Department of Nuclear Safety and Security

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
international strategic management
Advertisements

Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley
Scaling up the global initiative on the implementation of the SNA and supporting statistics Meeting on Scaling up the coordination and resources for the.
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
ASYCUDA Overview … a summary of the objectives of ASYCUDA implementation projects and features of the software for the Customs computer system.
Tips and Resources IASC Cluster/Sector Leadership Training
UNITED NATIONS Shipment Details Report – January 2006.
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
Aviation Security Training Module 4 Design and Conduct Exercise II 1.
ActionDescription 1Decisions about planning and managing the coast are governed by general legal instruments. 2Sectoral stakeholders meet on an ad hoc.
EU-Regional Policy Structural actions 1 GROWING EVALUATION CAPACITY THE MID TERM EVALUATION IN OBJECTIVE 1 AND 2 REGIONS 8 OCTOBER 2004.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
1 RA I Sub-Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Casablanca, Morocco, 20 – 22 December 2005 Status of observing programmes in RA I.
Module N° 7 – Introduction to SMS
BUILDING THE CAPACITY TO ACHIEVE HEALTH & LEARNING OUTCOMES
1 Aberdeen City Probationer Teacher Induction Programme.
Introduction to Auditing
1 Implementing Internet Web Sites in Counseling and Career Development James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State University Copyright 2003 by James P. Sampson,
1 According to PETROSAFE safety policy, the company is keen that: Introduction All Egyptian Petroleum companies and foreign companies working in A.R.E.
REVIEW: Arthropod ID. 1. Name the subphylum. 2. Name the subphylum. 3. Name the order.
Presenter: Beresford Riley, Government of
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Chapter 5 – Enterprise Analysis
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
Effective Contract Management Planning
1 RA III - Regional Training Seminar on CLIMAT&CLIMAT TEMP Reporting Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 – 27 October 2006 Status of observing programmes in RA.
Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge18/20/ Basel-ICU-Journal Challenge8/20/2014.
1..
Strategic Financial Management 9 February 2012
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Functional Areas & Positions
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
Intracellular Compartments and Transport
PSSA Preparation.
Essential Cell Biology
1 Technical Meeting on Managing the Development of a National Infrastructure for Nuclear Power SECURITY STATUS IN CHILE Mauricio Lichtemberg Chilean Nuclear.
Educator Evaluation: A Protocol for Developing S.M.A.R.T. Goal Statements.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Functions of Regulatory Body (RB) on EPR Appraisal guidance: Part.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
Acting Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section, NSNI, IAEA
Technical Meeting on Evaluation Methodology for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development December, 2008 Nuclear Safety in Infrastructure Building.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.
Postgraduate Educational Course in radiation protection and the Safety of Radiation sources PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview of legal framework Regional Workshop - School for Drafting Regulations 3-14 November 2014 Abdelmadjid.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Senior Regulators Meeting Technical Cooperation Programme Supporting Radiation Safety Infrastructure in Member.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES FIRST THINGS FIRST Invitation of a mission Information meeting self-assessment.
IAEA - Department of Nuclear Safety & Security
08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.
IAEA IAEA Support Services and Tools for Embarking Country Regulators Regulatory Cooperation Forum (RCF) Plenary 2015 NICIC Adriana Acting Section Head.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency School of Drafting Regulations – November 2014 Government and Regulatory Body Functions and Responsibilities IAEA.
Technical Meeting on Milestones for nuclear power infrastructure development Radiation Protection Khammar Mrabit Head, Regulatory Infrastructure and Transport.
1 st Workshop on issues and trends arising from the European IRRS missions Findings and Conclusions A.Munuera Brussels, 22 nd and 23 rd January 2014.
International Atomic Energy Agency Irina Sanda Education and Training in the Area of Safety Assessment Irina Sanda Safety Assessment Section Division of.
23 January 2016 Gustavo C ARUSO Head, Regulatory Activities Section Division of Nuclear Installations Safety Department of Nuclear Safety and Security.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency The IAEA Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) IRRS Missions : Overview from a Radiation Safety.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Arusha, Tanzania EGYPT Mohamed Reda Ezz El-Din 2 – 5 December 2013 RAF9038 Final Coordination Meeting.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Arusha, Tanzania CAMEROON Dr CHAKAM TAGHEU Pulchérie Julie 2 – 5 December 2013 RAF9038 Final Coordination Meeting.
Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Arusha, Tanzania Uganda Dr. Akisophel Kisolo Project Counterpart 2 – 5 December 2013 RAF9038 Final Coordination.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Burkina Faso Delwendé NABAYAOGO RAF9038 Final Coordination Meeting Arusha, Tanzania 2 – 5 December 2013.
RAF9038 Final Coordination Meeting
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Education and Training in the Area of Safety Assessment Irina Sanda
Presentation transcript:

Department of Nuclear Safety and Security Self-Assessment of the National Safety Infrastructure for a NPP 4th Steering Committee, competence of regulatory bodies | 05 December 2012 Jean-René JUBIN Regulatory Activities Section | Division of Nuclear Installation Safety Department of Nuclear Safety and Security

Self-assessment against SSG-16 IRIS - Methodology IRIS – Software Contents Self-assessment against SSG-16 IRIS - Methodology IRIS – Software Conclusion JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

Self-assessment against SSG-16 IRIS - Methodology IRIS – Software Contents Self-assessment against SSG-16 IRIS - Methodology IRIS – Software Conclusion JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

Self-Assessment against SSG 16 |1 Safety Guide SSG 16 constitutes a “road-map” for the progressive application of IAEA safety standards according to 20 Elements through 200 actions. These actions are a “step” towards the full application of IAEA safety standards during the early phases of the implementation of a nuclear power programme JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

Self-Assessment against SSG 16 |2 National Policy and Strategy for Safety Global safety regime Legal framework Regulatory framework Transparency and openness Funding and financing External expert support Provision of technical services Leadership and management for safety Human resources development ... Safety qualification of industrial organizations Technical infrastructure reliability Design safety Preparation for commissioning Transport safety Interfaces with nuclear security 20 Safety Elements, divided in phase 1, 2 and 3 Relevant requirements are listed Actions (should statements) are numbered Additional text provides rationale for the should statements guidance on how to get prepared and how to reach this statements JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS Abida Khatoon– Nuclear Safety Infrastructure development

Self-Assessment against SSG 16 |3 To facilitate the use and implementation of SSG 16, upon Member States’ request, it has been decided to develop a self-assessment mechanism IRIS, Integrated Review of Infrastructure for Safety JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

Self-Assessment against SSG 16 |4 What is self-assessment a learning and investigation process to review the current status of an organisation, its processes and performance against predefined criteria in order to identify areas for improvement of its efficiency and effectiveness an opportunity to develop safety culture across the involved organisations an integral part of the development of organizations aiming at excellence resource intensive activity which request a strong commitment JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

Self-Assessment against SSG 16 |5 What is the aim of self-assessment assess the current situation and progress made to build up the safety infrastructure for a nuclear power programme create a common understanding among stakeholders of the progress made in the development of the safety infrastructure identify gaps between the current situation and expected status of the national safety infrastructure, and list areas where improvement is needed take appropriate actions to strengthen the current safety infrastructure if necessary, in order to comply with IAEA standards Progress made during a period can be measured by repeating the self-assessment as the national power programme develops JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

Self-Assessment against SSG 16 |6 IRIS is based on 20 question-sets developed for the 20 Elements of Safety Infrastructure (Legal framework, regulatory framework, funding and financing, safety research, etc.) Self-assessment Question-sets based on 200 SSG-16 Actions JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

Self-Assessment against SSG 16 |7 Governmental programme management Global safety regime Legal framework Regulatory framework Transparency and openness Funding and financing External expert support Provision of technical services Leadership and management for safety Human resources development Safety research Radiological protection and safety Safety assessment Radioactive waste safety and decommissioning Emergency preparedness and response Site selection and evaluation Operating organization Safety qualification of industrial organizations Technical infrastructure reliability Design safety Preparation for commissioning Transport safety Interfaces with nuclear security For each action, one primary question and subsidiaries to develop some aspects of the answer Primary question Has the Government recognized the need for an effectively independent and competent Regulatory Body, and considered the appropriate position of the Regulatory Body in the State’s Governmental and legal framework for safety? Subsidiary question What are the role and responsibilities going to be assigned to the future regulatory body? JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

Integrated Review of Infrastructure for Safety Contents Self-assessment against SSG-16 IRIS - Methodology IRIS – Software Conclusion Integrated Review of Infrastructure for Safety JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

IRIS – Methodology |1 Pre-conditions The Government should commit itself to complete the self-assessment in accordance to an agreed scope should ensure that SA is performed at a meaningful stage in the NPP so that benefits from the SA can be expected should ensure coordination arrangements to be established and implemented between organizations taking part in the SA JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

IRIS – Methodology |2 Pre-conditions The Senior Management of the involved organizations should commit itself to: allocate adequate resources for completion of the SA encourage staff to perform the SA in a frank and honest manner and in a blame free environment consider the SA conclusions in a frank and transparent way in a no- blame culture fully implement the subsequent actions JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

IRIS – Methodology |3 The lifecycle of an IRIS self-assessment comprises 5 different steps Can be repeated to measure regularly the progresses made to establish the infrastructure for safety 1 Preparation 5 Follow Up 2 Answering 4 Action Plan 3 Analysis JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

