Crestwood Elementary School Review of Data School Improvement Process October 26, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Working Document on Racial and Ethnic Disparities Data from the Davis Joint Unified School District compiled by Jann Murray-García, M.D., M.P.H. Nicelma.
Advertisements

NYC Teacher Data Initiative: An introduction for Principals ESO Focus on Professional Development October 2008.
Newark Kids Count 2011 A City Profile of Child Well-Being Advocates for Children of New Jersey 35 Halsey Street Newark, NJ
New Jersey Statewide Assessment Results: Highlights and Trends State Board of Education, February 6, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D., Assistant Commissioner,
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Annual Progress Report Submitted to The Iowa Department of Education by the Cedar Rapids Community School District.
2007 ITBS/ ITED Results Cedar Rapids Community Schools.
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY Title I For additional information contact the school at
Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
* Princeton Public Schools State School Performance Report Interpretive Guide *Based upon data.
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report Preliminary Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (D-STEP) Information August 6,2013.
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Middle School 8 period day. Rationale Low performing academic scores on Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) - specifically in mathematics.
School Improvement Advisory Committee October 15, 2008 Welcome!
Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3 through 8 and 11 September 6, 2007 For Haddonfield Public Schools.
Spencer Elementary School From Needs Improvement School to Title One Distinguished School!
STATE TEST DATA SPRING 2012 Report to SSD School Board.
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/18/2008 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.
1 Public Primary Schools and Making Connections Neighborhoods Denver CHAPSS Learning Exchange May 15, 2008 Tom Kingsley and Leah Hendey The Urban Institute.
MCSD EQUITY UPDATE Presented by Sergio Sanchez K-12 Math and ESOL Program Specialist Educational Equity and ADA Coordinator MCSD sanchezs 1.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Track Performance Division of Performance Accountability.
Columbus Tustin Middle School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
+ Duluth High School Gwinnett County, Georgia Joy Singleton Scott Gravitt Elizabeth Goff Duluth High School Analysis of Assessment Data.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
1 Leanna Stiefel and Amy Ellen Schwartz Faculty, Wagner Graduate School and Colin Chellman Research Associate, Institute for Education and Social Policy.
Grape Creek Report Card Grape Creek Intermediate School Robin Graham Erica Crawford Dee Ann Shelton Carol Anderson.
Hawthorne Elementary School Review of Data School Improvement Process Fall, 2009.
March 2010 what the school readiness data mean for Harford County’s children ©
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2010 Results Leslie Wilson, Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability and Assessment July 20, 2010 State.
Academic Achievement Highlights San Francisco Unified School District August 2010.
Van Hise Elementary School Review of Data School Improvement Process March 3, 2009.
1 Is the Achievement Gap in Indiana Narrowing? September 19,
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,
Ch á vez Elementary School Review of Data School Improvement Process School Year
Daniel Melendez. School Demographics  Language  English Learners  7% (55 students)  Socio-Economic  35% qualify for free or reduced lunch (276) 
Using Assessments to Plan for Learning MEAP and MME Data Collection.
District 11 CSAP Results School Year D11 Board Presentation August 9,2006.
Citizens of the World Charter School Quarterly Report January 20, 2011.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
091 Equity Initiative Status Indicators_March Lodi Unified School District Equity Initiative Status Indicators Prepared by the Assessment, Research,
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
A Closer Look at CRCT Data Comparing LaBelle, Cobb County School District, and State Data LaBelle Elementary (544 students enrolled) Intended use for.
Ready At Five & Maryland State Department of Education.
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Mesa Union School District “A Day in the Life of Data”
Student Homelessness in NYC
Lauren Kinsella Dr. Wright ITEC 7305
Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report
Data Overview Sandtown Middle School
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Presentation transcript:

Crestwood Elementary School Review of Data School Improvement Process October 26, 2009

We’ll begin with student demographic data.

How has the overall enrollment changed across time?

What do we know about our students? ENROLLMENT BY LOW INCOME AT CRESTWOOD

How does Crestwood’s level of economically disadvantaged students compare to the District and State?

This Year’s Enrollment by Low Income: MMSD September, 2009 District Elementary Avg. = 49%

This Year’s Enrollment by Low Income: MMSD September, 2009 District Elementary Avg. = 49%

Data on our students… RACIAL/ETHNIC DIVERSITY AT Crestwood

How does Crestwood’s diversity of students compare to the District and State? School Year

Data on our students… IN COMPARISON TO THE DISTRICT, CRESTWOOD HAD LOWER MOBILITY LEVEL AND HAS A SIMILAR DENSITY OF SPECIAL EDUCATION STUDENTS Mobility rate: move in/out per 100 students CURRENT SPECIAL EDUCATION DENSITY

What about student engagement data?

What do we know about how our students are engaged? ATTENDANCE RATES FOR ALL STUDENTS: CRESTWOOD AND MMSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS The District’s goal is 94% attendance rate for all students…

While the overall attendance data is above the 94% goal, it’s been a mixed story for our African-American students across the District… ATTENDANCE RATES FOR AFRICAN-AMERICAN STUDENTS: CRESTWOOD AND MMSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS …and all student groups at Crestwood Last year: Hispanic = 94.1% Asian = 94.8% White = 95.8%

What do we know about how our students are engaged? SUSPENSION RATES FOR ALL STUDENTS: CRESTWOOD AND MMSD ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Rates are based upon number of suspensions per 100 students

What about student learning data?

