From Walls to Fences: Understanding Europe’s New East –West Divide Joan DeBardeleben Institute of European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies Carleton University,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Transnationality and locally implemented pilot actions in the BSR.
Advertisements

European Research Policy: from coordination and cooperation to integration and the ERA Dr. Maria Nedeva MIoIR, MBS. The University of Manchester EULAKS.
of EU Development Policy
Bodil Persson EuropeAid The ENPI CBC programmes and their content.
Energy, Climate and Economic Development Producers Point of View Energy Security: How to Ensure Supply for the EU and its Neighbours? Danila Bochkarev.
The political framework
EuropeAid European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument Cross Border Co-operation within the Baltic Sea Region Programme Hamburg, May 2007 Martin.
Italian Presidency of the Council of the European Union July – December 2014.
New opportunities for regional development through cross-border cooperation Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development November 16,
EU Energy and Competition Law: Influence On Russian Trade and Investment Interests Ivan Gudkov, MGIMO-University, May, 31, 2013.
RELEVANT CALLS IN HORIZON2020 FOR THE INSTITUTE FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE BY MS ZSUZSANNA ANGYAL 18 DECEMBER 2014 REGIONAL CENTRE FOR INFORMATION AND.
EU and Russia energy trade: impact of WTO, transit and integrated economic areas Yulia Selivanova Trade expert, Energy Charter Secretariat The first EU-Russian.
Undiscovered Avenues? CSOs as Agents of Europeanization Eiki Berg and Kristian L. Nielsen.
Integration of the Black Sea Region: Themes and Challenges Oleksandr Svyetlov 1.
Global Linkages Country A Country B Management Linkages Policy Linkages Trade and Investment Linkages.
TURKISH FOREIGN POLICY II (POST COLD WAR PERIOD).
Images of Europe and European Values: Surveys of the Russian Elite Valeria Kasamara.
Perceptions of the Eastern Partnership Dr. Nathaniel Copsey JMWEN and Aston Centre for Europe Aleksanteri Institute/Wider Europe Seminar Helsinki, 10 September.
Petrozavodsk State University Karelia, Russia “The EU-Russia Relations” International Days 2010 – Technology and Communication Vaasa, Finland March 15-18,
Borders of Inclusion and Exclusion1 The European Union and Borders of Inclusion and Exclusion James W. Scott Leibniz-Institute for Regional Development.
ENI Cross Border Cooperation & Eastern Partnership Territorial Cooperation Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum: Working Group July.
The Black Sea Region: New Challenges and Opportunities for Regional Cooperation ( ANALYSES from Ukraine) prof. Grygorii Perepelytsia.
Chapter 15 Comparative International Relations. This (that is the LAST!) Week.
Russia-EU Relations Development and perspectives.
Regulatory Transparency and Interaction with the Government Dr. Konstantin Petrov Head of Section, Policy and Regulation.
EU 3 rd Energy Package in the context of the tax problems of cross-border energy supplies REPORTER: KUROCHKIN DENIS ALEKSEEVICH EURASIAN RESEARCH CENTRE.
EU cooperation with the Eastern Neighbourhood Anita Ryczan
Part-financed by the European Union The new Baltic Sea Region Programme Susanne Scherrer, Director of the Joint Secretariat Rostock/Riga.
Conceptual definition of the European Union as a security actor
Part Four: Citizens, Society & the State
1. Become familiar with history, comparative figures, and ethical questions on democracy assistance. 2. Assess generally how effective democracy assistance.
The Eastern Partnership Robert Soltyk External Relations Directorate General European Commission Brussels,
Promoting Internationalism SS 20-1 – Chap 13. Issues for Discussion In what ways can organizations promote internationalism? How can the work of organizations.
Our ENP partners The immediate neighbours of the enlarged EU to the South and to the East… … but not candidate countries or “potential candidates” Israel,
Russia: Where is it Heading? A C G, Philadelphia Klaus Segbers, FUB/ CU 27. November 2007.
