Workshop: Protecting market position IP Finance and Monetisation Conference, Krakow, 6-7 September 2012 Richard Vary Head of Litigation, Nokia 1 Personal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ICP 7-th Regional Coordinators Meeting World Bank, Washington D.C.
Advertisements

Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law Name / Date 1 Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law Competition.
Preliminary Injunctions in IP cases Simon Smith Partner Blake Lapthorn Taro Lyons.
BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF- 18 MAY BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF 18 MAY 2009 BACKGROUND - ERASMUS SORBONNE DECLARATION 1998 (FRANCE, GERMANY, ITALY, UK)
1 Patent Infringement Litigation Before the U.S. International Trade Commission By Timothy DeWitt 24IP Law Group USA 12 E. Lake Dr. Annapolis, MD
Seite 1 SONNENBERG FORTMANN 24IP LAW GROUP USA PLLC SONNENBERG FORTMANN 24IP LAW GROUP FFANCE MÜNCHEN BIELEFELD LONDON © 11 April IP LAW GROUP European.
Regional and national initiatives in support of European Technology Platforms Dr. Fiona Williams Chairman, eMobility steering board
ESMA/2013/641 ESMA and crowdfunding Crowdfunding: Untapping its potential, reducing the risks Workshop, 3 June 2013 Laurent Degabriel Head of Investment.
1 Ignacio de Castro WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Solving Disputes: The Services of the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center WIPO-INSME Training.
0 - 0.
Addition Facts
Treasury Organisation
UNITARY PATENT Challenges for the EPO - Advantages for the users Georg Artelsmair6 September 2012.
Perverse Management Incentives Damage The Economy Andrew Smithers High Pay Centre London 6 th March 2014.
Standard Essential Patents in Infringement Litigations - Orange-Book-Approach and latest developments Conference on Information Technology, Innovation.
1 IFIEC VISION OF A LIBERALISED EUROPEAN GAS MARKET Energy Forum, 22 Nov Steinar Solheim, Chairman of Working Party Oil & Gas.
Higher education policy, main developments in Europe Empower European Universities Annual conference The State of Universities for Progress Parkhotel.
Lady Gaga and Misgivings of the JPO? Dr. Shoichi Okuyama AIPPI Japan Okuyama & Sasajima.
BAU 2011 Europe’s building industry after the crisis – What now? Erich Gluch ifo Institute for Economic Research, Munich BAU Information Talks on 28 October.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
26/28/04/2014 – EU/EP Patent Management HG Patent Strategy in Europe in the Advent of a Unified European Patent System – How to Manage Non-Practicing.
The UPC in the European Patent Litigation landscape
The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases
© 2005 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Offense as Defense in U.S. Patent Litigation Anthony L. Press Maximizing IP Seminar October 31, 2005.
AIPLA Annual Meeting 2014 Bifurcation before the UPC Dr. Jochen Pagenberg Attorney-at-law, Munich/Paris Past President EPLAW Prinzregentenplatz
April 8, 2013 NPE litigation in Japan Activities and impact of FRAND commitments Eiichiro Kubota, Hogan Lovells Tokyo.
The EUROPEAN PATENT SYSTEM AND ITS FUTURE PROSPECT
London Brussels Hong Kong Beijing Countdown to the Unitary Patent system in Europe Susie Middlemiss 8 June 2015.
| Intellectual Property, in particular Patent Litigation in Switzerland Dr. iur. Andri Hess April 22, 2013.
Introduction to the Unified Patent Court
LANGUAGE AND PATENTS Gillian Davies Montréal, July 2005.
Comparison of the Litigation Systems in Germany, France and the UK
Dr. Thomas W. Reimann IP Practice in Japan AIPLA Midwinter Meeting Las Vegas, January 2012 Latest Patent Development in the European Union.
Handling IP Disputes in a Global Economy Huw Evans Norton Rose Fulbright LLP.
Protecting your knowledge and creativity, the basis of your success. Patents in European Union national, European, unitary Presentation for.
Geneva, October 9, 2012 GSC-16bis Meeting: Recent US IP Developments Earl Nied, Chair, ANSI Intellectual Property Rights Policy Committee Document No:
A Worldwide Forum Ina Brock and Joe Cyr. Pharmaceutical Product Liability in Europe… Is increasingly mass torts litigation involving claims brought in.
The world leader in industrial and medical gases SPEEDY AND PROPER LITIGATION ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY The 3rd JIPA INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY SYMPOSIUM Thierry.
International Conference on Intellectual Property Rights Protection in Europe Prague 22 May 2009 Practical Experience with Intellectual Property Rights.
Patent Litigation in Europe – Now and in the future 12 June 2013 Kings College London Trevor Cook
Current Korea Patent Court System, compared to that of the U.S.A. Pilot program.
The ECJ's Huawei/ZTE judgment (C-170/13) Thomas Kramler DG Competition, European Commission (The views expressed are not necessarily those of the European.
1 FRAND COMMITMENTS AND EU COMPETITION LAW Thomas Kramler European Commission, DG Competition (The views expressed are not necessarily those of the European.
Institut der beim Europäischen Patentamt zugelassenen Vertreter Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office Institut des.
The Unified Patent Court
Challenges Associated With, And Strategies For, U.S. Patent Litigation Russell E. Levine, P.C. Kirkland & Ellis LLP LES Asia.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION TRIAL-SETTING PROCEDURES.
OEPM The European Patent with unitary effect: Gateway to a European Union Patent? Perspectives from non-participating member States. Raquel Sampedro Head.
1 CEIPI Conference Towards a European Patent Court 17 April 2010.
Patent Remedies in Global Perspective Thomas F. Cotter Briggs and Morgan Professor of Law University of Minnesota Law School February.
EU-China Workshop on the Chinese Patent Law 24/25 September 2008 Topic IV: Legal Consequences of Invalidity of a Patent Prof. Dr. Christian Osterrieth.
Judicial System in Germany for IPR Protection presented at the 2009 International Conference on Judicial Protection of IPR 10 September 2009, Chengdu,
Managing IP Risk in the Supply Chain - Identifying The Weakest Link 02/11/2016 Time: – Dr N. Imam Partner at Phillips & Leigh Registered UK.
16/20/11/09 – EU Civil Patent Enforcement HG Patent Rights in the EU – The Civil Enforcement Perspective Heinz Goddar Boehmert & Boehmert.
European Patent Litigation
Heinz Goddar and Carl-Richard Haarmann Boehmert & Boehmert
Tongji University, March 2010
“1-Click” Amazon Patent
International Conference on Judicial Protection of IPR
PATENT LAW TRENDS (walking around patent knowledge)
International Conference on Judicial Protection of IPR
IEEE ComsocSCV Meeting
Lessons learned – Lab IP Enforcement
MSFT/MMI SEP Milestones
Dispute resolution in the nordic countries
“The View From the Corner of U.S. Competition Law and Patents”
& LAIPLA Spring Seminar
Presentation transcript:

Workshop: Protecting market position IP Finance and Monetisation Conference, Krakow, 6-7 September 2012 Richard Vary Head of Litigation, Nokia 1 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

2 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

Where in practice do we see patent cases filed? 3 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

Where do patent cases go to trial 4 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

The UK High Court London 5 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

What differences do we see in the UK system? Declaratory relief Quick but rigorous trial Discovery experts Amendments must be made in good time Costs awards: typically winner recovers 60-80% of actual cost 6 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

The squeeze 7 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia UK court hears validity and infringement/essentiality together

Italy Tribunale di Milano 8 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

The Netherlands District Court of the Hague Fast procedure, but speed comes with certain costs: can’t easily amend, or evolve your case Strict time limits for evidence Infringement/validity heard together High reputation of judges Cross border reach 9 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

France 10 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

How does it work in Germany? Race to a remedy: get injunction before patent invalidated argue for broad construction before regional court, narrow on invalidity 11 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

Dusseldorf 12 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

Landgericht Mannheim 13 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

Bundespatentgericht 14 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

Result: If you haven’t been injuncted in Germany by now, you should probably be a little offended PartiesCourtDate of DecisionDecision Apple./. MotorolaRegional Court Munich I01 March 2012Injunction against Motorola Apple./. MotorolaRegional Court Munich I16 February 2012Injunction against Motorola Motorola./. AppleRegional Court Mannheim3 February 2012Injunction against Apple Apple./. SamsungRegional Court Munich I01 February 2012 Injunction against Samsung HTC./. IPComRegional Court Düsseldorf19 December 2011 Injunction against IPCom (misleading warning letters) Motorola Mobility./. Apple Regional Court Mannheim09 December 2011Injunction against Apple Motorola Mobility./. Apple Regional Court Mannheim04 November 2011Injunction against Apple IPCom/NokiaRegional Court Mannheim8 February 2011Injunction against Nokia IPCom/HTCRegional Court MannheimFebruary 2009Injunction against HTC

Map of interactions 16 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia German infringement court UK court Federal Patent Court Italian Civil Court Italian Prosecutors French court Dutch court

Imagine you are a CEO Where would you locate your factories, your warehouses, your distribution centres?

Unified Patent Court Local or regional divisions hear infringement Revocation may be local, or referred to the Central Division Injunctions are pan European 18 Personal observations and experiences only: not necessarily the views of Nokia

The vicious circle of bifurcation Increase need to reach cross licence with non-EU competitors Pay higher royalties to non-EU competitors Reduced cash available for R&D in Europe Fewer EP patents than non-EU competitors Increased risk of business disrupting injunction compared to non-EU based competitors

Result Ultimately EU-based hi-tech business less able to compete with non-EU competitors, as they will become net payers of royalties International companies: relocate factories/distribution hubs to Asia/US Domestic companies: don’t grow as fast, or fail  Fewer jobs/less investment in Europe

Bifurcation: bad for business European ^ But really rather good for our competitors!