An Air Quality Proving Ground (AQPG) for GOES-R R. M. Hoff (UMBC GEST/JCET), S. A. Christopher (UAH), F. Moshary (CCNY), S. Kondragunta (STAR), R. B. Pierce.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving the View of Air Quality from Space Jim Crawford Science Directorate NASA Langley.
Advertisements

A Tutorial on MODIS and VIIRS Aerosol Products from Direct Broadcast Data on IDEA Hai Zhang 1, Shobha Kondragunta 2, Hongqing Liu 1 1.IMSG at NOAA 2.NOAA.
SPoRT Products in Support of the GOES-R Proving Ground and NWS Forecast Operations Andrew Molthan NASA Short-term Prediction Research and Transition (SPoRT)
Title: Applications of the AWG Cloud Height Algorithm (ACHA) Authors and AffiliationsAndrew Heidinger, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR Steve Wanzong, UW/CIMSS Topics:
NOAA GOES-R Air Quality Proving Ground July 30, 2011 Case Study Haze in Mid-Atlantic.
Overview of GOES and MTSAT Platforms: Fire Monitoring Characteristics
1 1. FY09 GOES-R3 Project Proposal Title Page Title: Trace Gas and Aerosol Emissions from GOES-R ABI Project Type: GOES-R algorithm development project.
Satellite based estimates of surface visibility for state haze rule implementation planning Air Quality Applied Sciences Team 6th Semi-Annual Meeting (Jan.
Xiaolei Niu and R. T. Pinker Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Radiative Flux Estimates from.
Development of a Simulated Synthetic Natural Color ABI Product for GOES-R AQPG Hai Zhang UMBC 1/12/2012 GOES-R AQPG workshop.
Validation of MODIS based GOES-R ABI AOD retrievals using Ground based LIDAR Data R. Bradley Pierce Ed Eloranta, Dave Turner, Shobha Kondragunta, Pubu.
A Tutorial on MODIS and VIIRS Aerosol Products from Direct Broadcast Data on IDEA Hai Zhang 1, Shobha Kondragunta 2, Hongqing Liu 1 1.IMSG at NOAA 2.NOAA.
Update on Delivery System Options for ABI and VIIRS Air Quality Products Ray Hoff.
BRAVO - Results Big Bend Regional Aerosol & Visibility Observational Study Bret Schichtel National Park Service,
GOES-R AEROSOL PRODUCTS AND AND APPLICATIONS APPLICATIONS Ana I. Prados, S. Kondragunta, P. Ciren R. Hoff, K. McCann.
Upcoming AQPG Activities Amy Huff Battelle Memorial Institute NOAA GOES-R AQPG 2 nd Annual Advisory Group Workshop January 12, 2012.
Shobha Kondragunta 1 and Pubu Ciren 2 GOES-R ABI Aerosol Detection Product (ADP) Validation 1 NOAA/NESDIS/STAR 2 Second AWG Validation Workshop.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Air Quality Products from.
Chapter 2: Satellite Tools for Air Quality Analysis 10:30 – 11:15.
Infusing satellite Data into Environmental Applications (IDEA): PM2.5 forecasting tool hosted at NOAA NESDIS using NASA MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging.
Infusing satellite Data into Environmental Applications (IDEA): R. Bradley Pierce NOAA/NESDIS/STAR PM2.5 forecasting tool hosted at NOAA NESDIS using NASA.
Aircraft spiral on July 20, 2011 at 14 UTC Validation of GOES-R ABI Surface PM2.5 Concentrations using AIRNOW and Aircraft Data Shobha Kondragunta (NOAA),
Shobha Kondragunta and Ivan Csiszar NOAA/NESDIS Amy Huff Pennsylvania State University Hai Zhang and Pubu Ciren IMSG at NOAA Xiaoyang Zhang South Dakota.
