Uncommon Priors Require Origin Disputes Robin Hanson George Mason University ProLogic 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Complexity of Agreement A 100% Quantum-Free Talk Scott Aaronson MIT.
Advertisements

Believing Where We Cannot Prove Philip Kitcher
The idea of morality as a social contract offers an explanation of why its reasonable to act in accordance with the dictates of morality As such it provides.
The Challenge of Cultural Relativism
Recent versions of the Design Argument So far we have considered the classical arguments of Aquinas and Paley. However, the design argument has attracted.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
What is Science?.
Value conflicts and assumptions - 1 While an author usually offers explicit reasons why he comes to a certain conclusion, he also makes (implicit) assumptions.
What we’re about—NOT!.
Relativism Michael Lacewing
Science and Christianity Dave Scott and Daphne Brenner.
American Culture: Consumer Culture
René Descartes ( ) Father of modern rationalism. Reason is the source of knowledge, not experience. All our ideas are innate. God fashioned us.
Meditations on First Philosophy
Everything You Need to Know (since the midterm). Diagnosis Abductive diagnosis: a minimal set of (positive and negative) assumptions that entails the.
Hume’s Problem of Induction. Most of our beliefs about the world have been formed from inductive inference. (e.g., all of science, folk physics/psych)
For Bayesian Wannabes, Are Disagreements Not About Info? Robin Hanson Economics, GMU.
Moral Relativism, Cultural Differences and Bioethics Prof. Eric Barnes.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey.
“I can tell you who I am, what I think, feel, believe, want to do, and have done, without getting anxious or worrying about what you may think about.
Next Week: Final 4 presentations - two on Tuesday and two on Thursday… No readings! Today: Are there Laws and/or Foundational Principles of Ecology? 18.
Argumentation - 1 We often encounter situations in which someone is trying to persuade us of a point of view by presenting reasons for it. We often encounter.
The Problem of Knowledge. What new information would cause you to be less certain? So when we say “I’m certain that…” what are we saying? 3 things you.
Decide whether the following statements are true or false.
The very idea Key resources: Meta-ethics in a small nutshell (short) Meta-ethics in a small nutshell Meta-ethics in a much larger nutshell (longer) Meta-ethics.
Philosophy of Mind Week 3: Objections to Dualism Logical Behaviorism
Looking at the Roots of Philosophy
Learning Sociology Through Sports. Sociology Sociology is the scientific study of society and social behavior We focus on the group rather than the individual.
The field of philosophy offers many different theories or points of view on the nature of these categories of reality, and on the relationships between.
CCSS: Types of Writing. Common Core: Writing Anchor Standards Overview 1.Write arguments using valid reasoning and evidence 2.Write informative/explanatory.
Bayesian Learning By Porchelvi Vijayakumar. Cognitive Science Current Problem: How do children learn and how do they get it right?
AIT, Comp. Sci. & Info. Mgmt AT02.98 Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Computing September Term, Objectives of these slides: l What ethics is,
CT (critical thinking) in Economics When economists reason, they make arguments, they deduce from hypotheses, they create models, and they offer explanations.
 “In a democratic society, you can't control people by force. Therefore, you've got to control what they think.”  -Noam Chomsky, author of Manufacturing.
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 9 The Challenge of Cultural Relativism By David Kelsey.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?. SCIENTIFIC WORLD VIEW 1.The Universe Is Understandable. 2.The Universe Is a Vast Single System In Which the Basic Rules.
 existence precedes essence  in order to make a table, the artisan must first have a conception of the table  not so with human beings; we come into.
Epistemology ► Area of Philosophy that deals with questions concerning knowledge ► Philosophy of Knowledge.
SCIENCE AND MYTH BY STEPHANIE GONZALEZ -LAS 497A – ASSIGNMENT 1.
René Descartes, Meditations Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
4. Beliefs and Material Culture. Beliefs Ideas about the nature of reality (science, God, gods, etc) Ideas about the nature of reality (science, God,
Listening Skills For School Outreach. 2 Hearing Refers to the process by which sound waves hit the ear with speed and are transmitted to the brain. It.
Decision Making Week 6. Decision-Making Would you rather work alone or in a team? Do groups make better decisions?
One Form of Argument… “Argument” in NGSS In science, the production of knowledge is dependent on a process of reasoning from evidence that requires a.
Epistemology ► Area of Philosophy that deals with questions concerning knowledge ► Philosophy of Knowledge.
The Nature of Knowledge. Thick Concept When a short definition is not enough, it is called a thick concept word. It can only be understood through experience.
Ethics Chapter 12. Ethics  The moral principles governing or influencing conduct  The branch of knowledge concerned with moral principles  Ethics.
Epistemology (How do you know something?)  How do you know your science textbook is true?  How about your history textbook?  How about what your parents.
Thinking & Language. Obstacles to problem solving.
Two central questions What does it mean to talk of, or believe in, God? –Is talk about God talk about something that exists independently of us? Or a way.
The Research Paper English 12. Argumentative Research Papers  Present a strong claim to a possibly resistant audience  You will gather evidence by looking.
Relativism, Divine Command Theory, and Particularism A closer look at some prominent views of ethical theory.
VIDEO ANALYSIS OF TEACHING ASSESSMENT OF CLINICAL PRACTICE ECE Spring 2014 By: Megan McGuire.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
Basic concepts in Ethics
Moral Theory Review.
Michael Lacewing Relativism Michael Lacewing
What do we mean by the word “knowledge?”
What is Philosophy?.
Theory of Knowledge Review
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
“Truths & Misconceptions About Evolution” Get out your spirals and title your notes. Adapted from the UC Berkley website:
THE NATURE OF SCIENCE.
What is a thesis statement? A thesis statement:
The Nature of Science.
Synopsis: On many important issues of science, philosophy, politics, and religion, equally knowledgeable and intelligent people often disagree with one.
Philosophy Forum, November 2015
VicSkeptics Presentation, 20th Jan 2014
Presentation transcript:

Uncommon Priors Require Origin Disputes Robin Hanson George Mason University ProLogic 2005

Clarifying “Objective” Beliefs Regarding belief as truth estimate –vs. as expression of individuality, or what provokes intellectual progress Yes, distinguish possible topics of beliefs –what theory to apply now, vs. theory closest to ultimate truth, vs. mix of topics to focus research now Normative, not positive, claim –Clearly real people with similar info often disagree –But big scientists in big episodes may be wrong Need not know how to explicitly construct –Constraints: ≥0, Σ=0, update via Bayes’ rule, more? –If enough constraints, result must be unique

The Puzzle of Disagreement Persistent disagreement ubiquitous –Speculative trading, wars, juries, … –Argue in science, politics, family, … Theory seems to say this irrational Possible explanations –We’re “just joshing” –Infeasible epistemic rationality –Fixable irrationality: all will change! –Non-epistemic rationality – truth not goal

We Can’t Agree to Disagree Aumann in 1976 Any information Re possible worlds Common knowledge Of exact E 1 [x], E 2 [x] Would say next For Bayesians With common priors If seek truth, not lie Since generalized to ® Impossible worlds ® Common Belief ® A f(, ), or who max ® Last ±(E 1 [x] - E 1 [E 2 [x]]) ® At core, or Wannabe ® Symmetric prior origins

My Answer: We Self-Deceive We biased to think better driver, lover, … “I less biased, better data & analysis” Evolutionary origin: helps us to deceive –Mind “leaks” beliefs via face, voice, … –Leak less if conscious mind really believes Beliefs like clothes –Function in harsh weather, fashion in mild When see our self-deception, still disagree –So at some level we accept that we not seek truth

Two Faces of Priors Prior help tell us what to believe We have beliefs about prior origins/causes –Can this help constrain rational priors?

Origins of Priors Seems irrational to accept some priors –Imagine random brain changes for weird priors In standard theories, your prior is not special –Species-common DNA Selected to predict ancestral environment –Individual DNA variations (e.g. personality) Random by Mendel’s rules of inheritance Sibling differences independent of everything else! –Culture: random + adapted to local society But you must think differing prior special! Can’t express these ideas in standard models

Standard Bayesian Model Agent 1 Info Set Agent 2 Info Set Common Kn. Set A Prior

An Extended Model Multiple Standard Models With Different Priors

Standard Bayesian Model

Extending the State Space As event

An Extended Model

My Differing Prior Was Made Special My prior and any ordinary event E are informative about each other. Given my prior, no other prior is informative about any E, nor is E informative about any other prior.

Corollaries My prior only changes if events are more or less likely. If an event is just as likely in situations where my prior is switched with someone else, then those two priors assign the same chance to that event. Only common priors satisfy these and symmetric prior origins.

A Tale of Two Astronomers Disagree if universe open/closed To justify via priors, must believe: “Nature could not have been just as likely to have switched priors, both if open and if closed” “If I had different prior, would be in situation of different chances” “Given my prior, fact that he has a different prior contains no info” All false if they are brothers!