Successfully Navigating National and Global Discovery Disputes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Williams v. Sprint/United Management Co.
Advertisements

Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC “Zubulake IV”
The Evolving Law of E-Discovery Joseph J. Ortego, Esq. Nixon Peabody LLP New York, NY Jericho, NY.
New Decade, New Rules: Discovery of Electronically Stored Information in Ontario 2010 and beyond May, 2010 Presentation by Clifford F. Shnier, JD President,
Saving Your Documents Can Save You Anne D. Harman, Esq. Bethany B. Swaton, Esq. Dinsmore & Shohl LLP 2100 Market Street, Wheeling (304)
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2004 District Justice Scheindlin Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC Zubulake V.
Effective Document Retention: Lean, Mean, But Not Spoiling You or Your Lawsuit Effective Document Retention: Lean, Mean, But Not Spoiling You or Your Lawsuit.
Considerations for Records and Information Management Programs in Light of the Pension Committee and Rimkus Consulting 2010 Decisions.
248 F.R.D. 372 (D. Conn. 2007) Doe v. Norwalk Community College.
Litigation Holds: Don’t Live in Fear of Spoliation Jason CISO – University of Connecticut October 30, 2014 Information Security Office.
Ronald J. Shaffer, Esq. Beth L. Weisser, Esq. Lorraine K. Koc, Esq., Vice President and General Counsel, Deb Shops, Inc. © 2010 Fox Rothschild DELVACCA.
Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O’Lakes, Inc.  Motion Hearing before a Magistrate Judge in Federal Court  District of Colorado  Decided in 2007.
Establishing a Defensible and Efficient Legal Hold Policy September 2013 Connie Hall, J.D., Manager, New Product Development, Thomson Reuters.
Ethical Issues in Data Security Breach Cases Presented by Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
Ethical Issues in the Electronic Age Ethical Issues in the Electronic Age Frost Brown Todd LLC Seminar May 24, 2007 Frost Brown.
A PROACTIVE APPROACH TO E-DISCOVERY March 4, 2009 Presented to the Corporate Counsel Section of the Tarrant County Bar Association Carl C. Butzer Jackson.
1 A Practical Guide to eDiscovery in Litigation Presented by: Christopher N. Weiss Aric H. Jarrett Stoel Rives LLP Public Risk Management Association (PRIMA),
5 Vital Components of Every Custodian Interview David Meadows, PMP, Managing Director – Discovery Consulting, Kroll Ontrack Dave Canfield, EJD, Managing.
E-Discovery LIMITS ON E-DISCOVERY. No New Preservation Rule When does duty to preserve attach? Reasonably anticipated litigation. Audio sanctions.
1 Best Practices in Legal Holds Effectively Managing the e-Discovery Process and Associated Costs.
Litigation Hold Overview Tom O’Connor Gulf Coast Legal Technology Center
E -nuff! : Practical Tips For Keeping s From Derailing Your Case Presented by Jerry L. Mitchell.
1 Structuring your Information Management to Ensure Litigation Readiness Julian Ackert, Principal Washington DC John Forsyth, HBOS Edinburgh Andrew Haslam,
Xact Data Discovery People Technology Communication make discovery projects happen XACT DATA DISCOVERY Because you need to know
Investigating & Preserving Evidence in Data Security Incidents Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
©2011 Office of Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley E-DISCOVERY Hélène Kazanjian Anne Sterman Trial Division.
© 2009 Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. PENSION COMMITTEE v. BANC OF AMERICA SECS., LLC Diving Deeper Into the Zubulake Alvin F. Lindsay 24 February.
DOCUMENT RETENTION ISSUES FOR IN- HOUSE COUNSEL Rebecca A. Brommel BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone:
Gregory L. Riggs, J.D. AABI Industry/Educator Forum February 21, 2013.
The Sedona Principles 1-7
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON SUMMER III 2010 – 5297 E-DISCOVERY First Responses – Pitfalls and Practical Tips.
EDISCOVERY: ARE YOU PREPARED? Dennis P. Ogden Belin McCormick, P.C. 666 Walnut Street, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone: (515) Facsimile:
E-Discovery in Health Care Litigation By Tracy Vigness Kolb.
“PRESERVATION, COLLECTION, AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND ESI IN CONSTRUCTION CASES” PRESENTERS: John Foust Jones Day San Francisco, CA John Foust Jones.
Rewriting the Law in the Digital Age
2009 CHANGES IN CALIFORNIA DISCOVERY RULES The California Electronic Discovery Act Batya Swenson E-discovery Task Force
DOE V. NORWALK COMMUNITY COLLEGE, 248 F.R.D. 372 (D. CONN. 2007) Decided July 16, 2002.
244 F.R.D. 614 (D. Colo. 2007). Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O’Lakes Inc.
Tackling Preservation Before it Tackles You: A Practical Approach to Data Preservation Joseph A. Venturella Advanced Discovery Solutions Group.
Against: The Liberal Definition and use of Litigation Holds Team 9.
P RINCIPLES 1-7 FOR E LECTRONIC D OCUMENT P RODUCTION Maryanne Post.
© 2010 Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. A Healthy Dose of E-Discovery: A Review of Electronic Discovery Laws for the Healthcare Industry.
The Challenge of Rule 26(f) Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer July 15, 2011.
Rambus v. Infineon Technologies AG 22 F.R.D. 280 (E.D. Va. 2004)
Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O’Lakes, Inc. 224 F.R.D. 614 (D. Colo. 2007) By: Sara Alsaleh Case starts on page 136 of the book!
EDiscovery Preservation, Spoliation, Litigation Holds, Adverse Inferences. September 15, 2008.
Session 6 ERM Case Law: The Annual MER Update of the Latest News, Trends, & Issues Hon. John M. Facciola United States District Court, District of Columbia.
MER 2012: T1 – Achieving Enterprise Content and Records Management with SharePoint John Isaza, Esq., FAI Partner Legal Developments & Rules Affecting SharePoint.
Defensible Records Retention and Preservation Linda Starek-McKinley Director, Records and Information Management Edward Jones
Copyright © 2015 Bradley & Riley PC - All rights reserved. October 30, 2015 IA ACC 2 nd Annual Corp. Counsel Forum Timothy J. Hill Laura M. Hyer N EW F.
Emerging Case Law and Recent eDiscovery Decisions.
The Sedona Principles November 16, Background- What is The Sedona Conference The Sedona Conference is an educational institute, established in 1997,
Zubulake IV [Trigger Date]
U.S. District Court Southern District of New York 229 F.R.D. 422 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)
1 PRESERVATION: E-Discovery Marketfare Annunciation, LLC, et al. v. United Fire &Casualty Insurance Co.
EDiscovery Also known as “ESI” Discovery of “Electronically Stored Information” Same discovery, new form of storage.
Proposed and Recent Changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Shadbolt & Co LLP Solicitors E-DISCLOSURE IN THE ENGLISH COURTS – REVEALING ALL? ABA CONFERENCE OCTOBER 2005 Kate Matthews Commercial Litigation and Dispute.
Electronic Discovery Guidelines FRCP 26(f) mandates that parties “meaningfully meet and confer” to consider the nature of their respective claims and defenses.
Investigations: Strategies and Recommendations (Hints and Tips) Leah Lane, CFE Director, Global Investigations, Texas Instruments, Inc.
#16PACE Preparing For The Inevitable... How To Be Ready When The Lawsuit Comes And Steps To Proactively Limit Corporate Inconvenience And Liability Mitchell.
Women in Products Liability 2016 Annual Regional CLE November 3, 2016
Information Technology & The Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Sonya Naar - DLA Piper US LLP Doug Herman - UHY Advisors FLVS, Inc.
Sponsored by Kroll Ontrack Inc.
The Ethics of Technology
E-DISCOVERY The Sophomore Year May 20, 2010.
Litigation Holds: Don’t Live in Fear of Spoliation
The Importance of Legal Hold Policies
The Trade Union Act 2016 and the Right to Strike
Internal Investigations: Top 10 “Dos”
Presentation transcript:

