2 nd National Pilot Survey of OAA Title III Service Recipients: Key to Planning & Improving Performance Nancy Wellman, PhD, RD National Resource Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title VI National Training and Technical Assistance Forum and Listening Session Title VI Program Evaluation May 1, 2007 Bob Hornyak U.S. Administration.
Advertisements

1 Older Americans Act for AAAs Texas Dept of Aging and Disability Services Austin, TX June 6, 2006.
1915(i) State Plan Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) Kathy Poisal (Additional material added by R. Cooper) Center for Medicaid, CHIP, and Survey.
Sandy Markwood National Association of Area Agencies on Aging
Fundamentals of Foundation Grant Research and Writing Linda Holliday, Vice President for Organizational Development.
STATE PLANNING GRANTS Deborah Burns Aging Services Program Specialist Office of Community Based Services US Administration on Aging James Whaley Director.
National Aging Program Information System (NAPIS) National Aging Program Information System (NAPIS) is connected to the Reporting and Analyzing Information.
Program Performance: Using Management Tools and Evaluation Data Assessing Performance to Drive Change Jean L. Lloyd US Administration on Aging 4 th State.
Access To Recovery III GPRA Training Welcome Introductions Agenda
September 30, 2009 NCST Distance Learning Event 1 Federal Funding for Transportation 201: The Older Americans Act NCST – Distance Learning Event September.
Long Term Care, Family Caregiving and the Law of Succession Part One Josephine Gittler The Aging Population, Alzheimer’s and Other Dementias: Law and Public.
An Evaluation Model to promote linkages between community-based public health practice and academia.
Fiscal Year 2007 Data with Projection Scenario Senior and Disabilities Services (SDS) has been working since it’s inception in July of 2003 to develop.
Aging Services in the 21 st Century, the Local Perspective Ken Genewick, Director Randy Hoak, Commissioner.
Older Americans Act Overview
Great change is made through small steps... Attachment Area Plan Public Hearing Handout.
CDC Resources and Tools for Aging Services Professionals Angela Johnson Deokar, MPH, CHES, CPH Public Health Advisor, Healthy Aging Program Centers for.
KENTUCKY PROGRAMS FOR THE ELDERLY October 22, 2014 Frankfort, KY Presented by: BRIAN BOISSEAU: Constituent Services Branch Manager LANNY TAULBEE: Physical.
Preconception Health of Adolescents in Cuyahoga County: Data from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey 2014 CFHS ANNUAL MEETING APRIL 14, 2014 ERIKA S. TRAPL,
HHS HUD Housing Capacity Building Initiative for Community Living Programs of the Administration on Aging Department of Health and Human Services.
Leading for Change Sudha Reddy, MS, RD Georgia Department of Human Resources Division of Aging Services 4th State Units on Aging Nutritionists & Administrators.
Title V and the Older Americans Act: Closing the Loop Ryan Kibby OAA Program Analyst State Unit on Aging.
Older Americans Act Reauthorization 2011 Julie Jarvis Director, Program Development and Planning Karen Webb Manager of Older Americans Act Programs June.
Harris County Area Agency on Aging Aging and Disability Resource Center.
Orientation to the Older Americans Act and Older Californians Act Johnna Meyer, Policy Manager California Department of Aging.
Rebalancing Long Term Care: The Role of the Older Americans Act Nutrition Program Jean Lloyd Dian Weddle 4 th State Units on Aging Nutritionists & Administrators.
ElderCare of Alachua County Senior Hunger Facts 1 in 12 seniors is threatened by hunger 4.8 million seniors face the threat of hunger in 2010 The senior.
1 Older Americans Act Orientation JEAN LLOYD, MS, RD US Administration on Aging 4 th State Units on Aging Nutritionists/Administrator Conference August,
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
