Ensuring Success for Every Student Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

1. 2 Revised ReadiStep Score Scale Agenda ReadiStep and the College and Career Readiness Pathway Revising the ReadiStep Score Scale Benefits.
NC Department of Public Instruction: Future-Ready Core NC Department of Public Instruction Academic Services and Instructional Support K-12 Curriculum.
1 Common Core State Standards What they are! & How they came to be! Implications for New Jersey New Jersey State Board of Education May 4, 2011 Dorothy.
Presentation to DPAS-II Student Growth Measures Working Group July 14, 2010 Dr. Michael Stetter, Acting Director Accountability Resources Director, Curriculum,
June 13 and June 16, 2011 Analytical and Applied Sciences June/July
Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 1.
1 R-2 Report: Success in algebra by the end of ninth grade A presentation to the Board of Education by Brad Stam, Chief Academic Officer Instructional.
Inspire… Empower… Succeed… Class of 2016 PREPARING FOR TRANSITION TO GLENBARD SOUTH.
Guide to Compass Evaluations and
Changes in Student Assessment and School Accountability A-1.
P.E.R.T. Presentation Prepared by Rita Effing, Accountability Coordinator Department of Accountability, Research, and Continuous Improvement The School.
Evaluation Orientation Meeting Teacher Evaluation System
Copyright © 2010, SAS Institute Inc. All rights reserved. Making Data Work for Kids: EVAAS Teacher Reports October 2012 SAS ® EVAAS ® for K-12.
High School School Performance Framework (SPF)
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK (SPF) Clark County School District.
West Virginia Schools 21 st Century Learning. WV Content Standards and Objectives.
Katonah-Lewisboro School District Annual Professional Performance Review Update 5/23/
REMEDIATION IN COLORADO Dr. Scott Mendelsberg Executive Director, Colorado GEAR UP.
Paulding County School District Stakeholder’s Meeting
1 LAUSD Mathematics Periodic Benchmark Assessments Using Data to Inform Instruction.
The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.
Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data.
Compass: Module 3 Student Growth.
School Grades Model and Historical Background
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Focus Schools Conference Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. September 17-18, 2012.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Support Professionals Evaluation Model Webinar Spring 2013.
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012.
Professional Learning
Connecting the Process to: -Current Practice -CEP -CIITS/EDS 1.
Illinois High School to College Success Report High School Feedback Reporting In Cooperation with ACT, Inc. Illinois Community College Board Illinois Board.
Compass Schools Program Auburn High School School District Profile One High School One Middle School Four Elementary Schools  96% White  1% Hispanic.
ITEC 7445: EMERGING TECHNOLOGY EMILY TOMS NOVEMBER 12, 2012
Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.
Using Data to Identify Student Needs for MME Stan Masters Coordinator of Curriculum, Assessment, and School Improvement Lenawee ISD August 26, 2008.
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Observations Pre observation (optional) Observations (minimum of 2 thirty minute) Post observation Rubric
C. “Changing the conversation…” Instructional Change –  Align to standards  Set higher expectations  Rigorous coursework  Assess  Data driven intervention.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
ILP Intervention Plans Tutorial. Intervention Plans in the ILP The Intervention Plan module was added to the ILP in May 2009 to meet requirements of SB.
Ensuring Success for Every Student Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting.
Annual Report to the Public October Board Meeting 2015.
EVAAS and Expectations. Answers the question of how effective a schooling experience is for learners Produces reports that –Predict student success –Show.
Sparta High School Continuous School Improvement Plan.
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Cheryl Blanco Smarter Balanced Colorado Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force August 24, 2012.
Spring 2015 Verona PARCC Results: Year One Wednesday, March 16 7:00-8:00 p.m. VHS Learning Commons.
Curriculum Night Middle School. What do I as a parent need to know to support student assessments at CCAS? Essential Question.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
USING MAP DATA TO SET GOALS AND ENGAGE STUDENTS AND FAMILIES 7/14/16.
Milestones Results August 2016 Bibb County School District P-1.
Advanced Placement & PARCC Results
Teacher SLTs
Local Growth Models for Accountability
Growth Models Oklahoma
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Teacher SLTs
EPAS Educational Planning and Assessment System By: Cindy Beals
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Presentation transcript:

Ensuring Success for Every Student Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting

To ensure a student-focused learning environment where every student succeeds. District 219 Mission 1 DISTRICT 219 PHILOSOPHY D219 GROWTH MODEL A L I G N E D Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting

LOCAL growth model 1 Accounts for confounding variables, i.e. SES, Sp. Ed., Race Growth is determined under local programs, courses and teachers Propensity scores can capture achievement potential from multiple past achievement records with different growth projections/scales Uses Local Norming – not State, Regional or Federal Same testing windows Same Assessments or combination of assessments – District chooses

