Beamline Overview Collaboration Meeting 16 June 2014 Ken Moffeit 1:30pm - 3:00pmBeamline overview (15’+5’)Ken Moffeit Status of the beamline construction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
Advertisements

1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
Transition from the Long Shutdown to Hot Checkout: Pre-Hot Checkout Steve Suhring Operability Manager 6/6/13.
Radiation Safety Training Lab Survey Program Washington State University Radiation Safety Office.
PEPPo Weekly Status Meeting February 16, 2011 & 6MSD Planning Meeting February 23, 2011 Part 1 – Technical summary of layout Part 2 – Month-by-Month Installation.
Preparing for the CD-2 Review Elton Smith Hall D Collaboration Meeting October 12-14, 2006.
Present Assembly Status Three important milestones completed: – We tried the entire assembly procedure on real modules and it worked – The construction.
HPS MPS OVERVIEW Dan Sexton & the Safety Systems Group JLAB 1.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Upcoming Review of the Hall D Photon Beam and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting.
Status of the Tagger Hall Background Simulation Simulation A. Somov, Jefferson Lab Hall-D Collaboration Meeting, University of Regina September
LCLS Transition to Science DOE Status Review of the LUSI MIE Project LCLS NEH ARR John Arthur LCLS Experimental Facilities Division August 11, 2009 Welcome.
EPAC June 2003 The EPAC June 2003 Questions 1. Clarify the Motivation for the Proposal. 2. How to ensure the e+ polarimeter works right away? 3. What is.
E166 Collaboration J.C. Sheppard SLAC, October, 2003 E166 Background Test Simulations: Overview-what do we need J. C. Sheppard.
BLM review Mario Santana Leitner OUTLOOK ON FLUKA SIMULATIONS FOR UDULATOR DAMAGE AND BLM RESPONSE Mario Santana Leitner, Alberto.
Undulator-Based Production of Polarized Positrons Status Report on E-166 Undulator-Based Production of Polarized Positrons K.T. McDonald Princeton University.
PROBLEM: Radiation Dose Rate in IR2 When IR1 is Operating (and Vice Versa) Muon Dose Rate > 1 mRem/hr for 0.1% Collimated Halo.
Progress on Photon Beam and Simulation Part 1: active collimator Part 2: physics simulations Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX collaboration.
TEST BEAMS Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Ted Fieguth DoE/SLAC Program Review April & May 1, 1997.
SHMS Detector Commissioning and Installation Howard Fenker Hall-C Users Meeting Jan-2015.
We are Here! Gluex Collaboration Meeting May Engineering Status - Presented by Tim Whitlatch1.
HPS Budget and Schedule Marco Oriunno, June 4-6, 2013 HPS Collaboration Meeting, JLAB.
PAIR SPECTROMETER DEVELOPMENT IN HALL D PAWEL AMBROZEWICZ NC A&T OUTLINE : PS Goals PS Goals PrimEx Experience PrimEx Experience Design Details Design.
1 Getting Ready for the Climb HPS Project Overview HPS Collaboration Meeting at SLAC John Jaros September 10, 2012 John Jaros HPS Collaboration Meeting.
HPS EC Report John Jaros HPS Collaboration Meeting at JLAB June 18, 2014.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
Bubble Chamber Experimental Readiness Review September.
Beamline update Ken Moffeit 5 June 2013 The Beginning Overview of the beamline Beam diagnostics Silicon Protection New options for location of HPS Beamline.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Global Design Effort Push-pull studies How to proceed LCWS07 June 1, 2007 at DESY Andrei Seryi for BDS Area leaders Deepa Angal-Kalinin, A.S., Hitoshi.
WBS1 SBS Basic: Magnet and Infrastructure Robin Wines 11/4/ SBS DOE Review.