1 Tools for Regional Development Thomas Wobben Representation of Saxony-Anhalt to the EU Boulevard Saint Michel 80 B-1040 Brussels
The Convention on Diversity of Cultural Expressions and the Coalitions for Cultural Diversity.
KAJ MORTENSEN DG AGRI – G.4 European Commission EastAgri Annual Meeting, Paris, 11 Sep 2008 Support to agriculture and rural development.
‘State Capture in Transition’: Summary Findings Joel Hellman and Daniel Kaufmann The World Bank
Director of the General Department for Analysis and Regulation of Foreign Economic Activity of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation.
ENERGY SECURITY AND THE IMPORTANCE OF EU - RUSSIA ENERGY RELATIONS By Const. S. MANIATOPOULOS Chairman, Institute of Energy for S.E. Europe IENE, Athens,
The Role of Partnership in EU Foreign Policy Elena Korosteleva International Politics Aberystwyth University CES staff seminar,
Methodological Framework for the Assessment of Governance Institutions P. Diaz and A. Rojas PFRA Workshop, March 17, 2006.
The Söderköping Process Gaspar Bergman Head of Secretariat, Söderköping Process *The Cross-Border Co-operation/Söderköping Process is a project.
Part-financed by the European Union Setting regions in motion by Giedrė Švedienė, Undersecretary Joint Programming Committee/Ministry of the Interior,
KALININGRAD : A RUSSIAN REGION, A EUROPEAN OPPORTUNITY Regional Economic Development Agency Kaliningrad: a Russian region, an European opportunity by Alexey.
1 Functional Borders and Sustainable Security: Integrating the Balkans in the EU (IBEU) Presentation for 3 rd Call Kick-off Meeting March, 2003 Brussels.
EuropeAid Cross Border Co-operation Neighbourhood Programmes Lessons Learnt Cristina MOSNEAGA Programme Manager Europe Aid Rome 10 December 2009.
The Role of Peer Review in a Multilateral Framework on Competition Policy Andrea Bruce Investment Trade Policy UNCTAD Regional Seminar for Latin America.
Salzbourg, 13th March 2005 Joaquín Farinós Dasí University of Valencia ESPON GOVERNANCE OF TERRITORIAL AND URBAN POLICIES FROM EU TO LOCAL LEVEL.
Towards a new European Neighbourhood Policy Implications for Norway Pernille Rieker
Civil society in Russia in 2015: trends, challenges, openings EESC-EU-Russia Civil Society Forum Joint Event Brussels 30 June 2015.
UBC Environment and Sustainable Development Secretariat,/Sakari Saarinen / Project Coordinator / NEW BRIDGES Kick-off 4-5 March 2009 New Bridges – Strengthening.
PUA Annual Conference The Energy Charter Jerusalem 30 November 2015 Ernesto Bonafé Regulatory expert Energy Charter Secretariat.
Russia in Eurasia: Interests, possibilities and constraints by Elena Alekseenkova.
ENPI – The example of Ukraine DG RELEX UNIT E-2 Ukraine, Moldova and Belarus.
Advocacy Activity of the Eastern Partnership Territorial Cooperation Support Programme November 5, 2014 Tbilisi, Georgia Lyubov Palyvoda, Advocacy Expert.
Developing National Capability for Integrated Border Management (IBM) in Lebanon Project Funded by the European Union Implemented by the International.
Unclassified MG. L. HOXHA Skopje, 21 st of June 2005 REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE GENERAL STAFF OF THE ARMED FORCES.
1 Strategy for Statistical Cooperation in the ENP-East Region High Level Seminar June 2012, Tbilisi, Georgia Session No. 7 Jolanta Szczerbinska,
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden BALTIC SEA TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION: RU PERSPECTIVE Irina Karelina.
EU and Russia the instruments of trade policy and the political and economic impact for both partners.
Aligning higher education in the EU and Russia
10 year investment plan ERGEG approach and contribution
TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION:
Discussion points, EU-Russia institutional aspects
European Neighbourhood Policy
EUROPEAN UNION - RUSSIA RELATIONS IN THE FRAMEWORK OF WTO VIENNA, 3 JULY 2017 EU-RUSSIA RELATIONS ‘RESTRICTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES’ PROF DR JAAP W. DE.
The Eastern Partnership
ENI CBC Joint Operational Programme Black Sea Basin
Presentation transcript:

