1 1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Proposal to Require Identification of Patent Owners Stephen S. Wentsler AIPPI/JFBA/AIPLA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Advertisements

Presented by: Thomas Montrone, President & CEO, R&T and Eagle Rock Mary Rose Cascaes, EVP & COO, R&T Bernard Lopez, Eagle Rock Proxy Advisors LLC 1.
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany BUSINESS LAW E-Commerce and Digital Law International Law and Ethics.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
1 Regulatory Reform of Domestic Regulations in the Telecommunications Sector - Japanese Experience- FURUICHI, Hirohisa Senior Advisor General Affairs Division.
1 Patent Infringement Litigation Before the U.S. International Trade Commission By Timothy DeWitt 24IP Law Group USA 12 E. Lake Dr. Annapolis, MD
The IP Experts 1 BY P. KANDIAH KASS INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD SHAPING BUSINESS STRATEGY THROUGH COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE STRATEGIC USE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
WIPO Patent Information Services
1 Ignacio de Castro WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Solving Disputes: The Services of the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center WIPO-INSME Training.
New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission Pay-to-Play January 2013.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
Reporting and Disclosure Requirements - Module 1 Gainful Employment 1.
August 6, To Understand: Budget Requirements Budget Template Budget Approval Process, Notifications and Timeframe To walk through the completion.
Determine Eligibility Chapter 4. Determine Eligibility 4-2 Objectives Search for Customer on database Enter application signed date and eligibility determination.
My Alphabet Book abcdefghijklm nopqrstuvwxyz.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
ZMQS ZMQS
Presenter:Dr. Maureen White Developer: Dr. Chuck Wiseley 12/9/10 1.
RULE ADOPTION The Commissions Role. What is a rule? A "rule" is the whole or any part of a state agency statement of general applicability that: (1) has.
America Invents Act What to Expect from Patent Reform.
The UEA House of Delegates Directing YOUR Association through the democratic process. 1.
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
Practice Professionalism and Profitability Presented by Lawrence Atkinson Slide 1 Lawrence Atkinson Practice Management Services.
Page 1 of 30 To the Create Assignment Request Online Training Course An assignment request is created by an assignor to initiate the electronic assignment.
ABC Technology Project
15-1 Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 15 Money and Banking.
1 Pre-Appeal Brief Conference (with Demo) By: Bennett Celsa Jean Witz Kathleen Bragdon TC1600 Quality Assurance Specialists.
VOORBLAD.
1 NEW PRE-APPEAL BRIEF CONFERENCE PRACTICE OVERVIEW & TIPS FOR PRACTICE November Off. Gaz. Pat. Office, Vol. 2 (July 12, 2005)
“Start-to-End” Simulations Imaging of Single Molecules at the European XFEL Igor Zagorodnov S2E Meeting DESY 10. February 2014.
By David W. Hill AIPLA Immediate Past President Partner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Overview of the America Invents Act.
1 DELAYED LAST STATE AID - BORROWING PROCESS
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Loans/Investments, Acceptance of Deposits & SFIO - under Companies Act, 2013 CA Jayant Thakur 27th April 2014, WIRC, ICAI.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Incorporation by Reference
Webinar: Request for Comments on AIA Trial Proceedings Before the PTAB July 29, Scott Boalick, Vice Chief Judge (Acting) Patent Trial and Appeal.
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
PSSA Preparation.
Weekly Attendance by Class w/e 6 th September 2013.
COMPARISON OF REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL SETTINGS AND NON-RESIDENTIAL SETTINGS HCBS FINAL RULE FEBRUARY 10, 2015 NOTE: THIS MEETING WILL BE TAPE RECORDED.
June 8, 2006 PATENTS: WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW Steven R. Ludwig, Ph.D., Esq.
Update on USPTO Activities November 18, 2014 Drew Hirshfeld Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy 1.
1 1 1 AIPLA American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Updates Including Glossary Pilot Program Chris Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. IP Practice.
Attributable Ownership Public Hearing March 13, 2014: Alexandria, VA.
Attributable Ownership Public Hearing March 26, 2014: San Francisco, CA.
Remy Yucel Director, CRU (571) Central Reexamination Unit and the AIA.
1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association EMERGING TRENDS IN INTER PARTES REVIEW PRACTICE TOM ENGELLENNER Pepper Hamilton, LLP.
Patent Prosecution Luncheon February Defective Priority Claim Means No Priority Claim Each intermediate application in the chain of priority must.
1 1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association U.S. Implementation of the Hague Agreement For Designs John (Jack) J. Penny, V Event.
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Report to the AIPLA’s IP Practice in Japan Committee January 22, 2012 USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules Presented by: Stephen S. Wentsler.
USPTO Appeal Process: Appeal Strategies and New Rules
Presentation transcript:

1 1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association USPTO Proposal to Require Identification of Patent Owners Stephen S. Wentsler AIPPI/JFBA/AIPLA Joint Meeting Tokyo, Japan April 7, 2014

2 2 2 AIPLA Firm Logo June 4, 2013 White House issued an executive order titled “Making ‘Real Party in Interest’ the New Default” January 24, 2014 issued Notice of Proposed Rulemaking –Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 16

3 3 3 AIPLA Firm Logo Who is considered an “Attributable Owner”?

