Psychological biases In Negotiation. Anchoring and adjustment In the face of uncertainty, people fix on the first piece of information and subconsciously.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
$100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200.
Advertisements

Judgment & Decision Making Based on High Consumer Effort
Psych 253 Judgments and Decisions Negotiations
The Behavioral Side of Pricing MKT 750 Dr. West. Agenda Issues associated with product pricing Defining terms Capturing value Behavioral pricing Discuss.
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons
Fundamentals of Cost Analysis for Decision Making
An Exploration of Decision Processes in an Evolutionary Perspective: the Case of the Framing Effect.
Reason, Passion, & Social Cognition Week 13, Part 1 Announcements for April Papers due at start of class on Thursday. 2. Class will meet in 223D.
Day 2 Evolution of Decision-Making.  Tversky and Kahneman, 1974  Heuristics – general rules of thumb, or habits  Generally result in decent estimates.
Samantha Nicholas & Khrys Nugent Hanover College
1 Intuitive Irrationality: Reasons for Unreason. 2 Epistemology Branch of philosophy focused on how people acquire knowledge about the world Descriptive.
Thinking: Concept Formation Concept formation: identifying commonalities across stimuli that unite them into a common category Rule learning: identifying.
1 Perception, Cognition, and Emotion MGT 5374 Negotiation & Conflict Management PowerPoint10 John D. Blair, PhD Georgie G. & William B. Snyder Professor.
Network Security An Economics Perspective IS250 Spring 2010 John Chuang.
Survey.
CHAPTER 14 Utility Axioms Paradoxes & Implications.
Prospect Theory, Framing and Behavioral Traps Yuval Shahar M.D., Ph.D. Judgment and Decision Making in Information Systems.
Decision making and economics. Economic theories Economic theories provide normative standards Expected value Expected utility Specialized branches like.
Week 8. ~ The process by which people organize and interpret the environment ~ StimulusBehavior Perception.
Running Experiments with Amazon Mechanical-Turk Gabriele Paolacci, Jesse Chandler, Jesse Chandler Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 5, No. 5, August 2010.
BEE3049 Behaviour, Decisions and Markets Miguel A. Fonseca.
DECISION MAKING February 10, 2010 Decision-Making Styles Logical, systematic Action oriented Facts focused Autocratic, Short-term More information &
The Psychology of Security ….a work in progress Bruce Schneier DIMACS Workshop on Information Security Economics Rutgers University 18 January 2007.
N EGOTIATION R ATIONALLY : T HE POWER AND IMPACT OF THE N EGOTIATOR ’ S F RAME Juliane Arndt Sebastian Gabor Alexander Shopov.
General Analytical Model of Decision Making
Managers as Decision Makers
Choice. There’s never just one reinforcer Hmm…what to do?
JA Dollars With Sense. Overview IntroductionsExpectations Lesson 1: Let’s Talk Money Lesson 2: Be A SMART Shopper Lesson 3: Look After Your Money Lesson.
Judgment in Managerial Decision Making 8e Chapter 11 Negotiator Cognition Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons.
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. What is Perception? Perception: The process of recognizing and understanding others By understanding.
Review of Related Literature Different decision-making: – Budget decisions of managers – Irrationality of continuing the risk of losing a prospect – Decision-making.
Decision making Making decisions Optimal decisions Violations of rationality.
Decision Making choice… maximizing utility framing effects
Framing Effects From Chapter 34 ‘Frame and Reality’ of Thinking Fast and Slow, by D. Kahneman.
Business System Analysis & Decision Making - Lecture 12
4. The Theories and the Real World 4.3 What the theory does not reflect? (Back to your experiment)
A Heuristic Solution To The Allais Paradox And Its Implications Seán Muller, University of Cape Town.
Prospect Theory. 23A i 23B, reference point 23A) Your country is plagued with an outbreak of an exotic Asian disease, which may kill 600 people. You.
NEGOTIATION/ PREPARATION Aiming for a Negotiated Agreement: Aspiration (Target) Point –Most preferred or ideal settlement Reservation Point (Bottom Line)
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS Special Lectures University of Kuwait Richard Wilson Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics Harvard University January 13th, 14th and.
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS Special Lectures University of Kuwait Richard Wilson Mallinckrodt Professor of Physics Harvard University January 13th, 14th and.
Decision Making choice… maximizing utility framing effects.
CHAPTER FIVE Perception, Cognition, and Emotion McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Perception, Cognition, and Emotion in Negotiation
Reframe the problem or the solution
Psychology 485 March 23,  Intro & Definitions Why learn about probabilities and risk?  What is learned? Expected Utility Prospect Theory Scalar.
Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior Chapter 5. Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior 1.In order to compare the riskiness of alternative choices, we need to.
Decision Making Decision - making a choice from two or more alternatives. Problem - an obstacle that makes it difficult to achieve a desired goal.
Introduction to Prospect Theory Psychology 466: Judgment & Decision Making Instructor: John Miyamoto 11/17/2015: Lecture 08-2 Note: This Powerpoint presentation.
1 DECISION MAKING Suppose your patient (from the Brazilian rainforest) has tested positive for a rare but serious disease. Treatment exists but is risky.
Perception, Cognition, and Emotion McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
MODULE 9 MANAGERS AS DECISION MAKERS “Decide first, then act” How do managers use information to make decisions and solve problems? What are the steps.
Portfolio Management Unit – III Session No. 23 Topic: Asset Allocation Unit – III Session No. 23 Topic: Asset Allocation.
Terms Distributive negotiation Reservation Price BATNA Target Price Bargaining Zone/ZOPA negative positive.
1 BAMS 517 – 2011 Decision Analysis -IV Utility Failures and Prospect Theory Martin L. Puterman UBC Sauder School of Business Winter Term
Behavioral Finance Biases Feb 23 Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Framing Effects and Focusing Illusion Psychology 355: Cognitive Psychology Instructor: John Miyamoto 6/2/2016: Lecture 10-4 Note: This Powerpoint presentation.
Management Practices Lecture Recap Decision Making Classical Model of Decision Making The Decision-Making Process Decisions in the Management Functions.
Preference Assessment 1 Measuring Utilities Directly
International Business Negotiation
Effects of Foreign Language on Decision Making
Framing Effects and Affective Forecasting
Decision Making Decision - making a choice from two or more alternatives. Problem - an obstacle that makes it difficult to achieve a desired goal or purpose.
Framing Effects and Affective Forecasting
Copyright © 2005 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.
DIS 280 Social Science Research Methodology: Problem Framing
Choices, Values and Frames
The Role of Intuition Intuitive decision making
Behavioral Finance Economics 437.
Avoiding Bad Decisions – And Indecision When Action is Warranted
Presentation transcript:

