Corporate America in Crisis: Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 www.morganlewis.com Presented by: Linda L. Griggs Paul Huey-Burns Washington Office Frank G. Zarb,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Policies for Nonprofit Boards Dan Rollman August 18, 2011.
Advertisements

The PERE Real Estate CFOs Forum Regulation Coming? October 7, 2009 New York R. Eric Emrich Chief Financial Officer Lubert-Adler Partners, LP.
Assurance and Advisory Business Services
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany BUSINESS LAW E-Commerce and Digital Law International Law and Ethics.
Assurance Services Independent professional services that “improve the quality of information, or its context, for decision makers” Assurance service encompass.
Building on Our Core Values Building on Our Core Values © 2003 by the AICPA The Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Chapter 17 Completing the Audit Engagement McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter 17 Completing the Audit Engagement McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Hot accounting issues and SEC topics in recent US IPOs Arik Reizner, Partner, High-Tech services PwC Israel Kesselman & Kesselman March 2005.
Additional Assurance Services: Other Information
© 2005 KPMG IFRG Limited, a UK registered company, limited by guarantee, and a member firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved.
Conflict of Interest, Conflict of Commitment, and Outside Activities UTSA HOP 1.33 Non-covered UTSA staff 1.
Audit Reports Chapter 3.
Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants
© 2004 Dechert LLP FORM N-CSR, CERTIFICATIONS AND DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES James F. DesMarais, Esq. MFS Investment Management Brian S. Vargo,
© Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, All rights reserved.1 Financial Accounting: A Managerial Perspective Second Edition Prepared by R. Narayanaswamy.
2010 DODD-FRANK ACT EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION REFORM Presented by Andrew B. Coburn Wyche Burgess Freeman & Parham, P.A. August 25, 2010 Copyright 2010 Wyche.
© 2007 PROSKAUER ROSE LLP® SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Presented by: Julie M. Allen
The Application of Sarbanes-Oxley to the Non-Profit Healthcare Sector Presented to: American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics and Seton Hall University.
Certifying the Accuracy of SEC Filings and Update on the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, NYSE and Nasdaq Proposals.
R. Todd Johnson, Partner in Charge Jones Day Menlo Park January 17,2003 The New Audit Committee -- Risks, Realities and Responses.
Legal Responsibilities for Board Members of Nonprofit Organizations Or…all you need to know to stay out of trouble. Presented: July 2007 Prepared by: Elsbeth.
Professional Ethics Chapter 4.
© Copyright 2003 Latham & Watkins. All Rights Reserved. USC Institute for Corporate Counsel The SEC’s New Part 205 Regulations Brian G. Cartwright March.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Corporate Governance Reforms September 26, 2002.
Case 6.1 Enron Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill.
Corporate Governance: The New Age The Expanded Role of Outside Counsel and Standards of Professional Conduct for Attorneys March 10, 2003 Turnaround Management.
September 2002 Corporate Governance: Can You Afford To Wait? The information provided here is of a general nature and is not intended to address the specific.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of Benefits of Act Three quarters of the financial executives in the Oversight Systems survey said that their company had realized.
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)
Frank Hubach Partner-in-Charge Jones Day Dallas
1 Overview of Ethics Requirements for Employees of Montgomery County This is a summary to help identify issues; it is not the law. Please address ethics.
ELECTION AND QUALIFICATIONS OF DIRECTORS Robert D. Strahota, Assistant Director * SEC Office of International Affairs Prepared for the panel on Improving.
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. 2 What Is It? Act passed by Congress in response to the recent and continuing corporate scandals. Signed into law July 30, Established.
Outside Business Activities and Selling Away
Chapter 03 Professional Ethics McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning
New SEC Corporate Disclosures Southern Gas Association Accounting & Financial Executives Conference April 28, 2003 Robert E. Jensen Trinity University.
COMPLIANCE & SOX.
WELCOME Annual Meeting & Compliance Seminar. Code of Conduct - Impact on Corporate Culture by Andy Greenstein Knight Capital Group, Inc.
Current Developments at the PCAOB Ensuring Integrity: 3 rd Annual Auditing Conference at Baruch College December 4, 2008.
© 2004 Ceridian Corporation. All rights reserved. Corporate Integrity and The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Victoria Nemerson Vice President Compliance, Ceridian.
1. 2 CVM’s OBJECTIVES u to stimulate the creation of savings and their investment in securities; u to promote the expansion and regular and efficient.
Professional Ethics. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 3-2 Steps in Resolving an Ethical Dilemma Identify.
NEW SEC AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE REQUIREMENTS Financial Executives International Janet Luallen Director - Technical Activities.
ADB Project TA 3696-PAK, Regulation for Corporate Governance 1 REGULATION FOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN PAKISTAN CAPITAL MARKETS.
2012 Governance & Leadership Institute January 29 – 30, 2012.
Implementation Issues of Sarbanes-Oxley CASE Presentation September 23, 2004 By Denise Farnan.
Summary of the Investor Protection, Auditor Reform, and Transparency Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley Act)
Scandals (in the public and private sector)  Enron  Worldcom  Livent  Nortel  HRDC  Sponsorship Scandal.
Issues in Corporate Governance: Board Structures and Functions Based on a Student Presentation by Joshua Shullaw and Matthew Domeyer.
Sarbanes Oxley Act. The Sarbanes Oxley Act consists of 11 Sections I – Public Company Accounting Oversight Board II – Auditor independence III – Corporate.
ESOPs: It’s More Than a Matter of Trust Presented by: Dan Reser President; Fiduciary Services, Inc
1 Sarbanes-Oxley Overview. 2 Sarbanes-Oxley Act Summary The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 §201Prohibited Non-Audit Services §202Audit Committee Pre-Approval.
The New SEC Auditor Independence Rules: Implications for Audit Committees and Management
WorldCom This fraud occurred in a major public company and went undetected for 3-4 years. How could this occur? Why did this occur? Was Betty Vinson a.
VA Connecticut Research and Education Foundation
OVERVIEW OF SOX. CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTS Principal executive and financial officers are responsible for designing, establishing.
Sarbanes Oxley Act. General Provisions of SOX To make rules governing audits of public companies To make rules governing audits of public companies To.
BusinessAllstars.com 1 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 BusinessAllstarsPresents Copyright © 2004 by Gainbridge Associates All right reserved This material may.
Building on Our Core Values Building on Our Core Values © 2003 by the AICPA The Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Improving Compliance with ISAs Presenters: Al Johnson & Pat Hayle.
Impact On Government Contractors
Summary of the Investor Protection, Auditor Reform, and Transparency Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley Act)
Chapter 03 Professional Ethics McGraw-Hill/Irwin
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Managing Chapter Funds
Dr. Donald K. McConnell Jr.
Dr. Donald K. McConnell Jr.
Dr. Donald K. McConnell Jr.
Presentation transcript:

Corporate America in Crisis: Sarbanes-Oxley Act of Presented by: Linda L. Griggs Paul Huey-Burns Washington Office Frank G. Zarb, Jr. Northern Virginia Office

2 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 n Provisions effective upon signing by President Bush on July 30, 2002 –Section 906 certification by CEO and CFO in periodic reports containing financial statements –New liability provisions, among others: Extension of statute of limitations (§ 804) Prohibition on extending, arranging or renewing personal loans, directly or indirectly, to directors and executive officers (§ 402) Employee whistleblower protections (§ 806) Disgorgement of profits and bonus following restatement (§ 304) n Provisions effective on August 29, 2002 –Two-business day deadline for filing reports on Form 4 (§ 403) SEC rules adopted effective August 29, 2002 ( ) –Section 302 certification by CEO and CFO in annual and quarterly reports SEC rules adopted effective August 29, 2002 ( )

3 SOA (continued) n Provisions effective by January 26, 2003 –Disclosure regarding audit committee financial expert (§ 407) SEC proposal dated October 22, 2002 ( ) –Disclosure regarding the existence of a code of ethics for senior financial officers and any waiver of such a code (§ 406) SEC proposal dated October 22, 2002 ( ) –Disclosure relating to off-balance sheet obligations (§ 401) SEC proposal dated October 30, 2002 –Clarification of pension plan trading black-out (§ 306) SEC proposal dated October 30, 2002 –Disclosure of non-GAAP financial measures (§ 306) SEC proposal dated November 4, 2002 –Retention of records relating to audits and reviews (§ 802) SEC proposal dated November 21, 2002 –Standards of professional conduct by attorneys (§ 307) SEC proposal dated November 21, 2002

