T HE D ATA A SSIMILATION S YSTEM IN THE ERA-20C R EANALYSIS ERA-20C: ERA-CLIM pilot reanalysis of the 20th-century using surface observations only Paul.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

Weather Forecasting This chapter discusses: 1.Various weather forecasting methods, their tools, and forecasting accuracy and skill 2.Images for the forecasting.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
1 Chapter 40 - Physiology and Pathophysiology of Diuretic Action Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
© Crown Copyright Source: Met Office Dale Barker, Tomas Landelius, Eric Bazile, Francesco Isotta, Phil Jones 17 April 2013 EURO4M – WP2: Regional.
Demands and expectations at SMHI on the European Reanalysis for observations and climate Per Und én Tomas Landelius SMHI.
Forecasting winter wheat yield in Ukraine using 3 different approaches
Nowcasting and Short Range NWP at the Australian Bureau of Meteorology
1 The GEMS production systems and retrospective reanalysis Adrian Simmons.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Extended range forecasts at MeteoSwiss: User experience.
Slide 1 The Wave Model ECMWF, Reading, UK. Slide 2The Wave Model (ECWAM) Resources: Lecture notes available at:
User Meeting 15 June 2005 Monthly Forecasting Frederic Vitart ECMWF, Reading, UK.
F. Prates Data Assimilation Training Course April Error Tracking F. Prates.
ECMWF Training Course 2005 slide 1 Forecast sensitivity to Observation Carla Cardinali.
Ensemble Data Assimilation Massimo Bonavita ECMWF Acknowledgments: Lars Isaksen, Elias Holm, Mike Fisher, Laure Raynaud.
Summary of Convergence Tests for Series and Solved Problems
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
0 - 0.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt ShapesPatterns Counting Number.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Page 1 of 26 A PV control variable Ross Bannister* Mike Cullen *Data Assimilation Research Centre, Univ. Reading, UK Met Office, Exeter, UK.
1 NCAS SMA presentation 14/15 September 2004 The August 2002 European floods: atmospheric teleconnections and mechanisms Mike Blackburn (1), Brian Hoskins.
Improvements in Statistical Tropical Cyclone Forecast Models: A Year 2 Joint Hurricane Testbed Project Update Mark DeMaria 1, Andrea Schumacher 2, John.
50 th Anniversary of Operational Numerical Weather Prediction John Jones Deputy Assistant Administrator for Weather Services June 15, 2004 University of.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
WIND INSIGHT a wind power forecasting tool for power system security management Dr Nicholas Cutler 21 March 2013
Page 1 NAE 4DVAR Oct 2006 © Crown copyright 2006 Mark Naylor Data Assimilation, NWP NAE 4D-Var – Testing and Issues EWGLAM/SRNWP meeting Zurich 9 th -12.
© S Haughton more than 3?
The challenge ahead: Ocean Predictions in the Arctic Region Lars Petter Røed * Presented at the OPNet Workshop May 2008, Geilo, Norway * Also affiliated.
© European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Operational and research activities at ECMWF now and in the future Sarah Keeley Education Officer.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
1 Verification of wave forecast models Martin Holt Jim Gunson Damian Holmes-Bell.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
1 NWS-COMET Hydrometeorology Course 15 – 30 June 1999 Meteorology Primer.
Introduction to data assimilation in meteorology Pierre Brousseau, Ludovic Auger ATMO 08,Alghero, september 2008.
Week 1.
Number bonds to 10,
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Bottoms Up Factoring. Start with the X-box 3-9 Product Sum
PSSA Preparation.
Climate reanalysis at ECMWF Reanalysis is based on analysis methods developed to provide initial states for numerical weather prediction It applies a fixed,
Atmospheric Reanalyses Update Mike Bosilovich. ReanalysisHoriz.ResDatesVintageStatus NCEP/NCAR R1T present1995ongoing NCEP-DOE R2T present2001ongoing.
Dr Mark Cresswell Model Assimilation 69EG6517 – Impacts & Models of Climate Change.
Ensemble-variational sea ice data assimilation Anna Shlyaeva, Mark Buehner, Alain Caya, Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Research Jean-Francois.
Ocean Data Variational Assimilation with OPA: Ongoing developments with OPAVAR and implementation plan for NEMOVAR Sophie RICCI, Anthony Weaver, Nicolas.
Use of sea level observations in DMIs storm surge model Jacob L. Høyer, Weiwei Fu, Kristine S. Madsen & Lars Jonasson Center for Ocean and Ice, Danish.
© Crown copyright Met Office Plans for Met Office contribution to SMOS+STORM Evolution James Cotton & Pete Francis, Satellite Applications, Met Office,
Reanalysis: When observations meet models
Slide 1 Wind Lidar working group February 2010 Slide 1 Spaceborne Doppler Wind Lidars - Scientific motivation and impact studies for ADM/Aeolus Erland.
Slide 1© ECMWF Presentation to NOAA Climate Reanalysis Task Force, 29 April 2015 ERA-20C results and plans Paul Poli from the ERA section: Dick Dee, Hans.
ECMWF/EUMETSAT NWP-SAF Satellite data assimilation Training Course Mar 2016.
Data Assimilation Training
Weak constraint 4D-Var at ECMWF
The ECMWF weak constraint 4D-Var formulation
Comparison of different combinations of ensemble-based and variational data assimilation approaches for deterministic NWP Mark Buehner Data Assimilation.
New DA techniques and applications for stratospheric data sets
Project Team: Mark Buehner Cecilien Charette Bin He Peter Houtekamer
Presentation transcript:

T HE D ATA A SSIMILATION S YSTEM IN THE ERA-20C R EANALYSIS ERA-20C: ERA-CLIM pilot reanalysis of the 20th-century using surface observations only Paul Poli, Hans Hersbach, David Tan, Dick Dee, Carole Peubey, Yannick Trémolet, Elias Holm, Massimo Bonavita, Lars Isaksen, and Mike Fisher

Outline Expectations and challenges ERA-20C system overview Assimilation method Evolution of background errors Post-assimilation diagnostics Issues Case studies (1899, 1987) Conclusions

How good are forecasts issued from analyses of Ps only? Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS Day 6 >~ day 3 Day 6 ~ day 3 Day 6 fc error Day 3 fc error [K]

Challenge for any climate dataset based on observations: changing observing system Surface pressure Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS

Challenge for any climate dataset based on observations: changing observing system (cont.) Wind above ocean surface Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS

ERA-20C system overview Resolution as in ERA-20CM, except archive 3-hourly – 75 surface fields – 14 fields for each of the 91 model levels – 16 fields (+PV, +RH) for each of the 37 pressure levels Forcings: as in ERA-20CM Surface observations assimilated – Surface pressure from ISPD – Surface pressure and near-surface wind from ICOADS 2.5.1, ocean only 4DVAR analysis – Outer loop (short forecasts) at T159 or 125 km – Inner loop (analysis increments) at T95 or 210 km – 24-hour window 10 realizations or members, including a control 6 production streams Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS

ERA-20C production streams Speed: ~30-40 days/day/stream. Completed in ~200 days. Missing Oct 2009-Dec 2010 During production: – 3.5 Tb/day, 350 million of meteorological fields. – DVAR assimilations daily A failure rate as low as 0.1% would imply already 2 manual interventions per day.  Home-grown solution to automatically detect model explosion, stop production, halve the model time-step, set the date back, resume production, record the problem, and resume to normal time-step once problematic date is recovered Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS

Constructing a history of the past with (24-hour) 4DVAR data assimilation Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS [Pa] Surface pressure at Montreal, Quebec Observations from ISPD 3.2.6, collection #3004 (Canadian Stations Environment Canada )

Ensemble of 4DVAR data assimilations: Discretization of the PDF of uncertainties Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS Surface pressure at Montreal, Quebec Observations from ISPD 3.2.6, collection #3004 (Canadian Stations Environment Canada ) Background forecast, with uncertainties in the model and its forcings (HadISST ensemble) Observations with uncertainties (some could not be fitted – they are VARQC rejected) Analysis, with uncertainties Benefits: 1. Estimate automatically our background errors, and update them 2. Provide users with uncertainties estimates (not perfect, but better than … nothing) Forcing uncertainties Model uncertainties Observation uncertainties Reanalysis uncertainties

