The MODIS Land Cover Product MODIS Land Cover Team Boston University GLC 2000 – “FIRST RESULTS” WORKSHOP JRC – Ispra, 18-22 March 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DEPARTMENT OF LAND INFORMATION – SATELLITE REMOTE SENSING SERVICES CRCSI AC Workshop November 2005 Remote Sensing in Near-Real Time of Atmospheric.
Advertisements

EEA – Copenhague May 2006 Net Primary Production derived from land products Remote Sensing Data Overview Nadine Gobron With collaboration from.
Beyond Spectral and Spatial data: Exploring other domains of information GEOG3010 Remote Sensing and Image Processing Lewis RSU.
Examining Vegetation Recovery Time After a Small Scale Disaster using MODIS Data and the OSDC Zac Flamig (University of Oklahoma) Gilbert Warren Cole (University.
Satellite data products to support climate modelling: Phenology & Snow Cover Kristin Böttcher, Sari Metsämäki, Olli-Pekka Mattila, Mikko Kervinen, Mika.
GLC 2000 – “FIRST RESULTS” WORKSHOP JRC – Ispra, March 2002 GLC 2000 – South America map Presented by H.Eva E. E. de Miranda C. di Bella V. Gond.
Has EO found its customers? Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit GLC2000 GLOBAL LEGEND GLC 2000 – “FIRST RESULTS” WORKSHOP JRC – Ispra, March 2002.
A Land Cover Map of Eurasia’s Boreal Ecosystems S. BARTALEV, A. S. BELWARD Institute for Environment and Sustainability, EC Joint Research Centre, Italy.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS/EROS Data Center Global Land Cover Project – Experiences and Research Interests GLC2000-JRC.
GLC 2000 ‘Final Results’ Workshop (JRC-Ispra, 24 ~ 26 March, 2003) GLC 2000 ‘Final Results’ Workshop (JRC-Ispra, 24 ~ 26 March, 2003) LAND COVER MAP OF.
Scaling Biomass Measurements for Examining MODIS Derived Vegetation Products Matthew C. Reeves and Maosheng Zhao Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group.
Xiangming Xiao Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Arts and Sciences Center for Spatial Analysis, College of Atmospheric.
VEGETATION MAPPING FOR LANDFIRE National Implementation.
NLCD and MODIS Landuse Processing Tools and Projection Issues in Modeling Limei Ran and Alison Eyth Center for Environmental Modeling for Policy Development.
III LBA Scientific Conference, July 27-29, 2004 SEASONAL ANALYSIS OF THE MOD13A2 (NDVI / EVI) AND MOD15A2 (LAI / fAPAR) PRODUCTS FOR THE CERRADO REGION.
Sistema de Monitoreo de la Cobertura del Suelo de América del Norte.
1 Has EO found its customers? GLC 2000 Workshop ‘Methods’ Objectives F. Achard Global Vegetation Monitoring Unit.
03/06/2015 Modelling of regional CO2 balance Tiina Markkanen with Tuula Aalto, Tea Thum, Jouni Susiluoto and Niina Puttonen.
Change analysis of Northborough, Massachusetts, Kristopher Kuzera and Silvia Petrova 1987 LANDSAT TM – 30m resolution False Color Composite Bands.
The Role of RS Techniques in European Land Use Database Construction Centre for Geo-Information 1 The Role of RS Techniques in European Land.
Detect and Simulate Vegetation, Surface Temperature, Rainfall and Aerosol Changes: From Global to Local Examples from EOS MODIS remote sensing Examples.
BOSTON UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ART AND SCIENCES LAI AND FPAR ESTIMATION AND LAND COVER IDENTIFICATION WITH MULTIANGLE MULTISPECTRAL SATELLITE DATA.
Ph. D. Dissertation defense Evaluation of the Performance of the MODIS LAI and FPAR Algorithm with Multiresolution Satellite Data Yuhong Tian Department.
Global Land Cover: Approaches to Validation Alan Strahler GLC2000 Meeting JRC Ispra 3/02.
1 Space Applications Institute Joint Research Centre European Commission Ispra (VA), Italy Global Vegetation Monitoring.
Module 2.1 Monitoring activity data for forests using remote sensing REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank FCPF 1 Module.
Accuracy Assessment. 2 Because it is not practical to test every pixel in the classification image, a representative sample of reference points in the.
1 The MODIS Land Cover and Land Cover Dynamics Products A.H. Strahler (PI), Mark Friedl, Xiaoyang Zhang, John Hodges, Crystal Schaaf, Amanda Cooper, and.
Classification Advantages of Visual Interpretation: 1. Human brain is the best data processor for information extraction, thus can do much more complex.
Surface Reflectivity from OMI using MODIS to Eliminate Clouds: Effects of Snow on UV-Vis Trace Gas Retrievals Gray O’Byrne, 1 Randall V. Martin, 1,2 Aaron.
Co-authors: Maryam Altaf & Intikhab Ulfat
