S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S CBA/Justice Annual Meeting National Environmental Energy and Resources Law Section.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A 2030 framework for climate and energy policies Marten Westrup
Advertisements

CA Manufacturers & Technology Assn. Mike Rogge Greenhouse gas presentation to Cal EPA Climate Action Team workshop October 24, 2005.
Getting More for Four Principles for Comprehensive Emissions Trading Jan Mazurek, Director Center for Innovation and the Environment 2002 Environmental.
Reliability in British Columbia
WTO Compatibility of «Green Border Taxes» Dr. Joëlle de Sépibus World Trade Institute, Bern.
IBM Corporate Environmental Affairs and Product Safety
AB32: CAs Global Warming Solutions Act of first ever statewide cap of GHG pollution -CA is 12 th largest source of GHG pollution in world -law designed.
Implementing a Realistic Climate Change Strategy Hans Konow Canadian Electricity Association April 03, 2003.
Clean Energy Project Analysis Course Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis with RETScreen ® Software © Minister of Natural Resources Canada 2001 – Photo.
European Commission: Environment Directorate General Slide: 1 Linking the EU Emissions Trading Scheme with JI and CDM Linking the EU Emissions Trading.
Responsible Resource Development April 17, Context Government focussed on responsible development of Canada’s natural resources to create jobs and.
1 Workshop on inventories of greenhouse gas emissions from aviation and navigation May 2004, Copenhagen EU greenhouse gas emission trends and projections.
S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S This may not necessarily represent the view of the Government CBA/Justice Annual.
Sectoral Approaches to the Post-2012 Climate Change Policy Architecture Jake Schmidt, Director of International Programs Center for Clean Air Policy *******
Corbin Devlin McLennan Ross LLP October 19, 2007 ALBERTA’S CLIMATE: A Comparison to Canada’s Approach to Managing Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
Canada’s Offset System for Greenhouse Gases Dean Stinson O’Gorman New Brunswick Climate Change Hub meeting October 7, 2009.
Climate Action EU ETS #EU2030 Jos Delbeke DG CLIMATE ACTION Carbon Expo 2014 – Cologne 28 May 2014.
This may not represent the view of the Government 1 Canada’s Climate Change Plan Large Final Emitters Regime and Domestic Offsets Regime Stéphane Roberge,
The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) Rationale and Lessons learnt Artur Runge-Metzger Head of International Climate Negotiations, European Commission.
1 Katy R. Forney Energy Sector Technical Authority Air Permits Section EPA Region 4 PSD and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule 14 th Annual Power Generation.
1 Moving Beyond Kyoto Ratification Presentation to the Senate Standing Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources April 3, 2003 Ottawa,
Canada’s Approach to Tackling Climate Change John M R Stone Carleton University Ottawa, Canada.
Oregon Climate Change Regulatory Activities and Policy Initiatives Bill Drumheller -- Oregon Department of Energy University of Oregon School of Law Climate.
Negotiated Energy Agreements Pilot Project 24 th September 2003 Andrew Parish Project Coordinator Report Launch.
Carbon markets An international tool for cost-effective GHG mitigation.
Greenhouse Gas GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION BUYERS POOL NATSOURCE ASSET MANAGEMENT 1 Introduction to Emissions Trading Paul Vickers Managing Director Natsource.
Market Mechanisms to Curb Greenhouse Gases: Challenges and Future Directions Joe Kruger February 20, 2007 Joe Kruger February 20, 2007.
Turning the Corner: An Action Plan to Reduce Greenhouse Gases and Air Pollution Regulatory Framework for Industrial Air Emissions October 2007.
Comments on Canada’s Large Final Emitters (LFE) and Domestic Offsets Climate Change Plans GRAY E. TAYLOR 1 First Canadian Place, 44 th.
FEDERAL CLIMATE CHANGE LEGISLATION Overview of Key Provisions of House and Senate Bills for Industrial Energy Users John Clancy Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. 780.
Presentation to the Climate Change Leadership Forum 1.Proposal for an Australian ETS 2.Update on USA, Japan & EU ETS 6 August 2008 Dave Brash.
AGEC/FNR 406 LECTURE 21 Atmospheric Concentrations of Carbon Dioxide,
Doing Their Bit: Ensuring Large Industrial Emitters Contribute Adequately to Canada’s Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol Matthew Bramley / Robert Hornung.
