CRISs as a Management Tool: Experiences and Perspectives at the German Research Foundation (DFG) Presented at the 8th international Conference on Current.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

Information and support for running European projects.
1 Information and Publicity in programming period.
INTERREG III B, PHARE CBC and TACIS CBC Programme -Combination of EU instruments for transnational co- operation in the BSR CEEC\NIS participation in BSR.
Introduction to UIS and RICYT data collection tools and guidelines CARIBBEAN REGIONAL WORKSHOP ON SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION.
Quality, the assurance of improvement. Student Involvement in QA processes: The Catalan experience Esteve Arboix Madrid, October 2006.
TELLING THE STORY. WORKSHOP 2 C BRUSSELS, 26th NOV WOLF BORN, Information Office Mecklenburg-Vorpommern to the EU E U R O P A – M V. D E – A REGIONAL.
Simplification strategies for Luxembourg
RECENT INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN THE KUJAWY-POMORZE VOIVODESHIP IN POLAND RECENT INNOVATION INITIATIVES IN THE KUJAWY-POMORZE VOIVODESHIP IN POLAND Prof.
Research center for metal in the Istrian region - MET.R.IS. Istrian development agency - IDA.
Knowledge and Expertise in European Programmes (KEEP) Background and State of Play Regions for Economic Change – Building Sustainable Growth 20 May 2010.
EuropeAid PARTICIPATORY SESSION 1: 3 topics Each table chooses its topic: o Managing reality (Blue) o Assessing performance (Yellow) o Monitoring & reporting.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT, 15 June 2006 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
WIPO Conference on Building Partnerships for Mobilizing Resources for Development Thematic Session 2 Science, Technology and Innovation for Development.
Institutional Repositories: two consortial models Rachel Proudfoot, White Rose Consortium Rebecca Stockley, SHERPA-LEAP Consortium.
The Library of the University of Konstanz Fostering Open Access by a new international information platform Anja Kersting, Karlheinz Pappenberger Library.
From AgentLink II to AgentLink III Co-ordinators: Peter McBurney, University of Liverpool, UK Terry Payne, University of Southampton, UK.
Security Education and Awareness Workshop January 15-16, 2004 Baltimore, MD.
Social Development: Proposed Strategic Directions for the World Bank
Korkeakoulujen arviointineuvosto — Rådet för utvärdering av högskolorna — The Finnish Higher Education Evaluation Council (FINHEEC) eLearning and Virtual.
Website: Bologna Secretariat Transparency Tools in The European Higher Education Area Viorel Proteasa 2010.
Quality Enhancements in After- School and Out-of-School Time (ASOST-Q) Competitive Grant (FC 530) Grant Information Webinars May 23 rd and 30 th, 2014.
Water Integrity Capacity Building Programme: Outcomes and lessons learned from SADC regions SIWI WGF & CapNet UNDP 29 May A3.
Science, Technology and Culture Strategy document October 2006.
Public knowledge: some findings of a survey on open access publishing Juergen Guedler, German Research Foundation (DFG), Department of Information Management.
CNRIS CNRIS 2.0 Challenges for a new generation of Research Information Systems.
Identification of critical success factors for implementing NLLS, through collaboration and exchange of expertise IDENTIFY LLP-2008-RO-KA1-KA1NLLS.
Berlin, Knowledge by Networking 2007 Scientific Library Services and Information Systems: “Digitisation.
Ekkehard Nuissl von Rein Quality Assurance by External Evaluation of Leibniz Institutes Strasbourg, 15th November 2005.
New DFG Information Infrastructure Projects Dr. Stefan Winkler-Nees; Birmingham, 28. March 2011 New DFG Information Infrastructure Projects.
CAPMAS Arab Republic of Egypt Central Agency for Public Mobilization and Statistics Presented by : Salwa Elsayed Selim Elshazly Director of establishments.
Standardisation of Classification Schemes for Evaluative and Monitoring Purposes – Services of the DFG Christian Fischer, Jürgen Güdler, Holger Hahnen.
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