D219S LGM 1 In addition benchmarking growth against state, national and college readiness benchmarks, the growth model benchmarks individual and aggregate growth against local norms. Eliminate known limitations of the EPAS system for measuring growth Reliably identify students at risk for not being on track to meet or exceed state standards Capture individual and aggregate value-added growth Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting Local norms provide the following benefits: Provide more meaningful growth benchmarks; benchmarks individual student growth against typical growth of similar D219 students

Application 1 TEACHER AND ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION PLACING STUDENTS into the most rigorous courses; ensuring all students have equitable access to instruction within the curriculum; academic intervention placement MONITORING THE ACHIEVMENT GROWTH of every individual student; setting realistic but rigorous individual targets Program and course evaluation – RETURN ON INVESTMENT

Current D219 EPAS Program EXPLORE (for course placement) GRADE 8 PLAN SPRING GRADE 9 Practice ACT SPRING GRADE 10 ACT/PSAE SPRING GRADE 11 Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting

Local Norms Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting Example: Mathematics CRL = College Readiness Level

Setting Individual Targets Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting Every student will grow one point greater each year than comparable students in the norm group. Individual Student Targets: Mathematics CRL = College Readiness Level *Note: Student has not yet taken ACT

ILP STUDENT A Releases have been obtained by the parents to use this data in this presentation

Value-Added Education If the District 219 Instructional Program is improving, students should outperform the projections. How are we going to do that? One student at a time by: Setting realistic, but rigorous individual student targets for every single student. Ensuring students have access to the most important components of the curriculum through appropriate course placement and access to interventions. Improving the effectiveness of all programs. Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting Adds to the conversation – HIGH SCHOOL READINESS

District 219 will also be using the models to reliably and analytically recommend eighth-grade students into freshman-year courses. Course Placement Rigor will be stressed when considering placement. Students will be placed in the highest-level course that is supported by the data. Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting

Placement decision rules are based on sophisticated analytical procedures. The following table shows a simple rule of thumb that works for most cases. Course Placement: Rules of Thumb Rules of Thumb: Math Facilitating academic success for all through rigorous, individual achievement growth targeting EXPLORE MathEXPLORE Math, ScienceRecommendation 17-25Math + Science > 38A05/07 Math + Science < 38A *Math + Science > 43A03 2*Math + Science < 43A Science > 12A01 Science < 12B B01

Summer 2010

131 students enrolled in Algebra Readiness to improve mathematics deficiencies 33% of these students tested out of the extension course Average proficiency went from 20% to 52% mastery of learning targets for Algebra Algebra Readiness students increased their EXPLORE math scores by an average of 2.6 points Summer 2011 Algebra Readiness Results

Summer 2011Algebra Proficiency Results 75 students enrolled in Algebra Proficiency 88% were promoted to Geometry Due to both summer Algebra Proficiency and the Algebra Proficiency exam, 223 students who would have normally retaken Algebra as freshmen are taking Geometry. This alters their destiny, as they will be able to take Calculus as a senior

EVALUATION and Value-Added Growth Models Value-added growth models are designed to answer a basic question that has frustrated educators for decades. How do we know if a student or group of students performed any better than they would have anyways: - In a different school - Under a different curriculum -If they were not in a particular program -With a different teacher Historically, our inability to answer this question has been related to the absence of control groups.

Teacher/Administrator Evaluation 1

1. PAR in D219: Vision PAR is a comprehensive and collaborative process for effectively mentoring, assisting, developing, and evaluating teachers. PAR represents a shared vision between the District and the NTFT of great teaching, high quality mentoring and supervision, and best practices in evaluation. It fosters a trusting environment where all members of the organization assume responsibility for developing and promoting high standards in teaching.

2. PAR in D219 Highlights Teachers Evaluate Teachers. The PAR Panel, a joint union-administrative committee, appoints Consulting Teachers who guide and evaluate teachers. - Untenured years 1 & 2 and tenured who need improvement. The PAR Panel acts upon retention and dismissal recommendations from the Consulting Teachers and Directors. Directors continue to be content-area leaders in every department, but the role of the Director shifts from evaluator to guide for teachers working with a Consulting Teacher.

3. PAR Rollout in D219 During the school year, only first year untenured teachers will participate in PAR. In the school year, 1 st and 2 nd year untenured teachers and tenured teachers who either self-refer or receive ratings warranting PAR as their professional development plan will participate in PAR. (Student Achievement data pilot for tenured in English & Math)

Legal Context for Use of Growth Models in Evaluation 105 ILCS 5/ requires new multi- year admin contracts be performance contacts Illinois Public Act requires student growth be used in teacher and principal evaluations