1 Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-tsaad-ccamp-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute-05 Author.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation_ID © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved
Advertisements

Igor Umansky Huub van Helvoort
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 MPLS –TP Fault OAM draft-ietf-mpls-tp-fault-01 George Swallow
1 IEEE 1588v2 Clock Synchronization & P2MP LSP with co-routed reverse path Lizhong Jin (ZTE) Frederic Jounay (France Telecom Orange)
RSVP-TE extensions for dynamic hostname traversing OSPF routing areas draft-zheng-ccamp-rsvp-te-dynamic-hostname-00 Zhi Zheng,
Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching: An Overview of Signaling Enhancements and Recovery Techniques IEEE Communications Magazine July 2001.
1 68th IETF, Prague, March 2007 Graceful Shutdown in MPLS Traffic Engineering Networks draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-graceful-shutdown-02.txt Zafar Ali
1 RSVP-TE Extensions for Collecting SRLG Information draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-09.txt Authors: Oscar Gonzalez de Dios Fatai.
Multicast LDP extension for hub & spoke multipoint LSP
OLD DOG CONSULTING Challenges and Solutions for OAM in Point-to-Multipoint MPLS Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting Ltd. Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems, Inc.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—8-1 MPLS TE Overview Understanding MPLS TE Components.
Protection Mechanisms for LDP P2MP/MP2MP LSP draft-zhao-mpls-mldp-protections-02.txt Quintin Zhao, Emily Chen, Tao Chou Huawei Technology Daniel King OldDog.
Refresh Interval Independent facility FRR draft-chandra-mpls-enhanced-frr-bypass-01 Chandrasekar Ramachandran Markus.
Pseudowire Endpoint Fast Failure Protection draft-shen-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-00 Rahul Aggarwal Yimin Shen
PW Endpoint Fast Failure Protection draft-shen-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-02 Yimin Shen (Juniper Networks) Rahul Aggarwal (Arktan Inc) Wim Henderickx.
PW Endpoint Fast Failure Protection draft-shen-pwe3-endpoint-fast-protection-03 Yimin Shen (Juniper) Rahul Aggarwal (Arktan Inc) Wim Henderickx (Alcatel-Lucent)
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 12 FastReRoute (FRR) - Big Picture.
MPLS and Traffic Engineering
November th Requirements for supporting Customer RSVP and RSVP-TE over a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN draft-kumaki-l3VPN-e2e-mpls-rsvp-te-reqts-05.txt.
1 Fabio Mustacchio - IPS-MOME 2005 – Warsaw, March 15th 2005 Overview of RSVP-TE Network Simulator: Design and Implementation D.Adami, C.Callegari, S.Giordano,
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
1 RSVP-TE Extensions for Associated Bidirectional LSPs draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-06 Author list: Fei Zhang, ZTE
IETF 68, MPLS WG, Prague P2MP MPLS-TE Fast Reroute with P2MP Bypass Tunnels draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-01.txt J.L. Le Roux (France Telecom) R. Aggarwal.
P2MP MPLS-TE FRR with P2MP Bypass Tunnel draft-leroux-mpls-p2mp-te-bypass-00.txt J.L. Le Roux (France Telecom) R. Aggarwal (Juniper) IETF 67, MPLS WG,
1 Reoptimization of Point-to-Multipoint Traffic Engineering Loosely Routed LSPs draft-tsaad-mpls-p2mp-loose-path-reopt-03 Author list: Tarek Saad
Protection and Restoration Definitions A major application for MPLS.
A Snapshot on MPLS Reliability Features Ping Pan March, 2002.
1 IETF- 56 – TE WG- SAN FRANCISCO Inter-AS MPLS Traffic Engineering draft-vasseur-inter-AS-TE-00.txt Jean-Philippe Vasseur – Cisco Systems Raymond Zhang.
1 IETF-81, MPLS WG, Quebec City, Canada, July, 2011 draft-ali-mpls-inter-domain-p2mp-rsvp-te-lsp-06.txt MPLS WG IETF-81 Quebec City, Canada July, 2011.
RSVP-TE Extensions to Notification for Shared Mesh Protection CCAMP WG, IETF 81th draft-he-ccamp-notification-shared-mesh-protection-00 Wenjuan He
Kireeti Kompella draft-kompella-mpls-rmr-01
(Slide set by Norvald Stol/Steinar Bjørnstad
