S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor ivabradine T rial Efficacy and safety of ivabradine in patients with chronic systolic heart failure.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr. Abdulkareem Alsuwaida Associate Professor King Saud University Hemodialysis Symposium February 2014 Al Madinah AlMunawwarah.
Advertisements

Effects of selective heart rate reduction with ivabradine on left ventricular remodelling and function: results from the SHIFT echocardiography substudy.
Key messages Stephen S Lim, et al. Lancet 2007; 370:
The INTENSIFY study: practical daily effectiveness and tolerance of ivabradine in chronic systolic heart failure in Germany Zugck C, Martinka P, Stöckl.
S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor ivabradine T rial Heart rate reduction with ivabradine and health related quality of life in.
analysis from the SHIFT study
Ian Graham et al. European Heart Journal 2007;28:
May 23rd, 2012 Hot topics from the Heart Failure Congress in Belgrade.
B-CONVINCED: Beta-blocker CONtinuation Vs. INterruption in patients with Congestive heart failure hospitalizED for a decompensation episode by Guillaume.
Effects on outcomes of heart rate reduction by ivabradine in patients with congestive heart failure: is there an influence of beta-blocker dose? Systolic.
Effect of ivabradine on recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure: findings from SHIFT S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor.
BEAUTI f UL: morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I f inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction Purpose.
Kotseva K, et al. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2009 Mar 12 [Epub]
S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor ivabradine T rial Objective, design and baseline Swedberg.
Effect of ivabradine on recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure: findings from SHIFT S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor.
S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor ivabradine T rial Main results Swedberg K, et al. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):
S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor ivabradine T rial Efficacy and safety of ivabradine in patients with severe chronic systolic.
The effect of heart rate reduction with ivabradine on renal function in patients with chronic heart failure: an analysis from SHIFT Systolic Heart failure.
Enrollment and Outcomes Fan Fan Hou, et al. N Engl J Med 2006;354:
Camm J, et al. On Behalf of The SHIFT Gothenburg, Cardiac safety of selective heart rate reduction with Ivabradine in chronic heart failure. Poster, Heart.
S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the If inhibitor ivabradine T rial Michel Komajda and Karl Swedberg on behalf of the Investigators.
S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor ivabradine T rial Selective heart rate reduction with ivabradine unloads the left ventricle in.
Influence of background treatment with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on ivabradine's effects in patients with chronic heart failure Systolic Heart.
Heart rate in heart failure: Heart rate in heart failure: risk marker or risk factor? A subanalysis of the SHIFT trial on behalf of the Investigators M.
New 2011 SHIFT quality of life substudy Quality of life ( QoL) in heart failure: where do we stand? Therapies that have survival benefits either have a.
Wald DS, et al. Am J Med 2009;122: Details of the 42 Trials Included in the Meta-analysis - Part I Wald DS, et al. Am J Med 2009;122:
Treatment options for patients with chronic symptomatic systolic heart failure. ACE, angiotensinconvertingenzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; CRT-D,
Treatment options for patients with chronic symptomatic systolic heart failure. ACE, angiotens inconverting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker;
Echocardiographic modalities for evaluation and risk stratification of heart failure patients. 3D indicates 3-dimensional; EF, ejection fraction; LA, left.
Emerging Concepts in Heart Failure
by Peter J. Schwartz, Maria Teresa La Rovere, Gaetano M
Relative mortality risk associated with quartiles of systolic blood pressure compared with systolic
An Endocrinology Clinic in Dyslipidemia
Figure 4 BMI and mortality in patients with heart failure
Systolic Heart failure treatment with the If inhibitor ivabradine Trial The effect of heart rate reduction with ivabradine on renal function in patients.
Figure 7 European Society of Cardiology 2016
by Alexander Röth, Andreas Hüttmann, Russell P
Summary of DURATION development program select efficacy results: absolute difference in change in A1C, body weight, systolic blood pressure, and LDL cholesterol.
Why double blind, controlled randomized trials?
SIGNIFY Trial design: Participants with stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure and resting heart rate >70 bpm were randomized to.
Figure 4 Prevalence of HFpEF and HFrEF by age
Treatment-related risk factors of inhibitor development in previously untreated patients with hemophilia A: the CANAL cohort study by Samantha C. Gouw,
Using Heart Rate as a Biomarker in Clinical Practice.
Mirnela Byku, and Douglas L. Mann BTS 2016;1:95-106
Case #1 Case #1 (cont) Case #1 (cont)
BAT for HFrEF Trial design: Patients with chronic systolic HF were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either baroreceptor activation therapy (BAT) or control.
Mirnela Byku, and Douglas L. Mann BTS 2016;1:95-106
CAD and HF Often Coexist
Recommended algorithm for high-flow nasal cannula use in acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure in immunocompetent or immunocompromised patients. #: arterial.
Nat. Rev. Cardiol. doi: /nrcardio
CHAMPION Trial design: Patients with recent hospitalization for heart failure were implanted with a pulmonary artery pressure monitor and randomized so.
Systolic Heart failure treatment with the If inhibitor ivabradine Trial Effect of ivabradine on recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure:
DENERHTN Trial design: Patients with resistant hypertension were randomized to renal denervation plus standardized stepped-care antihypertensive treatment.
Entry, Randomization, and Follow-up of Patients in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial Of the 461 patients who did not meet the protocol criteria,
The proportion of patients confronted with a cardiovascular risk factor (CVRF) they were previously unaware of, referring to the instrument based tests.
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics (means ± SD or %) of Subjects in Different Office SBP and DBP Categories Mancia G et al Hypertension. 2005;45:1072.
Kaplan-Meier Curves for the Percentages of Subjects with Microalbuminuria during Treatment with Trandolapril plus Verapamil or Placebo Piero Ruggenenti.
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
The amplitude of oscillation of end-tidal CO2 correlates to the amplitude of oscillation of cardiac output for both patients with heart failure (no fill)
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
Number of patients who would have benefitted from addition of ACE inhibitor (ACEi), beta blockers (BB) or optimal therapy (one or both of ACEi and BB)
William T. Abraham et al. JCHF 2018;j.jchf
Summary of STICH trial patients included in the analysis of 6 min walk distance. Reasons for non-inclusion at each follow-up time are given. CABG, coronary.
Recurrence of HF hospitalization Total-time approach
End point Valsartan Valsartan+HCTZ p
(D) Systolic blood pressure (BP) values at baseline and after treatment with anagliptin in 20 participants at 12 and 24 weeks. . (D) Systolic blood pressure.
Examples of ventilatory efficiency slope (minute ventilation (V′E)/carbon dioxide production (V′CO2) slope) in a healthy subject (green line) and a patient.
International Journal of Cardiology
Fig. 3: Possible algorithm for controlling blood pressure in diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. [This algorithm is based on the opinions and practice.
Average change in blood pressure (BP) from recruitment to 6-month postrecruitment in intervention and control patients >50 years included due to having.
Presentation transcript:

S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor ivabradine T rial Efficacy and safety of ivabradine in patients with chronic systolic heart failure according to blood pressure level in SHIFT Komajda M et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16(7):

<74 bpm 74 to <81 bpm ≥81 bpm <115 mm Hg115 to <130 mm Hg≥130 mm Hg Rate of primary end point (cardiovascular mortality or hospitalization for worsening heart failure), % Systolic blood pressure at baseline Heart rate at baseline P= for difference between the groups Outcomes in placebo patients grouped according to tertiles of systolic blood pressure and resting heart rate Komajda M et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16(7):

Time (years) <115 mm Hg to <130 mm Hg ≥130 mm Hg Numbers at risk P= for difference between the groups <115 mm Hg 115 to <130 mm Hg ≥130 mm Hg Outcomes in placebo patients according to tertiles of baseline systolic blood pressure Rate of primary end point (cardiovascular mortality or hospitalization for worsening heart failure), % Komajda M et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16(7):

Baseline systolic blood pressure <115 mm Hg Placebo Ivabradine Numbers at risk Incidence of primary end point (%) Placebo Ivabradine HR 0.84 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.98), P=0.022 Time (years) Effect of ivabradine on primary outcomes (CV death or HF hospitalization) according to systolic blood pressure level Komajda M et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16(7):

Placebo Ivabradine Numbers at risk Incidence of primary end point (%) HR 0.86 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.03), P=0.099 Time (years) Baseline systolic blood pressure 115 to <130 mm Hg Effect of ivabradine on primary outcomes (CV death or HF hospitalization) according to systolic blood pressure level Placebo Ivabradine Komajda M et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16(7):

Placebo Ivabradine Numbers at risk Time (years) Incidence of primary end point (%) HR 0.77 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.92), P=0.003 Baseline systolic blood pressure ≥130 mm Hg Effect of ivabradine on primary outcomes (CV death or HF hospitalization) according to systolic blood pressure level Placebo Ivabradine Komajda M et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16(7):

Baseline SBP <115 mm Hg HR 0.84 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.98), P=0.022 Time (years) HR 0.86 (95% CI, 0.72 to 1.03), P=0.099 Time (years) Baseline SBP 115 to <130 mm Hg Time (years) HR 0.77 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.92), P=0.003 Baseline SBP≥130 mm Hg Effect of ivabradine on primary outcomes (CV death or HF hospitalization) according to systolic blood pressure level Rate of primary end point (cardiovascular mortality or hospitalization for worsening heart failure), % Placebo Ivabradine Placebo Ivabradine Placebo Ivabradine Komajda M et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16(7): P for interaction =0.68

Adjusted hazard ratio P-value P-value for interaction Cardiovascular mortality <115 mm Hg to <130 mm Hg ≥130 mm Hg Hospitalization for worsening heart failure <115 mm Hg to <130 mm Hg ≥130 mm Hg Heart failure mortality <115 mm Hg to <130 mm Hg ≥130 mm Hg All-cause mortality <115 mm Hg to <130 mm Hg ≥130 mm Hg Effect of ivabradine on other outcomes according to baseline systolic blood pressure Komajda M et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16(7):

SBP, mm Hg< to <130≥130 IVA, %PL, %PIVA, %PL, %PIVA, %PL, %P Symptomatic bradycardia Asymptomatic bradycardia Atrial fibrillation Phosphenes Hypotension according to systolic blood pressure level Adverse event leading to withdrawal according to systolic blood pressure level Komajda M et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2014;16(7):