OCTOBER 8, 2014 Bob Laurita INTERNAL MARKET MONITORING New Import Capacity Resource FCM Market Power Mitigation Order to Show Cause Compliance Filing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

December 12, 2000 Supplier Meeting Parma Aggregation Group.
FPLs Request for Recovery of the Costs Associated with the Seabrook Transmission Substations Pool Transmission Facilities NEPOOL Participants Committee.
Evaluation Independent Monitoring Presented at: LPSC Staffs Technical Conference and ESIs Bidders Conference for the Fall 2006 Limited-Term RFP September.
PG&Es 2009 Participating Load Pilot. 2 Overview Regulatory Context Pilot Characteristics Lessons Next Steps.
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
E-Tariff - The Problem with Joint and Shared Filings Presented by National Grid NAESB E-Tariff Conference Colorado Springs January 23-25, 2008.
August 31- September 1, 2011 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Grants 3.0 Departmental Administrator Review January 22, 2014.
Demand Resource Operable Capacity Analysis – Assumptions for FCA 5.
FERC Order minute Scheduling.
2000, Independent Electricity Market Operator All Rights Reserved 1.
MAY 10, 2012 | NEPOOL MARKETS COMMITTEE WESTBOROUGH, MA Andrew Gillespie PRINCIPAL ANALYST | MARKET DEVELOPMENT Proposal Static De-List Bid Changes.
1 WHY WE NEED AN ICAP MARKET IN NEW ENGLAND Presentation By: Dr. Richard A. Rosen Tellus Institute Boston, MA To: Massachusetts Electric Restructuring.
Standard Market Design (SMD) in New England Federal Energy Regulation Commission Conference on Standard Market Design January 22, 2002 David LaPlante Vice.
Overview of CAISO Stakeholder Process for FERC Order 764 Compliance Implementation of 15 minute scheduling and settlement Jim Price, CAISO Presentation.
© 2013 Day Pitney LLP Overview and Update on the Ever-Evolving New England Wholesale Capacity Market presentation to Boston Bar Association May 23, 2013.
Regulations Governing the Conduct of Open Seasons for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission February 9, 2005.
1 PENDING FERC ISSUES RELATING TO THE ALASKA NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION PROJECT Presentation by Karol Lyn Newman Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP November.
Summary of Proposed Market Rules For Transition Period Price-Responsive Demand and Active Demand Resources in the Forward Capacity Market Henry Yoshimura,
Brookfield Renewable Energy Group. Focusing on Renewable Power Generation and Transmission Conceptual discussion how to integrate renewable resources under.
FEBRUARY 14, 2013 RELIABILITY COMMITTEE MEETING Steve Weaver SYSTEM OPERATIONS In-Day Reserves & Supplemental Procurement.
DRAFT Installed Capacity Requirement (ICR) and Related Values for the 2014/15 Forward Capacity Auction (FCA5) Maria Agustin.
DECEMBER 17, 2013 | WESTBOROUGH, MA Reliability Committee & Transmission Committee & Markets Committee Capacity Zone Modeling Al McBride MANAGER, AREA.
Legal Framework, Investment Opportunities and Technical Innovation in the Electricity Sector Security of Supply through competitive markets: Design of.
Welcome to SMD Installed Capacity Market with UCAP & GADS.
Copyright © 2013 The Brattle Group, Inc. ISO-NE Offer Review Trigger Prices 2013 Study Final Results NEPOOL Markets Committee Sam Newell September 10,
