Contextualized Goals Setting: How to operationalize ISLLC standards for school improvement Dawn Shannon Assistant Superintendent, Broome-Tioga BOCES dshannon@btboces.org.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Advertisements

In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Katonah-Lewisboro School District Annual Professional Performance Review Update 5/23/
Family Interventions: Will What We Know Now Change What We Do in the Future? Susan M. Sheridan University of Nebraska-Lincoln Discussant.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Van Buren School District Principal Evaluation Pilot District July 2012.
RISE Principal Evaluation and Development System: Overview and Principal Effectiveness Rubric.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
SAM LPLP Provider Training Program June 27, 2014Helena, Montana.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Mid-Year Conferences.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
1. 6 leadership standards what are they? 3 2 Teaching & Learning 1 Vision, Mission & Goals 6 The Education System 4 Collaborating with Families and Stakeholders.
STRATEGIES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR BEGINNING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS BY MACARTHUR JONES ROSANNA LOYA MICHAEL SAENZ FALL 2011 A Leader’s First 100 Days.
Driving Effective Principal Practice: High Accountability. High Support. February 10, 2010.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
OCM BOCES Day 5 Principal Evaluator Training. 2 Nine Components.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ William E. Harner, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Principal Effectiveness: Domains Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural.
Principal Effectiveness: Domains Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Domain 1: Strategic/Cultural.
District Vision “To Become a Premier District” District Instructional Goals 1.Increase AA, Hispanic, & low SES scores on TAKS science & math to meet or.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
Day 4 Principal Evaluation Training March 12, 2012 Albany, NY Day Long Session.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
ISLLC Standard #4 ISLLC Standard #4 Monitoring Diverse Needs Name Workshop Facilitator.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Click to edit Master subtitle style New Evaluation Assessment for Principals and School Leaders Jan Hammond Jan Hammond
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Principal Evaluation: Different? One Year Later Coaching Principals Collect evidence Support your local.
Dept. of Educational Leadership Assessment Forum, April 18, 2014 Ball State University Written Comprehensive Examinations.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Messaging Research & Literature Article Read Planning Visits (and HW) Artifact Review Support your local.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Together, we can make a difference.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Rachelle Kuehl Assistant Principal Applicant Roanoke City Public Schools.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
OCM BOCES Day 2 Principal Evaluator Training 1. Back to the beginning: 2 Nine Components.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
ISLLC Standard #4 Collaborating with Families (and Stakeholders) Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #3 Planning for School – wide Behavior Management
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Supporting Education Reform Name Workshop Facilitator.
A Framework for Continuous Improvement August 6, 2013 A Framework for Continuous Improvement August 6, 2013 School Improvement Planning Special Assistants.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
© 2012, Community Training and Assistance Center © 2012, Teaching Learning Solutions Linking ISLLC and your Principal Rubrics to a Case.
What Does it Mean to Observe Only Observable Elements? Defining Observation for Your District for
July 2, :30 – 11:30 Dawn Shannon and Barb Phillips.
ISLLC Standard #3 Implementing Effective Meetings Name Workshop Facilitator.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
State Board of Education Progress Update
Strategic Plan: Heards Ferry Elementary
Presentation transcript:

Contextualized Goals Setting: How to operationalize ISLLC standards for school improvement Dawn Shannon Assistant Superintendent, Broome-Tioga BOCES dshannon@btboces.org 607-766-3700

The story. . .

How do we AVOID creating an evaluation system that treats instructional leadership like a list of “activities” that principals accomplish?

Outcomes. . . Participants will. . . Compare the "activities driven principalship” with strategic, instructional leadership described in ISLLC standards Describe “contextualized goal setting” Explain how using ISLLC standards in the context of goals creates focus and efficiencies in principal evaluation Describe the implications of this process for principal evaluation in your region Create questions using a principal evaluation rubric that align with contextualized goal setting

What are the differences between managers and leaders? Principal Managers. . . Principal LEADERS. . Don’t know about this. . COMPARE TO ISLLC STANDARDS

INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM One view of ISLLC A school administrator is an educational leader who promotes the success of all student by. . . . INSTRUCTIONAL PROGRAM STUDENT SUCCESS! Political, Economic Integrity? Fairness? COLLABORATION

What are the implications of this model? How is evidence collected in this “disparate” view of the ISLLC standards? What are the implications of this model?

Defining the “leverage point” CONSIDER THIS. . . Defining the “leverage point” What does the principal want/need to improve? Example: student performance in ELA (grades 3,4,5) What is the highest leverage action that will increase the probability of success? Examples. . Implementing modules? Implementing DDI? Implementing evidence based observation with feedback for teachers? STEP 2: SET THE GOAL! The building will fully implement a data driven instruction model in the 13-14 school year in order to improve student performance on ELA state tests in grades 3,4,5 by an increase in 10 students achieving a score of 3 or 4 (this equals 10% of students)

ISLLC in CONTEXT What is the principals’ shared vision for DDI? Who is doing what? How did s/he create a shared vision? How does the principal manage the issues of more assessments (formative) in the political climate about testing in this community? What is essential in the school culture to support DDI? Is it present? How will the principal support it? Change it? How will this impact the instructional program? DDI How does the implementation of DDI ensure the success of ALL students in a way that is fair and ethical? Is data used fairly and ethically? What systems, resources, PD, time, supports, will be needed for DDI to be successful? How will these be provided ? How does the principal support teacher collaboration? How does the principal help parents/community understand DDI?

How does a contextualized goal setting model change the conversations How does a contextualized goal setting model change the way evidence is collected? How does a contextualized goal setting model change the conversations between the principal and the evaluator?

CREATE QUESTIONS TO FOCUS EVIDENCE COLLECTION THROUGH. . GO TO YOUR RUBRICS. . . CREATE QUESTIONS TO FOCUS EVIDENCE COLLECTION THROUGH. . Observation (school visits) Pre and post conferences Review of artifacts Does it work?

Stories from the field. . . QUESTIONS?

So. . . Can contextualized goal setting AVOID creating an evaluation system that treats instructional leadership like a list of “activities” that principals accomplish?

Assistant Superintendent, Broome-Tioga BOCES THANK YOU! Dawn Shannon Assistant Superintendent, Broome-Tioga BOCES dshannon@btboces.org 607-766-3700