Expedited Family Reunification Project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Indiana IV-E Waiver Original Demonstration 1998 – 2002 Informal Extension 2002 – 2005 Current Extension
Advertisements

Sustaining Ohios Waiver Reforms: Possibilities & Challenges 12 th Annual CW Demonstration Projects Meeting, June 2008 Human Services Research Institute.
Project First Step: Approaches to Co-occurrence of Child Maltreatment & Substance Abuse in New Hampshire 2007 CAPTA State Liaison Meeting Bernie Bluhm,
Care Coordinator Roles and Responsibilities
1 NM Behavioral Health Collaborative New Mexico Behavioral Health Plan for Children, Youth and Their Families March 2007.
Department of Health and Human Services & Department of Probation October 28, 2014 Title IV-E California Well-Being Project.
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Community Based Care in Florida and the IV-E Waiver.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
A Community Idea For A Better Future: The Pulaski County Commission on Children and Families John Bumgarner Project Associate, Institute for Policy Outreach.
Katie A. Agreement Child Welfare and Mental Health working together will provide:  Intensive home and community based mental health services to children.
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
Child Welfare and Education Two Systems Working Together for Foster Youth.
White Earth Indian Child Welfare Initiative 2010
Strategic Thinking to Align Initiatives and Integrate Management, Supervision, and Practice Heidi D. McIntosh, MSW Deputy Commissioner Fernando J. Muñiz,
Increasing Child Welfare Permanency Options: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley.
Policy and Practice Options Related to Exit Issues Experimenting and Improving the Recovery Coach Model Joseph P. Ryan, Ph.D. Working Conference on Race.
1 CFSR STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT LESSONS LEARNED (State) CFSR Kick Off (Date)
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
Permanency Enhancement Project Peoria, Illinois Jennifer La Fever Elizabeth Morgan Amy Roman
Shared Family Care: An Innovative Model for Supporting & Restoring Families through Community Partnerships Amy Price, Associate Director National Abandoned.
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Improving the Commonwealth’s Services for Children and Families A Framework.
The Norfolk Hotline and the Homeless Action Response Team (HART) Presentation by Jill Baker Norfolk Department of Human Services.
May 18, MiTEAM Is Michigan’s guide to how staff, children, families, stakeholders and community partners work together to achieve outcomes that.
FosterEd: Santa Cruz County Judge Denine Guy, Superior Court of Ca., Santa Cruz County, Juvenile Division Mark Holguin, Family and Children’s Services.
Amethyst, Inc. Amethyst exists to nurture and sustain healthy women and families. We have been providing gender specific and trauma informed alcohol, tobacco.
Measuring a Collaborative Effort a Child Welfare – Drug & Alcohol Family Preservation example Family Design Resources, Inc.  Fawn Davies  Deborah W.
1 Child Welfare Improvement Overview House Appropriations Subcommittee Kathryne O’Grady, Deputy Director Michigan Department of Human Services September.
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota’s Crossover Youth Implementation of the CYPM April 18, 2012.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
LA County Cases: An Overview of Characteristics & Disposition Outcomes Denise C. Herz, Ph.D. California State University—Los Angeles School of Criminal.
Data Quality Initiative-Update May 14, Data Quality Initiative The eWiSACWIS Data Quality Initiative will support counties, the BMCW and the Special.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
+ Jennifer Miller, ChildFocus Melissa Devlin, FFTA Brian Lynch, Children’s Community Programs Sue Miklos, The Bair Foundation Child Welfare Peer Kinship.
Sangamon County Action Team Sara Sanders Christy Cunningham Chrissy Gosteli.
Polk County Family Drug Court The Honorable Karla Fultz Todd Beveridge, M.S.W., M.S.
One Community’s Partnership with Juvenile Justice Dawn Project 2004 Marion County, Indiana.
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
Linkages Program Mark Twain Mark Twain.
Connecticut Department of Children and Families Agency Overview.
Stanislaus County Children and Family Services Families In Partnership After Care Program A Parent Mentor Program.
1 Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Report to the Community January 13, 2006 Jan. – Dec Progress summary of 2005  Safety  Permanence  Well-Being.
Community Partnerships to Protect Children: Challenges and Opportunities Deborah Daro.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Skills for Success Program Savenia Falquist Youth Development Coordinator Jefferson County Juvenile Officer July 14, 2005.
A Valuable Bridge How Linkages Can Advance Other Initiatives Leslie Ann Hay, MSW Hay Consulting (206)
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Pathways to Safety (DR) In Monterey County A Community-Based Early Intervention Initiative.
Los Angeles County’s Department of Children and Family Services Title IV-E California Well-Being Project and Strategic Plan June 3, 2015.
An Overview of the California Foster Care System Navigating the System.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
ACCELERATED FAMILY REUNIFICATION (A-FRE) State Initiative Leads: Marcella Herrera (Region 6) Maria Galloway (Region 8)
1. DFCS Performance Update Georgia Child Welfare Reform Council September 16, 2015.
The Child and Family Services Review (CFSR) February 2008 Update.
1 DHS Board Meeting Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program Overview Mark Washington Division of Family and Children Services August 18, 2010.
Lilliput Family Finding & Relative Support Efforts Karen Alvord, CEO, Beverly Johnson, CPO,
Georgia DFCS Outcome- Based Permanency Initiative A Proposal to Introduce Performance- Based Contracting and Partner for CFSR Success.
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
BackgroundBackground ObjectivesObjectives MethodsMethods Study Design 1E-06 One of the biggest challenges for the Child Welfare System is sustaining successful.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
No Place Like HOME Texas Kick Off Meeting
Continuum of Care Reform Ventura County Update
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services January 23, 2015
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Wraparound Oregon Designing a coordinated service system for children, youth and their families.
Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Review of Title IV-E Waiver Opportunity
Presentation transcript:

Expedited Family Reunification Project Arizona Child Welfare Demonstration Project

Overview of Project Description of Project Project Outcomes Program Components

Description of Project Arizona’s project is designed to expedite reunification of children who are placed in out-of-home care through intensive in-home and aftercare services.

Description of Project Target population are children who are: in out-of-home placement for no more than 9 months; in congregate care or licensed foster care settings; for whom reunification is a case goal; and for whom the juvenile court concurs with a case plan of expedited reunification

Description of Project Located in Maricopa County Child Protective Services offices Implementation in two phases Phase 1 began in April 2006 Phase 2 began in January 2008

Project Outcomes Reduce children’s length of stay in congregate and licensed foster care settings. Decrease the likelihood of re-entry into out-of-home care. Prevent the recurrence of child abuse and neglect. Improve family-well being and functioning.

Program Components Child and Family Teams Home Based Strategies and Interventions Flexible Funding Role of the child protection services worker and waiver service provider

Child and Family Teams Provides strength based framework for reunification Team includes everyone involved in the case The team is responsible for all assessment, planning, intervention and aftercare phases of the reunification process

Home Based Strategies and Interventions Array of services provided based on needs identified Minimum of 6 hours per week of face-to-face contact with clients Intensive visitation between parent (s) and children One provider for all services, monitoring and coordination

Flex Funding Flex funds are used to address needs such as: Specialized services Housing/Utilities assistance Transportation Job related expenses

Role of Workers Provider staff (Expedited Reunification Team) Provider of all services to family Lead in facilitating CFTs Coordination of all services

Role of Workers CPS Worker Retains legal responsibility Provide oversight of planning process Not make independent decisions Work with the Expedited Reunification Team

Evaluation Design

Phase I: April 2006 – July 2007

Primary Caregiver Characteristics 94% mothers 85% Caucasian 24% Hispanic or Latina/o 9% African American 2% American Indian 33.8 years of age (avg) 16 to 69 years of age (range)

Target Child Characteristics 55% males  45% females 86% Caucasian 28% Hispanic or Latina/o 13% African American 2% American Indian 7.2 years of age (avg) 1 to 17 years of age (range)

Safety Related Outcomes Is there a reduction in the recurrence of child abuse and neglect?

Permanency Related Outcomes Is the time in out-of-home placement reduced?

Reentry Into Out-of-Home Placement Is there a reduction in subsequent out-of-home placements?

Child and Family Well-Being Is there an increase in overall family well-being and functioning?

Summary and Accomplishments Full implementation of project within nine months of waiver approval Over 100 children from 88 eligible cases received waiver services A higher percentage of waiver cases (43%) reunified than comparison cases (17%) for new cases July 1, 2006 and after Improvements in selected child and family domains for existing waiver families

Lessons Learned Develop strategies to better integrate waiver and substance abuse services Explore strategies for continual training on waiver services and procedures Develop increased management system support Develop quality measures on key waiver service components Provide monthly reports to implementation team on process, outcome, and cost indicators

For additional information: Flora Sotomayor IV-E Waiver Project Director Division of Children, Youth & Families Arizona Department of Economic Security 1789 W. Jefferson Phoenix, AZ 85007 (602) 364-1346 fsotomayor@azdes.gov