V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Edinburg,13-15 Sept. 2009 Photoproduction of    on protons ► Identification of  p →  o.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Photons and Jets from the first year of ALICE A
Advertisements

Data Analysis (ODU) and Simulations (J. Udias, Madrid)
Polarisation Observables for Strangeness Photoproduction on a Frozen Spin Target with CLAS at Jefferson Lab Stuart Fegan Nuclear Physics Group University.
Polarization Observables in Hyperon Photoproduction with CLAS Craig Paterson University of Glasgow Eurotag Workshop Glasgow, 1 st September 2008.
Rory Miskimen University of Massachusetts, Amherst
 photoproduction with linearly polarized photons at SPring-8 SENDAI03 16 th June, 2003 Tsutomu Mibe (Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka univ.,
Recent Bottomonium Results from BaBar Bryan Fulsom SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 35 th International Conference on High Energy Physics Paris, France.
Radphi Analysis at I.U. Dan Krop 9/06/02. Overview BGV Callibration Using Gradphi Monte Carlo PWA Formalism for Spin 1 Beam Moments of the Angular Distribution.
Count rate estimates from TDR Assuming beam intenisties from previous slide and acc *rec from SIM LH2 case [counts/24h] p [GeV/c] beam momentum Solid.
 *(1520) CrossSection Zhiwen Zhao Physics 745. Λ BARYONS (S = − 1, I = 0) Λ 0 = u d s Λ(1520) D 03 I( J P ) = 0( 3/2 − ) Mass m = ± 1.0 MeV [a]
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo-production --On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2γ collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University.
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo- production --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2 γ collaboration 2010 Annual Fall Meeting.
T.C. Jude D.I. Glazier, D.P. Watts The University of Edinburgh Strangeness Photoproduction: Polarisation Transfer & Cross-Section Measurements.
Polarisation transfer in hyperon photoproduction near threshold Tom Jude D I Glazier, D P Watts The University of Edinburgh.
T.C. Jude D.I. Glazier, D.P. Watts The University of Edinburgh Strangeness Photoproduction At Threshold Energies.
K +  photoproduction with the Crystal Ball at MAMI T.C. Jude The University of Edinburgh New method of K + detection with the Crystal Ball Extraction.
Motivation. Why study ground state hyperon electroproduction? CLAS detector and analysis. Analysis results. Current status and future work. M. Gabrielyan.
Calibration of the new Particle Identification Detector (PID) Tom Jude, Derek Glazier, Dan Watts.
V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Mainz, September 2008 Photoproduction of    on protons ► Introduction ► Data analysis.
Magnetic moments of baryon resonances Teilprojekt A3 Volker Metag II. Physikalisches Institut Universität Giessen Germany SFB/TR16 Mitgliederversammlung.
1 Tomoaki Hotta (RCNP, Osaka Univ.) for The LEPS Collaboration Cracow Epiphany Conference, Jan 6, 2005 Introduction LEPS experiment Results from new LD.
09/10/2005NSTAR Graal collaboration1 The Graal collaboration results and prospects Presented by Carlo Schaerf Università di Roma “Tor Vergata” and.
J/  production in p+p collisions at PHENIX and gluon distribution QWG meeting at FNAL September Hiroki Sato (Kyoto University) for the PHENIX collaboration.
Total photoabsorption on quasi free nucleons at 600 – 1500 MeV N.Rudnev, A.Ignatov, A.Lapik, A.Mushkarenkov, V.Nedorezov, A.Turinge for the GRAAL collaboratiion.
Spin transfer coefficient K LL’ in  photoproduction at HERMES D. Veretennikov On behalf of the HERMES collaboration DIS08, London.
Kelli Hardy Compton Study from Experimental Data.
STATUS OF PREPARATION OF dp-ELASTIC SCATTERING STUDY AT THE EXTRACTED BEAM OF NUCLOTRON. Yu.V.Gurchin LHE JINR September 2009.
