Phase II Study of Temozolomide and Thalidomide in Patients With Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jan 20;24(3):401-6. Vs 劉俊煌 CR 周益聖 財團法人台灣癌症臨床研究發展基金會.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation of Oral Azacitidine Using Extended Treatment Schedules: A Phase I Study Garcia-Manero G et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 603.
Advertisements

Nimotuzumab and radiotherapy in children and adolescents with brain stem glioma: Preliminary results from a Phase II study. T. Crombet 1, R. Cabanas 2,
Change in longest diameter = -19%. Change in sum of perpendicular diameters = -21%
A Phase II Trial of Perifosine in Patients with Chemo-Insensitive Sarcomas Dejka M. Steinert, MD.
Accenture Life Sciences Rethink Reshape Restructure… for better patient outcomes CDISC Journey in Lymphoma using Cheson 2007 Kevin Lee CDISC NJ meeting.
AVAST-M Protocol Title A randomised trial evaluating the VEGF inhibitor, Bevacizumab (Avastin®),as adjuvant therapy following resection of AJCC stage IIB.
ACRIN Abdominal Committee ACRIN Gynecologic Committee Fall Meeting 2010.
NDA TLC D-99 Doxorubicin HCL Liposome The Liposome Company, Inc. Proposed Indication: “First line treatment of metastatic breast cancer in combination.
Adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable liver-limited metastasis colorectal cancer 指導VS: 鄧豪偉 財團法人台灣癌症臨床研究發展基金會.
Total Body Irradiation R4 洪逸平 Bone Marrow Transplantation (2011) 46, 475–484 Best Practice & Research Clinical haematology (2007) Current Opinion.
Supervisor: Vs 楊慕華醫師 Presenter: CR 周益聖醫師 N Engl J Med 2012;367:
SARC023 Phase I/II trial of ganetespib, an heat shock protein 90 inhibitor in combination with the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus for patients with unresectable.
Modified Megestrol The Clinical Trials by : Carolina R. Akib
Everolimus in Postmenopausal Hormone-Receptor–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer N Engl J Med 2011 Dec 7. Presenstor : CR 周益聖 Instructor : VS 趙大中 財團法人台灣癌症臨床研究發展基金會.
Renal Cancer Immunotherapy Walter Stadler. 2 Renal cancer natural history.
A MULTICENTRIC PHASE I STUDY OF SUNITINIB WITH CONCOMITANT RADIATION THERAPY IN INOPERABLE SARCOMAS (GIST EXCLUDED) M.P. SUNYACH, D. PEROL, N. PENEL, P.
Renal Safety of Zoledronic Acid in Patients With Breast Cancer.
A Randomized, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study Comparing Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (CRd) vs Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) in Subjects.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Phase II Trial of Bortezomib Plus Doxorubicin in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (E6202): A Trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group: Berlin J 1, Powell.
 Identify different options of cancer therapy.  Most cancers are treated with a combination of approaches.
SARC015: Phase II study of R1507 in wild-type GIST Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center Katie Janeway, Dana Farber Cancer Institute.
Phase III studies of Xeloda® in colorectal cancer (CRC)
A phase I dose escalation study of Nimotuzumab in combination with concurrent chemoradiation for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma.
Inclusion Criteria Patient has definitive histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. The definitive diagnosis.
A Phase II Trial of Perifosine in Patients with Chemo-Insensitive Sarcomas Study Update – November 2008 Dejka Araujo, MD MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston,
RECIST Overview.
Herceptin ® : leading the way in metastatic breast cancer care Steffen Kahlert.
Avoiding Protocol Violations
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
THE OUTBACK TRIAL A Phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiation as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer compared.
MAX: International multi-centre randomised phase II/III study of capecitabine (Cap), bevacizumab (Bev) and mitomycin C (MMC) as first-line treatment for.
MABEL – a large multinational study of cetuximab plus irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan H Wilke, R Glynne-Jones, J Thaler,
Bortezomib (VELCADE), Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone (VRCD) combination therapy in front-line low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (LG-NHL) is active.
. Background Paclitaxel and Irinotecan in Platinum Refractory or Resistant Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Galician Lung Cancer.
Niall C. Tebbutt International randomised phase III study of capecitabine, bevacizumab, and mitomycin C in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal.
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
Surgery of colorectal metastasis in the Optimox 1 study. A GERCOR Study. N. Perez-Staub, G. Lledo, F. Paye, B. Gayet, M. Flesch, A. Cervantes, A. Figer,
1 NDA Clofarabine Cl-F-Ara-A Presented by Martin Cohen, M.D. at the December 01, 2004 meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee meeting.
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel- Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab- Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
PHASE II RANDOMIZED STUDY OF TRASTUZUMAB EMTANSINE VERSUS TRASTUZUMAB PLUS DOCETAXEL IN PATIENTS WITH HUMAN EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2 – POSITIVE.
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab-Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY 2012; vol 30 Thomas Bachelot, Ce´line Bourgier, Claire Cropet, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Gilles Freyer, Sophie.
Daunorubicin VS Mitoxantrone VS Idarubicin As Induction and Consolidation Chemotherapy for Adults with Acute Myeloid Leukemia : The EORTC and GIMEMA Groups.
Single-agent nab-Paclitaxel Given Weekly (3/4) as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (An International Oncology Network Study, #I )
Esophageal Cancer: A Critical Evaluation of Systemic Second-Line Therapy Christiane Maria Rosina Thallinger, Markus Raderer, and Michael Hejna J Clin Oncol.
Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib as first-line therapy : A Korean multicenter.
Phase II Trial of Sorafenib Combined With Concurrent Transarterial Chemoembolization With Drug-Eluting Beads for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Timothy M. Pawlik,
Phase III Trial of Irinotecan/Cisplatin Compared With Etoposide/Cisplatin in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Clinical and Pharmacogenomic Results.
Everolimus for Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors N Engl J Med 2011;364: R4. 박선희 / Prof. 동석호.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 Phase II MONARCH 1: CDK4/6 Inhibitor Abemaciclib in HR+/HER2- MBC.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
12 th Annual CTOS Meeting 2006 SINGLE AGENT DOXORUBICIN VS DOSE INTENSIVE COMBINATION THERAPY WITH EPIRUBICIN / IFOSFAMIDE IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED ADULT.
Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone inpatients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status.
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab-Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
BCT Bortezomib Consolidation Trial
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Phase II Study of Docetaxel (D) and Oxaliplatin (O) in Recurrent Metastatic Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder Davar D1, Appleman LA1, Friedland.
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori
PHASE I/II STUDY OF PEGYLATED LIPOSOMAL DOXORUCIN (PLD) AND GEMCITABINE (GEM) IN RECURRENT PLATIN RESISTANT OVARIAN CANCER (OC). A Study of the VWOG.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Krop I et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 5090.
Lo sviluppo clinico di nab-paclitaxel Discussant: Nicola Silvestris
- Phase 1 Signalling Study
MITO 26 PHASE II TRIAL ON TRABECTEDIN IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED UTERINE AND OVARIAN CARCINOSARCOMA (CS)
Presentation transcript:

Phase II Study of Temozolomide and Thalidomide in Patients With Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors J Clin Oncol Jan 20;24(3): Vs 劉俊煌 CR 周益聖 財團法人台灣癌症臨床研究發展基金會

Outline Classification and grading of NET Introduction to temozolomide Inclusion and exclusion criteria Regimen dosage and adjustment Response assessment Result Disscusion Conclusion

Endocr Relat Cancer Mar;11(1):1-18.

Outline Classification and grading of NET Introduction to temozolomide Inclusion and exclusion criteria Regimen dosage and adjustment Response assessment Result Disscusion Conclusion

Cancer Chemother Pharmacol (2009) 64:647–655

J Clin Oncol 25:

Temozolomide dosing regimens for malignant gliomas J Clin Oncol 25:

The Oncologist 2007;12:1114– 1123

Outline Classification and grading of NET Introduction to temozolomide Inclusion and exclusion criteria Regimen dosage and adjustment Response assessment Result Disscusion Conclusion

Inclusion (1)‏ Histologically confirmed, locally unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine tumors Prior treatment with chemotherapy, other than DTIC, temozolomide, or thalidomide, was permitted ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2 Life expectancy > 12 weeks Adequate renal function (serum creatinine < 1.5 * the upper limit of normal [ULN])‏

Inclusion (2)‏ Adequate hepatic function (total and direct bilirubin < 2 * the ULN)‏ ALT and AST < 5 * the ULN, and alkaline phosphatase < 2 * the ULN or < 5 * the ULN in the setting of liver metastases Adequate bone marrow function (absolute neutrophil count >1,500/mm3, platelets > 100,000/mm3, hemoglobin >9 g/dL)‏

Exclusion Clinically apparent CNS metastases or carcinomatous meningitis History of myocardial infarction 6 months before protocol treatment History of major surgery within 2 weeks before treatment initiation HIV infection or AIDS-related illness Other serious medical or psychiatric illness Insufficient recovery from toxicities of prior therapies Pregnant or lactating.

