Division of Geoinformatics, Cartography and Visualization Lecture 4: Information analysis and Web users Elective module 10: Web sites for spatial data dissemination

Division of Geoinformatics, Cartography and Visualization Contents Role playing on the web: Persona Information Analysis  Categorizing information goals  Evaluating informational quality

Division of Geoinformatics, Cartography and Visualization Role playing on the web: Persona Web designers and users communicate through Persona  roles that they play  succes of the web sites’ communication depends largely on how succesful personas suit the purpose

Division of Geoinformatics, Cartography and Visualization Persona: Key concepts (1) Author persona:  Person or voice who ‘speaks through’ the web site  put on stage by the designer User persona:  Person of the target visitor (  real visitor)  created by the content of the Web site  the role the actual visitor is asked to play

Division of Geoinformatics, Cartography and Visualization Persona: Key concepts (2) Relationship:  Between author and user persona  Includes basic elements:  Distance  hierarchy Peripheral clues:  Cause positive feelings by association (rather than facts)

Division of Geoinformatics, Cartography and Visualization Designing Author persona Credible  Convince the audience the information is truthful, relevant, complete and accurate  May be achieved by information offered, peripheral clues or reputation Inviting  ‘friendly’: enables readers to find information  ‘seductive’: motivates readers to read & act

Division of Geoinformatics, Cartography and Visualization Designing User persona Important goal: distinguish the accidental visitors from the intended users Playable  Clearly defined with clear relationships  Logically implied or explicitly expressed Attractive  No ‘face threatening acts’: threaten the visitors’ wish to be in control and be respected

Division of Geoinformatics, Cartography and Visualization Importance of information analysis lReliance upon web-based information increasing lQuality of Web resources varies tremendously lCriteria needed to evaluate Web resources

Division of Geoinformatics, Cartography and Visualization Categorizing informational goal of sites Advocacy Web site  promoting certain views, politics, etc. Business/Marketing Web site Marketing Oriented  blending advertising and entertainment or information Informational Web Pages News Web Pages

Division of Geoinformatics, Cartography and Visualization Five Traditional Evaluation Criteria 1.Accuracy 2.Authority 3.Objectivity 4.Currency 5.Coverage

Division of Geoinformatics, Cartography and Visualization Criterion #1: Accuracy lHow reliable and free from error is the information? lAre there editors and/or fact checkers? lAlmost anyone can publish on the Web lMany Web resources not verified by editors and/or fact checkers lWeb standards to ensure accuracy not developed

Division of Geoinformatics, Cartography and Visualization Criterion #2: Authority lWhat are the author’s qualifications for writing on the subject? lHow reputable is the publisher? lOften difficult to determine authorship of Web resources lIf author’s name listed, his/her qualifications frequently absent lPublisher responsibility often not indicated

Division of Geoinformatics, Cartography and Visualization Criterion #3: Objectivity lis the information presented with a minimum of bias? lTo what extent is the information trying to sway the opinion of the audience? lWeb often functions as a virtual soapbox lGoals/aims of persons or groups presenting material often not clearly stated

Division of Geoinformatics, Cartography and Visualization Criterion #4: Currency lIs the content of the work up-to-date? lIs the publication date clearly indicated? lDates not always included on Web pages lIf included, a date may have various meanings: lDate first created lDate placed on Web lDate last revised

Division of Geoinformatics, Cartography and Visualization Criterion #5: Coverage lWhat topics are included in the work? lTo what depth are topics explored? lWeb coverage may differ from print or other media coverage lOften hard to determine extent of Web coverage

Division of Geoinformatics, Cartography and Visualization Additional challenges lUse of lypertext links lQuality of Web pages linked to original Web page may vary lBlending of entertainment, information, and advertising lIn other media, there usually are clear visual and/or audio distinctions between advertising and information lOn the Web, distinctions between advertising and information can become extremely blurred lSoftware Requirements may limit access lInstability of Web pages lSusceptibility of Web pages to alteration

Division of Geoinformatics, Cartography and Visualization Web site Evaluation Procedure lBased on checklist criteria, determine relative informational quality of sites lThe greater number of checklist questions answered positively, the more likely the page is of higher informational quality.