03/11/2013 MARKETS COMMITTEE Aleks Mitreski MARKET DEVELOPMENT (413) Overview of Market Rule revisions.
SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 | MARKETS COMMITTEE Aleks Mitreski MARKET DEVELOPMENT (413) Hourly Offer and Intraday.
Winter 2013/2014 Reliability Solution Including LNG MWHs N. Jonathan Peress Conservation Law Foundation Greg Lander Skipping Stone NEPOOL Markets & Reliability.
REGULATORY AND INVESTMENT CHALLENGES IN HYBRID POWER MARKETS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES REGULATORY AND INVESTMENT CHALLENGES IN HYBRID POWER MARKETS IN DEVELOPING.
Allocation of capacities between Portugal and Spain Madrid 30 th April 2013.
Agenda – Schools Forum May School Reform – what is happening and what does that mean for Leicestershire? Questions The Leicestershire Consultation.
JANUARY 14-15, 2014 | NEPOOL MARKETS COMMITTEE Matthew Brewster MARKET DEVELOPMENT | Conceptual design.
Al McBride MANAGER, AREA TRANSMISSION PLANNING Existing Import Interfaces: Transmission Transfer Capabilities and The Calculation of Tie Benefits DECEMBER.
NOVEMBER 18, 2013 | WESTBOROUGH, MA Administrative Pricing Rules for Forward Capacity Auction #8.
5th Annual Innovation Challenge Kick-Off and Overview Info Sessions 1 & 2 Fall 2014 September 9 & 22
Duquesne Light Company Request For Proposal
AUGUST 7-9, 2013 | LENOX, MA Andrew Gillespie MARKET DEVELOPMENT (413) Review of Market Rule 1: Section.
GPA Renewable Energy Resource for Guam Power Authority
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
Transmission Congestion on the Delmarva Peninsula December 17, 2003 PA
October 30, 2014 Terry Wolf, Manager of Transmission Services.
G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. COLD SNAP Overview of Proposed Options for Winter 2004/2005.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
1 Draft NYISO 2003 Budget Report BS&P Report to Management Committee October 16, 2002.
Reactive Power Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Open Meeting December 15, 2004.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People Transition of Authoritative Documents – Information Session September 2009 Doyle Sullivan Evelyn Kelly.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
FURTHER INFORMATION ON MISO FTR AUCTIONS For SPP RSC Discussion October 6, 2010.
S PIEGEL & M C D IARMID New England’s Forward Capacity Market: How Did We Get Here and Where Are We Going? Scott H. Strauss APPA Legal Seminar Cambridge,
NPRRs 663NPRR Ancillary Service Insufficiency Actions. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) specifies the actions ERCOT will take to ensure sufficient.
Load Resources Negative RRS Bidding in the Nodal Market Credit Working Group January 30, 2008.
© 2015 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, 2015 Session 6 – Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary?
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
Role Of ERC in the WESM To enforce the rules and regulations governing the operations of the WESM and monitors the activities of the Market Operator and.
Transition Plan Network Operations Model Change Requests 5/26/2010.
Connecting the Dots in New England: NEPOOL’s IMAPP Initiative
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Benefits of New England’s Proposed Capacity Market
FERC Order in Devon Power LLC, et al. ER
Summer Peak Energy Pricing in New England: The ISO-NE Response
Presentation transcript:

OCTOBER 8, 2014 Bob Laurita INTERNAL MARKET MONITORING New Import Capacity Resource FCM Market Power Mitigation Order to Show Cause Compliance Filing

Agenda Background Proposal Schedule 2

Summary of Order to Show Cause (September 16, 2014) Tight capacity conditions may allow suppliers who are aware of their pivotal role in the market to exercise market power [The Commissioners] are concerned that the market [power] mitigation provisions…may not protect customers against unjust and unreasonable prices for capacity. [The Commission] requires ISO-NE to, within 30 days.., either submit Tariff revisions that provide for the review and potential mitigation of importers’ offers in a manner similar to the manner in which other, existing resources are reviewed and mitigated, or show cause why it should not be required to do so. 3

Current Rules for Existing Resources 4 Starting Price Ending Price Static or Permanent Delist Bid Must Stay Must Exit Must Stay Free to Exit Dynamic De- List Threshold De-List BidNo De-List Bid

Current Rules for New Resources 5 Starting Price Ending Price New Resource Offer Floor Price (individual or ORTP) Free to Exit Must Exit

FCA Treatment of Import Capacity Currently, most imports are qualified as New Capacity for treatment in FCA – Grandfathered Imports or Imports associated with a long term contract that cleared as New in a prior FCA (and are still under contract) are treated as Existing – Most imports are single year contracts This is different from how New vs. Existing treatment is determined for Generation and Demand Resources – All capacity is New until it has cleared in a prior FCA, after which point it will always be treated as Existing 6

Current Mitigation Rule for Existing Import Capacity Resources An Existing Import Capacity Resource cannot exit the FCA above the Dynamic De-list Threshold, unless the Participant submits a De-list Bid that is reviewed and approved by the IMM The Existing Import Capacity Resource cannot exit the FCA at prices above the IMM approved De-list Bid and must exit the FCA if the price falls below the IMM approved De-list Bid Existing Import Capacity Resources that do not submit a De- list Bid are free to exit the auction at prices below the Dynamic De-list Threshold 7

Proposed Mitigation Rule for New Import Capacity Resources New Import Capacity Resources will be treated as if “existing” for market power mitigation purposes The Offer Review Trigger Price (ORTP) for New Import Capacity Resources from pivotal suppliers will be set to the FCA Starting Price – Exception: The ORTP for New Import Capacity Resources backed by a single new External Resource and that is associated with an investment in transmission that increases New England’s import capability will be based on the generation technology type 8

Proposed Mitigation Rule for New Import Capacity Resources (Continued) New Import Capacity Resources from pivotal suppliers wanting to remain in the auction below the FCA Starting Price must submit resource specific cost information* to the IMM for review and approval. The IMM will approve a New Resource Offer Floor Price New Import Capacity Resources from pivotal suppliers will be required to remain in the FCA at prices greater than or equal to the New Resource Offer Floor Price and removed from the FCA at prices less than the New Resource Offer Floor Price 9 * see Slide 10 for details

Proposed Rules for New Import Capacity Resources 10 Starting Price Ending Price Must Stay Must Exit New Resource Offer Floor Price Starting Price Ending Price ORTP Free to Exit Must Exit Pivotal Supplier Non-Pivotal Supplier

Pivotal Supplier Test A Participant with New Import Capacity Resources will be considered pivotal if, over the applicable interface(s): The sum of the New Import Capacity Resource qualified MWs from all Participants (Q All ) less The sum of the New Import Capacity Resource qualified MWs from the Participants (Q i ) is less than 110% of the applicable interface capacity transfer limit (D) 11 (Q All ) - (Q i ) < D x 1.10

Resource Cost Information Participants must submit their import resource’s expected costs and revenues using the IMM’s Excel cost workbook Participants must provide expected costs and revenues for the term of their project or agreement Costs may include the Participant’s expected opportunity costs If applicable, Participants must provide information on planned capital expenditures or investments associated with the import resource 12 Revenues (2015$) Energy Revenue ($/MWh) Ancillary Services ($/MWh) Renewable Energy Credits ($/MWh) Federal Production Tax Credit ($/MWh) Forward Reserve Revenue ($) Other Revenue ($) Operating Costs (2015$) Purchased Power Cost ($/MWh) Variable O&M Costs ($/MWh) Fixed Costs ($) Other Assumptions Project Life/Contract Duration (Years) Capacity Factor (%) Expected Shortage Event Availability (A) Expected Shortage Event Hours (H)

Schedule Markets Committee: October 8, 2014 Compliance Filing: October 16, 2014 Notification of Pivotal Supplier Status: October 22, 2014 Resource Cost Submittal Due to IMM: November 7, 2014 IMM Determination: December 12, 2014 FERC Filings of IMM Determinations: December 16, 2014 Deadline for Participant Challenges at FERC: December 23, 2014 Deadline for FERC Order: January 15, 2015 – If FERC does not issue an order by January 15, 2015, the IMM determinations will be used in the auction New Import Capacity Resource Withdrawal Deadline: January 16, 2015 FCA9: February 2,