Iran’s Nuclear Program: Status and Implications Olli Heinonen Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 19 November, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nuclear Forensics Project Development Eileen S. Vergino Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Advertisements

Fundamentals of Nuclear Power. Nuclear Fission We convert mass into energy by breaking large atoms (usually Uranium) into smaller atoms. Note the increases.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency V. Cisar Division of Concepts and Planning Practical Exercises on the Establishment of the SSAC at the State Level.
Verification and Compliance Aspects Trevor Findlay.
Oh, I almost forgot, it packs a 150 to 170 kiloton nuclear punch It’s about the size of an office trash can Let’s start with a modern nuclear.
Session 3.1 Overview of the Additional Protocol
Status of Iran’s Nuclear Program and Negotiations David Albright ISIS November 3, 2013 Nuclear Weapon Issues in the 21st Century Sponsored by the American.
Determining the Irreducible Elements of an Interim Agreement with Iran: A Freeze Plus David Albright ISIS November 5, 2013.
Laser Isotope Separation – The Genie is out of the Bottle Olli Heinonen Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs John F. Kennedy School of Government.
Nuclear Fuel, Uranium Enrichment, Fuel Fabrication, MOX Seminar on Nuclear Science and Technology for Diplomats P. Adelfang (+)Division of Nuclear Fuel.
Oslo, 4 March 2005Managing Nuclear Material Stockpiles in the 21 st Century 1 Nuclear Material Security and Multilateral Agreements Stephan Klement Office.
1 Cindy Boggs Argonne National Laboratory Megatons to Megawatts: An Overview of the U.S. – Russia Highly Enriched Uranium Transparency Program.
CRS 7/14/2015 # 1 LLNL This work was partially performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy by the University of California, Lawrence Livermore.
Indian strategy for management of spent fuel from Nuclear Power Reactors S.Basu, India.
Arguments Against Nuclear Power Development in Iran May, 2003.
 A nuclear reactor produces and controls the release of energy from splitting the atoms of certain elements. In a nuclear power reactor, the energy released.
“ Second Moscow International Nonproliferation Conference PLUTONIUM UTILIZATION IN REACTOR FUEL A. Zrodnikov Director General State Scientific Center of.
Iran’s Nuclear Program: Competing Narratives, Hard Choices August 29, 2012.
Instilling rigor and imagination in analysis Countering the Iranian Nuclear Threat Stuxnet and its Broader Implications Randolph H. Pherson Mary C. Boardman.
Foreign Obligations and Annual Inventories Jessica Norles Savannah River National Laboratory.
Japan’s Nuclear Energy Program
Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy
South Africa – Verification Lessons Learned from the Dismantled Nuclear Weapons Programme Olli Heinonen Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.
Fuel Cycle – High Level Waste Disposal
Stephen Dembek, Section Chief Export Controls and International Organizations Section Office of International Programs Contact Info: ,
Anita Nilsson Director, Office of Nuclear Security
Complex Approach to Study Physical Features of Uranium Multiple Recycling in Light Water Reactors A.A. Dudnikov, V.A. Nevinitsa, A.V. Chibinyaev, V.N.
PBNC- 1 Overview of US Nuclear Energy Initiatives /06- 1 Harold McFarlane President American Nuclear Society.
Nuclear Power Plants. History of nuclear power 1938– Scientists study Uranium nucleus 1941 – Manhattan Project begins 1942 – Controlled nuclear chain.
 Principles of nuclear energy  Fission reactions  Nuclear reactor  Nuclear power plants.
Origins of International Safeguards Fred Wehling Center for Nonproliferation Studies Monterey Institute of International Studies Thanks to: NNSA NA-243.
Security threats in the Middle East and Northern Africa: the problem of weapons of mass destruction proliferation Dr. Vladimir A. Orlov President, PIR.
