Optimization of BiV Pacing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numbers Treasure Hunt Following each question, click on the answer. If correct, the next page will load with a graphic first – these can be used to check.
Advertisements

EcoTherm Plus WGB-K 20 E 4,5 – 20 kW.
2 Casa 15m Perspectiva Lateral Izquierda.
1 A B C
Scenario: EOT/EOT-R/COT Resident admitted March 10th Admitted for PT and OT following knee replacement for patient with CHF, COPD, shortness of breath.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Case Studies St. Jude Medical.
AP STUDY SESSION 2.
Follow-up of CRT Patients
1
EuroCondens SGB E.
Slide 1Fig 26-CO, p.795. Slide 2Fig 26-1, p.796 Slide 3Fig 26-2, p.797.
Slide 1Fig 25-CO, p.762. Slide 2Fig 25-1, p.765 Slide 3Fig 25-2, p.765.
Select from the most commonly used minutes below.
STATISTICS INTERVAL ESTIMATION Professor Ke-Sheng Cheng Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering National Taiwan University.
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
NTDB ® Annual Report 2009 © American College of Surgeons All Rights Reserved Worldwide Percent of Hospitals Submitting Data to NTDB by State and.
Create an Application Title 1Y - Youth Chapter 5.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt BlendsDigraphsShort.
CHAPTER 18 The Ankle and Lower Leg
The 5S numbers game..
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
Media-Monitoring Final Report April - May 2010 News.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
Turing Machines.
Table 12.1: Cash Flows to a Cash and Carry Trading Strategy.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
MM4A6c: Apply the law of sines and the law of cosines.
Bellwork Do the following problem on a ½ sheet of paper and turn in.
Regression with Panel Data
K ONTRAK PERKULIAHAN I Made Gatot K, ST. MT 1. PENILAIAN Kehadiran min 75 % : 5 % Tugas: 20 % Diskusi / Presentasi: 20 % UTS: 25 % UAS: 30 % TOTAL: 100%
Operating Systems Operating Systems - Winter 2010 Chapter 3 – Input/Output Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Exarte Bezoek aan de Mediacampus Bachelor in de grafische en digitale media April 2014.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Biology 2 Plant Kingdom Identification Test Review.
Adding Up In Chunks.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Synthetic.
Artificial Intelligence
When you see… Find the zeros You think….
Before Between After.
Subtraction: Adding UP
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
1 hi at no doifpi me be go we of at be do go hi if me no of pi we Inorder Traversal Inorder traversal. n Visit the left subtree. n Visit the node. n Visit.
Speak Up for Safety Dr. Susan Strauss Harassment & Bullying Consultant November 9, 2012.
1 Titre de la diapositive SDMO Industries – Training Département MICS KERYS 09- MICS KERYS – WEBSITE.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
FIGURE 12-1 Op-amp symbols and packages.
Converting a Fraction to %
Numerical Analysis 1 EE, NCKU Tien-Hao Chang (Darby Chang)
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Clock will move after 1 minute
famous photographer Ara Guler famous photographer ARA GULER.
PSSA Preparation.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter 11 Simple Linear Regression.
Physics for Scientists & Engineers, 3rd Edition
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Copyright Tim Morris/St Stephen's School
1.step PMIT start + initial project data input Concept Concept.
1 Dr. Scott Schaefer Least Squares Curves, Rational Representations, Splines and Continuity.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Presentation transcript:

Optimization of AV and VV Delays Lumax 540 CRM Training and Education Optimization of AV and VV Delays

Optimization of BiV Pacing A-V Delay V-V Delay

AV Delay Optimization Goals Ensure BiV pacing Improve diastolic filling Reduce mitral regurgitation Cardiac Output 

AV Delay Optimization AV too long Close to intrinsic PR (fusion) Loss of CRT AV too short Premature mitral valve closure Hemodynamic compromise

AV Delay Optimization Methods Empirical Calculation Echocardiography Pulse pressure

AV Delay Optimization Aortic Pressure in percent LV dP/dtmax RV LV BiV Aortic Pressure in percent LV dP/dtmax in percent 16 24 12 18 8 12 4 6 PR - 30 ms PR - 30 ms -4 -6 -12 -8 A-V Delay A-V Delay Auricchio et al., Circulation 1999

AV Delay Optimization Calculation (PR interval) - 30 ms AVopt = 2 Example for As-Vs = 220 ms AVopt = (220-30)/2 = 95 ms Auricchio et al., Circulation 1999