Successfully Navigating National and Global Discovery Disputes

There is no delete key… David Neave Blake, Cassels & Graydon, LLP David Herr Maslon, Edelman Borman & Brand, LLP Bill Belt LeClair Ryan, LLP Colin West Bingham McCutcheon Scott OConnell Nixon Peabody, LLP

Introduction Challenges presented by electronic discovery laws Key cases Requirements for organizations and in-house counsel

Challenges Scope of obligation Discoverable documents Document preservation Costs

Electronic Discovery Overview Challenges for businesses and in-house counsel Current trends in case law

Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities, LLC (Southern District, NY) & Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. v. Nickie G. Cammarata, et al. (Southern District, TX) Key Cases

Overview: Pension Committee Decision Zubulake Revisited: Six Years Later Duty to preserve: Scope and criteria for determining discovery obligations Establishing prejudice and burden of proof

Overview: Pension Committee Decision cont. Standards: Negligence, gross negligence or willfulness Legal hold notices, collection efforts & back-up tapes Appropriate sanction remedies

Overview: Rimkus Consulting Decision Reliance on Pension Committee principles Factual context: intentional document destruction Standard of culpability Appropriate sanctions

Comparing Pension Committee & Rimkus

Pension Committee & Rimkus Consulting Issue #1: What is the necessary degree of culpability?

Pension Committee & Rimkus Consulting Issue #2: Different culpability standards amongst judicial districts?

Pension Committee & Rimkus Consulting Issue #3: Mandatory presumption of relevance and prejudice?

Pension Committee & Rimkus Consulting Issue #4: What are appropriate sanctions?

Tough Questions: When should e-discovery process start? What are the minimum requirements? What documents are necessary to preserve? What to do with back-up tapes?

Implications for Clients & In-house Counsel Contextualized nature of document discovery requirements Basic duties: preservation & avoiding spoliation Potential liabilities & avoiding sanctions

Implications for Clients & In-house Counsel cont. Legal Hold Notices Requirements imposed by Pension Committee Internal processes for dealing with legal hold notices Issue as soon as possible following reasonable anticipation of litigation

Implications for Clients & In-house Counsel cont. Back-up Tapes Preservation and segregation of tapes that are sole source of relevant information Establishing process to identify and preserve required back-up tapes

Implications for Clients & In-house Counsel cont. Collection Efforts Establish preservation and collection process Identify key players and sources of information Instruct custodians on preservation requirements

Concluding Thoughts Impact and burden of technology In Praise of the Delete Key Developing appropriate processes Future Challenges

Contact Information