ERA analysis window configurations Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS ERA-40 ERA-Interim ERA-20C

Observation diversity in ERA-20C Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS Surface pressure Wind components

1-year ensemble spread, throughout the century Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS h +27h [hPa]

From the ensemble spread, one can estimate background error variances Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS Estimate of bkg. error stdev. for vorticity at model level 89, for the year 1900 [s**-1]

Evolution of background error (std. dev.) Zonal wind near the surface Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS [m/s]

Self-updating background error covariances, throughout the century (updated every 10 days, based on past 90 days) Over the course of the century, more observations result in…  Smaller background errors, with sharper horizontal structures  Analysis increments that are smaller, over smaller areas = ERA-20C system adapts itself to the information available With satellites, radiosondes,… (for comparison) Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS

Impact of using our own background errors, instead of those derived for NWP Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS N. Hem. extratropics: 1 day of forecast gain S. Hem. extratropics: 1.5 day of forecast gain Tropics: brings 12h forecast skill above 60%

Background errors: stored also in the observation feedback Ortelius World map, circa 1570 ERA-20C 1900 weather world map of uncertainty, circa 2013 Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS [hPa]

Fit to assimilated observations Southern mid-lat. Northern mid-lat. Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS Before assimilation After assimilation

Assimilation error assumptions: budget closure AssumedActual Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS Showing only observations in the first 90 minutes of the 24-h window

What about error growth within the 24-hour window? Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS <+1h+23h [hPa] RMS (O-B) RMS (O-A) +12h <+1h+23h+12h

Estimated (and used) pressure observation error biases Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS

Mean differences between consecutive streams Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS

Upper-air temperatures Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS Anomalies ( ) Analysis increments

Issues Model time-step – On the long (cheap) side, 1 hour instead of 30 minutes (would have doubled the cost of the run) Observation quality control – Too loose, let a few bad observations in Analysis increments far away from observations – Systematic and changing upper-air analysis increments, causing spurious signal interfering with trends Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS

Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS Analyses Forecasts, from 96 hours ahead to 12 hours ahead Great Storm 16 October 1987, 00 UTC NWP ERA-15 ERA-40 ERA-Int ERA-20C “It was the worst storm since 1703 and was analysed as being a one in 200 year storm for southern Britain” (Met Office)

U.S. East Coast Great Blizzard February 1899 One of the most intense blizzards in US history Subject of earlier research, e.g. Kocin, Paul J., Alan D. Weiss, Joseph J. Wagner, 1988: The Great Arctic Outbreak and East Coast Blizzard of February Wea. Forecasting, 3, 305–318. Maps used for such studies usually based on measurements over the continental US and Canada Results from ERA-20C show global picture, with a wave-2 planetary pattern Embedded in this system, an extraordinary powerful low, nearly stationary, battered the Atlantic for several days Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS

Comparison of surface pressure reanalyses for 1-15 February 1899 Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS ERA-20C NOAA/CIRES 20CR

11 February 1899 Kocin et al., WAF 1987 Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS ERA-20C NOAA/CIRES 20CR

Application of ERA-20C for comparing with independent observational data records: e.g. temperatures from ships Temperatures from ships biased warm during day- time (measurements contaminated by the ship structures, heated by sun) Some data problems in 1980? Can be traced to 3 individual collections from the feedback archive Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS

Conclusions Innovative components in ERA-20C DAS – Ensemble of SST conditions (HadISST ) – Variational bias correction of surface pressure observations – 24-hour 4DVAR – Self-updating background error global covariances from ensemble, and cycling local variances ERA-20C ensemble production essentially done (missing last few months). A ~700Tb meteorological dataset produced in ~200 days. Trends are contaminated by systematic analysis increments Preliminary assessment suggests some capacity at representing interesting known extreme events, provided they were observed, in spite of low horizontal resolution, very likely thanks to the ensemble, flow- and time- dependent background errors, and 24-hour 4DVAR The automatic/self-update of the background errors approach developed and tested in ERA-20C is expected to be extended to ECMWF NWP operations soon Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS

For more details… Poli, ERA-20C Data Assimilation System, EMS ERA Report 14 available from the ECMWF website >> Publications >> ERA Reports >> ERA Report Series