4 SOA (continued) n Provisions effective by January 26, 2003 (continued) –Prohibited non-audit services (§ 201) SEC proposal dated December 2, 2002 ( ) –Audit committee pre-approval of audit and nonaudit services and disclosure of approval on nonaudit services (§ 202) SEC proposal dated December 2, 2002 ( ) –Rotation of engagement team partners (§ 203) SEC proposal dated December 2, 2002 ( ) –Provision by registered outside auditors of report on critical accounting policies and practices, alternative treatment of financial information within GAAP and other matters (§ 204) SEC proposal dated December 2, 2002 ( ) –One-year cooling off period when former engagement team members become management (§ 206) SEC proposal dated December 2, 2002 ( )

5 SOA (continued) n Provisions effective by April 26, 2003 –SEC rule to implement Section 301 must require the delisting of companies whose audit committee: Is not independent as defined, that is, receives no compensation other than fees for serving as a director and member of the audit committee and other committees and is not an affiliated person; Does not have the sole authority to hire and dismiss the outside auditors; Does not have the sole authority to determine and pay the outside auditors; Does not have the authority to oversee the work of the outside auditors, who must report directly to the audit committee; Does not have the authority to resolve any disagreements between management and the outside auditors; and Does not have procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and for the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. –Prohibition on improper influence on the audit process (§ 303) SEC proposal dated October 18, 2002 ( )

6 SOA (continued) n Provisions effective by July 30, 2003 –SEC rules to require electronic disclosure about stock beneficial ownership of insiders (§ 403) n Provisions with no required effective date –Requirement for annual management report on internal controls (§ 404(a)) SEC proposal dated October 22, 2002 ( ) –Requirement for attestation by outside auditors of management’s report on internal controls (§ 404(b)) SEC proposal dated October 22, 2002 ( ) –Attestation standards for reports of outside auditors on management report on internal controls Format of report in Section 103(a)(2)(A)(iii) –Real-time disclosure (§ 409)

7 Financial Expert n SEC has proposed rules requiring issuers to disclose whether or not a “financial expert” serves on the Audit Committee n Proposed rules require (among other things) experience in preparing or auditing financial statements of public company with similar accounting issues n SROs have said they may require listed companies to have a “financial expert” on the Audit Committee

8 Codes of Conduct/Ethics n Sarbanes-Oxley directs SEC to require disclosure by public companies of: –Whether they have adopted a “code of ethics” for senior financial officers –Waiver or amendment of any provision of the code of ethics for senior financial officers n Proposed SEC rule would require companies to disclose: –whether they have a code of ethics that applies to CEO as well as senior financial officers –disclosure of waivers on 8-K or Internet –requires that code of ethics be filed with annual report

9 What is a “Code of Ethics”? n Sarbanes-Oxley defines “code of ethics” as standards to promote: –Honest and ethical conduct, including the handling of conflicts of interest –Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in SEC reports –Compliance with rules and regulations n Proposed SEC rule would: –define “code of ethics” to include also mechanisms for reporting and dealing with violations and resolving conflicts of interest with an appropriate person and compliance with laws

10 Stock Exchange Proposals n Applies to all employees, officers, directors n Adoption required n Waivers only by Board or Board Committee

11 Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements n January 2002 interpretive release –Guidance on disclosure about liquidity and capital resources Financial guarantees or commitments, provisions in agreements that could accelerate maturity or create financial obligation, off-balance sheet arrangements Tabular presentation of contractual and commercial obligations –Disclosure about information about the valuation of non-exchange traded contracts –Related party transactions n November 4, 2002 SEC release would implement SOA Section 401(a) –Disclosure threshold – likelihood of occurrence is not remote –Broader than January 2002 release –Disclosure of business purpose, significant terms, and other details

12 Non-GAAP or “Pro Forma” Financial Information n December 2001 Cautionary Advice on Pro Forma Data in Earnings Releases n SEC proposal implements SOA Section 401(b) relating to non-GAAP or “pro forma” financial information –Proposed new Regulation G and amendments to Item 10 –Would apply to public written or oral disclosures of material information containing a “non-GAAP” measure n Proposal would require disclosure of –Most directly comparable GAAP measure –Reconciliation to GAAP –In SEC filings, also disclose purpose of disclosure and why management believes the non-GAAP measure is useful