CRISs as a tool for evaluative purposes – Activities and future plans at the German Research Foundation (DFG) Presented at EuroCRIS Members Meeting Tartu,
7th euroCRIS Strategic Seminar, Juergen Guedler Brussels, September, 14-15th, 2009 Timeliness and quality Information products based on process-produced.
Internet Based Distance Education at the HAS Bratislava, February, 7th-9th
1 INFRA : INFRA : Scientific Information Repository supporting FP7 “The views expressed in this presentation are those of the author.
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
System Establishing Your Management Reporting System.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
InWEnt | Qualified to shape the future1 Internet based Human Resource Development Management Platform Human Resource Development Programme in Natural Disaster.
The Knowledge Exchange Presentation to CNI April 2005 Bas Cordewener, SURF Sigrun Eckelmann, DFG Norman Wiseman, JISC.
Towards an Pan-European Research Information System The ESF Perspective and Approach Dr. Alexis-Michel Mugabushaka Science Officer in CEO Unit, ESF EuroCRIS.
Concept of Transparency Platform Martin Reisner Junior Adviser, Transparency ENTSOG’s Transparency Workshop Brussels – 11 September 2012.
CRIS 2008 Conference Maribor, June 4th – 7th 2008 Quality is the Product is the Quality Information Management as a Closed-loop Process DFG Jürgen Güdler.
Monitoring R&D as a Methodological Tool for Impact Studies Stig Slipersæter Norwegian Institute for Studies in Research and Higher Education Centre for.
Date: in 12 pts Education and Culture … in other words Mobility Tool 2013/2014: transition to E4A.
Eracon/INENTER conference 2012 Moderated and combined presentation from the InEnter workshop Starting of an Erasmus Placement Consortium and Eracon session.
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG The Use of Research Funding Databases for Research Assessment Information Systems Presented at the 8th international.
Identifying obstacles in the Single Market: Tom CORRIE, MARKT.B.TF1 Baltic Sea Strategy and the Internal Market conference 17 September 2010 The role of.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division Data Initiatives: The UNECE Gender Database and Website Victoria Velkoff On behalf of.
International Bureau of the BMBF - Creating international research and education networks 1 Creating international research and education networks Petra.
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems EU environmental research : Part B Policy objectives  Lisbon strategy.
The implementation programme for the 2008 SNA and supporting statistics UNECE special session on National Accounts for economies in transition Geneva,
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
Staff exchange week 2012 Katja Kurasto, Oulu University of Applied Sciences - Erasmus Consortium Coordinator, IIOHEI - International Relations Coordinator,
1 Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Clearing-house Mechanism for Information on POPs. Role of Regional Centres.
The bilateral exchange of Academics programme DAAD – HUST Hanoi, 8 January
Dissemination of SBS data and technical visits to MSs item 10 of the agenda Structural Business Statistics Working Group 14 April 2015, Luxembourg.
1 The Buddy Program: An initiative from the Office of the Dean of Students in the Division of Education, Arts & Social Sciences.
Advisory Forum, July 2005 Outcome of the first retreat of ECDC Management Team (EXC) 4-5 July 2005 Krägga Herrgård Zsuzsanna Jakab Director ECDC.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
1 Transnational Partner Search Toolkit Transnationality Contact Points Meeting 30 September Warsaw.
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft German Research Foundation DFG, Dr. Christian Schaich Tbilisi, September 19, 2016.
Prepared by: Galya STATEVA, Chief expert
German Research Foundation DFG
Knowledge Exchange – European Open Science Cloud
Introduction to the training
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Culture Statistics: policy needs
Presentation transcript:

CRISs as a Management Tool: Experiences and Perspectives at the German Research Foundation (DFG) Presented at the 8th international Conference on Current Research Information Systems, May 11-13th, 2006 in Bergen, Norway Juergen Guedler, German Research Foundation (DFG), Department of Information Management

Topics  Introduction  Information Management at the German Research Foundation  Products related to the DFG’s CRIS  Further developments

Topics  Introduction  Information Management at the German Research Foundation  Information products related to the DFG’s CRIS  Further developments

Objectives of presentation Main idea of CRISs: To publish information on ongoing research projects in an user-friendly searchable way. But a well established CRIS offers more:  Management Information  Base for statistical analysis  Base for evaluative studies on research programmes  Base for rankings The presentation will exemplarily illustrate these possibilities for the CRIS of the German Research Foundation (DFG). Conclusions will be drawn on the special possibilities for funding agencies, that emerge from a more offensive (and ideally collaborative) use of own data and data from partners.

The German Research Foundation  promote academic excellence on a competitive basis  serve science and the humanities in all fields  advise parliaments and public authorities on research questions  support the advancement and education of young researchers  encourage international research cooperation Who We Are What We Do  central public funding organisation for academic research in Germany

Third party funding income of German universities by source (1999/2000)

Facts and figures disciplines:All research areas in science and humanities programmes: Project funding, coordinated programmes, fellowships, prizes and infrastructure. staff: 700 people (head office in Bonn, dependances in Berlin, Beijing, Washington, Moscow and New Delhi) budget growth: 1985: 500 Mio €, 1995: 900 Mio €, 2005: Mio € New: the so-called „Excellence Initiative“ (add. budget of ~ 1.6 Billion Euro ( ))

Consequences of growth I  Public interest: Grown public interest in questions of research and research-funding as well as on the results of DFG-funded research  Accountability: Stakeholders (funds providers and taxpayers) ask for transparency in the use of funds provided  Political advice: demand for data as a base for political decisions (e.g. in the context of the above mentioned “Excellence“-Initiative)  Base for planning purposes: The DFG is increasingly asked to legitimate its strategic decisions on the basis of statistical data and to offer its members (=universities) such a base for the same purpose

For these and other reasons the DFG today is asked increasingly  to inform about its own activities and the activities of funded researchers (=„research information“) and  to collect data that allow a fact-driven evaluation of these activities (=„research and funding evaluation“) Consequences of growth II

Topics  Introduction  Information Management at the German Research Foundation  Information products related to the DFG’s CRIS  Further developments

„History“ of Data and Information Management at the DFG  Late 70ties till early 90ties: Centralized data management, slow but steadily growing data production by a single unit, based on a system of office-internal data entry forms. Use: “For statistics O N L Y”  Midst of 90ties till 2004: Decentralized data Management, fast growing data-and-documents-production by around 150 staff members within a mainfraim-based software-architecture (All-in-1). Additional use: Data-based production of letters to applicants and reviewers as well as of documentations for the deciding bodies of the DFG.  Since 2005: ElektrA – a web based tool that helps to manage all funding programmes of the DFG. Around 450 staff members are involved now. Additional use: support of workflows and production of far more detailed information on the funding activities and procedures of the DFG.

Applicants Reviewers Departments of the DFG rd Persons / year rd Persons / year more than450 people part. on data based proposal management send reviews ElektrA- DB ask for reviews send proposals and reports put information (data & documents) in database secure quality copy of data IM Evaluative reports / Ranking / statistics information services CRISs online (e.g.Inst-DB, GEPRIS) further databased information services (e.g. WWW of DFG) QV Base of information services: Process produced data in ElektrA

Topics  Introduction  Information Management at the German Research Foundation  Information products related to the DFG’s CRIS  Further developments

Exemplarily information products based on the DFG’s CRIS  Management Reports  Statistics and Evaluation  GEPRIS  Research Explorer  Funding-Ranking

Management Reports Object-orientated Link on ElektrA Objective: To offer easy accessible inf. on the process of reviewing and funding (on the base of more than applications yearly) Users: Management-Staff of the DFG Mode: Interactive and personalized user-interface via DFG-Intranet Size: More than 100 specialized rep. for different manag. purposes Software: Crystal Reports and Crystal Enterprise Server

