Assessing School Readiness in Indiana By Michael Conn-Powers and Jessica Peters.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Early Childhood Outcomes… Who, What, Where and How
Advertisements

1 When DAP Meets GAP Promoting Peaceful Coexistence between Developmentally Appropriate Practice & the Need to Address the Achievement Gap International.
California Statewide System of School Readiness Networks Inclusion of Children with Disabilities Prepared by Chris Drouin, Special Education Division Anne.
Early Language and Literacy Classroom Observation ELLCO
1 Champlain Valley Head Start Child Outcomes Assessment in Champlain Valley Head Start.
ALASKA DEVELOPMENTAL PROFILE Department of Education & Early Development September 2012, District Test Coordinator Training.
Early Education and Care Assessment Systems – Panel Discussion
1 Early Childhood Assessment: Information for Parents.
1 Progress Reports in Child Care. 2 Why Progress Reports? Support communication with parents Help with program planning Support transitions to new programs.
1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006
PRIORITY PREKINDERGARTEN PROGRAM QUALITY SELF-ASSESSMENT March 26, 2014 NYS Education Department Office of Early Learning
What Is Read to Achieve? Read to Achieve is part of the Excellent Public Schools Act It becomes effective school year The law can be accessed.
DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
 EC Professional Development Day February 18, 2013.
Desired Results Developmental Profile - school readiness© A Project of the California department of education, child development division.
Visit Our Website at earlychildhoodohio.org Ohio’s Early Childhood Comprehensive Assessment System 1.
Research Findings and Issues for Implementation, Policy and Scaling Up: Training & Supporting Personnel and Program Wide Implementation
WEB IEP FOLLOW-UP ECO GATHERED FOR BIRTH TO 5 INCLUDING INFANT, TODDLER, PK 1.
FRANKLIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL COMMITTEE MAY 27, 2014 Massachusetts Kindergarten Entry Assessment (MKEA)
Judith J. Carta, Ph.D. Juniper Gardens Children’s Project University of Kansas with help from Elaine Carlson, WESTAT.
SUCCESSFULLY PREPARING ALL STUDENTS FOR THEIR FUTURES SE 256 TH STREET, KENT, WA | Dr. Linda Del Giudice Dr. Razak Garoui.
Madison Public Schools Full Day Kindergarten Discussion Teaching for understanding requires time September 27,
School and Achievement
Title One Program Evaluation Report to the CCSD Board of Education June 17, 2013 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator Leslie Titler, Title One Teacher.
Terrific Transitions:
Kindergarten Readiness:
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
1 Reading First at Oak Grove Elementary School Medford School District 549C Julie York – District Person Julie Evans – Principal Barbara Low – Reading.
Early Childhood Education Dr. Bill Bauer William L. Heward Exceptional Children: An Introduction to Special Education, 8e Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education,
Supporting PreK Teachers During Act 3 Implementation.
© 2013, 2009, 2006, 2003, 2000 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. William L. Heward Exceptional Children An Introduction to Special Education.
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
Policy Analysis of the Massachusetts School Readiness Assessment System Ashaunta Tumblin, M.D. Commonwealth Fund/Harvard University Minority Health Policy.
Introducing The Work Sampling System. What is Work Sampling? Authentic Performance Assessment Curriculum Embedded Instructional Assessment Authentic Performance.
New Jersey Department of Education Division of Early Childhood Education March 3, 2009.
UIC Early Reading First Building the Foundations for Early Literacy Excellence Alicia J Wyche Summer Internship 2009.
TEXAS LITERACY INITIATIVE.  San Antonio Independent School District (SAISD) will partner with an approved service provider to deliver literacy readiness.
Long Term Outcomes: a Community Collaboration
Kindergarten Individual Development Survey (KIDS) District 97 pilot involvement December 11, 2012.
Chapter 2 Observation and Assessment
Getting to Know the California Early Learning and Development System Unit 2 - Key Topic 1
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
We worry about what a child will be tomorrow, yet we forget that he is someone today. --Stacia Tauscher.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Read to Achieve Parent Presentation What is Read to Achieve? Read to Achieve was created in legislation and approved by the North Carolina.
Kindergarten Entry Assessment (KEA): Getting It Right For All Children Kathleen Hebbeler, SRI International Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center.
Minnesota's Approach to Comprehensive Assessment Megan E. Cox, Ph.D. Principal Leadership Academy January 11, 2016 Minnesota’s Approach to Comprehensive.
Ready schools... Ready schools... Ready Children... Ready Families... Ready Schools... Ready Communities Ready Schools Virginia’s Definition of School.
Creative Curriculum and GOLD Assessment: Early Childhood Competency Based Evaluation System By Carol Bottom.
GETTING KANSAS KIDS READY FOR KINDERGARTEN. KEY IDEAS KINDERGARTEN READINESS  Measuring kindergarten readiness provides a snapshot of where children.
Knowledge-Building and Instructional Practice in Georgia Reading First.
Observing and Assessing Young Children
Diapers to Diplomas Preschool Study Group April 10, 2014.
Focus Questions What is assessment?
PreK – 3rd Grade System Design Strategies for Planning, Implementing and Evaluating Your World’s Best Workforce Plan Bobbie “Leading for educational excellence.
Chapter 5 Early Identification and Intervention
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
Introduction to Evaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
California's Early Learning and Development System Overview
Welcome To Pre-K! Presenter welcomes participants and introduces NC Pre-K teachers, co-teachers and support staff. Introduce any other staff who are attending.
Welcome Parents! Parent Advisory.
Big Day for Pre-K Angela Wells ECYD Curriculum Planning September 23, 2018.
Using Standards and Assessment in Early Childhood Education
Preschool Snapshot New Jersey Department of Education
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Monitoring Children’s Progress
2 Simple Workshop.
Introduction to Evaluation IDEA 2004.
Beaufort County Preschool Program
Presentation transcript:

Assessing School Readiness in Indiana By Michael Conn-Powers and Jessica Peters

What we wanted to know  How is SR being assessed?  What components of SR are looked at?  Who is assessing SR?  What is done with this information?  How well is it working?

How we found out  Surveyed preschool & kindergarten teachers in Indiana  229 participants responded  Respondents consist of 185 kindergarten teachers, 31 preschool teachers, 4 elementary school principals, and 4 child care providers

Is school readiness being assessed?  More than ¾ of respondents report that they assess school readiness  Over 45% of school districts in Indiana represented

Specific domains of School Readiness  Many domains are being assessed adequately or very well: Health & physical well-being % Language development & literacy.. 83% Cognition & general knowledge %

Specific domains of School Readiness  Other domains are being assessed inadequately or not at all: Motor development % Social & emotional development.. 50% Approach to learning %

Who is involved in school readiness assessments?

When do school readiness assessments occur?  While the child is still in their early education/ child care program %  Spring event prior to kindergarten %  Summer event prior to kindergarten %  At the beginning of kindergarten %  Other %

Context of school readiness assessment  Assessment most often occurs in the classroom during school hours or in the school but not in the classroom  50% of respondents say records are kept as part of the child’s cumulative file  Another 37% of respondents keep the records for at least one year

Are school readiness procedures the same for all children in each district/school?

How is it being assessed?  Teacher observations/ judgment  Parent reports/ checklists  Teacher-created checklists and commercially published tools  Reports from preschool and school-wide checklists are less common

Commercially published assessment tools being used  Brigance  DIBELS  Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT)  Galileo  Creative Curriculum  DIAL-3 or DIAL-R  Early Prevention of School Failure (EPSF)  Indiana Reading Assessment  ISTAR/NWEA

A Critical look at these tests  Brigance Specific limitations of the test No decisions based solely on this score  DIAL-3 or DIAL-R Test manual states that results should not be used for instructional planning or tracking of any kind

A Critical look at these tests  Early Prevention of School Failure (EPSF) Does not assess social and emotional development, cognition and general knowledge, approach to learning  DIBELS Measures language and literacy  Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) Measures language and cognition  Indiana Reading Assessment Measures language and literacy  ISTAR/NWEA Measures cognition, language and literacy

Decisions made from these results  Create heterogeneous classrooms/ allocate resources (35%)  Recommendations are made: Placement in developmental kindergarten classrooms (15%) School deferment (34%) Placement in special education (13%) Placement in full-day versus half-day kindergarten programs (36%)  The results have no influence over class placements (30%)

How do the assessment results influence class work?  Planning curriculum & instruction (73%)  Determining learning groups (51%)  Identifying extra resources needed (73%)  Monitoring student progress (74%)  Informing families about placement (50%) what they can do at home (75%)

To what extent are all children included?  Most respondents reported that all children are assessed in the same way  Children with physical and sensory disabilities or significant developmental delays or disabilities were more likely to be partially included in assessment

How well do the assessment results help with decision-making for different groups of students?

What did we learn?  Most schools assess SR  Assessment not always comprehensive  Important placement decisions made  Influences classroom instruction  While all children are included …  not always helpful for all.

Next Steps  Look systematically at SR assessment Clarify purpose and decisions Identify best assessments across domains Determine who, when, where, & how Strategies to make it work for all children  Spring workshop & Summer Institute