University of Wisconsin - Madison (UW) University of Hawaii (UH) Texas A& M (TAMU) University of Colorado at Boulder (CU) University of Alabama in Huntsville.
SATELLITE AIR QUALITY PROVING GROUND Amy Huff Shobha Kondragunta Ray Hoff.
NOAA GOES-R Air Quality Proving Ground (AQPG) Advisory Group Workshop September 14, 2010 University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) Raymond M. Hoff,
Developing a High Spatial Resolution Aerosol Optical Depth Product Using MODIS Data to Evaluate Aerosol During Large Wildfire Events STI-5701 Jennifer.
Estimates of Biomass Burning Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Emissions from the GOES Imager Xiaoyang Zhang 1,2, Shobha Kondragunta 1, Chris Schmidt 3 1 NOAA/NESDIS/Center.
Infusing satellite Data into Environmental Applications (IDEA): R. Bradley Pierce NOAA/NESDIS/STAR PM2.5 forecasting tool hosted at NOAA NESDIS using NASA.
Air Quality Proving Ground R. M. Hoff 1, A. Huff 2, S. Kondragunta 4, P. Ciren 4, C. Xu 4, H. Zhang 1, S. Christopher 3, E.-Y. Su 3 1 UMBC 2 Battelle Memorial.
GOES-R ABI PROXY DATA SET GENERATION AT CIMSS Mathew M. Gunshor, Justin Sieglaff, Erik Olson, Thomas Greenwald, Jason Otkin, and Allen Huang Cooperative.
GOES and GOES-R ABI Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) Validation Shobha Kondragunta and Istvan Laszlo (NOAA/NESDIS/STAR), Chuanyu Xu (IMSG), Pubu Ciren (Riverside.
Update on Delivery System Options for ABI and VIIRS Air Quality Products Ray Hoff.
1 GOES-R Air Quality Proving Ground Leads: UAH UMBC NESDIS/STAR.
Significant contributions from: Todd Schaack and Allen Lenzen (UW-Madison, Space Science and Engineering Center) Mark C. Green (Desert Research Institute)
NOAA/NESDIS Cooperative Research Program Second Annual Science Symposium SATELLITE CALIBRATION & VALIDATION July Barry Gross (CCNY) Brian Cairns.
Air Quality Proving Ground 3 rd Users Workshop Raymond Hoff, UMBC Shobha Kondragunta, NESDIS STAR Amy Huff, Penn State University Raymond Hoff, UMBC Shobha.
The GOES-R Air Quality Proving Ground: Building An Air Quality User Community for the Next Generation of Products Raymond M. Hoff, H. Zhang, A. Huff, S.
NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications and Research Air Quality Products from GOES-R Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) S. Kondragunta, NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
DEVELOPING HIGH RESOLUTION AOD IMAGING COMPATIBLE WITH WEATHER FORECAST MODEL OUTPUTS FOR PM2.5 ESTIMATION Daniel Vidal, Lina Cordero, Dr. Barry Gross.
Overview of Case Studies of VIIRS Aerosol Products for Operational Applications Amy Huff Pennsylvania State University VIIRS Aerosol Science and Operational.
Improvements of the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites (GOES)-R series for Climate Applications GOES-R data and products will support applications.
Satellite Air Quality Proving Ground Ray Hoff (UMBC) Amy Huff (Battelle Memorial Inst.) Shobha Kondragunta (NESDIS)
GOES-R Recommendations from past GOES Users’ Conference: Jim Gurka Tim Schmit Tom Renkevens NOAA/ NESDIS Tony Mostek NOAA/ NWS Dick Reynolds Short and.
