André Augustinus 15 March 2003 DCS Workshop Safety Interlocks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 13: The Systems Perspective of a DSS
Advertisements

1 of 18 Information Dissemination New Digital Opportunities IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Dissemination New Digital Opportunities.
GOALS FOR TODAY Understand how to write a HACCP Plan
0 - 0.
CE PUWER. Which legislation applies? Which legislation applies? Product legislation Free movement of goods Employment legislation Employee protection.
ALICE DCS, Heidelberg 8 Sept G. De Cataldo, CERN CH and INFN Bari;A. Franco INFN Bari 1 Updating on the HV control systems in ALICE The DELPHI HV,
André Augustinus 22 June 2004 DCS Workshop Status on services controls.
1 According to PETROSAFE safety policy, the company is keen that: Introduction All Egyptian Petroleum companies and foreign companies working in A.R.E.
EMCal DCS Status By B. S. Nilsen, M. Cherney, J. Fujita Creighton University For the EMCal project.
1 of 17 LUKAS PÜLLEN New prototypes for components of a control system for the new ATLAS pixel detector at the HL-LHC New prototypes for components of.
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
Let’s watch a DVD… DVD Instructor Notes
State Fire Marshal Question and Answer Session with the Louisiana Automatic Fire Alarm Association March 19, 1999.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 27 Slide 1 Quality Management.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
The Control System for the ATLAS Pixel Detector
Alarms and interlocks handling in the FSM environment Hypernet 1.The standardization of the FSM state diagram; 2.The FSM error states and their recovering.
André Augustinus 16 June 2003 DCS Workshop Safety.
André Augustinus ALICE Detector Control System  ALICE DCS is responsible for safe, stable and efficient operation of the experiment  Central monitoring.
Understanding the management of risks to health and safety on the premises of a retail business Unit 352.
DCS LEB Workshop ‘98, Rome, Detector Control System, H.J.Burckhart,1 Detector Control System H.J Burckhart, CERN u Motivation and Scope u Detector and.
Oliver Bitterling  Introduction to the QPS  Radiation damage in electronic systems  Construction of radiation tolerant systems  Radiation test and.
The Detector Safety System for LHC Experiments Stefan Lüders ― CERN EP/SFT & IT/CO CHEP03 ― UC San Diego ― March 27 th, 2003.
Computer Process Control Application. Computer process control In computer process control, a digital computer is used to direct the operations of a manufacturing.
DSS Advisory Board Christoph Schäfer Rack Safety System.
09/12/2009ALICE TOF General meeting 1 Online Controls Andrea Alici INFN and Universtity of Bologna, Bologna, Italy ALICE TOF General Meeting CERN building.
Designing a HEP Experiment Control System, Lessons to be Learned From 10 Years Evolution and Operation of the DELPHI Experiment. André Augustinus 8 February.
Summary DCS Workshop - L.Jirdén1 Summary of DCS Workshop 28/29 May 01 u Aim of workshop u Program u Summary of presentations u Conclusion.
André Augustinus 10 September 2001 Common Applications to Prototype A two way learning process.
André Augustinus 16 September 2002 Safety issues.
XXVI Workshop on Recent Developments in High Energy Physics and Cosmology Theodoros Argyropoulos NTUA DCS group Ancient Olympia 2008 ATLAS Cathode Strip.
André Augustinus 10 September 2001 DCS Architecture Issues Food for thoughts and discussion.
André Augustinus 17 June 2002 Technology Overview What is out there to fulfil our requirements? (with thanks to Tarek)