Calorimetry for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory Workshop on General Purpose High Resolution.
P( ,n      reaction measured with the Crystal Ball at MAMI Dan Watts, Derek Glazier University of Edinburgh Richard Codling, John Annand University.
A First Analysis of the 3 He Test Beamtime CB Meeting Mainz, March 9, 2010 Patricia Aguar Bartolomé Alexander Mushkarenkov.
09/10/2005NSTAR Graal collaboration1 The Graal collaboration results and prospects Presented by Carlo Schaerf Università di Roma “Tor Vergata” and.
Status of Beam Asymmetry Measurements for Meson Photoproduction ASU Meson Physics Group Hadron Spectroscopy WG Meeting – June 2009 Status of Beam Asymmetry.
SANE Asymmetries Hovhannes Baghdasaryan. Measurement We are measuring Assumption is that background asymmetry is small Then Measured asymmetry is the.
Photoproduction of the  (1385) resonance at LEPS K. Hicks & D. Keller, Ohio U. LEPS Collaboration Meeting May 1, 2008.
Search for the  + in photoproduction experiments at CLAS APS spring meeting (Dallas) April 22, 2006 Ken Hicks (Ohio University) for the CLAS Collaboration.
K* photoproduction from g11 K. Hicks Ohio University HSG meeting, 12 June 2009.
Polarisation transfer in hyperon photoproduction near threshold Tom Jude D I Glazier, D P Watts The University of Edinburgh.
Crystal Ball Collaboration Meeting, Basel, October 2006 Claire Tarbert, Univeristy of Edinburgh Coherent  0 Photoproduction on Nuclei Claire Tarbert,
Georgie Mbianda 1 for the Baryon (E01-002) Collaboration 1 University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Exclusive Electroproduction of π + and η mesons.
Simultaneous photo-production measurement of the  and  mesons on the nucleons at the range 680 – 1500 MeV N.Rudnev, V.Nedorezov, A.Turinge for the GRAAL.
Hall C Summer Workshop August 6, 2009 W. Luo Lanzhou University, China Analysis of GEp-III&2γ Inelastic Data --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III.
Analysis of    production ► Data taking ► Reaction identification ► Results for double polarization observable F ► Summary Based on data taken in the.
Fabien Zehr Double π photoproduction Glasgow 28 March 2006 Double π photoproduction at threshold and in the second resonance region With Crystal Ball and.
Bénédicte Boillat Institut für Physik Universität Basel The + (1232) Magnetic Moment.
Polarisation Observables for Strangeness Photoproduction on a Frozen Spin Target with CLAS at Jefferson Lab Stuart Fegan Nuclear Physics Group University.
Gleb Fedotov Baryon 2016, Mai FSU, Tallahassee, FL 1 New Results on  v p→  +  - p Cross Sections in the Second and Third Resonance Regions Ralf.
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
PrimEx II 0 analysis status
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
PrimEx Preliminary Result (short status)
Investigation of the h -Dalitz Decay with MAMI &
COMPTON ANALYSIS STATUS
I.Larin, PrimEx Analysis meeting
by M. Della Negra, P. Jenni, and T. S. Virdee
Kazuya Aoki For the PHENIX Collaborations. Kyoto Univ. / RIKEN
Electroproduction of φ Mesons in CLAS
Photoproduction of poh pairs on the proton
gp g K+L Cross section measurement
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
Experiment (Jlab Exp : CLAS eg3)
The data status on p+p-p photo/electro- production with the CLAS
Status of Recoil Polarimeter
Michael Dugger* Arizona State University
p0 ALL analysis in PHENIX
MDM October 2004 D MDM General Martin Kotulla, University Basel.
Photoproduction of Neutral Kaons on Liquid Deuterium Target Kabi Bantawa and D. M. Manley Kent State University ץ + n  K0 +Λ With decays: K0  π0.
Proposal for an Experiment: Photoproduction of Neutral Kaons on Deuterium Spokespersons: D. M. Manley (Kent State University) W. J. Briscoe (The George.
COMPTON SCATTERING IN FORWARD DIRECTION
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Presentation transcript:

V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Edinburg,13-15 Sept Photoproduction of    on protons ► Identification of  p →  o  p reaction ► Total cross section ► Differential cross sections ► Data fitting ► Beam helicity asymmetry ► Spin observables In collaboration with A. Fix and M. Ostrick

- 4 or 5 clusters (4 of them are neutrals) - invariant mass for all possible  combinations (4 photons give 3 independent combinations) -  2 minimization and cut - background subtraction using missing mass distributions for each energy or angular bin V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Edinburg, September 2009  p →  o  p Reaction identification

The best combination of  pairs after   minimization and rejection of  o  o events. Two entries for each event corresponding to the two photon pair. V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Edinburg, September 2009  p →  o  p Reaction identification

(a) Data (blue) and the best fit by a gaussian + polynominal function (red line) (b) The fit components: gaussian (black) and polynomial (red dashed) (c) Data after background subtrction (blue) and GEANT simulation (red line) V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Edinburg, September 2009  p →  o  p Reaction identification Missing mass distributions after subtraction of random coincidences and empty target contribution and aplying   cut E  < 1 GeV E  > 1.2 GeV

LNS and GRALL  stat +syst CB-ELSA  stat (syst ~15%)  stat (syst ~5%) Blue curve shows the energy dependence of the reaction phase space with arbitrary normalization V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Edinburg, September 2009  p →  o  p Total cross section Data from July 2007 run

V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Edinburg, September 2009  p →  o  p Differential cross sections a(W) = (A 3/2 / A 1/2 ) 2 r =  S 11 ) /  a = 0.7 (1.0 – 1.1 GeV) a = 1.2 (1.1 – 1.2 GeV) a = 1.7 (1.2 – 1.3 GeV) a = 2.0 (1.3 – 1.4 GeV) r = 2/3 Data from June and July 2007 runs

Solid black curve: r = 2/3, a =2.0 Dashed red curve: r = 1/6, a = 2.0 Dotted blue curve: r = 2/3, a =0.7 High sensitivity of the distributions W K (   ) and W H (   ) to a and W K (   ) and W H (   ) to r V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Edinburg, September 2009  p →  o  p Differential cross sections

Black circles: 1.72<W<1.87 GeV Red circles: CB-ELSA 1.7<W<1.9 GeV V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Edinburg, September 2009  p →  o  p Differential cross sections

V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Edinburg, September 2009  p →  o  p Data fitting the best fits: green line: D33(1700) blue line: D33(1700) with d-wave red line: D 33 (1700) with d-wave + P 33 (1600) + P 31 (1750) + F 35 (1905)

V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Edinburg, September 2009  p →  o  p Data fitting blue line: the best fit with D 33 (1700), P 33 (1600), P 31 (1750), F 35 (1905), and Born terms Partial contributions: Red line: D 33 (1700) Green line: P 33 (1600) Black line: P 31 (1750) Dashed red line: F 35 (1905) Dashed blue line: Born terms

V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Edinburg, September 2009  p →  o  p Data fitting The quality of the phenomenological analysis can be greatly improved by accumulating additional data. For example, polarization observables on protons and neutrons. The simplest of them: Beam helicity asymmetry  only circularly polarized photon beam Such a data was taken already!

D. Krambrich, F. Zehr et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, (2009)    c = in experimental data analysis: Usually is analized as   dependence in the helicity system and may be expanded over function sin n   (n is integer) n is determined by the orbital momenta of the contributing resonances Pure D 33 (1700) provides only sin   term P 31 (1750), P 33 (1600), F 35 (1905) appear in the sin 2   term due to interference with D 33 (1700) sin 3   term coming from the interference between s and d waves in the D 33   decay V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Edinburg, September 2009  p →  o  p Beam helicity asymmetry + + - + + - + - - + - - Y+ + Y- Y+ + Y- Y+ - Y- Y+ - Y- P 1

V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Edinburg, September 2009  p →  o  p Beam helicity asymmetry Fit function : F = P 1 sin  + P 2 sin 2  Data from July 2007 and April 2009 runs

V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Edinburg, September 2009  p →  o  p Beam helicity asymmetry Fit function : F = P 1 sin  + P 2 sin 2  + P 3 sin 3  Data from July 2007 and April 2009 runs

V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Edinburg, September 2009  p →  o  p Spin observables Our future plans are connected with the proposal A2-09/09: “Spin observables for ph photoproduction in D 33 (1700) region” We will measure the transverse spin observables T and F We need: - circulary polarized photon beam (only for F); - transversely polarized proton target  frozen-spin butanol (C 4 H 9 OH) target Disadvantage: additional background from reactions on 12 C and 16 O Estimation of this background: - analysis of data taken with a carbon target using the same procedure as for runs with LH 2 target; -normalization of the photon flux to LH 2 target run; - taking into account the number of 12 C nuclei in a carbon target with respect to butanol ( 16 O = 4/3 12 C)

V.L. Kashevarov. Crystal Collaboration Meeting, Edinburg, September 2009  p →  o  p Spin observables E  = 1.0 – 1.1 GeVE  = 1.1 – 1.2 GeV Expected missing mass spectra for butanol target red line: background contribution from 12 C and 16 O (data from June 2008 run, 12 C target) blue line: investigated reraction (data from July 2007 run, LH 2 target) Proposal A2-09/09 was supported by the PAC with the highest priority (A)

This article was accepted on for publication in EPJA