13 “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” n Defined as numerical measures that: –Exclude amounts that are included in comparable GAAP measure –Include amounts that are excluded in comparable GAAP measure –Does not include statistical data like unit sales, number of employees, number of subscribers –Does not include financial information that is consistent with GAAP measures

14 Prohibitions n Cannot give non-GAAP measure greater prominence than comparable GAAP measure n Cannot exclude from a liquidity measure charges or liabilities that must be settled in cash n Cannot exclude “non-recurring” or “unusual” items that are likely to recur n Cannot present non-GAAP measure in financial statements n Cannot use titles or descriptions that cause confusion with GAAP measure n Cannot present non-GAAP per-share measure

15 8-K Filing of Certain Press Releases n File with SEC all releases that disclose material non-public information about results or financial condition n Release not eligible for non-filed status n Oral announcement need not be filed on an 8-K under certain circumstances, including that the financial information is posted on the company’s website n Non-GAAP financial measures in the filed release may have to comply with Item 10

16 Conduct by Attorneys n SEC proposal relating to conduct by attorneys would implement Section 307 of SOA n Would require an attorney appearing or practicing before the Commission to report to –the company’s chief legal officer or the chief legal officer and CEO or, –if such person(s) do not provide a timely or appropriate response or, if reporting to such person(s) is futile, the company’s audit committee or some other committee or –a qualified legal compliance committee of the board –any reasonable belief that a material violation of the securities laws, a material breach of fiduciary duty or a similar material violation. n Definition of attorney is broad: licensed or holding out

17 Attorneys’ Conduct (continued ) n Except if the attorney has reported the material violation to the qualified legal compliance committee, –If an outside attorney does not receive an appropriate or timely response, the attorney must make a “noisy withdrawal” and notify the SEC about the withdrawal for professional considerations and his/her disaffirming of particular disclosure. –If an attorney employed by the company does not receive an appropriate or timely response, the attorney must notify the SEC that he/she is disaffirming particular disclosure but need not resign his/her employment. n A qualified legal compliance committee must, among other conditions, have the authority to direct the company to adopt appropriate remedial measures. –Reporting to the qualified legal compliance committee, if the company has formed one, would avoid the need for a noisy withdrawal or notification to the SEC

18 Accountants’ Independence n SEC proposal to implement 201 of SOA –Will eliminate certain exceptions from existing prohibited nonaudit services, including limited exceptions for bookkeeping, valuations and internal audit outsourcing –SEC proposal release confirms that M&A diligence is okay but raises questions relating to tax services n SEC proposal to implement Section 202 of SOA will require the audit committee to pre-approve all audit and nonaudit services and disclose in proxy or Form 10-K any pre-approval policies and procedures for nonaudit services n SEC proposal to implement Section 203 of SOA will require mandatory rotation every 5 years of partners involved in the audit

19 Critical Accounting Policies n SEC proposal to implement Section 204 of SOA will require the outside auditors to provide to the audit committee oral or written information relating to critical accounting estimates, alternative accounting treatments and written communications with management n December 2001 Cautionary Advice on Critical Accounting Estimates –Estimates requiring the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments –Explain likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions –Loan loss reserves, valuations, warranties n May 2002 Proposal

20 Improper Influence on Outside Auditors n Would implement Section 303 of SOA n SEC proposal to prohibit action to “fraudulently influence, coerce, manipulate, or mislead” any outside auditor in connection with an audit or review of financial statements n Rule could apply to employees and agents of the company, outside counsel, partners and employees of the outside auditors and customers, vendors and creditors of the company n Level of culpability may be less than “intent,” and possibly mere negligence

21 Internal Controls n October 22, 2002 SEC proposal to implement Section 404 of SOA and require annual report of management on internal controls and procedures for financial reporting and attestation of such report n October 22, 2002 SEC proposal would also require quarterly evaluation of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting and disclosure about: –Effectiveness of internal controls and procedures and –Changes in internal controls during the covered period

22 New Relationship Between Audit Committees & Outside Auditors n Section 301 of SOA requires the SEC to adopt rules to require the delisting of a company whose audit committee –is not independent as defined (no compensation and not affiliated) and –does not have the sole authority to hire, dismiss and pay the outside auditors; –does not have the authority to oversee the work of the outside auditors, who must report directly to the audit committee, including to resolve any disagreements between management and the outside auditors; –does not have the authority to retain and pay advisors; and –does not have procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and for the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.