2 Breakout Session # 504 Michael P. Fischetti, Director, Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Department of Energy Date April 15, 2008 Time10:45.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning from Events 12th June 2013 The Tata Steel Approach
Advertisements

Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Planning Reports and Proposals
Cost Management ACCOUNTING AND CONTROL
1 of 17 Information Strategy The Features of an Information Strategy © FAO 2005 IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Strategy The.
INTERNAL CONTROLS.
1 AUDIT AND AUDIT RESOLUTION Peg Rosenberry, Director of Grants Management Claire Moreno, Audit Liaison, Office of Grants Management 9/18/2009 AMERICORPS.
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
. . . a step-by-step guide to world-class internal auditing
Module N° 7 – Introduction to SMS
Module N° 9 – SMS operation
Using Internal Control to Manage Risk Mary C. Braun, CPA, CGFM Management Concepts, Incorporated.
Gaining Senior Leadership Support for Continuity of Operations
Privacy Impact Assessment Future Directions TRICARE Management Activity HEALTH AFFAIRS 2009 Data Protection Seminar TMA Privacy Office.
International Conference on Implementation of the Common Assessment Framework Thessaloniki, on 10 & 11 June 2010 CAF Enforcement in the Regional Administration.
Presenter: Beresford Riley, Government of
IBM Corporate Environmental Affairs and Product Safety
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Management Internal Control Program Presented by: USU Manager's Internal Control Program Team Office of Accreditation and Organizational Assessment.
Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan Evaluation February 16, 2005.
2009 Strategic Planning playbook
Effective Contract Management Planning
1 Division of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) Knowledge Management and Transfer Project 7/30/12.
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
Checking & Corrective Action
Environmental Management Systems Refresher
Digital Futures International Forum - Tuesday 18th September 1 Digital Futures International Forum The Digitisation Standard: Back & Forth Stephen Clarke.
Risk The chance of something happening that will have an impact on objectives. A risk is often specified in terms of an event or circumstance and the consequences.
How to commence the IT Modernization Process?
Strategic Financial Management 9 February 2012
1 Knowledge Transfer Concepts Presented by the Division of Personnel State of Alaska.
Internal Control–Integrated Framework
CUPA-HR Strong – together!
CUPA-HR Strong – together!
© 2004 Dechert LLP FORM N-CSR, CERTIFICATIONS AND DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES James F. DesMarais, Esq. MFS Investment Management Brian S. Vargo,
Internal Control and Control Risk
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
Presented to: NDIA PMSC By: Keith Kratzert Date: January 29, 2009 Federal Aviation Administration Improving Program Performance at FAA.
Competency Management Defining McGill’s Competency Directory MANAGEMENT FORUM JUNE 7, 2005.
Chapter 14 Fraud Risk Assessment.
1 1 December 4-5, 2006 Sheraton Premiere at Tysons Corner Vienna, VA.
DOT Office of Inspector General Audit of DOT’s Office of the Secretary’s Acquisition Function Federal Audit Executive Council Procurement Training Conference.
1  AGA-DC and GWSPCA 6 th ANNUAL CONFERENCE OMB Circular A-123, Appendix A Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Innovative Approaches Jerome A. Vaiana.
Anita Hairston DOI Office of Acquisition and Property Management
1 Introduction to Workforce Planning and Development in State of Alaska Executive Branch Departments.
Center for Health Care Quality Licensing & Certification Program Evaluation 1 August 2014 rev.
Procurement Transformation State of North Carolina
Strategic Management of Human Capital Recruitment Strategy
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Procurement Engineering and Review Team (PERT) PEER REVIEW PROGRAM Patrick Marmo 2/7/2012 Independent Peer Review Program for Contractor’s Purchasing Systems.
Core Performance Measures FY 2005
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
1 DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP ASSESSING MY EMS Steven R. Woodbury
Session 5 Integrating CLAS Into Policy and Practice CLAS Training [ADD DATE] [ADD PRESENTER NAME] [ADD ORGANIZATION NAME]
Agency Risk Management & Internal Control Standards (ARMICS)
PERT Overview Federal Perspective Annual PERT Workshop February 7-9, 2012 Nevada Site Office Evelyn Landini, Contracting Officer Brookhaven Site Office.
DOE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
Company: Cincinnati Insurance Company Position: IT Governance Risk & Compliance Service Manager Location: Fairfield, OH About the Company : The Cincinnati.
Acquisition and Assistance Management Review Entrance Briefing Name of office reviewed Date of Review.
INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT Module 4.3: Internal Control & Audit.
Revision N° 11ICAO Safety Management Systems (SMS) Course01/01/08 Module N° 9 – SMS operation.
Unifying Talent Management. Harnessing the Power of Workforce Intelligence in Talent Planning to Drive Business Performance.
Safety Management Systems Session Four Safety Promotion APTA Webinar June 9, 2016.
Strategic Management of Human Capital FY04 Implementing Projects
Strategic Management of Human Capital Recruitment Strategy
FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services
Presentation transcript:

2 Breakout Session # 504 Michael P. Fischetti, Director, Office of Procurement and Assistance Policy Department of Energy Date April 15, 2008 Time10:45 am How DOE Assesses its Acquisition System under OMB Circular A-123 Using the GAO Framework

3 Agenda Introduction Background DOE’s Balanced Scorecard Approach What is the GAO Framework? The Cornerstones The Evaluation Team Performing the Assessment OMB Circular A-123: DOE’s Approach and Results An Example Final Outcome Summary Compliance Model

4 Introduction DOE is striving to be removed from the “High Risk List” for contract management DOE addressing GAO agency criteria for removal –Demonstrate strong commitment and leadership –Demonstrate progress in implementing corrective measures –Develop a corrective action plan that identifies Root causes Effective solutions Near-term plan for implementing the solutions

5 Background DOE learned of the “Framework” in September 2003 –Obtained a draft for agency comment Monitored development with GAO through FY2004 until formal publication in September 2005 Developed evaluation criteria in the form of questions Completed an internal assessment during FY2005 and FY2006 Monitored use of “Framework” criteria as part of GAO audits of TSA, INS, and DHS procurement functions

6 DOE’s Balanced Scorecard Approach Maintaining BSC performance measures in four strategic assessment areas: 1)Customer Perspective 2)Internal Business Perspective 3)Learning and Growth Perspective 4)Financial Perspective

7 DOE’s Balanced Scorecard Approach DOE initiated an internal BSC project to assess its procurement system using the “Framework” developed by the GAO to assess the health of its procurement system –Identified areas requiring management attention or early mitigation Followed up with an action plan for achievement Incorporated into existing FY-2006 Balanced Scorecard (BSC), self-assessment procurement performance reviews, and management system

8 DOE’s Balanced Scorecard Approach Objective –Using “Framework” developed a DOE Risk evaluation model for internally assessing DOE’s procurement system Approach for implementation Approach –Review the DOE BSC Self Assessment Guide against the “Framework” –Coordinate with the BSC Program Manager and Senior Procurement Management –Assess current procurement functions –Establish permanent process for proactive, continuous evaluation of procurement areas

9 DOE’s Balanced Scorecard Approach Documentation was: –Collected –Independent evaluation performed –Final report completed –Remediation conducted providing iterative improvement Follow-up actions: –Internal management control assessments under OMB Circular A-123 guidelines –Development of follow-on BSC initiatives addressing lower-rated areas

10 What is the GAO Framework? Cornerstones –Organizational Alignment and Leadership –Policies and Processes –Human Capital –Knowledge and Information Management Elements Critical Success Factors Key Questions, Things to look for, Cautions

11 The Cornerstones Organizational Alignment and Leadership –Aligning Acquisition with Agency Mission and Needs –Commitment from Leadership

12 The Cornerstones Plans and Processes –Planning Strategically –Effectively Managing the Acquisition Process –Promoting Successful Outcomes of Major Projects

13 The Cornerstones Human Capital –Valuing and Investing in the Acquisition Workforce –Strategic Human Capital Planning –Acquiring, Developing, and Retaining Talent –Creating Results-Oriented Organizational Cultures

14 The Cornerstones Knowledge and Information Management –Identifying Data and Technology to Support Acquisition Decisions –Safeguarding the Integrity of Operations and Data –Not part of review