MODIS Subsetting and Visualization Tool: Bringing time-series satellite-based land data to the field scientist National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Radiometric and biophysical measures of global vegetation from multi-dimensional MODIS data Ramakrishna Nemani NTSG.
Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results M.A. Friedl a,*, D.K. McIver a, J.C.F. Hodges a, X.Y. Zhang a, D. Muchoney b, A.H. Strahler.
Spatially Complete Global Surface Albedos Derived from MODIS Data
Satellite Cross comparisonMorisette 1 Satellite LAI Cross Comparison Jeff Morisette, Jeff Privette – MODLAND Validation Eric Vermote – MODIS Surface Reflectance.
Land_Cover_CCI – CMUG Co-location Meeting, Reading, March 2011 Land Cover_CCI Pierre Defourny et al. Univ.cath. de Louvain.
Spatially Complete Global Surface Albedos Derived from Terra/MODIS Data Michael D. King, 1 Eric G. Moody, 1,2 Crystal B. Schaaf, 3 and Steven Platnick.
1 The MODIS Land Cover Product The MODIS Land Cover/Land Cover Dynamics Product: Status and Validation A.H. Strahler (PI), Mark Friedl, Xiaoyang Zhang,
Has EO found its customers? Results of GLC2000 Legend Workshop November 2000 JRC / Ispra.
MODIS Workshop An Introduction to NASA’s Earth Observing System (EOS), Terra, and the MODIS Instrument Michele Thornton
Generating fine resolution leaf area index maps for boreal forests of Finland Janne Heiskanen, Miina Rautiainen, Lauri Korhonen,
ORNL DAAC MODIS Subsetting and Visualization tools Tools and services to access subsets of MODIS data Suresh K. Santhana Vannan National Aeronautics and.
BIOPHYS: A Physically-based Algorithm for Inferring Continuous Fields of Vegetative Biophysical and Structural Parameters Forrest Hall 1, Fred Huemmrich.
Assessing the Phenological Suitability of Global Landsat Data Sets for Forest Change Analysis The Global Land Cover Facility What does.
Test of forest classification over Bavaria (Germany) using a SPOT-VGT pixel mosaic Erwann FILLOL, Pamela KENNEDY, Sten FOLVING.
Goal: to understand carbon dynamics in montane forest regions by developing new methods for estimating carbon exchange at local to regional scales. Activities:
Flux–Model–MODIS Evaluation Dick Olson, Tom Boden, Bob Cook, Lisa Olsen, Steve Margle, many others Oak Ridge National Laboratory* Oak Ridge, Tennessee,
Measuring Vegetation Characteristics
SIMULATION OF ALBEDO AT A LANDSCAPE SCALE WITH THE D.A.R.T. MODEL AN EFFICIENT TOOL FOR EVALUATING COARSE SCALE SATELLITE PRODUCTS? Sylvie DUTHOIT*, Valérie.
0 0 Robert Wolfe NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD GSFC Hydrospheric and Biospheric Sciences Laboratory, Terrestrial Information System Branch (614.5) Carbon Cycle.
H51A-01 Evaluation of Global and National LAI Estimates over Canada METHODOLOGY LAI INTERCOMPARISONS LEAF AREA INDEX JUNE 1997 LEAF AREA INDEX 1993 Baseline.
Spatially Complete Global Spectral Surface Albedos: Value-Added Datasets Derived From Terra MODIS Land Products Eric G. Moody 1,2, Michael D. King 1, Steven.
Evaluating different compositing methods using SPOT-VGT S1 data for land cover mapping the dry season in continental Southeast Asia Hans Jurgen StibigSarah.
GLC 2000 Workshop March 2003 Land cover map of southern hemisphere Africa using SPOT-4 VEGETATION data Ana Cabral 1, Maria J.P. de Vasconcelos 1,2,
References: 1)Ganguly, S., Samanta, A., Schull, M. A., Shabanov, N. V., Milesi, C., Nemani, R. R., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B., Generating vegetation.
Science Review Panel Meeting Biosphere 2, Tucson, AZ - January 4-5, 2011 Vegetation Phenology and Vegetation Index Products from Multiple Long Term Satellite.
Global land cover validation activities Martin Herold (FSU Jena) & Mark Friedl (UBoston) CEOS Cal/Val land subgroup (land cover)
Temporal Classification and Change Detection
Global Landcover and Disturbance Analysis NRSM 532 BIOS 534
Land Use in Regional Climate Modeling
Comparison of GPP from Terra-MODIS and AmeriFlux Network Towers
Incorporating Ancillary Data for Classification
GLC-2000-Continental Southeast Asia
Paulo Gonçalves1 Hugo Carrão2 André Pinheiro2 Mário Caetano2
Limei Ran and Alison Eyth
NASA alert as Russian and US satellites crash in space
Planning a Remote Sensing Project
Igor Appel Alexander Kokhanovsky
The Land Cover Map of Northern Eurasia method, product and initial users' feedback Global Land Cover 2000 S. Bartalev, A. Belward EC JRC, Italy   D.
Presentation transcript:

