Prajwal Mohanmurthy, Mississippi State University with Dr. Dipangkar Dutta, Mississippi State University Medium Energy Physics Group Spin-Light Polarimeter.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 Diamond RAL Particle Physics Masterclass 12 March 2003 Glenn Patrick

Advertisements

RHESSI Studies of Solar Flare Hard X-Ray Polarization Mark L. McConnell 1, David M. Smith 2, A. Gordon Emslie 4, Martin Fivian 3, Gordon J. Hurford 3,

Simulation of Neutrino Factory beam and quasielastic scattering off electrons in the near detector Yordan Karadzhov University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”

Short bunches in SPEAR J. Safranek for the SPEAR3 accelerator group November 2, 20101J. Safranek CLS THz Workshop.

Eric Prebys USPAS, Hampton, VA  Wikipedia lists about 60 light sources worldwide USPAS, Hampton, VA 2015Special Topic - Light Sources 2.

1 Electron Beam Polarimetry for EIC/eRHIC W. Lorenzon (Michigan) Introduction Polarimetry at HERA Lessons learned from HERA Polarimetry at EIC.

M. Sullivan Mini-workshop on the MEIC design Nov 2, 2012.

Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September

K. LaihemE166 collaboration LCWS06 Bangalore March 12th 2006 The E166 experiment Development of a polarized positron source for the ILC. Karim Laihem on.

Super-B Factory Workshop January 19-22, 2004 Accelerator Backgrounds M. Sullivan 1 Accelerator Generated Backgrounds for e  e  B-Factories M. Sullivan.

27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.

Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)

Impact of synchrotron radiation in LEPTON COLLIDER arcs

Electron and Ion Spin Dynamics in eRHIC V. Ptitsyn Workshop on Polarized Sources, Targets and Polarimetry Charlottesville, VA, 2013.

Prajwal T. Mohan Murthy Laboratory for Nuclear Science, MIT νDM Group Spin-Light Polarimeter for the Electron Ion Collider EIC Users Meeting 2014 Jun 2014.

Proton polarization measurements in π° photo-production --On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2γ collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University.

The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.

Beijing, Feb 3 rd, 2007 LEPOL 1 Low Energy Positron Polarimetry for the ILC Sabine Riemann (DESY) On behalf of the LEPOL Collaboration.

Tools for Nuclear & Particle Physics Experimental Background.

Diana Parno – July 22, 2008 January PREx Test Run: Compton Photon Analysis Diana Parno Carnegie Mellon University HAPPEX Collaboration Meeting.

NEW COMMENTS TO ILC BEAM ENERGY MEASUREMENTS BASED ON SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FROM MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER E.Syresin, B. Zalikhanov-DLNP, JINR R. Makarov-MSU.

1/18 The Distribution of Synchrotron Radiation Power in the IR C. H. Yu IR Overview SR Distribution in the IR The Protection of SR Power.

Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using Small Magnetic Fields Integrals. PSTP 13 V.S. Morozov et al., Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using.

A study of systematic uncertainties of Compton e-detector at JLab, Hall C and its cross calibration against Moller polarimeter APS April Meeting 2014 Amrendra.

Polarimetry at the LC Source Which type of polarimetry, at which energies for LC ? Sabine Riemann (DESY), LEPOL Group International Workshop on Linear.

Helical Undulator Based Positron Source for LC Wanming Liu 05/29/2013.

Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Spokespeople: J.-P. Chen, A. Deur, F. Garibaldi Hall A Collaboration Meeting December 10 th, 2012.

Status of Møller Polarimeter Peter-Bernd Otte September 23, th Collaboration Meeting, Mainz.

Eric Prebys USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014.

Synchrotron radiation at eRHIC Yichao Jing, Oleg Chubar, Vladimir N. Litvinenko.

M. Dugger, February Triplet polarimeter study Michael Dugger* Arizona State University *Work at ASU is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation.

LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.

November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.

S. Kahn 5 June 2003NuFact03 Tetra Cooling RingPage 1 Tetra Cooling Ring Steve Kahn For V. Balbekov, R. Fernow, S. Kahn, R. Raja, Z. Usubov.

