Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Advertisements

The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
PLP Circle of Support: A prevention/intervention model December 12, 2003 Rhode Island Department of Education.
PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
Program Planning in NS Schools – a Team Approach AVRSB, 2012.
Inquiry Team Eydie Wilson, Ph.D. Math Coach November 3, 2009.
Purpose of Instruction
STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION/ CENTRAL CALIFORNIA MIGRANT HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEM CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEMS Training Plan * Outcomes Awareness.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Reading Intervention “Today a reader, tomorrow a leader.” -Margaret Fuller-
1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
Guiding and Evaluating Positive Behavioral Support Implementation Shawn Fleming.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
1. PBIS Team: Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation – PBIS requires some.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Module 4: Unit 2, Session 2 MODULE 4: TIERED INSTRUCTION Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 2, Session 2.
Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtII) East Penn School District.
Iowa Educational Services for the Blind and Visually Impaired (IESBVI)Conference October 8 th and 9 th, 2012 WELCOME!
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Cohort 5 Middle/Jr. High School Data Review and Action Planning: Schoolwide Reading Spring,
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
Progress Monitoring for All Student Adapted from the Kentucky Systems of Interventions Guidance Document.
Student Achievement Manager Intervention Plans. Creating a Student Intervention Plan Intervention Plans: Encompass all components of an intervention –
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Getting There from Here: Creating an Evidence- Based Culture Within Special Education Ronnie Detrich Randy Keyworth Jack States.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Vermont Early Childhood MTSS
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
PBIS Team: Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
NEASC SITE VISIT SEPTEMBER 30-OCTOBER 3, Standards of Accreditation 4 standards of Teaching and Learning 1- Mission and Expectations for Student.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Illinois Evaluation Tools SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting Kansas City, MO October 5 & 6, 2009 Kathryn Cox Illinois State Board of Education
Office of Service Quality
MASTERING READING INSTRUCTION A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR FIRST GRADE PROFESSIONALS.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
The IEP: Progress Monitoring Process. Session Agenda Definition Rationale Prerequisites The Steps of Progress Monitoring 1.Data Collection –Unpack Existing.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Which critical component (or guiding principle) of MTSS does the following statement belong with? A district-wide commitment and focus on student achievement.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
The Mentoring Process Martha Majors.
Co-Teaching in the 21st Century
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team

…..we were invited to attend the Systemic Change in Reading Training. Because our school did not meet the State Performance Plan for Indicator 3 in Reading (students with IEPs not meeting the standard in reading achievement)…..

General Education Special Education All Staff New Reading Methods and Strategies All staff will be working towards the same outcome… …helping all students improve their reading skills, but especially students with IEPs.

Systemic Change in Reading Training Outcomes – Year 1 Identify the five critical elements of reading instruction with a concentration on specific strategies for teaching phonemic awareness, phonics, and fluency. Implement specific strategies for teaching phonemic awareness, phonics, and fluency. Utilize Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM) for on-going student benchmarking and progress monitoring throughout the year. Analyze assessment data to drive instruction and intervention. Initiate the process of systemic change for school-wide improvement of reading instruction.

Systemic Change in Reading Training Outcomes – Year 1 Contd. Create a research-based action plan to improve and enhance reading instruction for all students. Implement staff development to address school-wide improvement of teaching reading. Establish SCR Team Meetings at least twice a month to design staff trainings, analyze data, progress monitor interventions, and review action plan. Develop and maintain an Implementation Team Portfolio to compile specific data on site efforts to alter and sustain practices related to teaching reading and improving student achievement.

Systemic Change in Reading Training Outcomes – Year 2 Continue the process of systemic change to improve reading instruction. Augment research-based action plan to improve and enhance reading instruction for all students and to sustain school-wide systemic change in reading. Continue to implement specific strategies to improve achievement in phonemic awareness, phonics, and fluency. Identify and implement specific strategies for teaching vocabulary and comprehension. Continue to utilize Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM) for on-going student benchmarking and progress monitoring throughout the year.

Systemic Change in Reading Training Outcomes – Year 2 Contd. Analyze assessment data to drive instruction and intervention. Continue the process of systemic change for school-wide improvement of reading instruction. Implement staff development to address school-wide improvement of teaching reading. Continue SCR Team Meetings at least twice a month to design staff trainings, analyze data, progress monitor interventions, and review action plan. Maintain an Implementation Team Portfolio to compile specific data on site efforts to alter and sustain practices related to teaching mathematics and improving student achievement.

Implementation Team Attendance at CSPD Trainings Site Team Attendance at Other Trainings Two year commitment with intact ongoing teams. No substitutions allowed. Training schedules are project specific and require full team attendance every session. Attendance is random, often with no sequence or commitment beyond a day or two. Absenteeism or substitutions frequently occur.

Implementation Team Attendance at CSPD Trainings Site Team Attendance at Other Trainings Implementation Teams consist of 5 specific members: School Principal A Special Education Teacher A General Education Teacher Two other Teacher Leaders that will enhance the team and the teams efforts. Random attendees are selected to attend.

Name of 5 th member Name of principal Name of special education teacher Name of general education teacher Name of 4 th team member

Implementation Team Attendance at CSPD Trainings Site Team Attendance at Other Trainings Receive information and strategies regarding evidence- based practices at each session with planned implementation expectations. Receive information on practices (may be evidence-based or just personal favorites of the presenter). No formal plans regarding implementation.

Implementation Team Attendance at CSPD Trainings Site Team Attendance at Other Trainings Report on your schools progress to your cohort of attending Implementation Teams, the CSPD Project Coordinator, and the Presenter to receive feedback. No reporting of actual progress to attendees.

Implementation Team Attendance at CSPD Trainings Site Team Attendance at Other Trainings No or minimal accountability at school site regarding implementation.

Implementation Team Attendance at CSPD Trainings Site Team Attendance at Other Trainings Specific documentation of implementation, analysis, and evaluation requirements is completed in a timely manner. No on-going implementation documentation requirements.

Implementation Team Attendance at CSPD Trainings Site Team Attendance at Other Trainings Implementation team decides how to present new information to staff. Staff development occurs between training sessions with documentation of presentations and evaluations. Principal makes decisions on how information is shared. Informal sharing occurs non-systematically depending on attendees preference. No documentation or follow-up occurs.

Implementation Team Attendance at CSPD Trainings Site Team Attendance at Other Trainings Change in practice is analyzed with evidence documented in the Implementation Team Portfolio. Typically, no objective evidence is gathered and evaluated to document success of team efforts.

Implementation Team Attendance at CSPD Trainings Site Team Attendance at Other Trainings CSPD Trainings are created to teach school teams how to begin and maintain sustainable change in practice for specific areas of need at their school sites. No information on sustainable change is given.

to improve reading achievement for all students but especially students with disabilities.