1 Service Providers Capacity Assessment Framework Presentation to the Service Delivery Advisory Group August 28, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

Project Prioritization Framework Principles
Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
Options appraisal, the business case & procurement
Local Immigration Partnerships: Systems Planning to Help People.
MSCHE Annual Conference December st Century Higher Education Projections Increasingly diverse student populations Widely varying levels of secondary.
School Community Councils Tuesday, March 23, 2010.
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
School Community Councils A New Framework for Achievement and Public Engagement Craig Melvin Cornwall Street Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 2K9 306.
GEF PROJECT TEMPLATES ANDGUIDELINES George Manful (PhD) Senior Task Manager, Climate Change UNEP UNFCCC Asia and Pacific Regional Workshop on Preparing.
Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations
“Building Capacity in Northern Communities” Strategic Plan (Draft Document) NOSDA Annual General Meeting April 9, 2013 Presentation by Michael.
Bryan Roach Chairman Crime Stoppers Australia. Strategic Planning The process for defining strategy (direction) and decision making For Crime Stoppers,
World Bank Financial Management Sector September 2010.
Labour Market Planning LMDA Service Delivery Advisory Group September 28, 2006 CONFIDENTIAL – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION.
CULTURAL COMPETENCY Technical Assistance Pre-Application Workshop.
PRESENTATION TO ASPECT NOVEMBER 8, EPBC Introduction Launched April 2, WorkBC Employment Services Centres (ESCs) in communities across the.
An Intro to Professionalizing Procurement & Strategic Sourcing
Reaching Out - Empowering Young People Agenda 2.15 pm Introduction Overview of Reaching Out: Empowering Young People Overview of other Big Lottery Fund.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Calhoun County School System Jacksonville, Alabama April 27-30, 2014.
“Ensuring Employment Sector Service Excellence Across Communities” Carol Stewart Employment Sector Council London-Middlesex (ESCLM)
Catulpa Community Support Services.  Use of an electronic data entry program to record demographic data and case notes to reflect service delivery 
1 Vision Area of Focus Success Metrics* * All success metrics to be completed by Spring ’08. Commitments to ActionStatus Provide access to quality and.
State of PLAR at Alberta Post-Secondary Institutions by: Lucille Walter, Chair September 22,,2005 A lberta C ouncil on A dmissions and T ransfer.
Current Developments in the Securities Lending Industry.
SEM Planning Model.
Aust. AM Collaborative Group (AAMCOG) An introduction to ISO “What to do” guide 20th October 2014.
Understanding Concurrent Disorders History A proposal, Strengthening Community Supports for Concurrent Disorders – Reduce ED visits SIGMHA – Data Analysis.
Enterprise Architecture
Benchmarks and Benchmarking in the UK - Lessons Learned Catherine Connor Quality Enhancement Unit London Metropolitan University.
UBC Senate: Supporting an integrated approach to enhancing the mental health and wellbeing of students in the academic environment Lindsey Kovacevic Academic.
National Standards for Safer Better Healthcare
Community Services Programme Strand 1 & 3 Business Planning Re-contracting April 2014.
Alberta-A Province Prepared Alberta Emergency Management Agency- Provincial Services.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Accountability in Health Promotion: Sharing Lessons Learned Management and Program Services Directorate Population and Public Health Branch Health Canada.
O F F I C E O F T H E Auditor General of British Columbia 1 OAG Review of the Performance Agreements between MoHS and Health Authorities.
Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results 2006 CSR Baseline Results Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results.
[Date] Moving on Mental Health - a system that makes sense for children and youth Child Youth and Family Services Coalition May 2013 System Transition.
PRESENTED BY: RAHIMA NJAIDI MJUMITA 3 RD APRIL 2012.
Year 1 Evaluation of Speech Language Demonstration Sites Interim Report September 2011-June 2012.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
BPK Strategic Planning: Briefing for Denpasar Regional Office Leadership Team Craig Anderson Ahmed Fajarprana August 11-12, 2005.
Circuit Rider Training Program (CRTP) Circuit Rider Professional Association Annual General Meeting and Conference August 30, 2012.
Corporate Social Responsibility LECTURE 25: Corporate Social Responsibility MGT
The Value Driven Approach
North Etobicoke LIP Summit Woodbine Convention Centre June 28 th, 2011.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Service Canada and Labour Market Information FLMM 2005 LMI Forum The Role of Labour Market Information in Advancing Economic Prosperity Plenary 4 – Panel.
1 Voluntary and Community Sector Review Voluntary & Community Sector Review Grants Strategy Working Party Participative Session 28 September 2006 Appendix.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
The Implementation of BPR Pertemuan 9 Matakuliah: M0734-Business Process Reenginering Tahun: 2010.
Information Technology Services Strategic Directions Approach and Proposal “Charting Our Course”
Prepared by: Forging a Comprehensive Initiative to Improve Birth Outcomes and Reduce Infant Mortality in [State] Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium.
Developing a Monitoring and Evaluation Framework: Insight into internal stakeholder learnings Beth Ferguson AES Conference Sydney 2 September 2011.
Team Leader, Technology Policy and Strategy, UNFCCC Mr Andrew Higham THE CANCUN AGREEMENTS, THE TECHNOLOGY MECHANISM AND TECHNOLOGY NEEDS ASSESSMENTS UNFCCC.
Capacity Development Results Framework A strategic and results-oriented approach to learning for capacity development.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
The Workforce, Education Commissioning and Education and Learning Strategy Enabling world class healthcare services within the North West.
Community Support Services Common Assessment Project (CMH CAP) OAILP May 5, 2010.
Torbay Council Partnerships Review August PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Date Page 2 Torbay Council Partnerships Background The Audit Commission defines.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
Portfolio Management December Vision To achieve a flexible, responsive and synchronized portfolio that meets the short and long term needs of.
THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND ADMINISTRATION
Explorative Stakeholder Dialogue
Presentation transcript:

1 Service Providers Capacity Assessment Framework Presentation to the Service Delivery Advisory Group August 28, 2008

2 Background On June 23rd, 2008 the ADM Steering committee approved the provincial decision model for developing a service provider network in each community. Service Provider Decision Model 1.Create a current service delivery “footprint.” 2.Determine ‘future state’ employment service levels. 3.Develop customer service thresholds to support funding for specialized employment services. 4.Planning Analysis: a.Current employment services levels and future employment service levels. b.Current delivery and ‘future state’ employment services. c.Current activity and organizational capacity per service provider and provincial baseline standard. 5.Service Providers will be assessed on: a.Employment Services (ES) capacity; b.Organizational capacity indicators –customer service management, service delivery, governance, Human Resources, IT, and Finance policies and procedures, Evaluation and Planning; c.Current performance; d.Additional resources, partnerships, networks and value added strengths/assets that a service provider brings to Employment Ontario’s Employment Services.

3  Key decision-making principles for creating the service provider network are: Customer-centric Transparent Accountable Promote integrated service delivery  The vision for October, 2008 is to begin the initial negotiations with service providers for the delivery of the transformed employment services. In April 2009 the first group of service providers delivering employment services will be contracted, followed by a rolling implementation resulting in the required number of service providers delivering the required employment services no later than September 2009 and a fully transformed employment services model in place by June The speed and approach to implementation of the Employment Services model may differ from community to community. Service providers who are identified to deliver the employment services will receive support from the Ministry, to deliver services in a performance management framework.

4 ES Implementation Principles Implementation of transformed Employment Services will:  Ensure customers will not be affected by changes, ie. will not start over.  Ensure business continuity and client service.  Be planned, staged, and managed.  Be driven by regional implementation plans to maximize local flexibility.  Vary in speed and approach between service delivery areas.  Employ risk mitigation strategies.  Be evidence-based and transparent.  Build on the strengths of the existing network.

5 Regional Transition Plans For each community, regions will conduct an environmental scan, collect data on current types of client services, service levels, and providers to create a current service delivery “footprint” and determine ‘future state’ service levels based on analysis of current employment services and mix, customer needs, labour market information, available funding and local planning. In their transition plans regions will identify:  service providers who will be delivering employment services, based on the community assessment;  service providers who will continue to provide services over the transition period;  new service providers for new services, if required;  service providers who don’t meet these standards and community needs and whose agreements will require wind down. Service Providers will be assessed by regional teams for their ability to deliver the employment services and rated against a minimum provincial baseline standard for organizational capacity required to deliver Employment Services effectively.

6 To develop tools and supports for this regional service provider assessment process, Project 27a - Service Provider Network project team reviewed the best practices in the various jurisdictions identified through the Deloitte research. As well, are working collaboratively with Ontario Internal Audit Branch, Education Services Audit team to ensure our process and criteria incorporates the requirements of the Transfer Payment Accountability Directive and consider risk mitigation best practices. We also considered the principles and processes associated with Program Design’s Performance Management framework for Employment Services which focuses on outcomes not process and supports continuous improvement in achieving goals in customer service, effectiveness and efficiency. The performance management framework defines the dimensions of success in employment services which makes up the overall service delivery quality standard and is linked to sustainable funding. We have incorporated, as part of the assessment criteria, the dimensions of organizational capacity which are characteristics and strengths that enable organizations to sustain and improve results and adapt to change.

7 Process for assessing Service providers’ capacity to deliver Employment Services: The new EO service provider network in Ontario will be comprised of community organizations that have demonstrated capability, experience and are effective and responsive working in and with their respective communities in support of the Employment Ontario promise. The new Employment Services model links overall service quality- Effectiveness, Customer service and Efficiency to funding and integrates service components into a more flexible, customer centric access to services. It builds on the strength of the current network and at the same time, enhances services to be more customer-centric, responsive and flexible to local community needs. (Outlined in the attachment is the recommended process for assessing service providers for full suite Employment Services.)

8  open, transparent and evidence based  provides a provincial framework for consistency and equitable assessment of service providers yet maintains regional flexibility to respond to local community characteristics  assessment criteria and expectations of Ministry are clear to service providers  engages all the service providers in a collaborative process by giving the service provider an opportunity to provide comprehensive information which will be used by the Ministry to assess their capacity to deliver Employment Services  value-added for service provider to assess their capacity against the Ministry standards for planning purposes  the assessment process will include the Ministry’s validation of the information received through the service providers’ capacity survey package and review of the current file, current performance, consultation and on-site/telephone visits to service provider  Ministry makes the final decision  Staggered assessment less resource intensive and allows for in-depth assessment and validation by Ministry staff  Supports ETD’s ability to meet our public commitment to have at least 25% of their Employment Services agreements in the regions in place by April Considerations in recommending this process include:

9 Who will be eligible to complete this capacity survey? All current active EAS and JC agreement holders will be sent this capacity survey package by the Ministry to provide feedback that will be used as part of the Ministry’s assessment process to determine which service providers possess the required Employment Services delivery capacity and the provincial standards for organizational capacity except: Practice firms Stand alone ERCs being considered under the ERC interim strategy, as identified in the regional transition plans All eligible service providers will receive the capacity survey at the same time to ensure fairness and consistent treatment and the deadline to return the completed survey will be the same for all recipients. The Service Provider Survey will collect data under the following categories: 1. Business Profile 2. Employment Services components capacity 3. Organizational Capacity 4. Current performance 5. Added community value.

10