19 July 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit (via Eric Torrence) VLCW06 19 July 06.

1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,

Oct. 6, Summary of the Polarisation Session J. Clarke, G. Moortgat-Pick, S. Riemann 10 November 2006, ECFA Workshop, Valencia.

Polarisation monitoring Sabine Riemann, Andreas Schälicke, Andriy Ushakov (DESY) Positron Source Group Meeting, October, 2009 University of Durham.

G E p -2γ experiment and the new JLab Hall-C Focal Plane Polarimeter Mehdi Meziane The College of William & Mary - APS Meeting April 14, On behalf.

Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.

BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,

Initial (FLUKA) calculations for synchrotron radiation at TLep April 4 th, 2013 F. Cerutti, A. Ferrari, L. Lari* *BE Dept.

1 Yuri Shestakov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk, Russia Tagging system of almost-real photons for photonuclear experiments at VEPP-3 Moscow,

Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.

HEP Tel Aviv University LumiCal (pads design) Simulation Ronen Ingbir FCAL Simulation meeting, Zeuthen Tel Aviv University HEP experimental Group Collaboration.

Plan for Today (AP Physics 2) Ch 24, 27, and 28 Review Day More Review Materials.

Update on ILC Production and Capturing Studies Wei Gai, Wanming Liu and Kwang-Je Kim ILC e+ Collaboration Meeting IHEP Beijing Jan 31 – Feb 2, 2007.

E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report E97-110: Small Angle GDH Experimental Status Report Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Inclusive cross section and single transverse-spin asymmetry of very forward neutron production at PHENIX Spin2012 in Dubna September 17 th, 2012 Yuji.

Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy The Department.

LCWS Paris – April 19-23, 2004 Polarimeter Issues K. Peter Schüler Polarimeter Issues 1 Polarimeter Studies for TESLA O General Considerations O.

Dark Current in ILC Main Linac N.Solyak, A.Sukhanov, I.Tropin ALCW2015, Apr.23, 2015, KEK LCWS'15, Tsukuba, 04/2015Nikolay Solyak1.

Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,

R. Arnold SLAC 24 June 2002 Real Photon Collaboration Conceptual Design Review Beam Monitoring Instruments.

JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.

Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton

T. Agoh (KEK) Introduction CSR emitted in wiggler

P. Chevtsov for the ELIC Design Team

A.P. Potylitsyn, I.S. Tropin Tomsk Polytechnic University,

Analysis of 14/20 mrad Extraction Line Energy Chicane

Energy calibration issues for FCC-ee I. Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk

Polarimetry Ken Livingston Sept 2012

Geant3 Simulation of Shielding for “sheet of flame” Background

Beam Background and the SVT Protection Collimator

Kazuya Aoki For the PHENIX Collaborations. Kyoto Univ. / RIKEN

PbWO4 Cherenkov light contribution to Hamamatsu S8148 and Zinc Sulfide–Silicon avalanche photodiodes signals F. KOCAK, I. TAPAN Department of Physics,

JLEIC Collaboration meeting Spring 2016 Ion Polarization with Figure-8

Update on MEIC Ion Polarization Work

Some of the Points Raised During my JLAB Visit

IR/MDI requirements for the EIC

Presentation transcript:

Prajwal Mohanmurthy, Mississippi State University with Dr. Dipangkar Dutta, Mississippi State University Medium Energy Physics Group Spin-Light Polarimeter for the Electron Ion Collider PSTP 2013 Sep 2013 Charlottesville, VA

Synchrotron Radiation (SR) “Spin-Light” Wiggler Magnets Collimators Ionization Chambers Geant4 Simulations Topic by Topic Case Studies (Only a Few Presented) Summary Outline (CHANGE)

Comparative Introduction

What is Synchrotron Radiation? First seen in General Electric Lab, 1947 Angular Distribution

So where is spin dependence? With QED Corrections by A.A.Sokolov and I.M.Ternov (1960s) Spin dependent term Spin flip dependent term Verified at VEPP-4 storage ring in Novosibirsk Belomesthnykh et. al., NIM 227, 173 (1984)