The State Unit on Aging Who we are and What we do!
MICHIGAN Elder Economic Security Initiative™ Program Judy Karandjeff, MI Women’s Commission Jacqueline Morrison, AARP Michigan Anita Salustro, AARP Michigan.
Avalere Health LLC | The intersection of business strategy and public policy New Data on Residential Care: Trends, Residents, and Rates October 4, 2012.
Trends in Aging and Long-Term Care August 17, 2007.
Napa Valley Fall Prevention Coalition StopFalls Napa Valley Coordinated Fall Prevention Outreach and Services.
Nutrition Data Webinar January 14, 2014 Kim W. La Croix MPH, RD State Unit on Aging Oregon Public Health Division Rhonda Buedefeldt OAA NAPIS Program Analyst.
Virginia Department for the Aging Area Plan Program Section Training FY 2011.
Comparing Medicaid & Non- Medicaid Environments Suzanne Crisp National Program Office February 13, 2008.
Virginia Department for the Aging Area Plan Program Section Training FY2008.
BreastCare in Arkansas: Results from the Arkansas BRFSS Presented By: LaTonya Steward, B.S. Arkansas BRFSS Coordinator.
The Capacity of the Aging Services Network: Top 10 Things to Know for Reauthorization.
April Resources for Social Marketers: Data for Initial Planning.
CPHA 2008 Public health messaging and program delivery: an ethical approach Heidi Piovoso Suzanne Galesloot.
THE VALUE OF RESULTS Frank Burns 4 th State Units on Aging Nutritionists & Administrators Conference Baltimore, MD August 2006.
Sixth Annual Social Marketing Conference of the California Nutrition Network Susan B. Foerster, Chief Cancer Prevention and Nutrition Section California.
Government Finance Outreach: Is Customizing the Way Forward? Biswa Das, Bailey Hanson Chris Seeger, Cindy Kendall.
D IVISION OF S ENIOR & D ISABILITIES S ERVICES D IRECTOR D UANE M AYES.
Division of Aging Services State Plan on Aging Georgia Department of Human Services Presenter: Jean O’Callaghan Deputy Director Division of Aging Services.
 2013 Cengage-Wadsworth A National Nutrition Agenda for the Public’s Health.
Virginia Department for the Aging Area Plan Program Section Training FY 2012.
Texas KIDS COUNT: The State of San Antonio & Bexar County Children Frances Deviney, PhD Texas KIDS COUNT Director Center for Public Policy Priorities
4 th State Units on Aging Nutritionists & Administrators Conference National Aging Program Information System State Program Report (NAPIS SPR) August 29,
Congregate Meals Program Extreme Makeover Floristene Johnson, MS RD\LD 4th State Units on Aging Nutritionists & Administrators Conference – August 2006.
Conducting Needs Assessments | October 3, 2012 Needs Assessment for the Topsfield Council on Aging Jan E. Mutchler, PhD Center for Social & Demographic.
CONNECTING PEOPLE WITH DEMENTIA AND THEIR FAMILY CAREGIVERS WITH CARE AND RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES December 12, 2012.
New York & Veterans Directed Home and Community Based Services Program Philip McCallion & Lisa A. Ferretti, Center for Excellence in Aging Services
Data-Driven Decision Making: Finding it, Analyzing it, Applying it. Sridevi Mohan, Public Health Madison & Dane County Eric Grosso, Wisconsin Dept. of.
Overview: Evidence-based Health Promotion and Disease Management Programs.
May 12, 2016 Client Diversity - Seniors Food Bank of Iowa Conference.
Lynn Kellogg, CEO Region IV Area Agency on Aging St. Joseph, Michigan February 24, 2009 – Boston, MA Setting the Stage for Veteran Directed Home and Community-Based.
Serving Older Adults, Persons with Disabilities,
Older Americans Act Nutrition Performance Outcome Report
National Survey of Area Agencies on Aging
Virginia Department for the Aging
Administration on Aging
Fiscal Director’s Refresher Training
Virginia Department for the Aging
Older Americans Re-authoraization Act 2015
Older American Act Amendments of 2006
St. Louis City Senior Fund
Dignity Fund Service and Allocation Plan Update
Presentation transcript:

2 nd National Pilot Survey of OAA Title III Service Recipients: Key to Planning & Improving Performance Nancy Wellman, PhD, RD National Resource Center on Nutrition, Physical Activity & Aging Florida International University 4 th State Units on Aging Nutritionists & Administrators Conference August 2006

Outline 2 nd National Pilot Survey overview 2 nd National Pilot Survey overview How AoA uses this information in its Performance Plan submitted to OMB & Congress every year How AoA uses this information in its Performance Plan submitted to OMB & Congress every year 2 nd National Pilot Survey findings 2 nd National Pilot Survey findings Questions: how can you use this information & data to justify, manage & plan for nutrition services in your state Questions: how can you use this information & data to justify, manage & plan for nutrition services in your state

General Purpose To show that Administration on Aging Programs achieve results intended by the Older Americans Act, and Administration on Aging Programs achieve results intended by the Older Americans Act, and Participants value the services. Participants value the services. See: Older Americans Act Program Results & Program Evaluation

Target Audiences for Report Federal Government Federal Government Congress – GPRA; AoA performance budget Congressional justification Congress – GPRA; AoA performance budget Congressional justification Office of Management and Budget - PART Office of Management and Budget - PART Program evaluation Program evaluation State Government State Government Benchmark for state/federal comparisons Benchmark for state/federal comparisons State legislature State legislature Tool for improving performance Tool for improving performance Tool for program planning Tool for program planning

Target Audiences for Report Local Local Justification for public funders: county/city Justification for public funders: county/city Justification for private funders: United Way, foundations, grants Justification for private funders: United Way, foundations, grants Benchmark for AAAs & local providers Benchmark for AAAs & local providers Tool for improving performance Tool for improving performance Tool for program planning Tool for program planning Public inquiries, other federal & state agencies, universities, researchers, general public Public inquiries, other federal & state agencies, universities, researchers, general public

National Pilot Surveys Specific Purposes:  Develop annual performance targets  Measure progress toward long-term performance targets  Develop preliminary national benchmarks for use by SUAs & AAAs  Develop plans for full-scale nat’l study in 2005—currently in data collection phase Sample sizes large enough for analysis by subgroup & geographical region. Sample sizes large enough for analysis by subgroup & geographical region.

National Pilot Surveys Specific Purposes:  Explore possibility of substituting survey for program reporting requirements  Plan next phase of POMP  Assess practical utility of various performance measurement instruments.

AoA Performance Plan aoa.gov/about/legbudg/performance/legbudg_performance.asp Improve targeting of OAA services: National Survey, NAPIS SPR Improve targeting of OAA services: National Survey, NAPIS SPR Vulnerable older populations Vulnerable older populations Services provided to people who need them Services provided to people who need them Improve program efficiency: NAPIS SPR Improve program efficiency: NAPIS SPR Improve client assessments & results: National Survey, NAPIS SPR Improve client assessments & results: National Survey, NAPIS SPR Services are of high quality Services are of high quality Meals improve food & nutrient intakes Meals improve food & nutrient intakes Programs provide opportunities for health promotion/disease prevention Programs provide opportunities for health promotion/disease prevention Consumers value program participation Consumers value program participation

National Pilot Survey Methodology Westat’s 2-Stage Sample Design 1 st Stage 1 st Stage 165 AAAs 165 AAAs Budget size, 4 Census Regions Budget size, 4 Census Regions 138 AAAs agreed to participate 138 AAAs agreed to participate 2 nd Stage 2 nd Stage Random sample: 24 recipients per AAA on average, for each service domain Random sample: 24 recipients per AAA on average, for each service domain

OAA Title III Service Domains Caregivers Caregivers Case Management Case Management Congregate Nutrition Program Congregate Nutrition Program Information & Assistance Assessment Information & Assistance Assessment Senior Centers Senior Centers Homemaker Service Homemaker Service Home Delivered Nutrition Program Home Delivered Nutrition Program Transportation Service Transportation Service

OAA Title III Participant Characteristics Physical Functioning Physical Functioning ADL Limitations ADL Limitations IADL Limitations IADL Limitations Social Functioning Social Functioning 2nd Longitudinal Study on Aging 2nd Longitudinal Study on Aging Measures of Social Isolation Measures of Social Isolation Emotional Well-being Emotional Well-being Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey Demographic Characteristics Demographic Characteristics

Services Targeted to Vulnerable Populations Home-delivered Older Older At nutritional risk At nutritional risk Lower income Lower income Less food access Less food access More vulnerable More vulnerable Frailer Frailer More functionally impaired More functionally impairedCongregate Older Older At nutritional risk At nutritional risk Lower income Lower income Less food access Less food access