The MODIS Land Cover Product MODIS Land Cover Team Boston University GLC 2000 – “FIRST RESULTS” WORKSHOP JRC – Ispra, March 2002

Terra Launch on December 18,1999

MODIS Land Bands

MODIS Land Cover Product Objective: –Provide a simple land-cover categorization for biophysical parameterization for GCM, hydrologic, and carbon cycling models

MODIS Land Cover Product: Features –Categorizes land cover according to life-form, cover and height of dominant vegetation type following IGBP-DIS scheme –Uses data from spectral and temporal domains –Relies on advanced classifier technology—i.e., decision trees—in a supervised classification mode –Network of global test sites used for algorithm calibration and validation –At-launch 1-km database derived from AVHRR heritage –Level 3, 1-km spatial resolution, 96-day product; Climate Modeler’s Grid (1/4°) product also available

Recent Global Land Cover Products Beta Product, released April 15, 2001 –Based on 2 16-day periods of Normalized BRDF-Adjusted Reflectance (NBARs) Provisional Product , released June 15, 2001 –Based on 9 16-day periods of NBARs within July 11– January 15, 2001 –Uses prior probabilities to help separate agriculture and natural vegetation –Includes IGBP classification, secondary classes, confidence measures –Draws from at-launch product when only 0–2 views are available or when classification confidence is less than 40%

Recent Global Land Cover Products, Cont. Validated Product –Due 15 April 2002 –Based on MODIS data from 2001 –Includes 4 sets of labels, per-pixel confidence measures, second choices

IGBP Land Cover Units (17) Natural Vegetation (11) –Evergreen Needleleaf Forests –Evergreen Broadleaf Forests –Deciduous Needleleaf Forests –Deciduous Broadleaf Forests –Mixed Forests –Closed Shrublands –Open Shrublands –Woody Savannas –Savannas –Grasslands –Permanent Wetlands Developed and Mosaic Lands (3) –Croplands –Urban and Built-Up Lands –Cropland/Natural Vegetation Mosaics Nonvegetated Lands (3) –Snow and Ice –Barren –Water Bodies

The Land Cover Input Database Surface Reflectance –Nadir-adjusted surface reflectance, 7 land bands Vegetation Index –MODIS Vegetation Index, maximum value composite Spatial Texture from 250-m Band 2* –Standard deviation-to- mean ratio in Band 2 (near-infrared), maximum value composite in 32-day period *To be added later Snow Cover* –MODIS Snow Cover Product, number of days with snow cover Land Surface Temperature* –MODIS Land Surface Temperature, maximum value composite Directional Information* –Bidirectional reflectance model choices from BRDF product Ancillary Data –DEM,* Land/Water mask