AV Delay Optimization Limitations of Calculation Methods LV lead in anterior vein RBBB Intrinsic PR > 300 ms AV block II°/III°

AV Delay Optimization Doppler Echocardiography Flow Velocity at Mitral Valve Aortic Velocity Time Integral

Echocardiography 4 Chamber View Apical Position

Apical 4-Chamber View

Doppler-Echocardiography Fd = Doppler frequency f0 = Ultrasound frequency (e.g., 2.4 MHz) V = Blood flow velocity  = Angle between sound beam and direction of blood flow c = Speed of sound in human tissue (1,530 m/s) 2 V cos  Fd = f0 c

Doppler-Echocardiography Blood flow velocity Spectral analysis 1.5 1.0 0.5

Mitral Valve Doppler Echo LV Ejection Filling ECG Doppler Sample Volume

Pulsed Wave Doppler Echo 4 Chamber View E/A Ratio Mitral Valve

Pulsed Wave Doppler Echo ECG E A Velocity (cm/s) Time (50mm/s)

AV Delay Optimization Doppler Echo Transmitral Flow Velocity  LV filling pressure E wave Early diastolic passive filling of the left ventricle A wave Late diastolic active filling of the left ventricle  atrial contribution

Normal Heart Cycle R P T P P Q S A A A E IVC IVR E IVC IVR E Aortic Flow Aortic Flow Isovolumic Contraction Isovolumic Relaxation LVFT Left Ventricular Filling Time

Left Bundle Branch Block R1 R2 R1 R2 P Q T T A A A A E

LBBB: Late MV Closure R1 R2 R1 R2 P Q T P P Mitral Valve Closure MVC A IVC* IVC* Aortic Valve Opening AVO * IVC = Isovolumic Contraction

LBBB: Late End of LV Systole R1 R2 R1 R2 P Q T P P MVC MVC A A A IVC IVC Aortic Flow Aortic Flow AVO Aortic Valve Closure Ejection LV Systole

LBBB: Late Start of LV Filling R1 R2 R1 R2 P Q T P Q T P MVC MVO* A A A IVC IVR* Aortic Flow Aortic Flow AVO AVC * MVO = Mitral Valve Opening ** IVR = Isovolumic Relaxation

LBBB: Fusion of E and A R1 R2 R1 R2 P Q T P Q T P A A A E E E Aortic Flow Aortic Flow Short LV Filling Time 250 ms at HR 65/min

LBBB: Resynchronization R1 R2 R1 R2 P Q T P Q T P MVC A A A E IVC IVR E E Aortic Flow Aortic Flow Pre Ejection Period (PEP)

Biventricular Pacing BiV BiV BiV AVD T T P P P MVC MVC A A A E IVC E Aortic Flow Aortic Flow Pro- longed LV Filling Time PEP 325 ms at HR 65/min

AV Optimization Short AV Delay Long AV Delay Ritter Formula Forced MVC QA QA A wave truncation Spontaneous MVC A A E E Ritter Formula

AVopt = AVshort + [(AVlong - AVshort) - (QAshort - QAlong)] AV Delay Optimization Ritter Formula "The Difference of the Differences" AVopt = AVshort + [(AVlong - AVshort) - (QAshort - QAlong)] Programmed AV Delays AVshort = short AV (25% of PR) AVlong = long AV (75% of PR) Measured QA Intervals QAshort = QA at short AV QAlong = QA at long AV Ritter et al., PACE 1995

Transmitral Flow At short AV delay AVshort = 50 ms QAshort = 128 ms Begin Q A E 128 ms

Transmitral Flow At long A-V delay AVlong = 160 ms QAlong = 48 ms Q A

AV Delay Optimization Result Programmed AV Delays AVshort = 50 ms AVlong = 160 ms Measured QA Intervals QAshort = 128 ms QAlong = 48 ms "The Difference of the Differences" AVopt = AVshort + [(AVlong - AVshort) - (QAshort - QAlong)] AVopt = 50 + [(160-50)-(128 - 48)] = 50 + (110 - 80) AVopt = 80 ms

AV Delay Optimization Short AV Long AV Optimal AV

AV Delay Optimization Doppler Echocardiography Flow Velocity at Mitral Valve Aortic Velocity Time Integral