1 Ping and Traceroute for GMPLS LSPs in Non-Packet Switched Networks draft-ali-ccamp-gmpls-lsp-ping-traceroute-01.txt Zafar Ali, Roberto Cassata (Cisco.
Draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection-00IETF 84 MPLS: 30 July Ingress Protection for RSVP-TE p2p and p2mp LSPs draft-torvi-mpls-rsvp-ingress-protection-00.
IP Traffic Engineering RSP draft-shen-ip-te-rsp-01.txt Naiming Shen Albert Tian Jun Zhuang
PIM Extension For Tunnel Based Multicast Fast Reroute (TMFRR) draft-lwei-pim-tmfrr-00 IETF 76, Hiroshima.
Refresh Interval Independent facility FRR draft-chandra-mpls-enhanced-frr-bypass-00 Chandra Ramachandran Yakov Rekhter.
A Snapshot on MPLS Reliability Features Ping Pan March, 2002.
1 RSVP-TE Signaling For GMPLS Restoration LSP draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-03 Author list: Rakesh Gandhi Zafar Ali
1 68th IETF, Prague, March 2007 Address Resolution for GMPLS controlled PSC Ethernet Interfaces draft-ali-arp-over-gmpls-controlled-ethernet-psc-i-04.txt.
Draft-li-mpls-proxy-te-lsp-01IETF 90 MPLS1 Proxy MPLS Traffic Engineering Label Switched Path(LSP) draft-li-mpls-proxy-te-lsp-01 Zhenbin Li, Xinzong Zeng.
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 MPLS Upstream Label Assignment for RSVP- TE and LDP draft-raggarwa-mpls-rsvp-ldp-upstream-
Establishing P2MP MPLS TE LSPs draft-raggarwa-mpls-p2mp-te-02.txt Rahul Aggarwal Juniper Networks.
RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-00 Yimin Shen (Juniper Networks) Yuji Kamite (NTT Communication) IETF 83, Paris, France.
82 nd Taipei Protection Mechanisms for LDP P2MP/MP2MP LSP draft-zhao-mpls-mldp-protections-00.txt Quintin Zhao, Emily Chen, Huawei.
1 RSVP-TE Extensions For Fast Reroute of Bidirectional Co-routed LSPs draft-tsaad-mpls-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute-00.txt Author list: Mike Taillon
Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Ingress Local Protection draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection-04 Huaimo Chen, Raveendra Torvi Autumn Liu, Tarek Saad,
Analysis on Two Methods in Ingress Local Protection.
1 RSVP-TE Signaling For GMPLS Restoration LSP draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp-04 Author list: Rakesh Gandhi - Presenter Zafar.
RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-03
Jean-Philippe Vasseur – Cisco Systems Raymond Zhang - Infonet
P2MP MPLS-TE Fast Reroute with P2MP Bypass Tunnels
Author list: Rakesh Gandhi Zafar Ali
RSVP-TE Extensions for Associated Co-routed Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs) draft-gandhishah-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-01 Author list: Rakesh.
Presenter: Jeffrey Zhang
MPLS LSP Instant Install draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instant-install-00
RSVP Setup Protection draft-shen-mpls-rsvp-setup-protection-02
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-03 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-03 Tarek Saad (Presenter)
Yimin Shen (Juniper) Rahul Aggarwal (Arktan Inc)
PLR Designation in RSVP-TE FRR
Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute-06 Authors: Mike Taillon.
Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP- based LSPs
draft-chandra-mpls-rsvp-shared-labels-np-00
LSP Fast-Reroute Using RSVP Detours
draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-01
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS). 2 MPLS Overview A forwarding scheme designed to speed up IP packet forwarding (RFC 3031) Idea: use a fixed length.
Fast Reroute for Node Protection in LDP- based LSPs
YANG Data Models for TE and RSVP draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-19 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-10 draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-te-05 draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls-01.
IP RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for P2P IP-TE LSP Tunnels Tarek Saad, Juniper Networks Vishnu Pavan Beeram, Juniper.
Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang
Presentation transcript:

1 Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-tsaad-ccamp-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute-05 Author list: Mike Taillon Tarek Saad Rakesh Gandhi - Presenter Zafar Ali Manav Bhatia Lizhong Jin Frederic Jounay Acknowledgment: George Swallow 91st IETF, CCAMP WG, Honolulu (November 2014)

222 Outline Requirements and Scope Summary and Update since Previous IETF Next Steps

333 Requirements and Scope Requirements: 1.Service Providers currently using RSVP-TE signaling would like to deploy packet tunnels using GMPLS signaling for bidirectional tunnels. 2.Fast reroute [RFC4090] is widely deployed in packet RSVP-TE networks today and hence it is preferred for GMPLS packet tunnels. 3.Motivation for fast reroute is to leverage the existing mechanisms for failure detection and restoration. Scope of TE LSP: 1. Signaled using GMPLS [RFC3473] 2. Unidirectional or bidirectional 3. Packet Switch Capable (PSC) 4. Using FRR procedures [RFC4090] Note: FRR procedures are not modified for unidirectional GMPLS packet tunnels.

444 Outline Requirements and Scope Summary and Update since Previous IETF Next Steps

555 Summary for Bidirectional Tunnels 1.Need mechanism to obtain upstream merge-point label.  Upstream PLR obtains the upstream MP label from the recorded labels in the RRO of the RSVP Path message. 2.The upstream and downstream PLRs may independently assign different (for NHOP/NNHOP) FRR bypass tunnels in the forward and reverse directions.  Coordinate the FRR bypass tunnel selections between downstream and upstream PLRs using new Bypass Assignment RRO subobject. 3.After FRR activation (for NHOP/NNHOP bypass), downstream PLR may timeout RSVP soft-state with in-band signaling. Signaling should follow the path of the traffic flow.  Upstream PLR needs to reroute Resv (and traffic) over FRR bypass tunnel in the reverse direction.

666 Update since IETF-89 London 1.Scope is GMPLS signaled packet tunnels 2.Cover both unidirectional and bidirectional tunnels

777 Outline Requirements and Scope Summary and Update since Previous IETF Next Steps

888 Draft has been stable. Welcome comments from the WG. Request to make this draft a WG Document.

999 Thank You.

10 Backup Slides 91st IETF, CCAMP WG, Honolulu, (November 2014)

11 Upstream PLR and Upstream MP Label 1.Upstream PLR obtains the upstream MP label from the recorded labels in the RRO of the RSVP Path message. 2.Downstream PLR obtains the downstream MP label from the recorded labels in the RRO of the RSVP Resv message [RFC4090]. Active/Head Passive/Tail Path Resv downstream PLR CD upstream PLR E B A F Resv Bypass Tc Resv Path ( DBA ) Resv Path ( DBA )

12 Bypass Assignment Coordination (NHOP/NNHOP bypass) 1.Define a new Bypass Assignment (BA) subobject in RRO that identifies a bidirectional bypass tunnel assigned by downstream PLRs: ::= 2.Source address for bypass is derived from node-id subobject in RRO [RFC4561]. 3.BA subobject is added in the RRO of the Path message every time downstream PLR assigns or updates the bypass tunnel. 4.Upstream PLR uses the recorded bypass tunnel to match the assignment. Active/Head Passive/Tail Path Resv downstream PLR CD upstream PLR E B A F Resv Bypass Tc1 Resv Path ( DBA ) Resv Path ( DBA ) Bypass Tc

13 FRR Reroute Phase (NNHOP bypass) Active/Head Passive/Tail Path Resv Traffic + Path Traffic + Resv downstream PLR CD Link Failure FRR reroute phase 1.The downstream PLR C and upstream PLR D independently trigger fast reroute procedures to redirect traffic onto respective bypass tunnels. 2.The downstream PLR C reroutes RSVP Path state onto the bypass tunnel Tc [RFC4090]. The upstream PLR D reroutes RSVP Resv state onto bypass tunnel Tb. 3.At this point, node D stops receiving RSVP Path and node C stops receiving RSVP Resv refreshes for the protected bidirectional tunnel. 4.This eventually leads to Path and Resv state timeouts for the protected bidirectional tunnel. Resv upstream PLR downstream MP E B A F Resv Bypass Tc Bypass Tb

14 FRR Re-coroute Phase (NNHOP bypass) Active/Head Passive/Tail Path Resv Path Resv downstream PLR C D Link Failure FRR active state – Re-coroute Phase E B A F 1.Once the traffic is protected (fast FRR switched), now need a way to get the primary LSP co-routed in both directions to avoid timeouts. 2.Downstream MP node E assumes the role of Point of Remote Repair (PRR) (upon receiving Path message over bypass tunnel Tc). 3.Node E finds the reverse bypass tunnels (Tc) that terminates on downstream PLR, node C. 4.Node E moves traffic in the reverse direction and Resv to bypass tunnel Tc. 5.Node D is now completely out of the primary tunnel path (bypassed). Resv Bypass Tc PRR downstream MP point of remote repair PRR

15 Thank You.