From Walls to Fences: Understanding Europe’s New East –West Divide Joan DeBardeleben Institute of European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies Carleton University, Ottawa

Something there is that doesn’t love a wall... He [my neighbour] says again, ‘Good fences make good neighbors.’ Excerpted from Robert Frost, Mending Wall

Explanations of fluctuations in EU-Russian relations 1. Values and norms 2. Conflicting interests 3. Governance structures

1. Values and Norms  The nature of the purported values clash  Mass and elite values (do they differ?)  The power context (Is it about values or about power?  Is Russia a European country?  Values vs. their application  EU as normative actor? Russian resistance to EU’s export of its value positions  Values and market economics (differences over interpretation of market principles and role of the state in the economy, e.g., in context of Gasprom dispute relating to EU’s 3 rd energy package)

2. Interests Mostly shared  Trade (WTO accession)  Investment  Energy interdependence  Non-proliferation  Common security threats (anti-terrorism)  Long term goal of visa-free travel More conflictual  Specific trade issues  Market access (e.g. energy, 3 rd energy package)  Siberian overflight charges  Middle East (Iran, Syria)  Priorities (environment)  Geopolitical competition in neighbourhood  Realization of visa-free travel

3. Governance: the questions  How do differences in governance structures between the EU and Russia affect their relationship with one another?  What kind of governance mechanisms have been developed to govern the relationship?  Do they involve externalization of EU governance (Gänzle) or a mix of EU and Russian governance mechanisms?

EU  Multilevel governance  Difficulties in reaching shared position  Role for civil society actors  Diffuse foreign policy identity  Highly institutionalized, greater transparency  Pooled sovereignty Russia  Formally federal but actually hierarchical  Unifed state actor  Limited role for civil society actors  Foreign policy as a focal point of identity formation  Limted institutional constraints, very limited transparency  Emphasis on state sovereignty

1) Problems of recognition and understanding deficient levels of knowledge and understanding poor intuitive fit 2) Problems of decision-making lack of agreed decision-making procedures different decision-making styles 3) Problems of legitimation lack of shared legitimizing discourse reinforcing misunderstandings asymmetry in public presentation and discourse

Multi-level aspect: types of interaction  EU Russian state  Member state Russian state (focus Estonia, Latvia, Poland, Germany)  Schengen, MS Russian state (focus border transit)  Member state Oblast’, city  City, local Oblast’, city, local  Border region/city Border region/city  EU/MS/border area* Border region/city/area* *e.g., EstLatRus, Euroregion

Methods of study (period )  Analysis of documents  In-depth interviews (EU, Russia, Estonia, Latvia, Germany, Poland) Government and local officials Experts NGOs  Content analysis of media for three issues: visas and CBC, energy, neighbours (Russia, Germany, Poland) Visa and CBC Energy relations Relations with neigbours (Ukraine, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova)

Types of issues for CBC  Impact of EU expansion on CBC  Impact of Schengen expansion on CBC  Importance of EU as an actor (and funding source) for CBC  Difficulties/opportunties posed by multilevel linkages  Goals/obstacles to CBC  Role of national or inter-state political factors in CBC  Impact of CBC on overall EU-Russian relationship CBC= cross-border cooperation

Do governance differences play a role at the cross-border or local level? 1) Problems of recognition and understanding deficient levels of knowledge and understanding poor intuitive fit 2) Problems of decision-making lack of agreed decision-making procedures different decision-making styles 3) Problems of legitimation lack of shared legitimizing discourse reinforcing misunderstandings asymmetry in public presentation and discourse

 Instrumental conditionality and muted normative conditionality  Technicalization and depoliticization  Bridging concepts and joint declarations  Functional two-level games  Multiple bi- and multilateralisms  Cross-border and lower level cooperation

 Much drawn from EU experience, but adapted to Russian preferences  EU adaptiveness (precedent-following + problem-solving approach)  Moving forward through ‘fits and starts’ (like European integration itself Minimal normative Europeanization; some procedural and regulatory Europeanization But Brussels not allowed to ‘call the shots’; sovereignty positions maintained