Sustainability of the Peruvian anchoveta-based supply chains from sea to plate ANCHOVETA-SC PROJECT status report Angel Avadi, IRD, Université Montpellier.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
14 th September Life Cycle Assessment of biomethane public transport Jan Paul Lindner Dept. Life Cycle Engineering (GaBi) Chair of Building.
Advertisements

1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Water Economic Modeling for Policy Analysis: A CGE approach to estimate the direct and indirect economic costs of water quality improvements in the WFD.
R E 1 Cross-scale Assessment of Biodiversity ; Opportunities and Limitations of the GLOBIO3 model and the Natural Capital Index (NCI) framework International.
BIOMASS FUTURES: Food, Fuel and the Environment: The implications for land use in Europe and beyond Ben Allen and Hannah Lee Institute for European Environmental.
Improving EEA marine indicators: a review of their performance now and in the future Trine Christiansen Colleagues in ETC/Water Eva Royo Gelabert.
R E 1 Some Experiences with Data and Models in International (Water) Assessments Ton Bresser National Institute of Public Health and Environment Frans.
Regional Policy Common Indicators: Infrastructure Definitions and Discussion Brussels, 22 nd November
The EEA marine and coastal work programme – what are we going to do in 2011? Trine Christiansen Project manager.
1 Background EEA A European Union institution Established by EU Regulation Staff: about 80 Budget: 22 Meuro Copenhagen EEA home page:
1 Regional Policy investing in ecosystems & green infrastructure for regional development Mathieu Fichter Policy Analyst Environment European Commission.
1 Stocks of biomass / C soil organic matter Expert meeting on land use and Ecosystem accounting 18./
UK 2010 Biodiversity Indicators EIONET Copenhagen 30 October 2007 James Williams Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House, City Road, Peterborough,
1. 2 Why are Result & Impact Indicators Needed? To better understand the positive/negative results of EC aid. The main questions are: 1.What change is.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Illinois Climate Change Advisory Group (ICCAG) Modeling Sub-group An introduction to ENERGY 2020 April 26, 2007.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
ZMQS ZMQS
Week 2 The Object-Oriented Approach to Requirements
Water scarcity in the Arab world: how to get from crisis to sustainable? Rania el Masri, Ph.D. Environment and Energy Policy Specialist Cairo, May 8, 2012.
Innovation =The act of starting something for the first time; introducing something new.
1 AirWare : urban and industrial air quality assessment and management Release R5.3 beta DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352.
1 Meeting carbon budgets – 5th Progress Report to Parliament Committee on Climate Change, June If you want to tweet about this report.
European Commission Directorate-General for Energy and Transport n° 1 Air Quality & CAFE AREHNA WORKSHOP Kos, 3-5 May 2003 Mrs Michèle LEPELLETIER.
21 st Annual Conference. Delivering sustainable solutions in a more competitive world Mercury Lamps - Life Cycle Assessment for Product Stewardship Peter.
WGP-AS UNDP/RBAS Water Governance Programme for Arab States (WGP-AS) NATIONAL CAPACITY NEEDS FOR THE EFFECTIVE JOINT MANAGEMENT OF SHARED WATER RESOURCES.
Energy & Green Urbanism Markku Lappalainen Aalto University.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
+21 Economic Expectations Europe December 2013 Indicator > +20 Indicator 0 to +20 Indicator 0 to -20 Indicator < -20 European Union total: +14 Indicator.
Monitoring Team – Safer Streets.  Air Quality Introduction ◦ Brent ◦ Air quality Monitoring ◦ Previous Air Quality Action Plan  The revised.
Madrid, 27 th October th IG Meeting South Gas Regional Initiative.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Model and Relationships 6 M 1 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
25 seconds left…...
Week 1.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
PSSA Preparation.
Dr. Niels Jungbluth ESU-services Ltd., Uster, Switzerland Life Cycle Assessment of BTL-fuels, Conversion Concepts and Comparison with Fossil Fuels 16 th.
The blue economy: new threats and opportunities to sustainable use of marine resources Gillian Cambers, SPC, GCCA: PSIS project.
Humans in the Biosphere
………………………. A perspective of life cycle thinking We believe in decision making based life cycle thinking. It results in: -no trade-offs in life cycle phases.
EEA core set of indicators 37 indicators Of known quality: Geographical and temporal coverage Comparable data Nationally representative data Methodological.
HUMANS IN THE BIOSPHERE. A Changing Landscape  Growing populations depend on the limited natural resources of earth for survival.  Humans rely on ecological.
Life Cycle Assessment of Organic Waste: Application and Relevance to New Zealand Simon Love.
Natural Heritage Trends The European Environment 2005 An Overview Assessment Ed Mackey Head of Environmental Audit Unit Scottish Natural Heritage.
National Policy and Strategy for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 15 March, 2004.
Humans in the Biosphere. A Changing Landscape * Human activities change the flow of energy in an ecosystem and can reduce the ability of ecosystems to.
Assessment on the environmental effect of adding soybean ethylic biodiesel to fossil diesel for passengers transportation in urban center Alex R. Nogueira,
Alice Delcour, Florence Van Stappen – avniR LCA Conference 2012 – Lille, 6-7 November 2012 Walloon Agricultural Research Centre Assessing.
InLCA/LCM 2003 Seattle, WA USA September 23, 2003 Life Cycle Analysis & Purchasing Workshop Sustainable Products Purchasers Coalition Neil Collie Development.
David Whitmarsh CEMARE University of Portsmouth ECASA Meeting in Paris, April 2005 Ecosystem Approach for Sustainable Aquaculture: the contribution of.
CESI Barcelona May 2003 R.BERTI IT Session 1 – Block 2 1 Product Environmental Profile and Benefits for Electrical Utilities R. Berti CESI.
Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution CAFE team, DG Environment and streamlined air quality legislation.
1 Life Cycle indicators for the Data Centres on resources, products and waste IMEA Workshop Paris, 20 March 2009 Ugo Pretato, David Pennington, Rana Pant,
05/11/2015 Workshop Ecolizer The methodology behind the Ecolizer 2.0 An Vercalsteren, Ann Van der Linden 25 February 2011.
The Canadian Approach To Compiling Emission Projections Marc Deslauriers Environment Canada Pollution Data Division Science and Technology Branch Projections.
Marine Aquaculture in U.S.A. David O’Brien. 2 Today’s Talk U.S. Aquaculture NOAA’s Role Research Initiatives.
“Aquaculture in the Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy” March 7 th 2012, European Parliament, Brussels « FIFO » and Carbon Footprint Sadasivam J. Kaushik.
Cereals food and non-food uses: « 4F »
Clean Technology (PB382) Click to edit Master title style Numfon Eaktasang, Ph.D.
A Scientific Way to Look at Going Green!
Dr. Tanveer Iqbal Associate Professor,
“Life Cycle Assessments of Wind Energy and Other Renewables”…
Product Environmental Footprint (PEF)
Sustainability assessment of the introduction of e-bus
Presentation transcript:

Sustainability of the Peruvian anchoveta-based supply chains from sea to plate ANCHOVETA-SC PROJECT status report Angel Avadi, IRD, Université Montpellier II Main project collaborators: Marilú Bouchon, IMARPE Camilo Cuba, UNFV Dr. Pierre Fréon, IRD Federico Iriarte, UNFV Ana Medina, IMARPE Jesus Nuñez, IRD Jorge Tam, IMARPE Rosa Vinatea, UNFV Otros colaboradores en IMARPE, e.g. Rocío Joo DISCOH Scientific Workshop 29-31 March 2012

Outline The ANCHOVETA-SC project Supply chain modelling and evaluation Sustainability indicators Initial LCA results

ANCHOVETA-SC Project financed by IRD and project partners Coordinator: Pierre Fréon, IRD Location: Peru Duration: 4 years (01.2010 - 12-2013) Theme: Environmental and socio-economic assessment of major international supply chains consuming Peruvian anchoveta (aligned to WP5 DISCOH) Outputs: Sustainability assessment Policy and sustainability suggestions PhD thesis (plus other theses)

Focus Characterisation of biophisical flows along the supply chains (SC) Featuring ecosystem-SC interactions Comparison of scenarios based on different fishing intensities and “fate” of landings (DHC vs IHC) Sustainability comparison of chains/scenarios based upon: Energy performance Environmental impacts (LCA) Seafood-specific impact categories Nutritional value Selected socio-economic indicators LCA o ACV: estudio de los impactos ambientales, expresados en una serie de categorías de impacto (e.g. GWP, eutrophication), asociados a la provisión de un bien o servicio a lo largo de todo su ciclo de vida, desde la extracción de materias primas pasando por la transformación y uso hasta la disposición final. La idea principal es permitir la comparación de productos y procesos productivos desde el punto de vista de su impacto ambiental.