So where is spin dependence? With QED Corrections by A.A.Sokolov and I.M.Ternov (1960s) Spin dependent term Spin flip dependent term Verified at VEPP-4 storage ring in Novosibirsk Belomesthnykh et. al., NIM 227, 173 (1984)

Longitudinal Spin Light

What are Spin-Light Characteristics? Spin light characteristics

Conceptual Design

Won’t all the fans of SR merge? The SR fans may be selected out after each dipole and collimated before being fed into the DIC. Notice only 2 fans are required for polarimetry, 4 fans are for statistics.

What are Spin-Light Characteristics? A differential ionization chamber can be used to measure the asymmetry. SR (+ SpinLight) The ionization chamber can use Xenon A split plane IC can pick out small up- down asymmetries in SR - influx. At the IC, the collimated SR beam spots shall be about 1cm. Notice: Figure on left is only one half of the actual IC. The middle plate is held at an intermediate potential.

A schematic for detection of SR (alternative arrangements are a possible) Detecting the Collimated SR

What will be the signal?

How does the dipole field look like? Central Uniform field BEAM Magnet Face Beam Pipe Edge fringe field Conceptual Design

How does the dipole field look like? Edge fringe field Central Uniform field BEAM Magnet Face Simulated using LANL Poisson EM Code Beam Pipe

Geant 4 Simulation

Geant 4 Simulation Results Simulation reproduces photon spectrum and asymmetry Only a single DIC is being simulated along with collimators

What about Background Simulations? Background events are mostly Bremsstrahlung events from the collimators

SR Spots from GEANT4? Notice only 2 fans are required for polarimetry, 4 fans are for statistics. Note: The Geant4 simulation plots are all for just one split plane IC, on one side of beamline.

How does this scale with E Beam and I Beam ? Number Spectra

How does this scale with E Beam and I Beam ? Power Spectra

How does this scale with E beam and I beam ? Asymmetry

How does this scale with E beam and I beam ? Asymmetry Not too bad

How does this scale with E beam and I beam ? Asymmetry Not too bad That’s good

How does this scale with E beam and I beam ? Asymmetry Not too bad That’s bad (with HE beams) That’s good

How does this scale with E beam and I beam ? Asymmetry Not too bad That’s bad (with HE beams) That’s good Bad too! (with HE beams)

Uncertainities Background and background asymmetry has to be measured with the wiggler on/off Simulation was used to estimate background

SUMMARY Acknowledgements This work is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under contract number DE-FG02-07ER41528 ‘10 – ’13 and DOE-JSA-JLAB Fellowship Grant ‘12 – ‘13. 3 dipole magnet:.1m dipoles separated by 1m. DIC 10m away Asymmetry in SR gives spin light component -> Polarization A non invasive and continuous method Minimal effect due to B field asymmetries & non uniform beam profile It can work!

Collaboration

Backup

Does the asymmetry in B field change anything? For each dipole Magnet: There is a reduction in both the total events and spin-light events (Plot: Events vs. E(MeV) of the light emitted)

Does the asymmetry in B field change anything? For each dipole Magnet: Even though there was a decrease in SR and SpinLight events, the asymmetry remains the same.

Does the Gaussian Beam profile change anything? Point BeamBeam Pipe 2inch SR Profile for Point Cross section of Beam The graph shows events as seen at the DIC For a point beam cross section, the SR profile is “box” like.

Does the Gaussian Beam profile change anything? Finite Beam size Beam Pipe 2inch SR Profile for Gaussian Beam Profile The graph shows events as seen at the DIC For a Gaussian beam profile, the SR profile is “box” with smooth edges. Notice the asymmetry has not changed. 200μ Note: Has been scaled to make it visible

Do the B field and dimensions affect? B field was chosen to be 4T YES! And the corresponding pole length of 10cm. This corresponds to a 10mrad angular beam bend.

What are Spin-Light Characteristics? Beam Energy dependence

How does this scale inclusion of Beam Halo? Asymmetry