Psychological biases In Negotiation

Anchoring and adjustment In the face of uncertainty, people fix on the first piece of information and subconsciously assign it extra significance.In the face of uncertainty, people fix on the first piece of information and subconsciously assign it extra significance. Opening offers are anchorsOpening offers are anchors

Purchase a watch You are in a store, about to buy a new watch for $70. You are in a store, about to buy a new watch for $70. As you wait for the sales clerk, a friend of yours comes by and says she has seen an identical watch on sale for $40 in another store two blocks away. You know the service and reliability of the other store is just as good as this one. Will you travel two blocks to save $30? Will you travel two blocks to save $30?

Purchase a TV You are in a store, about to purchase a new TV for $800. You are in a store, about to purchase a new TV for $800. As you wait for the sales clerk, a friend of yours comes by and says she has seen an identical TV on sale for $770 in another store two blocks away. As you wait for the sales clerk, a friend of yours comes by and says she has seen an identical TV on sale for $770 in another store two blocks away. You know the service and reliability of the other store are just as good as this one. You know the service and reliability of the other store are just as good as this one. Will you travel two blocks to save $30? Will you travel two blocks to save $30?

referents Percentage saving versus value of timePercentage saving versus value of time ContextContext Power of objective external standardsPower of objective external standards

Program decision 1 The U.S. is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual Asian disease that is expected to kill 600 people. Two alternatives programs are being considered. Which do you favor? The U.S. is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual Asian disease that is expected to kill 600 people. Two alternatives programs are being considered. Which do you favor? If program A is adopted, 200 people will be saved. If program A is adopted, 200 people will be saved. If program B is adopted, there is a one-third probability that all will be saved and a two- thirds probability that none will be saved. If program B is adopted, there is a one-third probability that all will be saved and a two- thirds probability that none will be saved.

Program Decision 2 The U.S. is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual Asian disease that is expected to kill 600 people. Two alternatives programs are being considered. Which do you favor? The U.S. is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual Asian disease that is expected to kill 600 people. Two alternatives programs are being considered. Which do you favor? If program A is adopted, 400 people will die. If program A is adopted, 400 people will die. If program B is adopted, there is a one-third probability that no one will die and a two- thirds probability that all will die. If program B is adopted, there is a one-third probability that no one will die and a two- thirds probability that all will die.

Results Group 1 (GAIN) Group 2 (LOSS) Program A (Secure) 76%13% Program B (Probability) 24%87%

Risk Preference Bias People tend to avoid taking risks when it means losing secure gains: positive framePeople tend to avoid taking risks when it means losing secure gains: positive frame People tend to accept risk to avoid a certain loss: negative framePeople tend to accept risk to avoid a certain loss: negative frame Risk-taking is not necessarily a personality characteristicRisk-taking is not necessarily a personality characteristic

Types of biases Ownership, endowment and sunk costsOwnership, endowment and sunk costs Reactive devaluationReactive devaluation Vividness, focal points, availability, and the tyranny of numbersVividness, focal points, availability, and the tyranny of numbers Egocentrism and over confidenceEgocentrism and over confidence AgreementAgreement

Lessons Information matters: negotiation is about perception Psychological factors (style, biases) influence how people process information Framing proposals can influence decisions Plan logically and systematically Use an outsider lens

The goal of A Negotiation… …is not to reach an agreement. Its to reach a good agreement.