André Augustinus 10 October 2005 ALICE Detector Control Status Report A. Augustinus, P. Chochula, G. De Cataldo, L. Jirdén, S. Popescu the DCS team, ALICE.
André Augustinus 26 October 2004 ALICE Technical Board DCS for ‘services’ costs On behalf of Lennart Jirdén.
CEDAR PMT Array DCS (Tim). Summary Summary of DCS monitored parameters based on original scheme – Major part of heat dissipation in electronics / PMTs.
Muon System Safety Issues Burkhard Schmidt.
André Augustinus 6 October 2005 Cabling, Interlocks, Racks Some remarks.
André Augustinus 21 June 2004 DCS Workshop Detector DCS overview Status and Progress.
André Augustinus 10 March 2003 DCS Workshop Detector Controls Layout Introduction.
Eric Thomas - Safety systems for LHC experiments 1 Safety Systems for LHC experiments Baseline specifications – Additional needs – Actions taken.
15-16/3/04 DCS workshop G. De Cataldo, A,.Franco and A. Tauro 1 Answers from the HMPID to the ACC questions 1.Concerning global DCS overview drawing 2.Concerning.
Calo Piquet Training Session - Xvc1 DCS and DSS Cuvée 2015 – RUN2 Xavier Vilasís-Cardona.
DSS  Informal review Tuesday 24 th October 10:00 Room , organized by Laurent Roy.  Subsystems will not be allowed to run overnight or at weekends.
André Augustinus 16 June 2003 DCS Workshop General Purpose Monitor.
André Augustinus 9 October 2006 Interlocks update.
BA6 Cooling Towers Test Day Process Control Functionality and Performance Tests TCR – PCR Monitoring.
Control, monitoring and safety aspects of electrical distribution in the Atlas experiment W.Iwanski PH/ESE-BE.
GIF++ Control System (GCS) Gilles MAIRE PH-DT-DI1.
André Augustinus 21 June 2004 DCS Workshop Follow-up from last workshop.
CMS ECAL DCS 10.Oct S.Zelepoukine ICALEPCS CMS ECAL DCS 1 The Detector Control System for the Electromagnetic Calorimeter of the CMS Experiment.
14 November 08ELACCO meeting1 Alice Detector Control System EST Fellow : Lionel Wallet, CERN Supervisor : Andre Augustinus, CERN Marie Curie Early Stage.
RPC DSS & DCS Action Matrices Review Anton Dimitrov CMS Action Matrix Review 2015, 06.Mar.2015, CERN, Geneva.
External Data and DIP Oliver Holme 18 th January 2008.
André Augustinus 17 June 2002 Detector URD summaries or, what we understand from your URD.
First discussion on MSS for Katrin March 26, 2013 M.Capeans CERN PH-DT.
A discrete event system: the CMS Tracker interlock Icaleps 2005 Icaleps 2005 Andromachi Tsirou, CERN The CMS Tracker interlock system The CMS Tracker and.
1 Infrastructure and DCS Presentation of the Infrastructure Controls aspect in the ALICE DCS Based on U ser R equirements D ocument …you should still know.
André Augustinus 18 March 2002 ALICE Detector Controls Requirements.
André Augustinus 13 June 2005 User Requirements, interlocks, cabling, racks, etc. Some remarks.
EtherCAT based RF Interlock System for SwissFEL LLRF 2015 Abstract As part of the overall development effort for SwissFEL's RF and LLRF systems, the RF.
Start of Sales MSI-XXXB Safety Relays Plugable screw or spring-cage terminal blocks.
Pixel Action Matrix C. Newsom July 15, Overview Critical Parameters Initial Discussion – Top 6 critical failures Discussion - Detailed Documentation.
CHEP 2010 – TAIPEI Robert Gomez-Reino on behalf of CMS DAQ group.
V Thermo-siphon Workshop Test protocol Jan Godlewski PH/DT-PO On behalf of thermo-siphon working group
1 04 April 2007 L. Roy Detector Safety System for infrastructure - General fire detection (barracks, cavern) - Sniffer system (smoke detection above the.
Safety Systems for ALICE
Presentation transcript:

André Augustinus 15 March 2003 DCS Workshop Safety Interlocks

André Augustinus 15 March 2003DCS Workshop 2 Safety, introduction  What is Safety: Safety of people (prevent injuries or worse) Safety, integrity of equipment (protect capital investment)  CERN Safety System Covers Level3 alarms (Fire, Gas etc.)  DCS ensures integrity through: Alarm reporting (for operator intervention) and automation Detailed control on detector level and control of infrastructure and services (with high granularity) Interlocks on detector level

André Augustinus 15 March 2003DCS Workshop 3 Safety, introduction  Concentrate today on interlocks What classes of interlocks Inventory of needs Open questions  Few words on the role of DSS

André Augustinus 15 March 2003DCS Workshop 4 Interlocks  Primary task is to protect equipment and the sub- detector from serious damage  In order to be able discuss efficiently the subject, and to define requirements more precisely, we should try to define a common understanding of interlocks: what is an interlock  Define different classes of interlocks Described in ‘interlocks document’ (and TDR) Please comment!

André Augustinus 15 March 2003DCS Workshop 5 Interlock classes  Consider ‘interlocks’ in its widest sense Distinguish four classes of interlocks:  “Hardwired”: Internal interlocks Cross-system interlocks Actions  “Software”: Actions Low level High level Complexity

André Augustinus 15 March 2003DCS Workshop 6 “Hardwired” internal interlocks  Provide intrinsic protection of each type of equipment, lowest level of interlocks Built into equipment or electronics  Examples: Switch-off of HV channel at over-current (‘Trip’) Hardwired protection on the Front End Electronics E.g. ‘programmed’ in a FPGA E.g. switch-off a voltage regulator at over-current

André Augustinus 15 March 2003DCS Workshop 7 “Hardwired” internal interlocks Interaction with DCS  Some of these interlocks might have no interaction at all with the DCS But the result of an interlock being activated will be seen  Some of these interlocks might be read The DCS will be informed if an interlock is activated or not  Some of these interlocks might need to be configured (setting a limit, such as maximum current: ‘trip limit’)

André Augustinus 15 March 2003DCS Workshop 8 “Hardwired” internal interlocks Provide an inventory of this class of interlocks, especially if an interaction with DCS is required (read status, set limits)

André Augustinus 15 March 2003DCS Workshop 9 “Hardwired” cross-system interlocks  This is what is usually understood as interlock  Consist of a hardwired connection between two sub- systems  Usually a contact that is kept closed by the source action is triggered when contact is opened  Typical example is to interlock HV if gas mixture is wrong (risk of sparks) or interlock LV if cooling is failing (risk of burning electronics) Power Supply Gas or Cooling

André Augustinus 15 March 2003DCS Workshop 10 “Hardwired” cross-system interlocks Interlock source  Only few are ‘real’ hardwired = activated directly by a dedicated sensor Example: thermo-switch  Most are generated by a PLC or similar system Relay in gas or cooling control system User defines conditions to activate interlock Temperature too high, gas mixture wrong  Other sources might be magnet control system, LHC accelerator, neighbour sub-detector etc.

André Augustinus 15 March 2003DCS Workshop 11 “Hardwired” cross-system interlocks Interlock receiver  Usually (HV and LV) power supplies Action is a emergency off of the power supply (usually a crude action) Commercial power supplies have an input for interlock Custom built equipment will have to implement such an input Provision should be made to distribute a single interlock signal to a set of power supplies (e.g. daisy chain)

André Augustinus 15 March 2003DCS Workshop 12 “Hardwired” cross-system interlocks Provide an inventory of these interlocks and define: On what conditions does the source have to activate the interlock? Are these conditions ‘fixed’ or likely to change often? Does the receiving end have an input for an interlock? Can we standardise on a closed contact for these interlocks? (thus, opening the chain will trigger the interlock)

André Augustinus 15 March 2003DCS Workshop 13 “Hardwired” actions  Can be seen as a “gentle interlock”  A hardwired signal will trigger a predefined action E.g. a ‘fast’ ramp down of the HV  Signal can be generated by the same source as mentioned before or even a simple push-button  However, this functionality does note come for free! Is normally not foreseen in equipment, need a specific implementation Provide your requirements for such actions

André Augustinus 15 March 2003DCS Workshop 14 “Software” actions  Normal level of protection  Programmed in the DCS (e.g. in Finite State Machine), can have any level of complexity  Examples: Make sure systems can only be switched on if other systems are OK (and switch systems off if problem in other systems) Make sure systems are switched on or off in a given order Provide first ideas on your requirements for such actions

André Augustinus 15 March 2003DCS Workshop 15 Your input is requested  Assess the potential hazards in your sub-detector  Decide what kind of interlock is suitable Is a software action sufficient, or is a hardwired interlock required (ask yourself what happens if the software action is not performed)  Make an inventory of all interlocks What is the source and what are the conditions to activate the interlock Make sure the ‘receiving end’ can receive interlocks, and what signal does it need (opening a contact, stop supplying a given level)

André Augustinus 15 March 2003DCS Workshop 16 Food for thought  What happens to your equipment and detector in case of power cut Might happen more often than activation of an interlock  What happens in case of a partial power cut E.g. no power in counting room, but still power in cavern  Are you sensitive to external systems or influences E.g. neighbouring sub-detector, magnet, LHC, earthquake  Can we standardise on ‘closed contacts’ for our interlocks

André Augustinus 15 March 2003DCS Workshop 17 The role of DSS  DSS is a ‘safe and reliable’ part of DCS and can be used to transmit crucial signals  Currently thought to be used to monitor the experiments environment (temperatures, water leak, power status)  Not necessarily involved in sub-detector interlocks To be seen on a case by case basis

André Augustinus 15 March 2003DCS Workshop 18 Conclusions  Defined different classes of interlocks Let us know your remarks  We need your input, your requirements concerning interlocks Especially the ‘hardwired’ ones Check if your equipment can accept interlocks  Think about the open issues pointed out before