4 4 4 AIPLA Firm Logo Who is an “attributable owner”? Titleholder –Assignee The entity that has been exclusively or jointly assigned title to the patent or application. –Sometimes the exclusive licensee if enough rights were transferred to effectively be an assignment Enforcement Entity –Entity with the rights to enforce the patent Entity is necessary to be joined in a lawsuit in order to have standing to enforce the patent or any patent resulting from an application

5 5 5 AIPLA Firm Logo Who is an “attributable owner”? Ultimate Parent Entity –The entity who: has ultimate control of the enforcement entity and/or the titleholder; and is not controlled by any other entity.

6 6 6 AIPLA Firm Logo Who is an “attributable owner”? Ultimate Parent Entity –Control means If incorporated – entity who holds 50% or more of the outstanding voting shares If not incorporated – –entity having the right to 50% or more of the profits, or –entity having the rights to 50% or more of the assets of the entity upon dissolution Entity having the contractual power to designate 50% or more of the directors of a corporation Trustee of an irrevocable trust in which the settlor does not retain a reversionary interest

7 7 7 AIPLA Firm Logo Who is an “attributable owner”? Hidden Beneficial Owners –An entity who hides its interest by preventing vesting of the interest with the entity –An entity that hides its interest by temporarily divesting itself of attributable ownership

8 8 8 AIPLA Firm Logo Example – Who are the attributable owners? A C ED B patent Holding company B enforces patents held by A C Parent to B D & E each own 50% of C P1-3P4-5 Attributable Owners: Titleholder – A Enforcement entity – B Ultimate parent entities – D, P4, P5 Hidden Beneficial Owner – P6 P6

9 9 9 AIPLA Firm Logo What information about the attributable owner needs to be disclosed?

10 10 AIPLA Firm Logo What needs to be disclosed? Public Company –Name of the company –Stock symbol –Stock exchange where the company is listed Non-Public Company –Name of the company –Place of incorporation –Address of the principal place of business

11 11 AIPLA Firm Logo What needs to be disclosed? Partnership –Name of the partnership –Address of the principal place of business If a natural person –Full name –Residence –Correspondence address Other entity –Name –Name of the state if organized under the state laws –Address of the principal place of business

12 12 AIPLA Firm Logo When does the attributable owner need to be disclosed to the USPTO?

13 13 AIPLA Firm Logo Disclosure to the USPTO At the time the application is filed (or shortly thereafter) –Does not apply to provisional –Applies to the national stage application (not the international application) –Considering 2-month shortened period of reply Extendable by 5 months Within 3 months of any change in the attributable owner during the pendency of the application –Not extendable

14 14 AIPLA Firm Logo Disclosure to the USPTO At the time of issue fee –Due within 3 months (not extendable) or the application/patent will be abandoned At the time of payment of the maintenance fee –Due before payment of the maintenance fee

15 15 AIPLA Firm Logo Disclosure to the USPTO When the patent is involved in certain post- issuance proceedings at the USPTO –Filing a request for supplemental examination –Filing a request for ex parte reexamination Filing a reply by the patent owner in an ex parte reexamination If a change happens during the reexamination proceeding, the patent owner has 3 months from the change to the attributable owner to notify (not extendable) –Trial proceeding before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) If a change happens during the PTAB proceeding – must notify within 21 days from the date of the change (not extendable)

16 16 AIPLA Firm Logo Which applications will be required to comply with the Rules?

17 17 AIPLA Firm Logo Applications required to comply with the Rule Identify at time of filing or when there is a change in an attributable owner –Required for all applications filed on or after the effective date of the final Rule Identify at the time of payment of the issue fee –Provided that the Notice of Allowance was mailed on or after the effective date of the final Rule

18 18 AIPLA Firm Logo Applications required to comply with the Rule Identify at time of payment of the maintenance fee –Required if the payment occurs on or after the effective date of the final Rule Identify when petition/request is filed –Required if the petition/request is filed on or after the effective date of the final Rule

19 19 AIPLA Firm Logo Voluntary Disclosures

20 20 AIPLA Firm Logo Voluntary Disclosures Licensing offers and related information to the Office –Willingness to license –Licensing contacts –License offer terms –Commitments to license the patent Office may make information available to the public on a searchable database such as the Public “Patent Application Information Retrieval” (PAIR) system.

21 21 AIPLA Firm Logo Who will have access to the information at the USPTO

22 22 AIPLA Firm Logo Access to the Information PTO examiners and staff The public on any published application or issued patent The USPTO expects to make the current attributable owner information available as well as historical changes to the attributable owner

23 23 AIPLA Firm Logo Further information and comments

24 24 AIPLA Firm Logo More Information Available USPTO Website – nership.jsphttp:// nership.jsp

25 25 AIPLA Firm Logo Public Comments Written Comments on the Proposed Rulemaking Due April 24, 2014 –By –By Postal Mail Attn: Mr. James Engel, Senior Legal Advisor Mail Stop Comments-Patents Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, VA –By Federal eRulemaking Portal

26 26 AIPLA Firm Logo Thanks for your attention! Questions? Stephen S. Wentsler Partner Pearne & Gordon LLP 1801 East 9 th Street, Suite 1200 Cleveland, Ohio