Role of Activity & Use Limitations in Clean Energy Development at Disposal Sites Elizabeth Callahan Acting Division Director, Policy and Program Planning,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wastewater and Stormwater Discharge from Landfills Rick Pinneo Illinois EPA.
Advertisements

Department of Environmental Protection CLEAN FILL POLICY
Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.
Overseeing the Little Dig- Construction at Contaminated Sites David A. Slowick, Section Chief MassDEP Emergency Response Western Region
Dion Novak, EPA Region 5 RPM
Former NAS Moffett Field
Not to be Considered as a Regulatory Submittal Pre-Decisional DRAFT 19438_1 Preferred Alternative Recommended by Core Team Environmental Impact Statement.
Land Remediation Section – Environmental Management Branch Update on Contaminated Sites Changing Legislation John E.H. Ward Land Remediation Section Ministry.
Workplace Occupational Health, Safety and Security
Home with an Underground Heating Oil Tank (UST) Solutions for your Leaking Heating Oil Tank.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Info Item: Waste Discharge Rules Presented to the Environment Committee September 14,
Checking & Corrective Action
Federal Energy and Environmental Regulation Agencies and Laws
Cytec Statement of Basis and Permit Modification July 16, 2012 Public Hearing Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.
NC SWANA FALL 2014 MEETING Presented by Ed Mussler P.E., Wilmington, NC October 2014 DWM Post-Closure Landfill Use Concepts and Considerations.
2014 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Amendments Discussion Points Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting May 22, 2014.
PA One Cleanup and Land Use Controls The “Business of Brownfields” Conference April 17, 2008 Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
Claremore Medical Office Building From Landfill to Medical Office Building A Brownfield Success Story THE GREEN SIDE OF BROWNFIELD REMEDIATION.
Long-term Management of Land Use Controls Mare Island RAB Meeting February 23, 2006.
Promoting Renewable Energy Development on Closed MA Landfills Sarah Weinstein, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, AEHS Foundation, UMass.
S-1925 Subsection t Stakeholder Meeting November 9, :30-2:30pm NJDEP Public Hearing Room 1 st Floor, 401 East State Street Trenton, NJ.
Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES) Utah Sewer Management Program (USMP)
PUBLIC INFORMATION SESSION: Old Fall River Road Landfill Dartmouth, MA Massachusetts Unlined Landfill Closure Policy March 28, 2013 Mark Dakers, Acting.
Status More on gardening pathway & historic fill proposals – situations addressed under the “Permanent Solutions with Conditions (No AULs)” MCP Public.
Who’s Monitoring Land Use Controls on Brownfield Sites? Terri Smith Environmental Liability Management, Inc.
Gary W. Baughman, Division Director 2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference November 17, 2010.
VAP Environmental Covenant Guidance 2015 CP Coffee - July 14, 2015 Sue Kroeger, Ohio EPA Legal Office.
Common Issues for Exposure Scenarios without GNS VAP CP Summer Coffee July 14 th, 2015 Mike Allen Ohio EPA CO- Supervisor
Excavation Instructional Goal: through class participation and discussion, the participant will identify the issues and hazards related to trenching and.
McCoy Field Proposed Keith Middle School Site EPA Proposes Approval of McCoy Field Cleanup Plan.
Scott Surovchak Rocky Flats Site Manager U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) Cleanup and Remedy Implementation at the Rocky.
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
MCP Considerations for Construction of Clean Energy Installations Patricia Donahue, MassDEP, Northeast Regional Office 1.
TRB: Waste Management and Resource Efficiency Workshop July 2011 Tom Roick, Senior Policy Analyst Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Oregon DEQ’s.
Fort Ord, Monterey County, California History and Closure of a Landfill on a former Military Installation and Current Superfund Site Derek S. Lieberman,
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Permitting Guidelines January 19, 2010 Daniel Hall, Solid Waste Section Chief.
2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference Institutional Controls Featuring the Pinellas Site Jack Craig U.S. Department of Energy Office of.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM Land Division Update Chip Crockett Chief, Industrial Hazardous Waste Branch Air & Waste Management Association Southern Section Pine.
Social Benefits Improve public health of work force and community. Create more walkable, accessible, and livable neighborhoods by incorporating Smart Growth.
1 The Use of Institutional Controls Under the RCRA Corrective Action Program.
The Contaminated Sites Cleanup Process (18 AAC 75)
October Mary Louise Hendrickson Solid Waste Section – Technical Lead
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Permitting Guidelines June 17, 2009 Mark Dakers, Environmental Analyst Massachusetts.
Environmental Covenant Guidance Certified Professional Coffee April 13, 2015 Sydney Poole – DERR-VAP Sue Kroeger – Legal.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
David M. Sullivan, LSP, CHMM TRC Environmental Corporation Lowell, Massachusetts Parker Street Waste Site Public Information Plan (PIP) Meeting Milestone.
AUL Guidance Revisions Draft AUL Guidance was made available for public review and comment December 2010 Available at
SAINT FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOL Case Study Continuous Gas Monitoring Sacramento County Environmental Management Department.
Lynne Welsh Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
1 Draft Final Safe Fill Regulations. 2 W hat’s new in Safe Fill Definition? Definition is short as a result of: – Due diligence procedures moved to existing.
1 Permit Implementation Regulations Defines the phrase “significant change in the design or operation of a solid waste facility that is not authorized.
Presentation to Association Municipalities of Ontario Implementation of Management of Excess Soil - A Guide for Best Management Practices Ministry of the.
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. LEHR Site Annual Soil Management Plan Training Sue Fields, Environmental Health & Safety Sept,
Update: AUL Guidance Revisions Summary of Comments June 23, 2011 Peggy Shaw Workgroup Chair.
The Public Waterfront Act. Covering the basic questions Why? Purpose of Act and Regulations Where? Geographic Jurisdiction What? Activities Subject to.
1 Draft Final Safe Fill Regulations Major Changes/Revisions Presented to the CSSAB November 8, 2002.
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Critical Components July 26, 2012 John Carrigan MassDEP Northeast Regional Office.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
Brownfields 101 Environmental Engineering Considerations Presented By: Ileen Gladstone, P.E., LSP, LEED.
 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials.
The World of AUL Presentation by: Atul Pandey, P.E. PANDEY Environmental, LLC 2016 Ohio Brownfield Conference April 7, 2016.
Institutional Controls in Pennsylvania’s Brownfields Program Presented by: Jill Gaito Director, Brownfields Action Team Office of Community Revitalization.
Goals: ◦ Minimize the environmental impacts of construction projects and tasks undertaken at the Lab; ◦ Remain in compliance with environmental rules;
Your Septic System Designing and its Maintenance.
Who I am Darren Bowling Phone: Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) Remediation and Redevelopment.
THE SUPERFUND PROCESS Assessment and Listing
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
Institutional Controls At Voluntary Cleanup Sites
the path less traveled Termination of Post Closure Care
Presentation transcript:

Role of Activity & Use Limitations in Clean Energy Development at Disposal Sites Elizabeth Callahan Acting Division Director, Policy and Program Planning, BWSC, Boston 1

Activity and Use Limitation (AUL) Deed notice or restriction recorded at the Registry of Deeds that is part of an MCP closure AUL provides notice of residual contamination & specifies “Consistent” and “Inconsistent” site activities and uses AUL dictates Obligations and Conditions for maintaining No Significant Risk Current property owner is required, under the MCP, to adhere to the terms of the AUL – Compliance with AUL is subject to MassDEP audit on an ongoing basis 2

Activity and Use Limitation Limitations/Conditions on site activities and uses apply to an “AUL Area” AUL area is not necessarily entire parcel 3

AUL Area – Portion of Parcel 4 AUL AREA

5 AUL Area – Entire Parcel

Clean Energy Development at Sites with Existing AULs Evaluate location of the “AUL area” relative to options for clean energy (solar/wind) development – Where proposed development overlaps AUL areas, seek LSP services – Also consider activities outside of AUL area that have potential to affect AUL area LSP Evaluation (310 CMR & (4)) – Evaluate terms of the AUL relative to the “contemplated use” clean energy development 6

Do development plans conform with terms (“Consistent” and “Inconsistent” activities and uses) of the existing AUL? Are the obligations sufficient, in terms of type and frequency, to maintain closure conditions? 7 LSP Evaluation

Most AULs with “Consistent Uses” that include Commercial/Industrial & Soil Management Plans will accommodate clean energy development proposals AULs with restrictions on all excavation or limits on excavation where project requires excavation >>> LSP Evaluation 8

9 MediaRisk Char. Method ConditionsExposure Assumptions AUL Limitation/Obligations SoilMethod 1 or 2Soil meets S-2 and S-3 standards, but does not meet S-1. No routine exposure to children. AUL prohibits residential, school, playground, or day care use of the site. SoilMethod 1 or 2Soil at depth does not meet S-3, but does meet S-2 standard. Excavation could expose construction workers to contamination. AUL prohibits excavation or prohibits excavation without the development and implementation of an appropriate Health & Safety and Soil Management Plans. SoilMethod 1 or 2Soil does not meet the S-1 standard, but such soil is below a solid pavement barrier. Exposure to soil is prevented by the barrier AUL requires that the barrier be inspected and maintained. SoilMethod 3Soil does not show No Significant Risk for the S-2 soil category. No direct contact with soils by workers or recreational use. AUL requires placement and maintenance of a barrier to direct contact, such as 3 feet of clean fill and a demarcation layer. Includes requirement to implement appropriate Health & Safety and Soil Management Plans. SOURCE: Draft AUL Guidance 2011

If Evaluation Determines AUL Does Not Support Clean Energy Development... Project can still go forward with additional cleanup to support contemplated use – Submit remedial plan – Conduct remediation – Amend AUL to allow for cleanup energy development 10

Clean Energy Installations Solid Waste Landfills21E Sites Landfill issues related to Clean Energy Installations. For example,  Maintain integrity of cap  Stormwater/erosion control  Landfill settlement  Avoid interference with landfill gas venting systems  Protect public health & env. Future obligations spelled out in Post-Closure Permit MassDEP approval of Post- Closure Permit 21E site issues related to Clean Energy Installations  Case-specific  Likewise concern for maintaining integrity of the remedy and protecting public health & env. Where applicable, future obligations contained in an AUL Property Owner/LSP develop AUL in compliance with the MCP 11

12 energy/lfpcu.htm

AUL Considerations – Clean Energy Development Projects Excavation for utilities, fencing, construction of access roads Worker Health and Safety Soil Management Plan/Dewatering Ensuring integrity of the remedy, e.g., – Maintaining clean soil layer, geotextile, Engineered Barrier, – controlling storm water run-off/erosion – Retaining access to existing barriers that require maintenance (e.g. paved areas) Post-installation maintenance activities Post-installation inspection 13

14 Existing AULs v. Contemplated AULs

15 Tel Contact: