GRETTIA A variational formulation for higher order macroscopic traffic flow models of the GSOM family J.P. Lebacque UPE-IFSTTAR-GRETTIA Le Descartes 2,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASME-PVP Conference - July
Advertisements

1 Analysis of Random Mobility Models with PDE's Michele Garetto Emilio Leonardi Politecnico di Torino Italy MobiHoc Firenze.
Christopher Batty and Robert Bridson University of British Columbia
2ª aula Evolution Equation. The Finite Volume Method.
Linear-Quadratic Model Predictive Control for Urban Traffic Networks
Modelling tools - MIKE11 Part1-Introduction
Level set based Image Segmentation Hang Xiao Jan12, 2013.
Urban Network Gridlock: Theory, Characteristics, and Dynamics Hani Mahmassani, Meead Saberi, Ali Zockaie The 20th International Symposium on Transportation.
Hamiltonian Formalism
Design Constraints for Liquid-Protected Divertors S. Shin, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, M. Yoda and ARIES Team G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Atlanta,
Traffic flow on networks: conservation laws models Daniel WORK, UC Berkeley Benedetto PICCOLI, IAC-CNR.
Session: Computational Wave Propagation: Basic Theory Igel H., Fichtner A., Käser M., Virieux J., Seriani G., Capdeville Y., Moczo P.  The finite-difference.
Analytical derivations of merge capacity: a multilane approach Ludovic Leclercq 1,2, Florian Marczak 1, Victor L. Knoop 2, Serge P. Hoogendoorn 2 1 Université.
Outline Introduction Continuous Solution Shock Wave Shock Structure
Universidad de La Habana Lectures 5 & 6 : Difference Equations Kurt Helmes 22 nd September - 2nd October, 2008.
1 MECH 221 FLUID MECHANICS (Fall 06/07) Tutorial 6 FLUID KINETMATICS.
Traffic flow on networks Benedetto Piccoli Istituto per le Applicazioni del Calcolo “Mauro Picone” – CNR – Roma Joint work with G. Bretti, Y. Chitour,
Mechanics.
Freeway Segment Traffic State Estimation
Atmospheric turbulence Richard Perkins Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides et d’Acoustique Université de Lyon CNRS – EC Lyon – INSA Lyon – UCBL 36, avenue.
Temperature Gradient Limits for Liquid-Protected Divertors S. I. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting (June 2004) G. W. Woodruff School of.
Computations of Fluid Dynamics using the Interface Tracking Method Zhiliang Xu Department of Mathematics University of Notre.
CE 1501 CE 150 Fluid Mechanics G.A. Kallio Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Mechatronic Engineering & Manufacturing Technology California State University,
PDE control using viability and reachability analysis Alexandre Bayen Jean-Pierre Aubin Patrick Saint-Pierre Philadelphia, March 29 th, 2004.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. A Case Study in Colorado Springs Comparative Fidelity of Alternative Traffic Flow Models at the Corridor Level 15.
Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations CAAM 452 Spring 2005 Lecture 9 Instructor: Tim Warburton.
Workshop on “Irrigation Channels and Related Problems” Variation of permeability parameters in Barcelona networks Workshop on “Irrigation Channels and.
If the shock wave tries to move to right with velocity u 1 relative to the upstream and the gas motion upstream with velocity u 1 to the left  the shock.
On The Generation Mechanisms of Stop-Start Waves in Traffic Flow
P. Ackerer, IMFS, Barcelona About Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Elements P. Ackerer, A. Younès Institut de Mécanique des Fluides et des Solides,
Tutorial 5: Numerical methods - buildings Q1. Identify three principal differences between a response function method and a numerical method when both.
Characteristics of Transitions in Freeway Traffic By Manasa Rayabhari Soyoung Ahn.
GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF BRANE KINEMATICS AND DYNAMICS Introduction Strings, branes, geometric principle, background independence Brane space M (brane kinematics)
BsysE595 Lecture Basic modeling approaches for engineering systems – Summary and Review Shulin Chen January 10, 2013.
A PPLIED M ECHANICS Lecture 02 Slovak University of Technology Faculty of Material Science and Technology in Trnava.
A cell-integrated semi-Lagrangian dynamical scheme based on a step-function representation Eigil Kaas, Bennert Machenhauer and Peter Hjort Lauritzen Danish.
Spectral Decomposition of Open Channel Flow Xavier Litrico (Cemagref, UMR G-EAU, Montpellier) with Vincent Fromion (INRA MIG, Jouy-en-Josas)
Statistical Description of Charged Particle Beams and Emittance Measurements Jürgen Struckmeier HICforFAIR Workshop.
Prof. dr. A. Achterberg, Astronomical Dept., IMAPP, Radboud Universiteit.
7. Introduction to the numerical integration of PDE. As an example, we consider the following PDE with one variable; Finite difference method is one of.
Three-Body Scattering Without Partial Waves Hang Liu Charlotte Elster Walter Glöckle.
Stress constrained optimization using X-FEM and Level Set Description
Some Aspects of the Godunov Method Applied to Multimaterial Fluid Dynamics Igor MENSHOV 1,2 Sergey KURATOV 2 Alexander ANDRIYASH 2 1 Keldysh Institute.
HT-splitting method for the Riemann problem of multicomponent two phase flow in porous media Anahita ABADPOUR Mikhail PANFILOV Laboratoire d'Énergétique.
Quality of model and Error Analysis in Variational Data Assimilation François-Xavier LE DIMET Victor SHUTYAEV Université Joseph Fourier+INRIA Projet IDOPT,
Exact and grid-free solutions to the Lighthill–Whitham– Richards traffic flow model with bounded acceleration Christian Claudel Assistant professor, Civil,
A New Traffic Kinetic Model Considering Potential Influence Shoufeng Lu Changsha University of Science and Technology.
Dr. R. Nagarajan Professor Dept of Chemical Engineering IIT Madras
Masakiyo Kitazawa ( Osaka U. ) Diffusion of Non-Gaussianity in Heavy Ion Collisions MK, Asakawa, Ono, arXiv: SQM, Birmingham, 23, July 2013.
STATIC ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAIN STRUCTURES USING INTERVAL EIGENVALUE DECOMPOSITION Mehdi Modares Tufts University Robert L. Mullen Case Western Reserve University.
V.M. Sliusar, V.I. Zhdanov Astronomical Observatory, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Observatorna str., 3, Kiev Ukraine
Environmental Hydrodynamics Lab. Yonsei University, KOREA RCEM D finite element modeling of bed elevation change in a curved channel S.-U. Choi,
Topic Overview and Study Checklist. From Chapter 7 in the white textbook: Modeling with Differential Equations basic models exponential logistic modified.
Weihua Gu Department of Electrical Engineering The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Bus and Car Delays at Near-Side/Far-Side Stops.
Traffic Simulation L2 – Introduction to simulation Ing. Ondřej Přibyl, Ph.D.
Traffic variables as function of space and time ! ! !
A hyperbolic model for viscous fluids First numerical examples
Continuum Mechanics (MTH487)
Modeling of Traffic Flow Problems
Times in Quantum Kinetic Equations
Non-recurrent Congestion & Potential Solutions
Ensemble variance loss in transport models:
Digital Control Systems (DCS)
Prof. dr. A. Achterberg, Astronomical Dept
Objective Numerical methods Finite volume.
Jeroen van der Gun Adam Pel Bart van Arem
Continuous Systems and Fields
Shock Wave Analysis Definition: Flow-speed-density states change over space and time. When these changes of state occur, a boundary is established that.
High Accuracy Schemes for Inviscid Traffic Models
Anthony D. Fick & Dr. Ali Borhan Governing Equations
Presentation transcript:

GRETTIA A variational formulation for higher order macroscopic traffic flow models of the GSOM family J.P. Lebacque UPE-IFSTTAR-GRETTIA Le Descartes 2, 2 rue de la Butte Verte F93166 Noisy-le-Grand, France M.M. Khoshyaran E.T.C. Economics Traffic Clinic 34 Avenue des Champs-Elysées, 75008, Paris, France ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 Outline of the presentation 1. Basics 2. GSOM models 3. Lagrangian Hamilton-Jacobi and variational interpretation of GSOM models 4. Analysis, analytic solutions 5. Numerical solution schemes

GRETTIA Scope The GSOM model is close to the LWR model It is nearly as simple (non trivial explicit solutions fi) But it accounts for driver variability (attributes) More scope for lagrangian modeling, driver interaction, individual properties Admits a variational formulation Expected benefits: numerical schemes, data assimilation ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA The LWR model ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 The LWR model in a nutshell (notations) Introduced by Lighthill, Whitham (1955), Richards (1956) The equations: Or:

GRETTIA Solution of the inhomogeneous Riemann problem Analytical solutions, boundary conditions, node modeling ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 Density Position

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 The LWR model: supply / demand the equilibrium supply and demand functions ( Lebacque, ) Demand Supply

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 The LWR model: the min formula The local supply and demand: The min formula Usage: numerical schemes, boundary conditions → intersection modeling

GRETTIA Inhomogeneous Riemann problem (discontinuous FD) Solution with Min formula Can be recovered by the variational formulation of LWR (Imbert Monneau Zidani 2013) ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 Time Position (a ) (b ) (a,0 ) (b,0 )

GRETTIA GSOM models ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA GSOM (Generic second order modelling) models ( Lebacque, Mammar, Haj-Salem ) In a nutshell Kinematic waves = LWR Driver attribute dynamics Includes many current macroscopic models ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 GSOM Family: description Conservation of vehicles (density) Variable fundamental diagram, dependent on a driver attribute (possibly a vecteur) I Equation of evolution for I following vehicle trajectories (example: relaxation)

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 GSOM: basic equations Conservation des véhicules Dynamics of I along trajectories Variable fundamental Diagram

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 Example 0: LWR ( Lighthill, Whitham, Richards 1955, 1956 ) No driver attribute One conservation equation

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 Example 1: ARZ ( Aw,Rascle 2000, Zhang,2002 ) Lagrangien attribute I = difference between actual and mean equilibrium speed

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 Example 2: 1-phase Colombo model ( Colombo 2002, Lebacque Mammar Haj-Salem 2007 ) Variable FD (in the congested domain + critical density)  The attribute I is the parameter of the family of FDs Increasing values of I

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 Fundamental Diagram (speed- density)

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 Example 2 continued (1-phase Colombo model) 1-phase vs 2-phase: Flow-density FD modéle 1-phase modéle 2-phase

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 Example 3: Cremer- Papageorgiou Based on the Cremer- Papageorgiou FD ( Haj-Salem 2007 )

GRETTIA Example 4: « multi-commodity » models GSOM Model + advection (destinations, vehicle type) = multi-commodity GSOM ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Example 5: multi-lane model Impact of multi-lane traffic Two states: congestion (strongly correlated lanes) et fluid (weakly correlated lanes)  2 FDs separated by the phase boundary R(v) Relaxation towards each regime  eulerian source terms ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 Example 6: Stochastic GSOM ( Khoshyaran Lebacque ) Idea: Conservation of véhicles Fundamental Diagram depends on driver attribute I I is submitted to stochastic perturbations (other vehicles, traffic conditions, environment)

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 Two fundamental properties of the GSOM family (homogeneous piecewise constant case) 1. discontinuities of I propagate with the speed v of traffic flow 2. If the invariant I is initially piecewise constant, it stays so for all times t > 0 ⇒ On any domain on which I is uniform the GSOM model simplifies to a translated LWR model (piecewise LWR)

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 Inhomogeneous Riemann problem I = I l in all of sector (S) I = I r in all of sector (T) x  l v l  r v r FD l FD r