Outline Classification and grading of NET Introduction to temozolomide Inclusion and exclusion criteria Regimen dosage and adjustment Response assessment Result Disscusion Conclusion

Treatment Program Temozolomide 150 mg/m2 days 1 to 7 and days 15 to 21 Thalidomide daily starting dose of 200 mg Every 28 days

Temozolomide adjustment Hold if ANC less than 1,000/mm3 Plt less than 50,000/mm3 all nonhematologic toxicities with National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 2 or higher Not resumed until full hematologic recovery On recovery, dose reduction of 50 mg/m2 Discontineud if Unable to resume therapy within 3 weeks Unacceptable toxicity levels

Thalidomide adjustment Increased weekly by 100 mg until a maximum dose of 400 mg Before escalation Toxicity >> reduced by 100 mg/d No improvement within 7days >> further reduced by 50 mg Not tolerate 50 mg/d >> removed from study After escalation Toxicity >> decreased by 100 mg not resolved to grade 1 within 7 days >> further reduced by 100 mg P't at a dose of 100 mg >> reduction to 50 mg daily

Outline Classification and grading of NET Introduction to temozolomide Inclusion and exclusion criteria Regimen dosage and adjustment Response assessment Result Disscusion Conclusion

Response assessment Every 8 weeks after initiation of treatment Computed tomography scan P't with complete [CR] or partial response [PR] or stable disease remained on treatment until progression CR disappearance of all target lesions at least 4 weeks

Response assessment PR decrease of more than 30% in the sum of the largest perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions at least 4 weeks without progression of any nonmeasurable sites Without new lesions. Progressive disease increase of 20% or more in the sum of longest diameters of target lesions one or more new lesions

Response assessment Stable disease: Neither PR, nor progressive disease Biochemical response secondary end point PR:decrease in chromogranin A by 50% or more Stable: <50 % decrease or <25% increase

Outline Classification and grading of NET Introduction to temozolomide Inclusion and exclusion criteria Regimen dosage and adjustment Response assessment Result Disscusion Conclusion

Duration of Treatment 29 patients received treatment for a median of 7.3 months (range, 1 to 23 months)‏ 1 patient required dose reduction of temozolomide due to thrombocytopenia 16 patients required dose reductions for thalidomide- related toxicities 14 required dose reduction to 100 mg 2 required dose reductions to 50 mg daily 9 patients continued thalidomide at their starting dose of 200 mg 4 patients able to undergo dose escalation to 400 mg Median thalidomide dose 100 mg/d

Treatment-related toxicities resulting in discontinuation: neuropathy (11 patients,38%, 6 pt's persist > 3 wks), infection (four patients), thrombocytopenia (four patients), neutropenia (one patient), rash (one patient). Infections included: Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (one patient), disseminated varicella zoster virus (one patient), staphylococcal sepsis (one patient), cutaneous herpes zoster (one patient)‏

Median time to treatment discontinuation for toxicity :8.4 months (range, 1.5 to 7.5 months)‏

Median duration of response was 13.5 months (range, 2 to 31 months)‏

Progression-free survival Overall survival 1-year survival rate: 79% 2-year survival rate: 61%

Outline Classification and grading of NET Introduction to temozolomide Inclusion and exclusion criteria Regimen dosage and adjustment Response assessment Result Disscusion Conclusion

Discussion Overall objective radiologic response rate of 25%(CR+PR)‏ Biochemical response rate of 40% 2-year survival rate of 61% Unique toxicities:neuropathy(38%) and selective lymphopenia(69%)‏

Carcinoid tumor Objective response rates of streptozocin-based regimens: 16% to 33%  J Clin Oncol 2: , 1984  Cancer Clin Trials2: , 1979  J Clin Oncol 23: , 2005 Pancreatic endocrine tumors Combined biochemical and radiologic response rate of. Streptozocin and doxorubicin : 69%  N Engl J Med 326: , 1992 Overall response rate of retrospective study of streptozocin, fluorouracil, and doxorubicin:39% J Clin Oncol 22: , 2004 Cancer 86: , 1999 Am JClin Oncol 27: , 2004

CR+PR Carcinoid tumor 1/15 (7%)‏ Pancreatic endocrine tumors 5/11(45%) Pheochromocytoma 1/3 (33%)‏

high proportion (55%) removed for toxicity Median time to treatment discontinuation for treatment- related toxicity:8.4 months 4 patients experienced progressive disease while receiving study therapy Prophylaxis against P carinii pneumonia and herpes simplex virus should be utilized

Outline Classification and grading of NET Introduction to temozolomide Inclusion and exclusion criteria Regimen dosage and adjustment Response assessment Result Disscusion Conclusion

Combination of temozolomide and thalidomide seems to be an active oral regimen for the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and alternative to intravenous regimens More active in pancreatic endocrine tumors than in carcinoid tumors. Further studies to more precisely assess the relative efficacy of this regimen in pancreatic endocrine and carcinoid tumors Also to assess the relative contributions of temozolomide and thalidomide to the antitumor activity