05/19/04 1 A Lessons Learned Process Celebrate the Successes Learn From the Woes Natalie Scott, PMP Sr. Project Manager.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

Learning from Events 12th June 2013 The Tata Steel Approach
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
My AmeriCorps Release 3 State Commissions and Programs User Roles and Management – Implementing Presentation developed for the Corporation for National.
FIS Enterprise Solutions EPK/EPM Implementation
PROJECT MANAGEMENT BASICS
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 38.
1 Chapter 40 - Physiology and Pathophysiology of Diuretic Action Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Chapter 1 Image Slides Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
My AmeriCorps Release 3 AmeriCorps National Programs User Roles and Management – Implementing Presentation developed for the Corporation for National and.
2 Session Objectives Increase participant understanding of effective financial monitoring based upon risk assessments of sub-grantees Increase participant.
Lisa Brown and Charles Thomas LAWNET 2002 Taking the Mystery Out of Project Management.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
Copyright © 2012 California Department of Education, Child Development Division with WestEd Center for Child & Family Studies, Desired Results T&TA Project.
Human Performance Improvement Process
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
Leading for High Performance. PKR, Inc., for Cedar Rapids 10/04 2 Everythings Up-to-Date in Cedar Rapids! Working at classroom, building, and district.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Making the System Operational
Around the World AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision.
ZMQS ZMQS
Niagara Portal Introduction January 2007 Scott Muench - Technical Sales Manager.
Performance Management and Appraisal
Special Education Survey Barnstable Public Schools September 17 – October 2, 2012.
1 Kentuckys Public Safety Awareness Initiative Program Coordination and Partnerships August 23, 2005.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Fact-finding Techniques Transparencies
Board Self-Assessment: May 2013 Benchmark Report NCMA Governance Committee Penny White, Chair.
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
1 Division of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) Knowledge Management and Transfer Project 7/30/12.
ABC Technology Project
© S Haughton more than 3?
15. Oktober Oktober Oktober 2012.
ODOT’s Public Involvement Process PI and the Project Development Process Minimum PI Requirements.
Developing a Public Involvement Plan Why Develop a PI Plan? PI Plan Format Public Involvement Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental.
Leadership ®. T EAM STEPPS 05.2 Mod Page 2 Leadership ® 2 Objectives Describe different types of team leaders Describe roles and responsibilities.
Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting your organization’s logo –“View”
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
We are learning how to read the 24 hour clock
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
QualTech Prize Finals 1www.qimpro.com. QualTech Prize Finals Managing for Improvement vs Managing for Innovation.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
SIMOCODE-DP Software.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Quality Assurance and Quality Control Skill Sets:
1 K. C. Lo / L. M. Chow Power Systems Business Group CLP Power Knowledge Management in CLP Power Oct 2004.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
Module 13 Unified Command Module 13 Unified Command Origin of Unified Command Origin of Unified Command Description of Unified Command Description of Unified.
Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Chapter The Future of Training and Development.
Project Kick-off Meeting > > Presented By: > >
May 22, 2000AIHCE Orlando May 20-25, Integrated Safety Management (ISM) and Public Involvement A Tool to Build Public Trust With ES&H Management.
Chapter 14 Fraud Risk Assessment.
Presentation transcript:

05/19/04 1 A Lessons Learned Process Celebrate the Successes Learn From the Woes Natalie Scott, PMP Sr. Project Manager

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03 Agenda Case Study Project Scope Lessons Learned Objectives Approach Methodology Lessons Learned Process Lessons Learned Tools

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03 Case Study Project Scope Large Project Two+ Years Multi-Department Participation Across Multiple Releases Case Study included >70 Resources Within Two Releases

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03 Lessons Learned Objectives To provide insights to project dynamics in order to execute projects more efficiently and effectively To provide opportunities for team members to share their views of project execution To provide a review of technique and approach that serves as a guide for future projects

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03 Approach Methodology Individual interviews with Management Team, Test/QA Management, and Business Department Heads Discussion groups with project participants from Information Systems and Business Departments Surveys of Project participants No contractor participation

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03 Lessons Learned Participants Discussion Groups – 2 groups with total of 24 participants 1:1 Steering Committee/Management Team Interviews - 11 Anonymous Surveys - 38

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03 Lessons Learned Process 1.Meet with Program Office Director to determine if formal Lessons Learned Sessions are appropriate for project. 2. Assign Project Manager to facilitate Lessons Learned Sessions Not the PM who led the project Training and/or experience with process

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03 Process 3.Confirm stakeholder groups within I/S, Business Units, & Executive Management. 4.Schedule Lessons Learned sessions. 5.Provide history, context, other info to Lessons Learned Project Manager

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03 Process 6.Facilitate Lessons Learned Sessions 7.Conduct Executive/Management individual interviews 8.Compile results from sessions, interviews, and anonymous surveys.

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03 Process 9.Present to Program Office Director and Executive Sponsors. 10.Provide feedback to project team. 11.Enter Lessons Learned documentation into Lessons Learned database.

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03 Executive Interview Perceived project scope Team construction Vendor management Interaction with business departments Project team/organizational dynamics Project reporting and communication Training and support Systems implementation Things that went right What could have happened better Suggested best practices

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03 Anonymous Project Surveys Surveys were developed and distributed to each of the participant groups (IS, Business Depts., Management) Anonymous survey had nine fixed and three open-ended questions Objective was to provide overall “feel” for project success and to provide additional avenues for feedback.

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03 Survey Question Examples Questions rated on scale from 1-5: The project was a success in that it met the requirements for compliance. The project helped our business operate more efficiently. Contractors provided needed knowledge and expertise. IS provided the necessary resources for project success.

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03 Survey Question Examples 5.The right resources were assigned at the right time to implement the system. 6.The project team was focused and worked well together as a team. 7.The system was properly tested before being put into production. 8.System support staff were well trained prior to implementing the system. 9.Users were well trained prior to implementing the system.

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03 Survey Question Examples Open ended questions: Three things on the project you considered a success Three things on the project that can be improved in future projects Personal success you are taking away from the project The one area that needs the most improvement

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03 Survey Data – Charted

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03 Lessons Learned Session Questionnaire Questions rated on scale from 1-5: 1.Session was well organized and made good use of the meeting time available 2.Ample opportunity to present concerns and suggestions 3.Session will help future projects Open ended questions: Best part of session Part of session that could be better Comments

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03 Lessons Learned Session Survey 20 surveys returned Scale 1-5  Session was well organized  Ample opportunity to present concerns  Session will help future projects Avg

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03 What Did We Learn About the Process? Large resource commitment Neutral PM gets better results Requires follow-up commitment

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03

05/19/ /21/0311/21/03