Global Composite Map of Nadir BRDF-Adjusted Reflectance (NBAR) April 7– km resolution, Hammer-Aitoff projection, produced by MODIS BRDF/Albedo Team no data MODLAND/Strahler et al. No data True color, MODIS Bands 2, 4, 3

MODIS Nadir BRDF-Adjusted Reflectance May 25–June False Color Image NIR–Red–Green

NBAR Time Trajectories

NDVI EVI MODIS 500 m Vegetation Indices MOD13A1 16 day Composite (September 30 – October 15, 2000 MODLAND/Huete et al

Test Sites IGBP-DIS Core/Confidence Sites –Random stratified sampling of classes on IGBP Global Land Cover Product –425 sites identified; 413 SPOT and TM scenes acquired; 91% migrated to WWW by BU BU STEP Database –2614 training sites from 645 TM scenes (6/6/00) –About 1000 training sites in current use for supervised classification

DISCover Core Validation Sites

Supplemental BU Training Sites

STEP Database STEP: –System for Terrestrial Ecosystem Parameterization Key STEP Parameters –Life form, height, cover fraction, of layers –Leaf type, phenology, periodicity, physiognomy of dominants in layers –Elevation, moisture regime, perturbation –Classifications: IGBP, BU, EDC SLCRs –Simple description of site and type (words) STEP Flexibility –Allows application of many different land cover labeling schemes by inference of label from parameters in database

MODLand Support Products Six Biomes for LAI / FPAR Algorithm –Used by Ranga Myneni’s radiative transfer model in retrieving LAI and FPAR Six Biomes for Net Primary Productivity (NPP) –Used by Steve Running’s Biome-BGC model in making the MODIS NPP product Fourteen Classes—University of Maryland Legend –We also provide a 14-class product using the University of Maryland scheme –Preferred by some modelers

Provisional Land Cover Product June 01

Northeast Provisional Land Cover Product, Jul 00–Jan 01 Agriculture Agriculture/Natural Vegetation Mosaic Mixed Forest Evergreen Needleleaf Forest Deciduous Broadleaf Forest Urban

Classification Confidence Map Second Most-Likely Class

Land Cover Validation Statistical Assessment Based on Site Data –Cross-validation provides probability estimate for errors of omission/commission Two sets of site data: –DISCover Core/Confidence sites—Random stratified sample based on DISCover Land Cover map (Loveland et al., EDC) –Supplemental sites compiled at BU—no explicit sampling design, but large N

Validation: Accuracy Assessment Classification Accuracy from Cross- Validation of Training Sites –Hide 20 percent of training sites, classify with remaining 80 percent; repeat five times for five unique sets of all sites –Provides “confusion matrix” –Not a stratified random sample, but a good within-class indication of accuracy

Confusion Matrix Global Test Site Confusion Matrix—Provisional Product

Per-Pixel Confidence Output Per-pixel Confidence –Based on statistical “boosting” theory –Allows decision-tree classifier to estimate probability of classification associated with each possible class label –Output for label with highest probability for each pixel

Validation: Other Datasets Comparison with Community Benchmark Datasets –Global (e.g., DISCover, UMd from AVHRR) Comparison with independent maps derived from high resolution data, e.g., –Humid Tropics: Landsat Pathfinder –Forest Cover: FAO Forest Resources Assessment –Western Europe: CORINE –United States: USGS/EPA MLRC –United States: California Timber Maps (McIver and Woodcock)

Validation: Comparisons Collaborative Comparisons –BigFoot sites –MODLand Test Sites

Reprojection of BigFoot UTM maps to ISIN BigFoot Results

Conclusions MODIS Land Cover Product –Draws on AVHRR heritage –Utilizes improved data and techniques –Top-down, globally-consistent approach –Validation plan emphasizes multiple approaches to build confidence –“Validated” product to be released about 15 April 2002 based on 2001 data