1) Simplified SC diagram Inputs Anchoveta, predators Canned, cured, frozen Ecosystem dynamics DHC processing Inputs Emissions Fisheries Con-sumption Inputs (including crops) Emissions Inputs Inputs Chinese finfish? European salmon? Shrimp? Reduction Aquafeed Aquaculture Anchoveta Emissions Emissions Emissions

Modelling ecosystem-SC interactions Ecopath with Ecosym Trophic model Lindeman spine: gráfico de cadenas tróficas lineales Umberto Material and energy flow model

2) Scenarios and 3) Indicators Status quo (maximum anchoveta stock exploitation) (1-2% DHC) Increase in DHC (10-15% DHC) Diversification (reduction of anchoveta catches + increase of predator catches) Mixed model with anchoveta DHC/IHC and anchoveta predators DHC Harvest Fate Indicators rationale To compare feed ingredients, feed formulations and seafood products: Gross energy content (MJ/kg) Edible protein Energy Return On Investment (%) Biotic Resource Use (g C/kg) Ecological Footprint (ha/t) To compare intermediate and final seafood products, and competing supply chains: LCA impact categories Socio-economic indicators (to be defined)

LCAs carried out Two fishmeal plants: a conventional one producing only Fair Average Quality (FAQ) fishmeal and using mainly heavy fuel as energy source a more modern steam plant producing both FAQ and prime quality fishmeal and using both heavy fuel and natural gas Detailed inventories of industrial anchoveta fleet under processing preliminary LCA of representative “average“ 395 m3 vessel category Two aquafeed plants (Iquitos) A pilot facility and a working commercial facility One aquaculture farm (Iquitos) Peruvian Amazonian species

Iquitos Colossoma farm Colossoma macropomum (Gamitana), a large Amazonian fish Farm: 30 ha, converted from rain forest, 11.2 ha of ponds (no wastewater treatment), production: 100 t/a, feed: 150 t/a

Network: Colossoma farm

Characterisation: Colossoma farm Main impact contributors: feed and rain forest transformation FRY Marine ecotoxicity Freshwater ecotoxicity Freshwater eutrophication Terrestrial acidification Photochemical oxidant formation Ozone depletion Urban land occupation Terrestrial ecotoxicity Ionising radiation Agricultural land occupation Climate change Ecosystems Natural land transformation Particulate matter formation Human toxicity Climate change Human Health Metal depletion Fossil depletion

Iquitos Aquafeed plants 2 plants visited: 30 t/a IIAP plant 8 t/m commercial plant (competing with Purina, etc.) < 6% Peruvian fishmeal content in feeds > 33% Bolivian soymeal content > 45% local cornmeal content

Network: Aquafeed plant (8 t/m)

Characterisation: Aquafeed plant Main impact contributor: use phase LCA FISHMEAL PLANT Marine ecotoxicity Freshwater ecotoxicity Freshwater eutrophication Terrestrial acidification Photochemical oxidant formation Ozone depletion Urban land occupation Terrestrial ecotoxicity Ionising radiation Agricultural land occupation Climate change Ecosystems Natural land transformation Particulate matter formation Human toxicity Climate change Human Health Metal depletion Fossil depletion

Aquafeed plant use phase Impact contributors in use phase: oil-powered electricity feed ingredients, mainly Bolivian soymeal (due to clearcutting in Bolivia) Marine ecotoxicity Freshwater ecotoxicity Freshwater eutrophication Terrestrial acidification Photochemical oxidant formation Ozone depletion Urban land occupation Terrestrial ecotoxicity Ionising radiation Agricultural land occupation Climate change Ecosystems Natural land transformation Particulate matter formation Human toxicity Climate change Human Health Metal depletion Fossil depletion

Network: Hypothetical trout feed plant (43% fishmeal)

Comparison of feed plants

Network: Fishing vessel 395 m3

Design remarks Key aquaculture products haven’t been characterised for Peruvian conditions E.g. Peruvian rice and corn. Proxies were used and adaptations introduced when possible (e.g. Bolivian soymeal adapted from Brazilian) Key industrial products haven’t been characterised, yet it’s composition is known/estimated E.g. electric and combustion engines

LCA results Construction and maintenance of (reduction, feed) plants contributes negligibly Fuel use is the main contributor to impacts in all activities (fishing, reduction, feed processing) Feed provision is the main contributor to impacts in extensive Peruvian aquaculture The sourcing of feed ingredients is a critical factor for associated environmental impacts of feeds E.g. Brazilian soymeal performing much worst than Bolivian one, due to clear cutting of rain forest vs. of shrublands.

Further (ongoing) work EwE scenarios definition and integration with Umberto Selection of and data gathering for socio-economic indicators Statistical processing of fleet inventories and comprehensive LCA of fleet categories Further LCAs: Canning, curing and freezing plants Carnivore fish and shrimp aquaculture farms Gathering supply chains operative data and LCIs Background processes for provision of feed ingredients Published LCI/LCA data must be recalculated to ensure consistency

Gracias por su atención… Preguntas, comentarios? XXXX XXXX