GOES-R Air Quality Proving Ground H. Zhang 1, R. M. Hoff 1, S. Kondragunta 2, A. Huff 3, M. Green 4, S. A. Christopher 5, B. Pierce.
VALIDATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF THE GOES-R RAINFALL RATE ALGORITHM Background Robert J. Kuligowski, Center for Satellite Applications and Research, NOAA/NESDIS,
The Asian Dust Events of April 1998 Prepared by: R. B. Husar, D. Tratt, B. A. Schichtel, S. R. Falke, F. Li D. Jaffe, S. Gassó, T. Gill, N. S. Laulainen,
As components of the GOES-R ABI Air Quality products, a multi-channel algorithm similar to MODIS/VIIRS for NOAA’s next generation geostationary satellite.
An Air Quality Proving Ground (AQPG) for GOES-R 6. ABI outputs will be integrated into an IDEA-like platform which will be the AQPG testbed for dissemination.
“An Exceptional Event Concerning Particle Pollution in the Southeast” By: Bill Murphey Chief Meteorologist, Georgia EPD.
Satellite Basics MAC Smog Blog Training CATHALAC, Panama, Sept 11-12, 2008 Jill Engel-Cox & Erica Zell Battelle Memorial Institute
Transpacific transport of anthropogenic aerosols: Integrating ground and satellite observations with models AAAR, Austin, Texas October 18, 2005 Colette.
Summary of User Feedback on GOES-R Air Quality Proving Ground Summer 2011 Experiment Shobha Kondragunta, Amy Huff, and Raymond Hoff Proving Ground All-Hands.
Estimating PM 2.5 from MODIS and MISR AOD Aaron van Donkelaar and Randall Martin March 2009.
GEOS-CHEM Activities at NIA Hongyu Liu National Institute of Aerospace (NIA) at NASA LaRC June 2, 2003.
Characterization of GOES Aerosol Optical Depth Retrievals during INTEX-A Pubu Ciren 1, Shobha Kondragunta 2, Istvan Laszlo 2 and Ana Prados 3 1 QSS Group,
Chemical Data Assimilation: Aerosols - Data Sources, availability and needs Raymond Hoff Physics Department/JCET UMBC.
NOAA GOES-R Air Quality Proving Ground March 25, 2011 Case Study Smoke in Southeastern U.S.
Transpacific transport of anthropogenic aerosols and implications for North American air quality EGU, Vienna April 27, 2005 Colette Heald, Daniel Jacob,
On the Verification of Particulate Matter Simulated by the NOAA-EPA Air Quality Forecast System Ho-Chun Huang 1, Pius Lee 1, Binbin Zhou 1, Jian Zeng 6,
Assessment of Upper atmospheric plume models using Calipso Satellites and Environmental Assessment and Forecasting Chowdhury Nazmi, Yonghua Wu, Barry Gross,
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Development of a visibility retrieval for the GOES-R Advanced Baseline.
GOES visible (or “sun-lit”) image
NOAA GOES-R Air Quality Proving Ground Case Study 2 May 24, 2007
(2)Battelle Memorial Institute, 2101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 800,
Geostationary Sounders
Using dynamic aerosol optical properties from a chemical transport model (CTM) to retrieve aerosol optical depths from MODIS reflectances over land Fall.
NOAA GOES-R Air Quality Proving Ground July 4, 2012 Case Study
Global Climatology of Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Estimated from Remote-Sensed Aerosol Optical Depth Aaron van Donkelaar1, Randall Martin1,2,
UW WRF mbar forecasts.
Presentation transcript:

An Air Quality Proving Ground (AQPG) for GOES-R R. M. Hoff (UMBC GEST/JCET), S. A. Christopher (UAH), F. Moshary (CCNY), S. Kondragunta (STAR), R. B. Pierce (NESDIS/CIMSS), M. Green (DRI), A. Huff (Battelle) GOES-R Proving Ground January 2010 Call R. M. Hoff (UMBC GEST/JCET), S. A. Christopher (UAH), F. Moshary (CCNY), S. Kondragunta (STAR), R. B. Pierce (NESDIS/CIMSS), M. Green (DRI), A. Huff (Battelle) GOES-R Proving Ground January 2010 Call

IDEA (

GOES Aerosol and Smoke Product (GASP) GASP is derived from a single visible channel and from a 28 day tracking of the darkest pixel in a scene Cannot do what MODIS and other multiwavelength sensors can do!

GOES GOES - R  Single wavelength  1/2 hourly scenes  Requires 28 day spin- up  Has a known diurnal bias  Less precise than MODIS AOD  Single wavelength  1/2 hourly scenes  Requires 28 day spin- up  Has a known diurnal bias  Less precise than MODIS AOD  Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) “MODIS at GEO”  16 spectral channels  Full disk, CONUS, and special scans  5 minute images  AOD should be as good as MODIS  Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) “MODIS at GEO”  16 spectral channels  Full disk, CONUS, and special scans  5 minute images  AOD should be as good as MODIS

 Spectral (wavelength dependent) thresholds can separate thick smoke, light smoke, and clear sky conditions Aerosol Detection Physical Description Heavy smoke clear smoke Clear Regime Smoke Regime Thick Smoke Regime

Air Quality Proving Ground  Using MODIS + Models + Ground data in hand, can we create cases that look interesting enough to train users?  NOAA is creating proxy data sets from model data  UMBC/UAH identifying cases which impact multiple areas and stations (UMBC, UAH, UW, CCNY, + …..?)  Using MODIS + Models + Ground data in hand, can we create cases that look interesting enough to train users?  NOAA is creating proxy data sets from model data  UMBC/UAH identifying cases which impact multiple areas and stations (UMBC, UAH, UW, CCNY, + …..?)

AQPG Workflow

AQPG Case 1 - Aug 20-24, 2006  Mark Green of DRI is working on a case study which exercises the AQPG  This is a case with smoke in the US Northwest and sulfate haze in the east  Period chosen in part because it occurred during the Second Texas Air Quality Study (TexAQS II)  We have a proxy GOES-R product for this case produced by Brad Pierce  “A model is guilty until proven innocent”- Bill Ryan  Mark Green of DRI is working on a case study which exercises the AQPG  This is a case with smoke in the US Northwest and sulfate haze in the east  Period chosen in part because it occurred during the Second Texas Air Quality Study (TexAQS II)  We have a proxy GOES-R product for this case produced by Brad Pierce  “A model is guilty until proven innocent”- Bill Ryan

Evaluation of the Case  Use GOCART aerosol module - predicts concentrations of seven aerosol species (SO 4, hydrophobic OC, hydrophilic OC, hydrophobic BC, hydrophilic BC, dust, sea-salt) + “other pm2.5”(p25)  Output at 15 minute intervals  Model PM2.5 calculated as: pm2_5_dry=p25+bc1+bc2+oc1+oc2+dust1+dust2*0.286+ssalt1+ssalt2*0.942+sulfate  NH 4 not included so added 0.375*SO 4 to account for ammonium in ammonium sulfate  Added larger dust and sea salt categories to obtain PM 10

Contour map of IMPROVE network particulate sulfur (8/24/06)

Contour map of IMPROVE organic carbon for 8/24/06

GOES and WRF-Chem AOD show similar patterns WRF-chem.gif

Results WRF-Chem does a good job predicting SO 4 Good correlation for OC, but WRF-Chem biased factor of 3 low - not surprising as sources are not inventoried

The overall WRF-Chem PM 2.5 prediction is dominated by this under-prediction of OC

Bondville- WRF-Chem AOD close to AERONET AOD except when WRF-Chem predicts clouds- much higher SO 4 AOD predicted Howard- Increase in SO 4 and OC AOD with WRF-Chem clouds (growth of hydrophilic OC and well as SO 4 ) Impact of speciation on AOD

Next Steps  Several more case studies have been identified  Amy Huff of Battelle Memorial Institute will be forming a user group at the EPA National Air Quality Conference in March  We will have a workshop in August to start training users on the case studies  Funding has been provided by GOES-R program office (Steve Goodman) under cooperative agreement number NA09NES and through the CREST Cooperative Agreement  Several more case studies have been identified  Amy Huff of Battelle Memorial Institute will be forming a user group at the EPA National Air Quality Conference in March  We will have a workshop in August to start training users on the case studies  Funding has been provided by GOES-R program office (Steve Goodman) under cooperative agreement number NA09NES and through the CREST Cooperative Agreement