Lessons from implementing the EU Emission Trading System DG Environment European Commission Side event 2009 Climate Change.
An industry perspective on carbon emission pricing Carbon Pricing and Environmental Federalism Conference Queen’s University, October 17-18, 2008 Rick.
Context, Principles, and Key Questions for Allowance Allocation in the Electricity Sector Joint Workshop of the Public Utilities Commission and Energy.
CLIMATE CHANGE – NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR SUBSOIL USERS Yerzhan Yessimkhanov Director, Subsoil Use Department Grata Law Firm 1.
California Cap on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Market-Based Compliance Mechanisms Edie Chang California Air Resources Board September 2015 California.
Management Systems Risk and Liability Management Process Improvements ©Copyright 2007 Kestrel Management Services, LLC Carbon.
Presentation “Green Investment Schemes – greenhouse gas emissions quotas trading mechanisms in Ukraine according to the Kyoto Protocol to the Convention.
1 Canada’s Climate Fund John Drexhage, Director Climate Change and Energy International Institute for Sustainable Development An Offsets Approach for Canada.
Large Industrial Emitters Emissions Trading Natural Resources Canada March 14, 2003.
American Public Power Association Pre-Rally Workshop February 28, 2006 Washington, D.C. Climate Change: Making Community-Based Decisions in a Carbon Constrained.
Manitoba Perspectives on Emissions Trading Bryan Gray Manitoba Energy Science and Technology March 14, 2003.
“Large Final Emitters”: The Centrepiece of Canada’s Kyoto Plan Matthew Bramley Pembina Institute March 16, 2004.
June 26, Background of Federal GHG Regulation Supreme Court determines greenhouse gases (GHGs) are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act U.S.
The EU Emissions Trading Scheme and its review Thomas Bernheim DG Environment, unit C.2 European Commission.
EU Emissions Trading. Context European Climate Change Programme (ECCP) European Climate Change Programme (ECCP) Directive on Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
CEMENT SECTOR PRESENTATION TO WCI CANADIAN PARTNERS OCTOBER, 2008 QUEBEC CITY, QUEBEC.
California to Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia and Beyond? Can Subnational Arrangements Fill the Gap? Professor Sharon Mascher Faculty of Law, University.
NS4054 Fall Term 2015 North America Energy Trilemma.
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson MAV Rate Capping Forum 26 November 2015.
Challenges and Opportunities for Addressing Global Climate Change February 2006.
Introduction to Domestic Emissions Trading Warren Bell Associate, IIISD Kyoto Mechanisms Seminar for the Manitoba Business Sector March 14, 2003.
2/27/ % below 2005 by 2020 cap and trade 11/15/2007 set emissions targets by 11/15/08 ~60-80% cuts by ???? (2040?) cap and trade; C inventory, reporting.
The Challenges of Regional Climate Policy Cooperation – A Canadian Perspective David McLaughlin President and CEO NRTEE.
Overview of Western Climate Initiative WESTAR Fall Meeting October 2008.
Greening Canada’s International Purchases Climate Law Symposium December 3, 2005 Warren Bell, IISD.
Dutch presidency agenda on ensuring industrial competitiveness Erik Janssen, Ministry of Economic Affairs The Netherlands.
European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: Institutional Lessons for China Ping CHEN, PhD Researcher Department of Public International Law Gent University.
Page 1 Legal and Policy Directions for Biofuels Proposed Federal Renewable Fuels Regulations Biofuels: Legal and Policy Dimensions The Law Foundation of.
Linkages Workshop November 14/ Outline Alberta context Regulatory framework Compliance options Carbon connections.
Trading Futures proposals for emissions trading in the UK Chris Hewett Research Fellow Institute for Public Policy Research.
Preparing Readiness for Market Instruments
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
Carbon Pricing Telling Canada’s story in numbers
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
Regional Climate Alliances Spring 2008
Canada’s Regulatory Framework for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Ontario’s New System to Price Industrial Pollution Emissions Performances Standards (EPS) March 15, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S CBA/Justice Annual Meeting National Environmental Energy and Resources Law Section Law Section Ottawa, ON October 22, 2004 Joanne Kellerman Senior Counsel Legal Services, Natural Resources Canada Climate Change: Proposed Policy Framework for Large Final Emitters (LFEs)