How do our students’ primary reading test scores compare to the District averages? PRIMARY READING TESTS, SPRING 2009

Does an achievement gap exist when we consider our primary reading test scores for minority students? When does it appear? become more significant? PRIMARY READING TESTS, SPRING 2009

Does an achievement gap exist when we consider our primary reading test scores for low-income students? When does it appear? become more significant? PRIMARY READING TESTS, SPRING 2009

Adequate Yearly Progress ReadingMath Starting Point %37% %37% %37% Intermediate Goal %47.5% (Begin new 3-8 tests) %47.5% %47.5% Intermediate Goal %58% %58% %58% Intermediate Goal %68.5% Intermediate Goal %79% Intermediate Goal %89.5% Goal: All Proficient % Annual Measurable Objectives % Proficient/Advanced

When we consider the “high stakes” test for reading, how did our students perform? WKCE - Reading: November, 2008 Criteria that determines a school’s status (AYP): Reading – 74%

How do our Proficiency/Advanced levels compare to the District and State? WKCE – Reading, 2008: Proficiency/Advanced %

What have been the long-term trends in reading achievement? WKCE - Reading, : Fourth Grade Proficiency/Advanced %

When we disaggregate the reading data by various groups of students, what are our Proficiency/Advanced levels ? We’ll start with gender… WKCE - Reading, 2008: Proficiency/Advanced %

Then we’ll look at race/ethnicity… WKCE - Reading, 2008: Proficiency/Advanced %

…and Economic Status. WKCE – Reading, 2008: Proficiency/Advanced % Third grade low income students: two small of a group to make a comparison

When we compare the students that we could instructionally impact (FAY) to Wisconsin schools with similar levels of economic disadvantage, how did we do in bringing our students up to proficiency in reading?

A 3 Year Comparison of Crestwood 5th Grade WKCE Reading Scores

When we consider the “high stakes” test for mathematics, how did our students perform? WKCE - Mathematics: November, 2008 Criteria that determines a school’s status (AYP): Math – 58%

How do our Proficiency/Advanced levels compare to the District and State? WKCE - Mathematics, 2008: Proficiency/Advanced %

What have been the long-term trends in mathematics achievement? WKCE - Mathematics,

When we disaggregate the math data by various groups of students, what are our Proficiency/Advanced levels ? We’ll start with gender… WKCE – Mathematics, 2008: Proficiency/Advanced %

Then we’ll look at race/ethnicity… WKCE - Mathematics, 2008: Proficiency/Advanced %

…and Economic Status. WKCE – Mathematics, 2008: Proficiency/Advanced % Third grade low income students: two small of a group to make a comparison

When we compare the students that we could instructionally impact (FAY) to Wisconsin schools with similar levels of economic disadvantage, how did we do in bringing our students up to proficiency in math?

Although not yet factored into AYP and other considerations, the importance of science achievement measured through the WKCE will soon increase. How do our Proficiency/Advanced levels compare to the District and State? WKCE - Science, 2008: Proficiency/Advanced %

Six-Trait Scores: Fifth Grade

Finally, what relationships data do we have?

Parents/guardians participate in school activities… CrestwoodDistrict No Opinion/ Don’t Know 0%4% Strongly Agree 54%30% Agree43%55% Disagree3%10% Strongly Disagree 0%1.% Crestwood Elementary School vs. District Elementary Schools-Staff Survey

CrestwoodDistrict No Opinion/ Don’t Know 0%1% Strongly Agree66%45% Agree31%45% Disagree3%8% Strongly Disagree 0%2% Our school culture values caring, celebration, and humor.

Our school has traditions and recognition events that are meaningful to staff. Crestwood Elementary School vs. District Elementary Schools-Staff Survey CrestwoodDistrict No Opinion/ Don’t Know 0%5% Strongly Agree43%24% Agree51% Disagree6%18% Strongly Disagree 0%2%

Crestwood Elementary School vs. District Elementary Schools-Staff Survey CrestwoodDistrict No Opinion/ Don’t Know 3%6% Strongly Agree18%7% Agree50%38% Disagree29%45% Strongly Disagree 0%4% Students in this school are free from bullying.

Conclusions from our Data Crestwood’s student achievement as measured by the state standardized test scores (WKCE) in reading, math, science, and social studies have historically been high and they remain so. When compared to other Wisconsin schools with similar demographics Crestwood students rank among the highest on the WKCE in reading. There is a significant achievement gap as measured by the WKCE between our white students and our students of color. The number of minority students, particularly African- American students at our school has increased significantly over the past few years. Our school’s suspension rate is significantly lower than the district average. Our school’s attendance rate among African- American is lower than the average for the district. Our school’s poverty rate has risen fairly dramatically over the past few years.

Goal #1: Consistent and systematic collaboration among staff will improve our academic program and raise the percentage of minority students who are proficient in reading, language arts, and math by 3% at the end of 2 years. Madison Metropolitan School District School Improvement Process: Action Plan School: Crestwood Year: Principal: Howard Fried Date Developed: 10/09

Goal #2: Develop a series of initiatives which utilizes Crestwoods’ ongoing strengths and at the same time prepares us for the inevitable changes that our future will bring.