AAR-410 02/13/031 FAA Airport Pavement Technology Program u Testing and preliminary data analysis from flexible pavements on low-strength subgrade (Construction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
The Simply Reliable Enterprise Library System
RWTÜV Fahrzeug Gmbh, Institute for Vehicle TechnologyTÜV Mitte Group 1 GRB Working Group Acceleration Pattern Results of pass-by noise measurements carried.
CT-RSA'031 Two-Efficient and Provably Secure Schemes for Server- Assisted Threshold Signatures Ravi Sandhu Joint work with Shouhuai Xu.
HIPAA PRIVACY RULE IMPLEMENTATION – WHATS UP AFTER 4/14/03? 8 th National HIPAA Summit Baltimore, MD March 8, 2004 Lynda A. Russell, EdD, JD, RHIA Privacy.
Win Big AddingSubtractEven/Odd Rounding Patterns Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Last Chance.
Jeopardy General Compare & Order AdditionSubtraction Vocabulary Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Final Jeopardy.
Whiteboardmaths.com © 2004 All rights reserved
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
CALENDAR.
Oklahoma DOT Perpetual Pavement Test Sections at the NCAT Test Track
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt ShapesPatterns Counting Number.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Terena Silk Paper Progress in The Silk Project Peter Kirstein Chair, Silk Board.
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire? Decimal Edition Question 1.
£1 Million £500,000 £250,000 £125,000 £64,000 £32,000 £16,000 £8,000 £4,000 £2,000 £1,000 £500 £300 £200 £100 Welcome.
DGAC/STAC Infrastructure research
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
27/08/03VOQUAL 031 Variation of glottal LF parameters across F0, vowels and phonetic environment Michelle Tooher & John McKenna School of Computing, Dublin.
CC-5: Post-Traffic Testing FAA Working Group Meeting DATE : April 24, 2012 By: Harkanwal Brar.
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
Federal Aviation Administration Airport Pavement Working Group Meeting
Filling and Wrapping Review Sheet
FAA Airport Technology Research & Development Program Air Transport Committee ASCE National Capitol Section March 22, 2005.
© 2003 Andrew Chang10/23/031 What Happens in a Fall? lFalling climber builds up momentum (force x time) lWhen climber is ‘stopped’ (either by rope/anchor.
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
RMS R83 Edition 3 Rev 0 ASCP Forum 24 Feb 2014 TSM CIVIL.
Adding Up In Chunks.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
Innovations on the Asphalt Mix Design for the Rehabilitation of National Route 3 between Mariannhiill and Key Ridge Jaco Liebenberg Dennis Rossmann Philip.
Before Between After.
Hosted by Mrs. Dickard RatiosProportionsUnit Rates Indirect Measurement
25 seconds left…...
Equal or Not. Equal or Not
Slippery Slope
EnvironmentEnvironnementCanada Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia September 5 – 7, Part 4: LFG Utilization.
Precision and Accuracy
Week 1.
Clock will move after 1 minute
Physics for Scientists & Engineers, 3rd Edition
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Murach’s OS/390 and z/OS JCLChapter 16, Slide 1 © 2002, Mike Murach & Associates, Inc.
1 Fundamentals and Application of Stress Ratio in Concrete Pavement Design Edward H. Guo Consultant April , 2012 FAA Working Group Meeting.
Construction and Testing of Construction Cycle 2 (CC2) Overlay Murphy Flynn FAA Airport Technology R&D Branch, AAR-410 William J. Hughes Technical Center,
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
FAA Airport Pavement Working Group Meeting, April Concrete Overlay Research Shelley Stoffels, D.E., P.E. Lin Yeh, PhD FAA Airport Pavement Working.
Pavement Design CE 453 Lecture 28.
In Tai Kim & Erol Tutumluer University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
PERMANENT DEFORMATION BEHAVIOR OF THE GRANULAR LAYERS TESTED AT THE FAA’s NATIONAL AIRPORT PAVEMENT TEST FACILITY NAVNEET GARG, Ph.D. Senior Research Engineer,
Gordon F. Hayhoe FAA AAR-410
February 1, Analysis of Test Slab Failure Data David R. Brill FAA Airport Technology R&D Branch, AAR-410 William J. Hughes Technical Center, Atlantic.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration National Airport Pavement Test Facility Update Airport Pavement Working Group Don Barbagallo April.
LTPP Lessons Learned: Kansas SPS-2 July 17, 2013 Abilene, KS Gabe Cimini Database Manager, LTPP NRSC.
LTPP Lessons Learned: Delaware SPS-2 Wednesday April 9, 2014 SPS-2 Tech Day, Dover, DE Gabe Cimini Project Manager, LTPP North Atlantic Regional Support.
AAR-410 January 14, FAA Airport Pavement Technology Program u National Airport Pavement Test Facility, FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center, Atlantic.
Using Reflective Crack Interlayer-
AAR-410 February 2, Alpha Factor Determination for 6-Wheel Gears u Gordon Hayhoe, AAR-410, FAA William J. Hughes Technical Center, Atlantic City,
Presented to: FAA Airport Pavement Working Group Meeting By: David R. Brill, P.E., Ph.D. Date: April 24, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Update on.
Asphalt Technology Course
Jerry L. Larson IRMCA Indiana LTAP Basics of a Good Road
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Full-Scale Testing Overload Update REDAC Subcommittee on Airports David R. Brill, P.E., Ph.D. March.
Rigid Airfield Pavement Research at Rowan Presented by: Yusuf Mehta, Ph.D., P.E. Wednesday April 25 th 2012.
Presented to: REDAC By: Navneet Garg, Ph.D. Date: March 15, 2016 Date: March 15, 2016 Federal Aviation Administration Full-Scale Testing – Perpetual Pavement.
Phase I Experiment 4 Different pavement structures, 8 sections Compare
Pavement Design  A pavement consists of a number of layers of different materials 4 Pavement Design Methods –AASHTO Method –The Asphalt Institute Method.
Pavement Structural Analysis
Presentation transcript:

AAR /13/031 FAA Airport Pavement Technology Program u Testing and preliminary data analysis from flexible pavements on low-strength subgrade (Construction Cycle Three (CC3)). u Current work and plans for next rigid pavement test items.

