World Heritage ‘Year of Reflection’ Workshop, UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 2-3 March 2006 Jon Day Director - Conservation, Heritage & Indigenous Partnerships.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Results of January 2007 Meeting of Working Group on the Questionnaire and Indicators 24 January 2007.

Advertisements

Every Child Matters: Change for Children Emerging Practice.

Developing the governors’ role in school improvement A Lancashire perspective.

Introduction: Towards an Integrated Reporting System for Marine Protected Areas in the Baja to Bering Sea (B2B) Commission for Environmental Cooperation.

Protecting Heritage Places 10 steps to help protect the natural and cultural significance of places.

An Overview of the European Policy Framework on Gender Equality Gender Agenda – Women, Men, Age and Employment in the Performing Arts.

AN INTRODUCTION TO SPHERE AND THE EMERGENCY CONTEXT

World Heritage Periodic reporting Latin America and the Caribbean Carolina Castellanos / Mexico.

General Analysis of the (European) Questionnaire Jorun Poettering Consultant WHC.

Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.

Learning Objectives LO5 Document an accounting system to identify key controls and weaknesses in order to assess control risk. LO6 Write key control tests.

Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.

IDBM industry project Project Plan. Add text here giving a brief background of the project Project Background.

DRAFT Strategic Planning U.S. Department of Energy Rebuild America Business Partners and Deanna Braunlin GAVIN Consulting, Inc. John Deakin Energy Program.

Results of January 2007 Meeting of Working Group on the Questionnaire and Indicators 24 January 2007.

OpportunitiesChallengesNeeds Already have 217 recognized FLMMA sites. Not ecologically representativeMaps of reef habitats to help optimize design Organizations.

Action Implementation and Evaluation Planning Whist the intervention plan describes how the population nutrition problem for a particular target group.

1 SOFTWARE PRODUCTION. 2 DEVELOPMENT Product Creation Means: Methods & Heuristics Measure of Success: Quality f(Fitness of Use) MANAGEMENT Efficient &

Date (Arial 16pt) Title of the event – (Arial 28pt bold) Subtitle for event – (Arial 28pt) Internal models Gareth Truran Head of Department, London Markets.

Technical Writing Function. The purpose of having guidelines is to make the document more readable. Standard guidelines govern – Format – page layout,

2nd meeting WH Periodic Reporting Reflection Year Monitoring Indicators for Cultural World Heritage sites ICOMOS Discussion points.

3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,

CR Toolkit Workshop CR Stakeholder Identification Tool ICMM Toolkit# 1 & 2 Trainers: Joe Samara and Merikas Timori Date: 07 th August 2013 Venue: CR Conference.

© 2003 IBM Corporation July 2004 Technology planning for not-for-profit organizations IBM volunteer name Title, organization.

Strategic Planning Process for Affiliates [Insert Chapter or State Council Name Here] © SHRM 2009 Planning Today for Tomorrow’s Challenges Presented by.

T. Dawson, TASC 9/11/13 Use of a Technical Reference in NASA IV&V.

1 Building Evaluative Capability in Schooling Improvement: The Student View Judy Parr,

LOGO PROJECT HerO Project Meeting in Liverpool Presentation of ‘Road Maps’ John Hinchliffe, City of Liverpool 16th-17th July 2009.

Module 4: Systems Development Chapter 12: (IS) Project Management.

Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)

Presenter’s Name June 17, Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting.

December_2009 Partnership maintenance. December_2009 Partnership maintenance $$ $ $

Indicators to Measure Progress and Performance IWRM Training Course for the Mekong July 20-31, 2009.

Management Effectiveness and Quality Criteria in European Protected Areas: April 2008 World Heritage Convention and the Assessment of Management Effectiveness.

Optimising results of protected area management efforts – a capacity building workshop Sportsman’s Arms Hotel, Kenya 27 th Nov – 1st Dec.

UN Delivering as One: Capacity Assessment for Rwanda External Stakeholder Perspectives on UN in Rwanda March 2008 NOTE: This tool/guidance has been developed.

INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Evaluation and Review of Experience from UNEP Projects.

Project management Topic 7 Controls. What is a control? Decision making activities – Planning – Monitor progress – Compare achievement with plan – Detect.

Technical Support for the Impact Assessment of the Review of Priority Substances under Directive 2000/60/EC Updated Project Method for WG/E Brussels 22/10/10.