Services Targeted to Vulnerable Populations Home-delivered 73% age % age % live alone 61% live alone 85% annual family income <$20,000 85% annual family income <$20,000 69% difficulty with 1+ ADLs 69% difficulty with 1+ ADLsCongregate 62% age % age % live alone 52% live alone

Services Targeted to Vulnerable Populations Home Delivered Nutrition Program 29% rated health as poor 29% rated health as poor Vs. 12% National Health Interview Survey respondents with incomes <$20,000 Vs. 12% National Health Interview Survey respondents with incomes <$20,000 58% high school graduates 7% college 58% high school graduates 7% college Vs. 78% & 23% Current Population Survey Vs. 78% & 23% Current Population Survey Socially isolated Socially isolated 46% would like to do more 46% would like to do more Vs. 24% of National Health Interview Survey Vs. 24% of National Health Interview Survey

Services Provided to People Who Need Them Meal provides half or more of total daily food intake 66% Home Delivered 66% Home Delivered 62% in 1st Nat’l Pilot Survey 62% in 1st Nat’l Pilot Survey 56% Congregate 56% Congregate

Services Provided to People Who Need Them Home Delivered FRUIT: 38% FRUIT: 38% 99% ate fruit served 99% ate fruit served VEGETABLES: 34% VEGETABLES: 34% 94% ate vegetables served 94% ate vegetables served DAIRY: 39% 95% ate products provided DAIRY: 39% 95% ate products provided MEAT: 51% 96% ate meat served MEAT: 51% 96% ate meat served GRAIN: 67% (1-2 servings) GRAIN: 67% (1-2 servings) 91% ate products provided 91% ate products providedCongregate 35% 96% 35% 96% 31% 95% 31% 95% 32% 86% 32% 86% 46% 97% 46% 97% 62% 93% 62% 93% Provides sole intake from key food groups: Ate only 1 serving/day

Meals Improve Dietary Intake Home-delivered FRUIT: 48% ate 2+ servings/day FRUIT: 48% ate 2+ servings/day VEGETABLES: 19% ate 3+ servings/day VEGETABLES: 19% ate 3+ servings/day DAIRY: 21% ate 3+ servings/day (milk, cheese, soy) DAIRY: 21% ate 3+ servings/day (milk, cheese, soy)Congregate 54% 54% 45% NHANES 24% 24% 13% NHANES 20% 20% 10% NHANES

Services help maintain individuals in their homes Home Delivered Nutrition Program 29% 3+ ADL limitations 29% 3+ ADL limitations 39% need assistance w/ 1+ ADLs 39% need assistance w/ 1+ ADLs 6% Census Bureau Survey of Income & Program Participation 6% Census Bureau Survey of Income & Program Participation 69% need assistance w/ 1 or more IADLs 69% need assistance w/ 1 or more IADLs 14% Survey of Income & Program Participation 14% Survey of Income & Program Participation

Services Are High Quality Home Delivered 95% rated meals good to excellent 95% rated meals good to excellent 92% said meals arrived on time 92% said meals arrived on timeCongregate 91% rated meals good to excellent 91% rated meals good to excellent 90% satisfied with taste of food 90% satisfied with taste of food 96% recommend program to friends 96% recommend program to friends

Consumers Value Program Participation Home Delivered 86% eat more balanced meals 86% eat more balanced meals 81% better able to avoid sodium & fat 81% better able to avoid sodium & fat 91% continue to live in own home 91% continue to live in own homeCongregate 79% 79% 76% 76% 72% 72%

Provide Opportunities for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention Congregate Nutrition Program 52% participated in fitness activity 52% participated in fitness activity 59% used health screening 59% used health screening 57% reported increased social opportunities 57% reported increased social opportunities

Summary 2nd National Pilot Survey showed services were: Targeted to vulnerable populations & individuals who needed them Targeted to vulnerable populations & individuals who needed them Highly rated by recipients Highly rated by recipients Provided assistance to individuals & caregivers Provided assistance to individuals & caregivers Helped maintain independence Helped maintain independence Avoided premature nursing home placement Avoided premature nursing home placement

How does Nat’l Pilot Survey info help you: Justify funding for congregate & home delivered meals? Justify funding for congregate & home delivered meals? Justify increased funding for one or both? Justify increased funding for one or both?