OVER 40 YEARS ON THE WORLD MARKET Over 40 Years at the World Market «New Russian initiatives in the nuclear energy and the global nuclear renaissance»
The Impact of Sanctions on Iran By Vinayak Ganeshan and Matt Nguyen Research Staff.
Assessment of Iran’s Nuclear Program Press Event Tuesday, September 14, 2004 Dr. Charles D. Ferguson Science and Technology Fellow.
U.S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School The U.S. Army’s Special Operations Center of Excellence The overall classification of this.
Nuclear Fuel Cycle.  According to World Nuclear Association:  The nuclear fuel cycle is the series of industrial processes which involve the production.
Fundamentals of Nuclear Power. Nuclear Power Plants Nuclear power is generated using Uranium, which is a metal mined in various parts of the world. Some.
The Nuclear Fuel Cycle Mary Lou Dunzik-Gougar, PhD ANS Teachers’ Workshop 2014.
Samin Mohebbi IRANIAN NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROGRAM. NUCLEAR WEAPONS About 12,000 nuclear weapons are deployed in 14 states. Five states: New Mexico, Georgia,
Technical summary of DPRK nuclear program Siegfried S. Hecker Stanford University Center for International Security and Cooperation 2005 Carnegie International.
Just Enough about Nuclear Power Jerry Peterson Professor of Physics.
Chapter 11 Nuclear Power  Energy released in combustion reactions comes from changes in the chemical bonds that hold the atom together.  Nuclear Energy.
US-DPRK Next Steps Workshop January 27, 2003Washington, D.C. Yongbyon Spent Fuel Experience Presented by Mark Mohr
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Milestones in the development of a national infrastructure for nuclear power The Nuclear Security dimension Technical.
The safeguards activities for LWRs with MOX in Japan - Remote data-driven safeguards - YATSU Shoichi Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and.
The Nuclear Fuel industry The nuclear fuel cycle.
The State Evaluation Process Therese Renis Section Head Division of Operations B Department of Safeguards 08 February 2007.
The Procurement Channel and the Procurement Working Group of the Joint Commission February 2016RELEX, Brussels1.
The Uranium Fuel Cycle Robert Tsai November 21, 2006.
Nuclear Safety & Security in the DPRK Sharon Squassoni Senior Fellow & Director Proliferation Prevention Program Asan Institute “The 2012 US-North Korea.
Nuclear Energy. Nuclear Fission We convert mass into energy by breaking large atoms (usually Uranium) into smaller atoms. Note the increases in binding.
1 Sixth ROK-UN Conference on Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Issues 3-5 December 2007 CONTROLLING SENSITIVE NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE ACTIVITIES Mr Jeff Robinson,
Iran has rejected a proposal to have much of its low-enriched uranium converted into fuel abroad and has suggested an alternative. Countries want Iran.
THE NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE. The Nuclear Fuel Cycle consists of sequence of steps in which U ore is mined, milled, enriched, and fabricated into nuclear fuel.
Russia and Iran’s Nuclear Program M.A. in Nonproliferation Studies
A Fissile Materials Cut-off Treaty: french views
What does it take for the DPRK to be a nuclear threat?
Mary Lou Dunzik-Gougar, PhD ANS Teachers’ Workshop 2013
Japan’s Nuclear Energy Program
Thomas MAZOUR IAEA, Div of Nuclear Power/NPES
Presentation on nuclear power
Safeguards Milestones
The Nuclear Weapons Convention
Legal and Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Installations in IRAN
GNI Advanced Reactors Security Analysis & Findings
Current Status of Iran’s Nuclear Program
Integration Modeling to Decipher a Fuel Cycle
Deterrence Below The Weapons Threshold Cristina Varriale
Fundamentals of Nuclear Power
Presentation transcript:

Iran’s Nuclear Program: Status and Implications Olli Heinonen Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 19 November, 2013

Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities Mining Gcchine Saghand Milling Gcchine Ardakan Conversion Isfahan Enrichment Natanz Fordow Fuel Fabrication Isfahan Reactors TRR Bushehr IR-40 Others, planned

Nuclear Infrastructure Iran has not adhered to the resolutions of the UN Security Council, but continued to build the nuclear program including the supporting infrastructure - Iran continues to manufacture centrifuges and their components - Iran is increasing the production of key raw materials (zirconium, heavy water, high strength aluminum), but depending still on imports (maraging steel, instrumentation) The net result: Iran is increasing its nuclear capabilities, but the international community knows less about them

20 % UF6 Is Not Medium Enriched Uranium

Production of Weapons Grade Material Production of 1 Significant Quantity (SQ) of weapons grade uranium from natural uranium requires about 5000 Separative Work Unit (SWU) of enrichment effort SQ-- The approximate quantity of nuclear material required to manufacture the first nuclear weapon taking into account the manufacturing losses.

Nuclear Material Stockpiles Current stock of UF6 - Natural uranium ca 425 metric tons % enriched uranium ca 7.1. metric tons - 20 % enriched uranium ca 200 kg Quantity of concern - 10 metric tons metric tons kg

Enrichment Capacity Natanz and Fordow IR-1 centrifuges Natanz 1000 IR-2m centrifuges Total number of centrifuges and rotors produced and their locations are not known

Break out Scenarios There are various scenarios available starting with feeding of natural, 3-5 % or 20 % enriched UF6, in Natanz, Fordow, or elsewhere to produce weapons grade, 90 % enriched uranium.

Break out Times for 90 % UF6 Examples of scenarios - Use all current centrifuges in Natanz and Fordow with natural uranium - Use all current centrifuges in Natanz and Fordow with 3-5 % uranium - Use 6000 IR-1 centrifuges as tandem cascades with 20 % uranium - Use 3000 IR-2ms at an unknown location Time required for one SQ 6 months 2 months 2 weeks 1-2 weeks

Need for Enriched Uranium Bushehr LWR has a contract for fuel with the Russians - annual reload 20 tons 4 % enriched uranium - requires IR-1 centrifuges to produce - requires yellow cake imports Tehran Research Reactor - 20 years ago Iran imported about 120 kg 20 % enriched fuel, which is close to being consumed - Iran has produced 410 kg 20 % enriched UF6 ( 274 kg uranium) Iran states that it plans for four additional research reactors, but has not disclosed details Iran plans to build additional LWRs, but no plans disclosed

When the IAEA Rings Bells ? IAEA inspects Fordow and Natanz every one or two weeks Uranium stocks ( natural, 3-5 % and 20 %) in Isfahan are inspected less frequently; monthly IAEA cannot provide assurances that all facilities and nuclear materials in Iran have been submitted to safeguards IAEA does not have knowledge how much “yellow cake” has been produced in Iran, and where these materials are IAEA does not have knowledge about the number of centrifuges produced

Add Time to Uranium Clock Action at known locations - Ship all 20 % uranium out - Convert all 20 % uranium to oxide form - Convert all 3-5 % uranium to oxide form (cannot be done in next 3 months) - Ship all 3-5 % and 20 % out - Allow a limited enrichment capability, 3000 IR-1 or 3000 SWU Time gained - 2 months - > 1 month - > 2 months - 6 months - > 1 month depending how much 3-5 % and 20 % UF6 stocks left

More Leash to the IAEA From the beginning of the interim agreement Iran to declare all the centrifuge rotors manufactured and their current location IAEA allowed to monitor rotors and their manufacturing All nuclear material (UF6, oxides) in Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan under IAEA remote monitoring Iran to declared and allow the IAEA to monitor yellow cake

The Heavy Water Reactor Program The IR-40 reactor will be commissioned in Ill suited for isotope production though claimed to replace Tehran Research Reactor. Will be able to produce plutonium enough for one nuclear device/year. Plutonium available earliest in 2016/17, but requires a reprocessing plant to be built.

Add Time to Plutonium Clock Suspend the construction of the IR-40 Suspend production of fuel for the IR-40 Place the key components and materials of IR-40 under the IAEA monitoring (heavy water, fuel loading machine, pumps of the primary circuit)

The Stakes Are high It is not only about Iran, but the credibility of the nonproliferation regime and the authority of the UN Security Council are being tested When looking at the past experiences a comprehensive initial declaration is essential for the success of the interim agreement