15 The Evaluation Team Selected senior procurements analysts new to the Department –Why? Not familiar with existing processes Significant diversity of procurement knowledge and experience –This is not just a “file review” –Benchmarking against other organizational experience Objectivity Dedicated resources

16 Performing the Assessment Understanding the “Framework” Collecting documentation (biggest challenge) Benchmarking other organizations Document Adhere to principles in OMB A-123 Stay on schedule

17 OMB Circular A-123: DOE’s Approach and Results “Agencies should strive to integrate control related activities within the control framework outlined in A-123. In particular, management should identify opportunities to integrate and coordinate in order to leverage the internal reviews already being performed” (Implementation Guide dated July 2005) A-123 provides a vehicle to assess and evaluate internal controls –Assurance they are well designed and operated –Appropriately updated to meet changing conditions A-123 assesses internal controls for: –Effectiveness and efficiency of operations –Reliability of financial reporting –Compliance with laws and regulations OFPP circulated draft Guide for using the Framework for review –DOE provided comments to the draft based on its experience

18 OMB Circular A-123: DOE’s Approach and Results DOE developed: –Test plan –Tested pre-defined areas for impact, likelihood of occurrence, and design effectiveness Test sub-categories included: –Management’s commitment to competence –Management of Human Capital –Proper execution of transactions and events –External relevant, reliable, and timely communications –Risk analysis and actions

19 OMB Circular A-123: DOE’s Approach and Results The Office of Procurement and Assistance Management provided reasonable assurance that: –Internal controls for financial reporting were working effectively –There were no material weaknesses identified in the design or operation of the specific Headquarters controls over financial reporting evaluated

20 An Example Human Capital: Having the capacity (people and resources) to resolve the problems –Framework Assessment Demographic trends analysis Educational Levels Internal training database (now migrated to ACMIS) Funding levels Position Descriptions –Risks identified Recruitment, retention, and training of the workforce

21 An Example Responses to identified risks translated to BSC initiatives –“Talent Management Plan” –Human Capital Survey Survey Conducted demographically representative focus groups with a summary report to the Director Leadership Interviews Documentation review

22 An Example Responses to identified risks translated to BSC initiatives –Department-wide Acquisition Career Development (ACD) Policy and Program Handbook (revised and issued) Outlines certification requirements for the acquisition workforce –“Acquisition Letters” issued Strengthened organizational relationships between Department Headquarters and field operational contracting elements, including re-emphasizing ACD policy –Performed Skill-Gap Analysis of 1102 workforce –Met with DOE IG in drafting an Advisory Memo to the Deputy Secretary * See the follow-on briefing on DOE’s ACD program

23 Final Outcome Continuous Monitoring of Procurement System Effectiveness “Monitor and independently validate the effectiveness and sustainability of corrective measures” BSC continuous review and identification of system improvements –Using the “Framework” tool –Conducting periodic reviews and monitor field operations self- assessments of contracting office operations –Implementing field Procurement Management Review –Review Contract Management Plans –Review contractor purchasing systems

24 Final Outcome Support interagency working groups in procurement and acquisition regulatory development Monitor procurement risks, issues, or vulnerabilities of other organizations Government Accountability Office (GAO) reports Agency Inspector General (IG) reports Internal financial and management audits and reviews Professional and trade association periodicals Procurement news sources or other documents Benchmarking/surveying other agencies Validation under A-123 Review

25 Summary Corrective Feedback using BSC Use of the GAO Framework Reporting and compliance under OMB Circular A-123, as implemented by the DOE Chief Financial Officer

26 Compliance Model Contracting Activities complete Compliance Self Assessment and PMR Checklist Compliance Self Assessment team and PMR review Compliance Self Assessment and PMR - Assessment Team recommendations Compliance Self Assessment and PMRs summary and trend data compiled Compliance Self Assessment and PMR Checklist revised as necessary Headquarters Strategic Direction * Balanced Scorecard Procurement Management Reviews Best Practices * * * Policy Development PMRs

27 OMB Circular A-123 DOE Next Steps Implementing the “Framework” tool and A-123 in the field –Establishing policy/oversight/review functions in field offices –Procurement Management Review Program