1 Kenneth Osborne, 9/14/07 Inter Group communications at the Advanced Light Source. Overview of the different methods of communication between different.
Question and Answer 1) A weighted Monte-Carlo ray trace of particles exiting the target/magnet assembly for all primary beam energies showing: a) Where.
NUMI NuMI Internal Review July 12, 2001 Infrastructure: Radiation Safety Page 1 Technical Components NuMI Beamline Radiation Safety Issues Radiation Safety.
Draft HPS Run Plan March 30, Next Steps Beamline Setup Trigger Commissioning Beam Stability Studies SVT Commissioning Data Taking Checking the.
Project Overview How to get here…. Half Way to the Test Run October 18, 2012HPS Project Overview2 …starting from here? John Jaros HPS Collaboration Meeting.
Experimental equipment interacting with beam operation D. Macina TS/LEA Many thanks to my colleagues both from the experiments and the machine for their.
HPS Beamline: Background Rates, Sensitivity to Field Uncertainties M. Ungaro1HPS Collaboration Meeting, JLAB, May Concrete Wall thickness Study.
Hovanes Egiyan Jefferson Lab. Main Hall B Beamline Components Beam Tuning Procedure HV System in Hall B Temperature Sensors Summary 10/19/ Hovanes.
CesrTA Experimental Plan M. Palmer for the CesrTA Collaboration November 17, 2008.
PrimEx collaboration meeting Energy calibration of the Hall B bremsstrahlung tagging system using magnetic pair spectrometer S. Stepanyan (JLAB)
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
HPS T EST R UN C ONTINGENCY P LAN S. Stepanyan JLAB.
1 G9a -FROST. 2 Experiments FROST New generation of CLAS photoproduction experiments with FROzen Spin Polarized Target (FROST) E02-112: γp→KY (K + Λ,
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
Transversity Readiness and Timeline Xiaodong Jiang, March 17th, This document specifies the overall readiness for Hall A experiments E06-010/E
HPS Budget and Schedule Marco Oriunno, June 18, 2014.
11/15/20051 Radiation Protection Issues for ILC (not exhaustive) A. Fassò, N. Noriaki, H. Vincke Radiation Physics.
HPS Summary Costs, Manpower, Schedule John Jaros Searching for a New Gauge Boson at JLab Jefferson Laboratory September 20, 2010.
MICE CM20 Alain Blondel 10 February The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment MICE CM20 Spokesmouse remarks.
Experiment Readiness Review P. Rossi – Hall C Coll. Meeting Jan 21, 2016.
Run Coordinator Report February 5 to 8 Stepan Stepanyan JLAB 1.
Status of n_TOF Facility
A. Baldini PSI July 05 Overview of the experiment MEG is being built (Beam line, Magnet, LXe, DC, TC, Elect., Software) Delays in some items: O(months)
Technical Board Summary Alan Bross MICE CM17 CERN February 25, 2007.
Proposal for the End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC John Jaros ALCPG09 Albuquerque September 30, 2009.
Mike AlbrowSept 8 th 2005Test Beam for FP420 Vacuum Chambers/Detectors 1 Things we need to test (and why) How we could, together with BTeV people, detectors,
Minerva Test Beam 2 Status Geoff Savage for the Test Beam 2 Team March 23, /23/2015AEM - Minerva Test Beam 2 Status1.
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Bubble Chamber Planning Meeting
Beam Background and the SVT Protection Collimator
HPS EC Report John Jaros
Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line
Status Report on E-166 Undulator-Based Production of Polarized Positrons K.T. McDonald Princeton University EPAC Meeting SLAC, November 15, 2003.
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
S. Stepanyan (JLAB) HPS collaboration meeting May 3 – 5, 2017 JLAB
LCLS Personnel Protection System and Beam Containment System
ESHAC #8 Safety Readiness Review Thomas Hansson, ESH
Presentation transcript:

Beamline Overview Collaboration Meeting 16 June 2014 Ken Moffeit 1:30pm - 3:00pmBeamline overview (15’+5’)Ken Moffeit Status of the beamline construction (30’+5’)F-X. Girod MPS/FSD systems for HPS (15'+5')Daniel Sexton Radiation safety in Hall B (15'+5')Pavel and Vashek Silicon detector stepping motor test (15'+5')Takashi Maruyama

Dear all, I am happy to inform that HPS chicane magnets are now installed in the Hall-B downstream alcove. Many thanks to the Hall-B engineering- technical team for the excellent work. Great work! Best, Stepan 5 June 2014

First Magnet Installed in Alcove – 3 June 2014 Spectrometer magnet installed in alcove 4 June 2014 Frascati magnet More in next talk “Status of the beamline construction” - F-X. Girod

Heavy Photon Search (HPS) Experiment Readiness Review Charge to the committee: 1.Are the HPS specific equipment, documentation and procedures to run the experiment in place and adequate? This includes demonstrated readiness for full rate capability and expedient analysis of the data. 2.Are the formal documentation requirements and reporting (run coordinator  shift leaders) procedures for running the experiment adequate, appropriate and complete (COO, ESAD, RSAD, ERG, OSP’s, general equipment operation manuals, etc.)? 3.Has the entire beamline, target, detector configuration been defined (including ownership, maintenance and control during beam operations)? Is all the necessary equipment installed and operable? If not, what are the completion/commissioning schedule and procedures? 4.Are the anticipated beam emittance, halo characteristics and general stability likely to be within the required specification to perform this measurement? 5.Has transmission of the primary beam and generated secondaries been evaluated for unexpected beam restrictions (e.g. too small of a beam pipe acting as a secondary target), background sources (e.g. large number of produced photons hitting the beam line) or paths (e.g. primary and/or secondary steering from a magnet fringe field)? 6.Are the radiation levels expected to be generated in the hall acceptable? Is any local shielding required to minimize the effects of radiation in the hall equipment? 7.Are the local shielding and the machine protection system required to minimize the effects of radiation in the HPS detector in place? 8.Have all the jobs that need to be done to mount the experiment/s been identified and defined adequately? 9.Have conflicts with the 12 GeV Upgrade in Hall B been examined and resolved? 10.Are the responsibilities for carrying out each job identified, and are the manpower and other resources necessary to complete them on time in place? Agenda II. Beamline and detectors (Stepan Stepanyan), will cover charge items #3, #4, and #6 A. Status and plans to complete B. Commissioning schedule and procedures (#3) C. Safety: evaluation of background sources (#4) D. Detector Protection: protection collimator, beam halo monitors and FSD, silicon positioning, local shielding (#6)

Documents and Procedures Beamline Installation document – this is a long list of things that has to be done, people and groups are identified, several weekly meetings are held with the people and groups doing the work. MPS/FSD – see presentation “ MPS/FSD systems for HPS” by Daniel Sexton Beamline design dificationDate= &api=v2

Experimental Hall-B and HPS Run Page CCO – HPS Conduct of Operations for Hall B Heavy Photon Search - June 11, (page 9 gives your responsibilities as a shift member) ESAD - HPS Experiment Safety Assessment Document (General Hazards, Hall B specific hazards) ERG - Hall-B Emergency Response Guidelines HALL B WORKER SAFETY AWARENESS TRAINING (SAF111) (Familiarize users with safety hazards and protection systems in the Counting House and Hall + maps) HPS Run Page – (documentation, including operational manuals for detectors, and safety documents - each detector should have description of its own controls in its own operational manual ) Silicon Detector (Tim Nelson – Silicon detector group) Ecal (work in progress – (Raphae ̈ l Dupré - Ecal detector group)

0.1 Radiation damage to electronics While most of the HPS electronics are located away from the beam line, the front-end electronics boards (FE boards) are inside the vacuum chamber of the PS magnet at 20 cm from the HPS target. There are ten FE boards and each FE board has one Xilinx Artix 100T FPGA and 25 voltage reg- ulator MOSFETs, which are potentially vulnerable to radiations, especially neutrons. While the radiation damage from Total Ionizing Dose (TID) and Non Ionizing Energy Loss (NIEL) are negligible, Single Event Upset (SEU) may cause data corruption in FPGA and Single Event Gate Rupture (SEGR) may permanently damage MOSFET. BaBar detector at SLAC had 47 FPGAs near the interaction point and observed many SEUs. Based on the BaBar experience and taking the ge- ometry difference into consideration, we estimate 1 SEU/day at the neutron flux of 8000 neutrons/cm2/sec. Since all the MOSFETs are operated at less than 5 V gate voltage, SEGR is verly unlikely to take place Neutron production calculation Neutron production calculations were made using the particle interaction simulation code FLUKA and Geant4. Following neutron production sources have been studied, 1. SVT Protection Collimator (1 cm Tungsten) 3 m upstream of the HPS target 2. HPS Target (4 μm Tungsten) 3. PS Magnet Coil/Body at the beam’s right 4. ECal vacuum chamber and downstream beam pipe 5. Beam dump Among these sources, the HPS target is by far the dominant neutron source for the FE boards and the neutron production rate is 2×10−6 neutrons per 2.2 GeV e-. The neutron flux at the FE boards is estimated to be 700 neutrons/cm2/sec at the beam current of 200 nA. This neutron flux is at least a factor of ten lower than the neutron flux expected to cause 1 SEU/day. RSAD – HPS Radiation Safety Assessment Document Page doesn’t exist at the moment. I ncludes section specific to HPS written by Takashi (see below) Radiation damage to electronics Neutron production sources See also talk in this session “Radiation safety in Hall B” Pavel and Vashek