Statistics and Evaluation Ad-hoc statistics: More than 250 statistical request yearly (2/3 internal, 1/3 external) on funding- and research-related topics Analysis: Detailled DFG-internal studies on the acceptance and user-profile of certain funding-programmes Questionaires: Use of addresses within the database for online-questionaires on funding- and research related topics: e.g. (published on - „Publication Strategies in Transformation?“ (acceptance and use of open access publications) (2005) - „Research and Careers - Experiences and Professional Development of Former DFG Fellowship Recipients“ (2004)

German Project Information System (GEPRIS) GEPRIS is a derivate from the DFG‘s productive data system and offers „classical“ CRIS-services:  Abstracts on the objectives of funded projects  Classifications (e.g. research areas, funding instruments, institutions, related countries)  A broad set of search-possibilities GEPRIS is the result of a two-step production-process: First step: Preparation of DFG-internal data for publishing purposes (90 % of the presented data) Second step: “Added value” by including feedback of applicants (e.g. key-words, actual addresses) Actually, GEPRIS is „under construction“. The new system will be published next weeks!

GEPRIS – Example of a project description project-title head of project project-partners discipline Abstract Administrative Informations

Research Explorer – Directory of German Research Institutes Base: DFG-internal database (ElektrA) Scope: more than institutes at German universities and research organizations Content:- Name (german/english) - Address - Hierarchical information - Disciplinary classification - Type of facility - WWW-Link and others Quality-Assurance: a.) data are productive (e.g. db-based mailing) b.) reg. QS-processes by a central unit of the admin.

Research Explorer: Single Item

The DFG-“Funding-Ranking“ Idea:  To give information about research activity of German universities and other research bodies  To inform about the disciplinary research profile of these institutions and of the regions they are active  To inform about networks in science „History“:  First Ranking in 1997 (database: only DFG-funded money) as a reaction to a demand of the ten biggest German universities (members of DFG)  Second Ranking in 2000 (new: regional aggregation of data)  Third Ranking in 2003 (new: networks in science, several other indicators)  Fourth Ranking (Sep. 2006) (new: more indicators, detailed inf. on research areas)

Visitor’s Statistics: ( to ) english version: Response to the Funding Ranking Highly publicised in mass media large echo in the scientific community

Topics  Introduction  Information Management at the German Research Foundation  Products related to the DFG’s CRIS  Further developments

Conclusions I Current situation with respect to the use of DFG’s CRIS-System:  Good progress with respect to quantitative and qualitative information about DFG-grants but  scarce information about the process as well as about the results and success of DFG funded research and  No working unit within or outside the DFG, which could satisfy the described needs in an appropriate way. With respect to actors outside DFG  Low co-operation between different producers and users of research information  Large difficulty to link information from different sources due to missing standards  Absence of a central „network-point“ that offers and coordinates appropriate services

Solution Establishment of a scientific facility, which supports the DFG and other actors involved in science policy with above described services for the purpose of programme and research planning as well as a service of information to the general public.  DFG-Foundation of the “Institute for Research Information and Quality Assurance (IFQ)” (Oct. 2005)

Examples of Future Service of the IFQ  Qualifying information (who is doing research with whom and with which results?) (= General Research Information)  Quantifying information (Input- and output-data on DFG-funded projects) (=monitoring/evaluation)  Empirical based information about process and results of DFG-funded projects (e.g. career of DFG-Fellows, Internationality and Interdisciplinarity of projects, „output“(publications, patents and others)).  E.g. establishment of an information system that publishes the final reports of DFG-funded projects. for details see (german only):

Conclusions II I.Today most funding agencies run „CRIS“-systems II. Most of the builders (and users) of these systems are not aware of the possibilities their systems offer for „more-than-internal“-services III.Try to use your CRIS in more than „one way“: the more products you offer the better is the quality of your CRIS (the data within)! IV. Get into contact to other CRIS-providers: Exchange Data! V.Even more effectivness is possible – by working together (as the following presentation will show)!

Thank you for your attention! More Infos at Dr. Juergen Guedler, Department of Information Management, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft...and remember: without data you are just another person with an opinion!