Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Management (ATM) Issues 30 Nautical Mile (NM) Lateral / Longitudinal Distance-based.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Farnborough Airspace Change Proposal FACC Briefing 4 October 2012.
Advertisements

MINIMUM NAVIGATION PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION AIRSPACE (MNPS)
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
Global ATM Operational Concept
Regional RAIM Prediction System – Progress Report
Federal Aviation Administration GOLD Introduction By:Tom Kraft Date:8 February 2012 Presented to:SOCM/2 Seminar GOLD.
ADS-B OUT - IATA VIEW ADS-B SITF/11 – Jeju, Korea 24 – 27 April 2012
Federal Aviation Administration Required Communication Performance (RCP) Date:26-30 March 2007 Presented to:ICAO Worldwide Symposium on Performance of.
Introduction to Required Communication Performance (RCP) and Required Surveillance Performance (RSP) Read Slide. SOCM/2 Christine Falk 8-10 February.
1 Marinus C. F. Heijl Acting Director Air Navigation Bureau ICAO 30 March 2007 SYMPOSIUM OUTCOMES AND THE WAY FORWARD.
A PERFORMANCE BASED GLOBAL AIR NAVIGATION SYSTEM: PART II
ICAO Performance Based Communication and Surveillance Workshop -- Closing Remarks Feb 2013 Paris, France.
Jeffrey T. Williams Manager, RNAV & RNP Group Air Traffic Organization
FANS 1/A over Iridium (FOI)
2017/3/28 Hong Kong PBN implmentation ICAO GNSS Implementation Seminar/Workshop 26 March 2012 ICAO FPP fdsagsdfgsdgsdgasdfsadf 1.
An Airline Perspective Prepared by Capt. Ian Varcoe, Air New Zealand.
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Autonomous Aircraft OSED CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Autonomous Aircraft OSED.
Federal Aviation Administration International Flight Inspection Symposium June 24, 2008 James H. Washington Vice President, Acquisition and Business Services.
Air Traffic Management
Federal Aviation Administration Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 8, 2012 SOCM-2 Seminar Data Link Operations.
SOCM-2 Seminar Data Link Benefits Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-20/PIA-4 Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Departure Profiles.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-86/PIA-3 Improved Access to Optimum Flight Levels through Climb/Descent.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
International Civil Aviation Organization Trajectory-Based Operations(TBO) Saulo Da Silva SIP/ASBU/Bangkok/2012-WP/25 Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12.
Traffic Management and FUA integration
CHINA GO TEAM VISIT 2014 Opening Civil/Military Session Erwin Lassooij ICAO PBN Programme Manager.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-40/PIA-4 Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application.
IP-20 Review of the Effectiveness of Branching UPRs from PACOTS Track 2 Electronic Navigation Research Institute The IPACG meeting 40, Sep. 2014, Washington.
USER COMMUNITY NAVIGATION TRANSITION PLAN 19 TH ANNUAL FAA/JAA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE June 3-7, 2002 Phoenix, Arizona Presented by Frank Alexander Northwest.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/39 Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 5-6, 2014 WP02: Timing Errors in Oakland OCA.
Protection Values for VOR-Defined ATS Routes
Agenda Item 5: Air Traffic Management (ATM) Issues WP- 06: Staged Implementation of an Unrestricted UPR Zone within Oakland Airspace (Presented by IATA)
Analysis of ATC Communication messages Relevant to Altitude Change Requests Electronic Navigation Research Institute IPACG/39, 5-6 February 2014, Fukuoka,
USING PBN in UPR APPLICATION, SUCCESS and LESSONS LEARNED
DARP.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Developing a Roadmap to Success What’s Needed to Support UPRs The 9 th Pacific Project Team Meeting.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/39 Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 5-6, 2014 IP09: LOST FUEL SAVINGS DUE TO LACK OF.
JCAB and FAA Joint Paper IP/12 UPR and PACOTS Update.
Area Nav: RNP Evolution
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Gulf of Mexico 50 NM Lateral Separation – RNAV Routes Project Project Overview ATO Oceanic & Offshore.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Management (ATM) Issues Summary of the Outcomes of the 17th Cross Polar Trans East.
1 Canadian Implementation of ADS-B Out Presentation to ASAS TN2 14 April 2008 Jeff Cochrane Manager, CNS Service Design.
FAA Anchorage ARTCC.
FAA NAS Enterprise Architecture – Informing Future Challenges in V&V for NextGen 2009 V&V Summit November, 2009.
GNSS Aviation Applications
Federal Aviation Administration ASPIRE Update APEC TPT-WG Aviation Emissions Taskforce Singapore 15/16 Sept 09.
Emerging Issues for Air Navigation Service Providers Rudy Kellar Vice President, Operations NAV CANADA September 2007.
RECITE A PRAYER…(15 SECONDS). ATM TOPIC 1. INTRODUCTION TO AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT,TYPE OF CONTROL AREAS & FLIGHT PLAN 2. AERODROME CONTROL 3. AREA CONTROL.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration ADS-C CDP Climb/Descend Procedure Implementation Project Update IPACG/39 Keith Dutch, FAA 03 –
Federal Aviation Administration APEC Seminar on Practical Measures to Manage Aviation Emissions Collaboration on Aviation Emissions Reduction Partnerships.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/39 Presented By: Dennis Addison, FAA Date: February 5-6, 2014 IP06: ADS-B In-trail- Procedure (ITP)
Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 29 March RNA and RNAV and RNP Strategy in Japan Yoshiki Imawaka Director.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration New York Center System Operations Traffic Flow Management Operations Weather Users Workshop Tom.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented To: IPACG/40 Date: September 8-12, 2014 IP8: Lost Fuel Savings due to lack of RNP4/FANS Equipage.
400328_M_1Y.ppt Thompson MIT Lincoln Laboratory Analysis of Terminal Separation Standards and Radar Performance Dr. Steven D. Thompson Dr. Steven.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
Larry Ley | Digital Aviation | Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Vertical, lateral separations based on time / distance
ASSTAR Overview Jean-Marc Loscos, DSNA
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
longitudinal separations based on time / distance
New Automation System Delivers FANS-1/A Benefits
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
FANS 1/A over Iridium (FOI)
Air Transport Reporting Form K for ANSPs
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
RNAV and RNP Strategy in Japan
CHINA GO TEAM VISIT 2014 Opening Civil/Military Session
Presentation transcript:

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Management (ATM) Issues 30 Nautical Mile (NM) Lateral / Longitudinal Distance-based Separation Standard between RNP-4 ADS-C capable Aircraft Transiting the Anchorage / Oakland Flight Information Region (FIR) Boundary IPACG/40> Steve Kessler, FAA September 8-12, 2014

Federal Aviation Administration Introduction 2 The FAA and JCAB have utilized reduced oceanic separation minima (30nm lateral / 30nm longitudinal) through the use of the Future Air Navigation System (FANS) procedures and the Required Navigation Performance 4 (RNP-4) specification. The ability to apply reduced separation on cross boundary aircraft has led to a more efficient system and a significant reduction in carbon dioxide emissions. Since November 2012, ZAN and ZOA have applied reduced separation minima (Automatic Dependent Surveillance- Contract, or ADS-C, 30/30) for aircraft separation on transfers along their common Flight Information Region (FIR) boundary where both facilities employ the Ocean 21 / Advanced Technologies and Oceanic Procedures (ATOP) automation system. This area of the FIR boundary falls west of the 164º West meridian.

Federal Aviation Administration 3 IPACG/40 IP/10 September , 2014 Anchorage ARTCC NOPAC Airspace

Federal Aviation Administration 4 IPACG/40 IP/10 September , 2014 = 30/30 Airspace in PAZA

Federal Aviation Administration Discussion 5 –Anchorage ARTCC utilizes the Flight Data Processor 2000 (FDP2000) automation system in the airspace east of the 164º West meridian. Due to the two facilities’ experience level with the 30/30 separation minima, and certain operating limitations within the FDP2000 system, the initial use of ADS-C 30/30 for cross boundary transfers between Oakland and Anchorage did not include that portion of the common FIR boundary where FDP2000 is used.

Federal Aviation Administration Discussion (cont.) 6 –Operational experience gained since November 2012 has led to the facilities’ determination that the ADS-C 30/30 minima can be used along the FDP2000 FIR boundary. Consequently, since February 19, 2014, Oakland and Anchorage ARTCC have been utilizing the ADS-C 30/30 minima for longitudinal separation between aircraft crossing the Oakland Ocean21 and Anchorage FDP2000 boundary. The initial implementation was hampered by a long term outage of the Cold Bay Air Route Surveillance RADAR system (CDB ARSR) but since its return to service, in June 2014, the 30nm longitudinal separation minima has been providing significant benefits to aircraft flying PACOTS tracks and User Preferred Routings (UPRs).

Federal Aviation Administration 7 IPACG/40 IP/10 September , 2014 = PAZA Airspace 30/30 ADS-C Transition to 5 NM Radar

Federal Aviation Administration 8 IPACG/40 IP/10 September , 2014 Detail view

Federal Aviation Administration Discussion (cont.) 9 –Anchorage ARTCC is now working on a project to extend the use of the Ocean21 system into the airspace east of the 164ºW meridian. The expansion of the Ocean21 system into Anchorage’s “Sector 69” will provide for an even more seamless operation for aircraft crossing the Anchorage / Oakland FIR boundary. The completion date of this project has not yet been determined, but updates will be provided as, and when, they become available.

Federal Aviation Administration Recommendation –The meeting is invited to note the information provided. 10

Federal Aviation Administration Questions? 11