S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S LARGE FINAL EMITTERS Large Final Emitters (LFEs) include: oil and gas production upgrading and refining pipelines thermal power generation Mining In 2000, LFEs were responsible for 46 percent of Canada’s total GHG emissions. In 2010, their share of Canada’s total GHG emissions is project to increase to approximately 50 percent. 1 steel aluminum chemicals and fertilizers pulp & paper cement and lime

S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S Climate Change Plan for Canada The Climate Change Plan for Canada established a three-pronged approach to Large Final Emitters (LFEs): targets for emission reductions of 55 Mt from 2010 “business as usual” access to emissions trading, domestic offsets, and international permits to provide flexibility; and complementary measures, including cost-shared investments in innovative technologies, to reduce emissions. 2

S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S Policy Principles 1.Covenants with a regulatory or financial backstop 2.Targets will be based on emission intensity – the ratio of emissions to physical output. 3.The system will not disadvantage firms that have taken early action 4.Competitiveness of Canadian industry will be protected. 5.No one region will bear an unreasonable burden. 6.Pre-approved commitments of larger reductions over the longer term in lieu of near term reductions will be explored. 7.The target will not be more than 55 Mt. 3

S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S Additional Policy Commitments In a letter to the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers in December, 2002, the former Minister of Natural Resources stated: that during the first compliance period, the Government will ensure that Canadian companies would have the opportunity to meet their obligations at a price no greater than $15 per tonne; and to set emissions intensity targets at a level no more than 15 percent below projected 2010 levels. In a subsequent letter to CAPP in July, 2003, the former Prime Minister reiterated the above commitments and further accepted: qualifying research and development incentives will be built into compliance mechanism; and long-term emissions targets to be locked-in in advance for new projects. 4

S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S Progress to Date Extensive, ongoing meetings with provinces and territories, as well as stakeholders. Discussion papers shared on a number of key design elements. Agreement with industry reps (IETA/CWGCM) on principles for a Canadian carbon market. Memoranda of Understanding with Dupont Canada and with the pulp and paper sector in expectation of legislative authority to establish covenants. 5

S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S LFE Obligations LFEs will be prohibited from emitting GHGs without an equivalent number of permits. LFEs will be required to quantify and report their GHG emissions on an annual basis. Government will provide a number of permits through a distribution method defined by regulation. At the end of each year, LFEs will be required to remit a permit for each tonne of CO 2 equivalent that they released. Companies that do not have enough permits at this point will have to buy additional ones on the market. 6

S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S Quantification and Reporting On March 12, 2004, the Government announced the start of mandatory reporting of GHGs by Canada’s major emitters. Initial reports of GHG emissions for 2004 will be due June 1, 2005 Many of those affected already report their GHG emissions though mandatory and voluntary initiative in several provinces Lays foundation for mandatory reporting for the LFE program in 2008 (and for the national GHG inventory). Offers a one window approach to emission reporting. Via a joint federal/provincial/territorial system This first phase focuses on: emission sources of at least 100 kilotonnes of CO 2 equivalent annually. 7

S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S Allocation The federal government will allocate permits free of charge during the first commitment period: equal, on average, to 85% of forecast 2010 emissions; which corresponds to the 15% emissions intensity target required to reach 55 Mt goal. The allocation of free permits is based on emission intensity targets, meaning that the exact number of permits a company receives will depend on its level of production. Permits will be electronic and will reside inside an emission trading registry managed by the government. Permits will be distributed at the end of the year, after companies report to government (ex post distribution): however, a partial distribution of permits earlier in the year is being considered to facilitate early emissions trading (partial ex ante allocation). 8

S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S Variation by Covenant Covenants might vary the number of permits allocated to a company free of charge: for example, the government could agree to reduce the magnitude of a company’s obligation by increasing its allocation of free permits. The government will only negotiate covenants with industry to address specific issues: competitiveness; early action; Strategic capital turnover. The authority to enter into a covenant on behalf of the Government of Canada will likely rest with the Governor in Council. 9

S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S Additional Flexibility Mechanisms $15 per tonne Price Assurance Mechanism: the government will share the financial risk faced by LFEs by ensuring that they are able to purchase permits at $15 per tonne. at the beginning of each year, companies may choose to contract with government to provide a certain number of $15 permits. the number of $15 permits available to a company will be limited to the gap between their free allocation and their target, and these will not be tradeable. Incentives for research and development: most appropriate mechanism still under development. 10

S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S Emission Trading Companies will be free to trade emission permits at any time. There will also be a period between allocation and “true-up” for companies to obtain the exact number of permits they are required to remit. It is expected that, over time, a mature market will develop to include different types of transactions like forward contracts, etc. It is also expected that the emissions trading exchange or platform will be developed and operated by the private sector. The government does not intend to regulate the market, but will simply track the transfer of permits between different accounts in the registry. The government will monitor international transactions to ensure that Canada respects its obligations under the Kyoto Protocol. 11

S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S Compliance LFEs are free to pursue whatever strategy they choose in order to meet their compliance obligations: implement efficiency and process gains in their own operations; buy Kyoto permits from companies in surplus or from international sources; and/or obtain domestic “offsets” – permits that represent a net reduction or removal of GHG in uncovered activities. LFEs that don’t remit required permits will be subject to penalties. Offences and penalties will apply equally to LFEs covered by covenants and those covered by the backstop regime. Companies in covered sectors with very low emissions may not be subject to legislative obligations. A de minimis threshold is being considered. 12

S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S Timeline Monitoring and Quantification Reporting Ex post Allocation True-Up Jan. 1, 2008Jan. 1, 2010Jan. 1, 2009 Year 1 of Compliance Period Year 2 of Compliance Period Monitoring and Quantification Reporting Ex post Allocation Emissions Trading 13

S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S Web resources: Large Final Emitters website: Discussion papers