Installation Procedures Silicon Detector (John Jaros) lation.pptx?version=2&modificationDate= &api=v2 Ecal Detector(Raphae ̈ l Dupré) 02_ECalInstall.pdf?version=1&modificationDate= &api=v2 Procedures to follow for HPS Beam Recovery from beam trip – work in progress Operation Procedures: HPS Protection Collimator Operation Procedures (see below) HPS Target Operation Procedures (see below) HPS Wires Operation (in progress)

HPS Beamline Commission document A) Beam to Hall-B tagger dump – Accelerator Operations B) HPS Pre-setup before bringing beam to alcove and dump C) Beam to alcove and dump – Accelerator Operations and HPS D) HPS and Accelerator Operations – center beam in Ecal vacuum chamber Vertical centering in Ecal vacuum chamber Horizontal centering in Ecal vacuum chamber E) HPS and Accelerator Operations – center beam in HPS silicon detector. F) Position HPS Protection Collimator G) Tests after beam through HPS is established, chicane currents are set and rates on halo counters are as expected.

HPS Protection Collimator (Radiator Stick) Drawings done Need decision on thickness of thin gold target used for no- field calibration source. Fabrication at JLAB MPS/FSD system must be operational when HPS PC in.

Protection Collimator Operation Manual – Takashi ate= &api=v2

HPS Target (Clive and Marco) Need decision on C12 and CH2 calibration targets. Drawing in progress Target Operation Manual - Takashi pi=v2

Beam Silicon layer 1 Target stepping motor 10 cm Thin Tungsten Targets Beam Thin Tungsten Targets: 4 microns at bottom and 8 microns above Calibration targets: C12 and CH2 Thin Gold Targets: 4 microns at bottom and 8 microns above Target cartoon

Magnets: Krister Bruhwell is working on the main dipole and on the Frascati magnet power supplies. Controls for Frascati magnets are all serial, Krister is in process restoring the hardware connections. Motors: Krister is working on installation of the downstream beamline motors. So far only beam stopper is working. Regular Hall B harp scans do not need significant changes. Ani Simonyan is working on 3-wire analysis for the scans. Vacuum: Accelerator division who will provide EPICS support for the beamline vacuum equipment for HPS. MSP/FSD: See talk in the beamline session. Beamline scalers: Same hardware for scalers (Struck and Joerger) for the HPS beamline. The scaler readout software needs to be transferred to new EPICS. SVT Motors: Takashi has the XPS controller to be used for target and SVT support, he is learning how to use for HPS SVT applications. So far XPS works well for Takashi. Takashi will send XPS controller to Hovanes once finished with testing and calibrating the SVT stages. Hall D uses XPS controllers for all motors, EPICS support is not a problem. The SVT scans will need to use Hall D scan procedure using XPS controller still under active development in Hall D. HPS Slow Controls (Update 4 June 2014: Hovanes Egiyan)

15 Beamline Costs Change M&S/LaborActualBudgetedDifference Beamline Elements$51.7k / $137.6k$189.4k$134.6k- $54.8 Alcove Installation$62.9k / $76.0k$138.9k$84.5k - $54.4 Magnet$33.3k / $7.5k$40.8k$26.6k- $14.2k TOTAL$147.9k / $221.1k$369.1k$245.7k- $123.4k The missing $125k were requested and agreed by Alan Stone on 4/25, as part of the contingency held by DOE.

Beamline Schedule 2014 Beamline Review

First beam into Hall-B may come some time between mid-October to mid-November. Beam through the HPS may be available some time beginning of November to December.