The Marine Stewardship Council: A Multi- Stakeholder Fisheries Assessment Programme for Sustainable Fisheries Oluyemisi Oloruntuyi (MSC)

. Thematic Working Group 4 Possible Elements – Chapter VI: Constraints, gaps and related financial, technical and capacity needs CGE Workshop to exchange.

Lead Agency Viability Assessment Consistent with OPPAGA Report 04-65, DCF contracted with FMHI to assist in the design and implementation of a centralized.

John N. Lavis, MD, PhD Professor and Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer and Exchange McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making McMaster.

Page 1 Portfolio Committee on Water and Environmental Affairs 14 July 2009.

UNESCO ‘Year of Reflection’ Workshop, Periodic reporting for World Heritage … Proposed list of ‘Factors affecting World Heritage’

World Heritage ‘Year of Reflection’ Workshop, Berlin, Nov 2005 Jon Day Director - Conservation, Heritage & Indigenous Partnerships Great Barrier Reef Marine.

Options for harmonizing national reporting to biodiversity-related agreements Peter Herkenrath UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre.

Rice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras, Philippines Presented by Cristi Marie Nozawa Vice Chair for IUCN WCPA SEA at the Expert Meeting of the World.

1 Corruption Prevention Strategies. 2 Specific Objectives: 1. Corruption Loopholes 2. Corruption Prevention Strategies 3. Conclusions.

Torbay Council Partnerships Review August PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Date Page 2 Torbay Council Partnerships Background The Audit Commission defines.

Software Engineering Process - II 7.1 Unit 7: Quality Management Software Engineering Process - II.

Tier III Preparing for First Meeting. Making the Decision  When making the decision to move to Tier III, all those involve with the implementation of.

EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,

Computer Security: Principles and Practice First Edition by William Stallings and Lawrie Brown Lecture slides by Lawrie Brown Chapter 17 – IT Security.

Design and modeling 10 step design process

Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 12. Risk Management.

Ten-Stage Design Process

The revised Periodic Reporting Questionnaires: general features Alessandra Borchi Policy and Statutory Meetings Section UNESCO World Heritage Centre.

WORLD HERITAGE - EXPERT MEETING ON BENCHMARKS

Ten-Stage Design Process

How to write a Strategic Plan

Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat R-series

Measuring Data Quality and Compilation of Metadata

Involuntary Resettlement 0P 4.12: Planning Instruments

Project Management Process Groups

Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)

Civil Contractors Federation ‘2014 Earth Awards’ Submission Template CATEGORIES 1 and 2 ONLY Company Name (NOTE: if an Alliance then the name of the.

Assessment of quality of standards

Water and Energy Cycle Project Office (WECPO)

Managing Self Kamal Nayan Pradhan Sheetal Moktan Managing Self

Presentation transcript:

World Heritage ‘Year of Reflection’ Workshop, UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, 2-3 March 2006 Jon Day Director - Conservation, Heritage & Indigenous Partnerships Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Periodic reporting in natural World Heritage Areas …a World Heritage manager’s perspective

Key points that may be useful when considering periodic reporting 1.Relatively simple – 15 pages to address key aspects 2.Focussed just on the five key issues 3.Repeatable – easily updated (completed three times over 4 years) 4.Listed key threats & actions to address those threats - including external threats (i.e. outside World Heritage Area - WHA) 5.Indicated complexity of the task – many actions required long term solutions; many actions also involved external agencies 6.Useful for me as a manager to monitor progress

Periodic reports – Part II Statement of Significance Criteria for World Heritage listing Statement of Integrity Management arrangements Plans of management Scientific & technical studies Management agency Factors affecting the World Heritage property Monitoring Conclusions Main conclusion re values Responsible implementing/agencies Timeframes

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/ WH values Manag’t Actions Monitor- ing Priority & scale Lead Agency (& others involved) Due date & comments List the natural and/or cultural criteria for WH listing Briefing outline the WH values that Describe the key factors that are affecting the WH values in (2) Describe the various manag’t actions underway to address the factors in (3) Describe any monitoring assessing the effectiven ess of (2) & (3) Clarify the priority & the scale at which issue is operatin g List lead agency first (and others involved) Estimate due date etc

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/ WH values Manag’t Actions Monitor- ing Priority & scale Lead Agency (& others involved) Due date & comments List the natural and/or cultural criteria for WH listing Briefing outline the WH values Describe the key factors that are affecting the WH values in (2) Describe the various manag’t actions underway to address the factors in (3) Describe any monitoring assessing the effectiven ess of (2) & (3) Clarify the priority & the scale at which issue is operatin g List lead agency first (and others involved) Estimate due date etc