How does Nat’l Pilot Survey info help you: Determine how SUAs & AAAs could/should be doing community needs assessments for nutrition services? Determine how SUAs & AAAs could/should be doing community needs assessments for nutrition services?

How does Nat’l Pilot Survey info help you: Think about what nutrition services should be in your state or area plans? Think about what nutrition services should be in your state or area plans?

How does Nat’l Pilot Survey info help you: Develop policies or plan for home & community based long term care for older adults that include nutrition services? Develop policies or plan for home & community based long term care for older adults that include nutrition services?

How does Nat’l Pilot Survey info help you: Plan services differently for congregate & home delivered participants? Plan services differently for congregate & home delivered participants? For example, are there different health promotion/disease prevention programs that SUAs, AAAs, or local nutrition service providers should be providing to congregate participants? For example, are there different health promotion/disease prevention programs that SUAs, AAAs, or local nutrition service providers should be providing to congregate participants?

How does Nat’l Pilot Survey info help you: Plan services differently for congregate & home delivered participants? Plan services differently for congregate & home delivered participants? For example, are there different social interaction programs & services needed by home delivered participants? For example, are there different social interaction programs & services needed by home delivered participants?

How does Nat’l Pilot Survey info help you: Plan services differently for congregate & home delivered participants? Plan services differently for congregate & home delivered participants? For example, given that 29% of home participants have 3+ ADL impairments (indicator of significant frailty = nursing home level of care), what are implications for program planning, implementation & evaluation? For example, given that 29% of home participants have 3+ ADL impairments (indicator of significant frailty = nursing home level of care), what are implications for program planning, implementation & evaluation? Are there other risk factors you should be considering with this very vulnerable population? Are there other risk factors you should be considering with this very vulnerable population? Who should you be educating about this? Who should you be educating about this? What are the training or technical assistance implications? What are the training or technical assistance implications?

How does Nat’l Pilot Survey info help you: Plan services differently for congregate & home delivered participants? Plan services differently for congregate & home delivered participants? For example, since the majority of both congregate & home participants are low income & rely heavily on the meal for their day’s food intake, what are the implications for linking with other food & nutrition assistance programs? For example, since the majority of both congregate & home participants are low income & rely heavily on the meal for their day’s food intake, what are the implications for linking with other food & nutrition assistance programs? How could/should this affect your program planning, implementation & evaluation? How could/should this affect your program planning, implementation & evaluation?

How does Nat’l Pilot Survey info help you: Plan services differently for congregate & home delivered participants? Plan services differently for congregate & home delivered participants? For example, given ADL/IADL impairment levels of home participants, how do you ensure that other agency staff, AAAs, local nutrition service providers, case managers, hospitals, etc. understand relationships between adequate food & nutrient intakes & functionality? For example, given ADL/IADL impairment levels of home participants, how do you ensure that other agency staff, AAAs, local nutrition service providers, case managers, hospitals, etc. understand relationships between adequate food & nutrient intakes & functionality? How can this understanding be integrated into outreach, case management practices, access, referrals, caregiver support, etc. How can this understanding be integrated into outreach, case management practices, access, referrals, caregiver support, etc.

How does Nat’l Pilot Survey info help you: Plan services differently for congregate & home delivered participants? Plan services differently for congregate & home delivered participants? For example, should meal content be changed in regard to importance of For example, should meal content be changed in regard to importance of customer satisfaction, customer satisfaction, meal to total food & nutrient intakes, meal to total food & nutrient intakes, key food group intakes as well as limitations of these food group intakes? key food group intakes as well as limitations of these food group intakes? How important is it to assess the meal delivery system? How important is it to assess the meal delivery system?

How does Nat’l Pilot Survey info help you: Plan services differently for congregate & home delivered participants? Plan services differently for congregate & home delivered participants? For example, how do you ensure quality? For example, how do you ensure quality? Are there implications for monitoring? Are there implications for monitoring? How do you educate re importance of monitoring to performance outcomes for individuals & programs? How do you educate re importance of monitoring to performance outcomes for individuals & programs?

How does Nat’l Pilot Survey info help you: Plan services differently for congregate & home delivered participants? Plan services differently for congregate & home delivered participants? For example, is there other data you believe would be useful for measuring performance in relationship to individuals, programs or systems? For example, is there other data you believe would be useful for measuring performance in relationship to individuals, programs or systems?