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 Generalized (translated) supply- Demand ( Lebacque Mammar Haj-Salem ) Example: ARZ model Translated Supply / Demand = supply resp demand for the « translated » FD (with resp to I )

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 Example of translated supply / demand: the ARZ family

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 Solution of the Riemann problem (summary) Define the upstream demand, the downstream supply (which depend on I l ): The intermediate state U m is given by The upstream demand and the downstream supply (as functions of initial conditions) : Min Formula:

GRETTIA Applications Analytical solutions Boundary conditions Intersection modeling Numerical schemes ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Lagrangian GSOM; HJ and variational interpretation ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Variational formulation of GSOM models Motivation Numerical schemes (grid-free cf Mazaré et al 2011) Data assimilation (floating vehicle / mobile data cf Claudel Bayen 2010) Advantages of variational principles Difficulty Theory complete for LWR (Newell, Daganzo, also Leclercq Laval for various representations ) Need of a unique value function ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Lagrangian conservation law Spacing r The rate of variation of spacing r depends on the gradient of speed with respect to vehicle index N ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 x t The spacing is the inverse of density r

GRETTIA Lagrangian version of the GSOM model Conservation law in lagrangian coordinates Driver attribute equation (natural lagrangian expression) We introduce the position of vehicle N: Note that: ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Lagrangian Hamilton-Jacobi formulation of GSOM ( Lebacque Khoshyaran 2012 ) Integrate the driver-attribute equation Solution: FD Speed becomes a function of driver, time and spacing ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Lagrangian Hamilton-Jacobi formulation of GSOM Expressing the velocity v as a function of the position X ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Associated optimization problem Define: Note implication: W concave with respect to r (ie flow density FD concave with respect to density Associated optimization problem ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Functions M and W ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Illustration of the optimization problem: Initial/boundary conditions: Blue: IC + trajectory of first vh Green: trajectories of vhs with GPS Red: cumulative flow on fixed detector ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 N t

GRETTIA Elements of resolution ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Characteristics Optimal curves  characteristics (Pontryagin) Note: speed of charcteristics: > 0 Boundary conditions ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Initial conditions for characteristics IC Vh trajectory ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 t N

GRETTIA Initial / boundary condition Usually two solutions r 0 (t ) ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013 t

GRETTIA Example: Interaction of a shockwave with a contact discontinuity Eulerian view ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Initial conditions: Top: eulerian Down: lagrangian ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Example: Interaction of a shockwave with a contact discontinuity Lagrangian view ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Another example: total refraction of characteristics and lagrangian supply ??? ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Decomposition property (inf-morphism) The set of initial/boundary conditions is union of several sets Calculate a partial solution (corresponding to a partial set of IBC) The solution is the min of partial solutions ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA The optimality pb can be solved on characteristics only This is a Lax-Hopf like formula Application: numerical schemes based on Piecewise constant data (including the system yielding I ) Decomposition of solutions based on decomposition of IBC Use characteristics to calculate partial solutions ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Numerical scheme based on characteristics (continued) If the initial condition on I is piecewise constant  the spacing along characteristics is piecewise constant Principle illustrated by the example: interaction between shockwave and contact discontinuity ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Alternate scheme: particle discretization Particle discretization of HJ Use charateristics Yields a Godunov-like scheme (in lagrangian coordinates) BC: Upstream demand and downstream supply conditions ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Numerical example Model: Colombo 1-phase, stochastic Process for I : Ornstein-Uhlenbeck, two levels (high at the beginning and end, low otherwise)  refraction of charateristics and waves Demand: Poisson, constant level Supply: high at the beginning and end, low otherwise  induces backwards propagation of congestion Particles: 5 vehicles Duration: 20 mn Length: 3500 m ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Downstream supply ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA I dynamics ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Particle trajectories ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Position of particles ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA Conclusion Directions for future work: Problem of concavity of FD Eulerian source terms Data assimilation pbs Efficient numerical schemes ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013

GRETTIA ISTTT 20, July 17-19, 2013