Safeguarding Animal Health Current levels of compliance with EU bulk- tank SCC standards and proposed (but rejected) US standards based on data from four.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Food Safety Research Programming in the Czech Republic Vilnius, 9 January 2006 Milena Vicenová Ministry of Agriculture – Food Authority, Czech Republic.
Advertisements

Reauthorization The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010.
The Renewable Future for the UK
Demand Resource Operable Capacity Analysis – Assumptions for FCA 5.
T riffid A Y ear L ater Flax Day 2011 Saskatoon, SK. January 10 th, 2011 Barry Hall, President Flax Council of Canada.
TRS posted the following information on why changes were made.
Independent non-profit organization Peter Huijsmans Kwaliteitszorg Onderhoud Melkinstallaties (Quality care on maintenance of milk equipment)
Superintendent’s Recommended Budget: FY Rockingham County Public Schools March 20, 2013.
Cove Point On The One-yard Line WVONGA Fall Meeting September 11, 2013.
This handout was developed to illustrate the application of the transition relief for the adoption of a hospital facility’s first implementation strategy.
Energy Year 2014 Electricity Finnish Energy Industries.
 Created by City Council in October Original purpose of the fund: To support housing opportunities for workforce families. $600,000 fund.  On.
2004 H.D. Norman, A.H. Sanders,* R.H. Miller, and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricutural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD.
Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
The Israeli Dairy Industry
Use of cow culling to help meet compliance for somatic cell standards H. D. Norman and J. R. Wright * Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.
Applying Appraisal Principles in Practice Felicia Nelson, AIC USDA:APHIS:VS.
2012 ADSA-AMPA-ASAS-CSAS-WSASAS joint annual meeting (1)Norman Comparison of daughter performance of New Zealand and North American sires in US herds H.D.
2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
Mastitis.
Export Certification: EU Export Requirements. Standard Operating Procedures for Export FARM REGISTRATION INFORMATION PATH PAD.
WiggansARS Big Data Workshop – July 16, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Changes in the use of young bulls K. M. Olson* 1, J. L. Hutchison 2, P. M. VanRaden 2, and H. D. Norman 2 1 National Association of Animal Breeders, Columbia,
2001 ADSA annual meeting, July 2001 (1) Timeliness of progeny-testing through AI and percentage of bulls returned to service (abstract 1020) H.D. NORMAN,*
1 Farm and Risk Management Team Cooperative Extension – Ag and Natural Resources Dairy Price Risk Management: Session 3 – Milk Pricing Fundamentals Last.
2002 7WCGALP (HDN-1) Performance of Holstein clones in the United States H.D. NORMAN,*,1 T.J. LAWLOR, 2 and J.R. WRIGHT 1 1 Animal Improvement Programs.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD NDHIA –
Drought Calculator Arnold Norman, NRCS Fort Worth, TX Gale Dunn, ARS Fort Collins, CO Megan Christensen, ARS Fort Collins NDSU Research Ext. Centers ARS-Mandan,
 PTA mobility was highly correlated with udder composite.  PTA mobility showed a moderate, positive correlation with production, productive life, and.
Chapter 16: Recordkeeping Systems © 2005 Thomson Delmar Learning. All rights reserved.
Interbull Technical Workshop, March 2-3 (1) Rex L. Powell and Paul M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
Performance of Holsteins that originated from embryo transfer or twin births H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright* and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory,
Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M.
Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Paul VanRaden USDA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Choice of Scales for Delivery of Genetic Evaluations.
Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Genetic Base and Trait Definition Update.
Trends in Noncompliance with Milk Quality Standards for Dairy Herd Improvement Herds in the United States H. D. Norman*, J. R. Wright Animal Improvement.
Adjustment of selection index coefficients and polygenic variance to improve regressions and reliability of genomic evaluations P. M. VanRaden, J. R. Wright*,
Effect of temperature and humidity on gestation length H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright,* and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.
Factors that affect abortion frequency in dairy herds in the United States R.H. Miller,* M.T. Kuhn, H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright Animal Improvement Programs.
2006 Mid-Atlantic Dairy Grazing Conference, 2006 (1) Is There a Need for Different Genetics in Dairy Grazing Systems? H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L.
J. B. Cole 1,*, P. M. VanRaden 1, and C. M. B. Dematawewa 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,
Dr. George R. Wiggans, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA
H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright, and R.H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
WiggansARS Big Data Computing Workshop (1) 2013 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Select Sires’
The epidemiology of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae Eric Bush USDA:APHIS:VS FDA:CVM Swine Mycoplasma Pneumonia Workshop Kansas City, MO March 6, 2002.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA 2009 meeting.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA EAAP.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
Ashley H. Sanders and H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
H. D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD DRMS annual.
H.D. Norman*, J.L. Hutchison, and J.R. Wright Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
Characteristics of milk ELISA results for Johne’s disease in US dairy cows Byrem, T. M. 1 *, H. D. Norman 2 and J. R. Wright 2 1 Antel BioSystems, Lansing,
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
2006 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (1) Trait Selection When Culling U.S. Holsteins H.D. Norman, J.L. Hutchison, J.R. Wright,
H.D. NORMAN,* R.L. POWELL, J.R. WRIGHT
Heard-health-parameters Dairy Herds Calculating Workability
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Abstr. M65 Test-day milk loss associated with elevated test-day somatic cell score R.H. Miller, H.D. Norman, G.R. Wiggans, and J.R. Wright Animal Improvement.
Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.
Relationship of gestation length to stillbirth
Presentation transcript:

Safeguarding Animal Health Current levels of compliance with EU bulk- tank SCC standards and proposed (but rejected) US standards based on data from four Federal Milk Marketing Orders J.E. Lombard 1, H.D. Norman 2, C.A. Kopral 1, J.M. Rodriguez 1, and J.R. Wright 2. 1 USDA:APHIS:VS:Centers for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Fort Collins, CO USA 2 USDA:ARS: Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Beltsville, MD USA 1

Safeguarding Animal Health Bulk-tank Somatic Cell Counts Increases with intramammary infections Associated with milk quality  Lower BTSCC  Increases shelf life  Increases cheese yield 2

Safeguarding Animal Health Bulk-tank Somatic Cell Counts Maximum levels  400,000 cells/mL in most of EU, Australia, and New Zealand  500,000 cells/mL in Canada  750,000 cells/mL in US Differences in implementation / calculation  Geometric mean vs. arithmetic mean  Number of months / tests above the limit 3

Safeguarding Animal Health 4

EU Regulations on Imports Were  Truck load or silo at plant had to satisfy 400,000 cells/mL limit Now  Each farm has to satisfy 400,000 cells/mL limit When  Originally, October 1, 2010  December 1,

Safeguarding Animal Health Objective Evaluate noncompliance of herds and milk for current and proposed US BTSCC limits - National Milk Producers Federation proposal  750,000 cells/mL – current standard  600,000 cells/mL in January 2012  500,000 cells/mL in January 2013  400,000 cells/mL in January

Safeguarding Animal Health Federal Milk Marketing Orders 7

Safeguarding Animal Health Material and Methods Data Source  Four Federal Milk Marketing Orders 8 FMO% Monitored Milk % US Milk Supply % Herds (Shipments) Upper Midwest Central Mideast Southwest Total

Safeguarding Animal Health Materials and Methods (cont) Noncompliance  Current and proposed US  3 of 5 tests above the limit  Current EU standard  Rolling 3 month geometric average 15 months of test data were required 9

Safeguarding Animal Health Materials and Methods (cont) Annual milk shipped used as proxy for herd size  <900 metric tons (<100 cows)  900-4,500 mt ( cows)  4,501-9,000 mt ( cows)  >9,000 mt (1000 cows or more) 10

Safeguarding Animal Health BTSCC Noncompliance - Herd 11

Safeguarding Animal Health BTSCC Noncompliance - Herd 12

Safeguarding Animal Health BTSCC Noncompliance – Milk 13

Safeguarding Animal Health BTSCC Noncompliance – Size 14

Safeguarding Animal Health Discussion/Conclusions Historical view of noncompliance  BTSCC continue to decline annually  Percent of herds noncompliant will be considerably higher if tougher standards are implemented 15

Safeguarding Animal Health Discussion/Conclusions FMO analysis  Higher percent of FMO herds are noncompliant compared with DHI herds  More milk shipped (larger herds ) = lower noncompliance rate  The NMPF’s proposed 400K limit is much more restrictive than the EU’s 16

Safeguarding Animal Health Questions? 17