To prepare and organise the whole assessment project IRIS – Methodology |4 Preparation Constitution of a Project Organisation (coordination, management, Respondents and Analysts Preparation of a National Plan scope for each involved organization Selection of the corresponding question- sets Main steps and schedule Training concerned persons 1 Preparation To prepare and organise the whole assessment project JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

Coordination Group (CG) Project Management Team (PMT) IRIS – Methodology |5 Preparation: project management structure Senior representatives of all relevant organizations (in early phase, it will be the NEPIO), in charge of defining the objectives and scope Coordination Group (CG) Project Manager (PM)   Project Management Team (PMT) Operational Team     Local Project Manager (LPM) Local Project Manager (LPM) Local Project Manager (LPM) Senior managers, specialists and technical staff from cross-functional areas within the relevant organizations, divided in: - Respondent Team (RT) in charge of the elaboration of the answers - Analysis Team (AT), if possible, not directly involved in the elaboration of the answers Local Project Management Team (LPMT) Local Project Management Team (LPMT) Local Project Management Team (LPMT) Organisation 1 Organisation 2 Organisation 3 JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

Performed by the Respondent Team(s) IRIS – Methodology |6 Answering Performed by the Respondent Team(s) descriptive response, reflecting the current factual situation and not the desired state all relevant evidence quality check the responses 1 Preparation 2 Answering JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

IRIS – Methodology |7 Analysis Performed by the Analysis Team(s) independent of the RT. Review the answers and further evidence and references Clarify answers, when needed (interview the RT, etc.) Analyse information Make recommendations Produce an analyst report 1 Preparation 2 Answering 3 Analysis JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

IRIS – Methodology |8 Action Plan Developed by the Project Management Team under the authority of the Coordination Group Based on the Analysis Report, including the recommendations Addressing all recommendations made during the analysis phase Addressing priorities, timelines and responsibilities (organisations) Action Plan 1 Preparation 2 Answering 4 Action Plan 3 Analysis JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

IRIS – Methodology |9 Follow-up Responsibility of Senior management of every organization to implement the action plan and follow-up Coordination Group should regularly follow-up the action plan 1 Preparation 5 Follow Up 2 Answering 4 Action Plan 3 Analysis JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

Self-assessment against SSG-16 IRIS - Methodology IRIS – Software Contents Self-assessment against SSG-16 IRIS - Methodology IRIS – Software Conclusion JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

IRIS Software |1 To facilitate the implementation of a Self-Assessment 1 Preparation 5 Follow Up 2 Answering 4 Action Plan 3 Analysis To facilitate the implementation of a Self-Assessment JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

IRIS Software |2 IRIS is a module of Self-Assessment Tool, which also includes SARIS Self-Assessment of Regulatory Infrastructure for Safety IRIS will address the Specificities of self-assessment against SSG 16 (multiple involved organisations, phases). It will possible to select: Phase(s) Organisation(s) JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

IRIS Software |3 IRIS includes the following main self-assessment steps To answer questions thoroughly and provide facts and evidences to support their answer (Respondent role) To analyse answers (SWOT) in order to identify rooms for improvements and provide recommendations (Analyst Role) To develop the action plan (Action Planner Role) from gaps identified and recommendations made during the Analyst Phase 2 Answering 3 Analysis 4 Action Plan JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

IRIS Software |4 Within IRIS, can be created Self-assessment lifecycles (scope, phases, etc.) Users and assign role and responsibilities Administrators (managers of the system and lifecycle) Readers Respondents (responsible to answer questions and gather all necessary data and information) Analysts (responsible to analyse the responses and made recommendations) Action planners (responsible to develop an action plan) Produce reports, interim and final JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

IRIS Software |5 JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

Self-assessment against SSG-16 IRIS - Methodology IRIS – Software Contents Self-assessment against SSG-16 IRIS - Methodology IRIS – Software Conclusion JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

Conclusion |1 SSG-16 provides guidance to apply progressively the IAEA Safety Standards in the development of a NPP IRIS is developed to facilitate a self-assessment of national safety infrastructure Self-Assessment is time and resource consuming but there are many motivations to use IRIS-self-assessment, including to Identify areas of improvement and to fix them at organisational level and national level (SSG 16) Develop safety culture and competences for safety across the involved organisations Promote staff commitment and involvement to their organization and its processes and its performances Inform all stakeholders of the NPP of the progress made to establish an infrastructure for safety and to help for coordination JR Jubin, Dec. 2012 | IRIS

Integrated Review of Infrastructure for Safety IRIS Integrated Review of Infrastructure for Safety Thank you 37