AAR /13/032 Low-Strength SG Flexible Replacement – Fall Target Repetitions to Failure 11, ,500 Thicknesses are based on 55,000 lb wheel load on 3 CBR subgrade. 5-in thick 8-in thick 43-in (110-cm) thick 34-in (85-cm) thick 24-in (60-cm) thick 16-in (40-cm) thick 6-Wheel 4-Wheel ,80036,400 LFC1 LFC2 LFC3 LFC4

AAR /13/033 Low-Strength SG Rework

AAR /13/034 Design Methodology u LEDFAA with 2-layer subgrade. u Vary Poisson’s Ratio with subgrade strength: u Poisson’s Ratio = 0.82 – 0.1 * (logE SG /145). u Improve behavior of failure model at low departure levels: u log  v = – – log C F (Super-Heavy Aircraft Study).

AAR /13/035 Design Conditions u Reworked subgrade CBR = 3 u Existing subgrade CBR = 5.5 u Wheel load = 55,000 lbs u Dual spacing = 54 inches (4- and 6-wheel) u Tandem spacing = 57 inches (4- and 6- wheel)

AAR /13/036 LFC3 – Reworked Subgrade = 3 CBR

AAR /13/037 Variation of Asphalt Modulus with Temperature (Witczak)

AAR /13/038 Variation of Pavement Life with Temperature – LFC3, from LEDFAA and

AAR /13/039 Testing Schedule u September 3: started. u September 4: stopped testing on LFC1. u September 6: 990 passes. u September 12: stopped testing on LFC2 at 3,168 passes. u September 13 and 16: 2 test pits in LFC2. u September 17: tried MWHGL wander on LFC3 and 4. u September 18: increased load to 65,000 and continued testing on LFC3 and 4 with old wander. u October 18: stopped at 23,826 passes.

AAR /13/0310 Asphalt Temperatures

AAR /13/0311 Pavement at 19,500 Passes

AAR /13/0312 North, 6-Wheel Track

AAR /13/0313 South, 4-Wheel Track

AAR /13/0314 Rut Depths from Straightedge Tried different wander. Then increased load to 65,000 lbs

AAR /13/0315 Rut Depths from Straightedge Tried different wander. Then increased load to 65,000 lbs

AAR /13/0316 LFC3 - Upheaval on North Track

AAR /13/0317 LFC3 - Upheaval on South Track

AAR /13/0318 Laser Profiler – 21.5 ft Span, 8 in Range

AAR /13/0319 Transverse Profile – LFC3 ~1,000 Pass Intervals

AAR /13/0320 Failure Criteria for Flexible Design u From MWHGL Report. u A pavement was considered failed when either of the following conditions occurred: u Surface upheaval of the pavement adjacent to the traffic lane reached 1 in. or more. u Surface cracking occurred to the point that the pavement was no longer waterproof.

AAR /13/0321 Rut Depths from Profiles

AAR /13/0322 Uplift from Profiles

AAR /13/0323 Rut Depth from Profiles

AAR /13/0324 Uplift from Profiles

AAR /13/0325 Uplift from Profiles

AAR /13/0326 Rut Depth from Profiles - Extrapolated

AAR /13/0327 CC3 and CC1-MFC Compared to MWHGL

AAR /13/0328 MWHGL DT Test Item B-747 gear, 60,000 lb wheel loads, failed at 420 passes.

AAR /13/0329 Layered Elastic Strain

AAR /13/0330 Starting Excavation of Trench

AAR /13/0331 Current Proposal for Rigid Reconstruction (1) u 15 ft x 15 ft (4.5 m x 4.5 m) slabs. u 3-Part optimized mix. u 28-day wet burlap cure. u Transverse joints doweled.

AAR /13/0332 Current Proposal for Rigid Reconstruction (2) u Looked at decreasing strength and increasing thickness: u Rounded intermediate aggregate, no significant decrease. u 30%, and 50% Class C flyash replacement in a two-part mix (batched 1/13/03), significant decrease at 50%.

AAR /13/0333 PCC Beam Strengths

AAR /13/0334 PCC Cylinder Strengths

AAR /13/0335 Flexural vs. Compressive

AAR /13/0336 Current Proposal for Rigid Reconstruction (3) u One more batch at 70% flyash replacement. u 15 ft x 15 ft x 11 in thick test slab on existing PCC. Will measure. u Vertical displacement of corners. u Horizontal strains. u Temperature through depth. u Relative humidity through depth.

AAR /13/0337 Current Proposal for Rigid Reconstruction (4) u Three test items on medium-strength subgrade: u Existing econocrete subbase. u Aggregate subbase. u Slab-on-subgrade. u Rebuilding medium strength subgrade to depth of 3 feet. Target strength is 7 CBR. Half finished.