Doppler Echo Apical Five Chamber View

Doppler Echo Aortic Flow Velocity Kruck, Biamino 1988

Aortic Flow Velocity LBBB A A A Aortic Flow Aortic Flow Time Velocity

Aortic Flow Velocity Biventricular Pacing AVD A E Aortic Flow Aortic Time Velocity

Velocity Time Integral Integral = Area under the curve VTI = AVO AVC V * dt (cm) Fehske 1988

Velocity Time Integral Ejection time Time vmax vmean Vmax = 1.58 m/s Vmean = 1.09 m/s ET = 288 ms VTI = Vmean * ET VTI = 0.31 m Velocity (m/s) ECG

AV Delay Optimization Velocity Time Integral VTI = 12.7 cm Dr. Uhrig, Vivantes Urban Hospital Berlin

VTI Method Derived Parameters Stroke Volume SV = VTI * A VTI = Velocity Time Integral A = Aortic Valve Area Cardiac Output CO = SV * HR HR = Heart Rate Fehske 1988

VTI Method Objective Identify optimal AV delay at max. VTI Procedure CW Doppler of aortic outflow tract Decrement AV delay by 20 ms down to ≥ 80 ms Limitations Doppler signal quality Breathing modulations Intrinsic error 10 - 15%

AV Delay Optimization 30 Pts. after CRT implantation NYHA III-IV, LVEF < 35%, SR BiV on atrial sensed beats AV optimization on LV dp/dt max Comparison to Ritter formula, diastolic filling time (DFT), LV VTI, E/A VTI Jansen et al., Am J Cardiol 2006

LV dP/dt max LV Pressure (mmHg) dP/dt (mmHg/s) Jansen et al., Am J Cardiol 2006

Compliance with LV dP/dt max. measurements Good Good to reasonable % Jansen et al., Am J Cardiol 2006

AV Delay Optimization Methods Empirical Calculation Echocardiography Pulse pressure

Pulse Pressure Method Objective Identify AV delay that provides maximal difference between systolic and diastolic blood pressure Procedure Arterial line to measure central aortic pressure accurately

Pulse Pressure Method Intrinsic Paced Pressure P Vp Time Pressure P R Aorta LV PEP Time Auricchio et al., PACE 1998

Pulse Pressure Method BiV Pacing 110 Aortic Pressure (mmHg) 85 60 LV IEGM Time (s) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

AV Delay Optimization Summary Pulse pressure: hemodynamic testing Calculation: initial programming Doppler Echo: non-responders

Optimization of BiV Pacing A-V Delay V-V Delay

V-V Delay Optimization AV AV AV AS AS AS VV VV LVP RVP LVP RVP RVP LVP VV = 0 LV first RV first

V-V Optimization 41 pts. with CHF after CRT-PM AV delay optimization RV-/LV pre-activation: 0, 12, 20, 40, 80 ms Endpoints: Cardiac output, mitral regurgitation from echo Bordachar et al., JACC 2004

V-V Optimization Echocardiographic Parameters M-mode: septal-to-posterior wall motion delay (SPWMD) Doppler: Interventricular mechenical delay (IVMD) Tissue Doppler: Intra LV delay onset (LV onset) Intra LV delay peak (LV peak) SD from 12 segments intra LV delay peak (SD LV peak)) Delayed longitudinal contraction (DLC) Bordachar et al., JACC 2004

V-V Optimization Correlation to Hemodynamics Cardiac Output Mitral Regurgitation Parameter LV peak SD LV peak LV onset DLC SPWMD IVMD -0.67 -0.64 -0.48 -0.41 -0.24 0.68 0.63 0.51 0.24 0.06 Bordachar et al., JACC 2004

V-V Optimization 41 CHF pts. with CRT-PM No. of pts. 80 40 20 12 12 20 12 20 40 80 ms LV first RV first Bordachar et al., JACC 2004

V-V Optimization 166 DCM pts. with CRT (Doppler Echo) No. of pts. 80 At Implant 3 months No. of pts. 80 40 20 20 40 80 ms LV first RV first Delurgio et al., NASPE 2002

V-V Optimization V-V Optimization van Gelder et al., Am J Cardiol 2004 AF SR ischemic SR non-ischemic V-V Optimization van Gelder et al., Am J Cardiol 2004

Optimizing BiV Pacing

Optimizing BiV Pacing RV only LV only BiV BiV LV first I V1

Optimizing V-V Delay Summary Start with standard setting VV optimization in patients with persistent dyssynchrony Trouble shooting option in clinical non-responders

Optimization of BiV Pacing A-V Delay V-V Delay