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/ WH values Manag’t Actions Monitor- ing Priority & scale Lead Agency (& others involved) Due date & comments List the natural and/or cultural criteria for WH listing Briefing outline the WH values Describe the Key factors that are affecting the WH values in (2) Describe the various manag’t actions underway to address the factors in (3) Describe any monitoring assessing the effectiven ess of (2) & (3) Clarify the priority & the scale at which issue is operatin g List lead agency first (and others involved) Estimate due date etc

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/ WH values Manag’t Actions Monitor- ing Priority & scale Lead Agency (& others involved) Due date & comments List the natural and/or cultural criteria for WH listing Briefing outline the WH values Describe the Key factors that are affecting the WH values in (2) Describe the various manag’t actions underway to address the factors in (3) Describe any monitoring assessing the effectiven ess of (2) & (3) Clarify the priority & the scale at which issue is operatin g List lead agency first (and others involved) Estimate due date etc

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/ WH values Manag’t Actions Monitor- ing Priority & scale Lead Agency (& others involved) Due date & comments List the natural and/or cultural criteria for WH listing Briefing outline the WH values Describe the Key factors that are affecting the WH values in (2) Describe the various manag’t actions underway to address the factors in (3) Describe any monitoring assessing the effectiveness of (2) & (3) Clarify the priority & the scale at which issue is operatin g List lead agency first (and others involved) Estimate due date etc

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/ WH values Manag’t Actions Monitor- ing Priority & scale Lead Agency (& others involved) Due date & comments List the natural and/or cultural criteria for WH listing Briefing outline the WH values Describe the Key factors that are affecting the WH values in (2) Describe the various manag’t actions underway to address the factors in (3) Describe any monitoring assessing the effectiveness of (2) & (3) Clarify the priority and the scale at which issue is opera- ting List lead agency first (and others involved) Estimate due date etc

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/ WH values Manag’t Actions Monitor- ing Priority & scale Lead Agency (& others involved) Due date & comments List the natural and/or cultural criteria for WH listing Briefing outline the WH values Describe the Key factors that are affecting the WH values in (2) Describe the various manag’t actions underway to address the factors in (3) Describe any monitoring assessing the effectiveness of (2) & (3) Clarify the priority and the scale at which issue is opera- ting List lead agency first (and others involved) Estimate due date etc

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/ WH values Manag’t Actions Monitor- ing Priority & scale Lead Agency (& others involved) Due date & comments List the natural and/or cultural criteria for WH listing Briefing outline the WH values Describe the Key factors that are affecting the WH values in (2) Describe the various manag’t actions underway to address the factors in (3) Describe any monitoring assessing the effectiveness of (2) & (3) Clarify the priority and the scale at which issue is opera- ting List lead agency first (and others involved) Estimate due date etc…

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/ WH values Manag’t Actions Monitor- ing Priority & scale Lead Agency (& others involved) Due date & comments List the natural and/or cultural criteria for WH listing Briefing outline the WH values Describe the Key factors that are affecting the WH values in (2) Describe the various manag’t actions underway to address the factors in (3) Describe any monitoring assessing the effectiveness of (2) & (3) Clarify the priority and the scale at which issue is opera- ting List lead agency first (and others involved) Estimate due date etc…

Possible Periodic Report format - matrix Criteria for WH listing WH Value Factors affecting WHA/ WH values Manag’t Actions Monitor- ing Priority & scale Lead Agency (& others involved) Due date & comments Advantages Retains main components of existing report, but more effectively shows linkages between above components Highlights significant ‘gaps’ (eg monitoring lacking against important adverse impact) Is a more concise form of Periodic Reporting Would assist in making better comparisons over successive Periodic Reports Similar information required for other Conventions.

Conclusions (cont) Need to keep reporting simple – managers are flat out managing, and will make little time for filling in forms UNLESS they see it can help them. Consider using pictures, graphs – “a picture paints a 1000 words” Trends are most useful over time (whether PR, RM or basic monitoring)…recognise that this will only happen if “comparing apples with apples”! Recognise some of the main excuses for ineffective reporting …. … Too bureaucratic, lack of consistent approach, concern about ‘what it might show’. Need to change Periodic Reporting do be simpler, more repeatable and less onerous for managers. Problems of databases as a basis for decisions if information is not correct.