God, Matter, and Information: What is Ultimate? What is “God”? What is “Matter”? What is “Information”? What does “Ultimate” mean?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FATE v. FREE WILL. Fatalism The idea of fatalism coincides with destiny. This means that everything in our lives is predestined by fate. In other words,
Advertisements

HOW OUR THOUGHTS CAN INFLUENCE OUR ACTIONS Quantum Theory Of The Mind-Brain Connection.
Puzzles and Paradoxes of Time Travel. Quiz Answer ONE of the following: 1) Should Andrew be considered a person? 2) Does Andrew have free will? 3) Do.
The basic questions before us here in Doha are: What is the fundamental nature of the world? and How Do We Fit Into It?
Mind in the Quantum Universe. Physics is Rooted in Astronomy Kepler’s Three Laws of Planetary Motion Coupled to Galileo’s Association of Gravity with.
HUMAN NATURE AND MODERN PHILOSOPHY HUME PHILOSOPHY 224.
Moral Reasoning Making appropriate use of facts and opinions to decide the right thing to do Quotations from Jacob Needleman’s The American Soul A Crucial.
 Humans are metaphysically free  Our choices define us and as a result our intuitions about the human condition are satisfied.  Dualism  Kant  Existentialism.
Science-Based Discussion Of Free Will Synopsis: Free Will: The capacity of mental intent to influence physical behavior. Classical mechanics makes a person’s.
Nondual Quantum Duality To Show How The “Duality Versus Nonduality” Conflict Is Resolved Within Orthodox Quantum Theory To Show How The “Human Freedom.
Quantum Theory of What? What does quantum theory describe?
The Basic Questions What is the fundamental nature of the world? How do we fit into It?
Quantum mechanics for Advaitins
Quantum Theory of Placebos “An important lesson in physic is here to be learnt, the wonderful and powerful influence of the passions of the mind upon the.
How do we know what we think we know is true? Einstein, revolutionised Physics with his thought experiments Galileo, father of experimental physics. Physicists.
“An attempt to understand and explain how the thoughts, feelings, and behavior of individuals are influenced by the actual, imagined, or implied presence.
PHY 042: Electricity and Magnetism Introduction Prof. Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin.
CHAPTER 3 – DIFFERENT EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHIES
Quantum Conception of the Mind-Brain Connection. Our Scientific Understandings of Nature Have Two Different Kinds Of Elements: Empirical/Mental/Subjective.
Quantum theory and Consciousness This is an interactive discussion. Please feel free to interrupt at any time with your questions and comments.
Philosophy of Mind Week 3: Objections to Dualism Logical Behaviorism
Epistemology Revision
Definitions of Reality (ref . Wiki Discussions)
KNOWLEDGE What is it? How does it differ from belief? What is the relationship between knowledge and truth? These are the concerns of epistemology How.
In 1887,when Photoelectric Effect was first introduced by Heinrich Hertz, the experiment was not able to be explained using classical principles.
The Copenhagen interpretation Born, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, Bohr ( ) Even though the Copenhagen interpretation is supposed to be the “orthodox”
Dimensions of Human Behavior: Person and Environment
Dualism: epiphenomenalism
LOGIC AND ONTOLOGY Both logic and ontology are important areas of philosophy covering large, diverse, and active research projects. These two areas overlap.
Physics 1910W Freshman Seminar Fall 2015 What is Time? 12:20-1:30 pm, Physics and Nanotechnology(PAN) 120 Instructor: J W Halley 181 Shepherd Laboratory.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?. SCIENTIFIC WORLD VIEW 1.The Universe Is Understandable. 2.The Universe Is a Vast Single System In Which the Basic Rules.
You Are What You Do In Search of the Good, chapter 2.
Ross Arnold, Summer 2014 Lakeside institute of Theology Philosophy of Human Nature.
Puzzles and Paradoxes of Time Travel
The Turn to the Science The problem with substance dualism is that, given what we know about how the world works, it is hard to take it seriously as a.
Issues and Alternatives in Educational Philosophy Philosophic Issues in Education Chapter 2 Philosophic Issues in Education Chapter 2.
Quantum Theory of the Human Person 1. The most important twenty-first-century development in science will be about the nature of human beings. 2. The.
Jamesian Volition in Quantum Theory A Quantum Theory of the Effect of Conscious Effort upon Brain Activity.
COMMENT’S ON SHA XIN WEI’S “WHITEHEAD’S POETICAL MATHEMATICS”
THEME OF MY TALK Quantum mechanics, unlike classical mechanics, allows consciousness to play an important dynamical role in the determination of the flow.
CHAPTER 3: R EALITY AND B EING. I NTRODUCTION Metaphysics is the attempt to answer the question: What is real? You might think that reality just consists.
What is Materialism?.
Definitions of Reality (ref. Wiki Discussions). Reality Two Ontologic Approaches What exists: REALISM, independent of the mind What appears: PHENOMENOLOGY,
Start – Thursday, Primacy of mind, categorization, and the problem of “the Other” Two categories: I [me, my, myself,...] and Other [she, her,
The Cosmological Argument for God’s Existence or how come we all exist? Is there a rational basis for belief in God?
Critical Theory and Philosophy “The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point, however, is to change it” Marx, Theses on.
Quantum Theory of What? What does quantum theory describe?
FREEDOM INTRODUCTORY QUESTIONS 1.Why is it that human beings, and not animals are only able to act morally 2.Define a human action. 3.Is freedom limited?
Lecture №1 Role of science in modern society. Role of science in modern society.
Quantum New way of looking at our world. Classical vs Quantum Typically a student develops an intuition about how the world works using classical mechanics.
Whitehead, James, and Quantum Physics Whitehead’s Process Ontology as a Framework for a Heisenberg/James/von Neumann Conception of Nature and of Human.
DUALISM: CAUSAL INTERACTIONISM Philosophy of Mind.
An analysis of Kant’s argument against the Cartesian skeptic in his ‘Refutation of Idealism” Note: Audio links to youtube are found on my blog at matthewnevius.wordpress.com.
The Mind And Body Problem Mr. DeZilva.  Humans are characterised by the body (physical) and the mind (consciousness) These are the fundamental properties.
The Quantum Mechanical Model of the Atom. Niels Bohr In 1913 Bohr used what had recently been discovered about energy to propose his planetary model of.
Critical Theory and Philosophy “The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point, however, is to change it” Marx, Theses on.
A process based architecture for artificial consciousness: from ontogenesis to phenomenal experience University of Genoa (Italy) Riccardo Manzotti September.
PHILOSOPHY AS A SECOND ORDER DISCIPLINE
Seeing the Father John 14:5-11.
PHILOSOPHY AS A SECOND ORDER DISCIPLINE
Searle on the Mind-Body Problem Minds, Brains and Science Chapter 1
Why Be Ethical?/You are what You Do
David Hume and Causation
Quantum theory and Consciousness
Property dualism: objections
Recap Questions What is interactionism?
What did I google to find this picture?
What is Postmodernism? A complicated term
Scientific Revolution
Presentation transcript:

God, Matter, and Information: What is Ultimate? What is “God”? What is “Matter”? What is “Information”? What does “Ultimate” mean?

What does “God” mean? 1.Suppose “God” means “the creator of all of the physical, mental, and spiritual aspects of reality, and of all the relationships between them.” Such a “God”, if existing, must be in some sense “ultimate”.

What does “God” mean? 2. Suppose “God” means “the totality of nature: the totality of all the physical, mental, and spiritual aspects of reality, and of all relationships between these aspects.” Such a “God” is in some sense “ultimate”, because nothing else exists!

But what if “God” is less? But what if “God” is less than the one described in points 1 or 2. Then some clarification of the meaning of the term “God” ---and also of the meaning of “ultimate”--- must be provided before any answer can be given to the question we are being asked to address. Moreover, what “matter” and what is “information” must be clarified. I, as a physicist, will discuss “Matter”

What is “Matter”? Ernan McMullin has given here a brief account of the history in philosophy and in physics of the meaning of “matter”: 1.Aristotle used it in connection with the notion of “materials for making”, such as timber. 2. The Neo-Platonists used it in contrast to the “spiritual” aspects of reality. 3. In the 17 th,18 th, & 19 th centuries it became used to denote the carrier of the small set of properties that, according to the then-ascendant “mechanical philosophy”, were the only properties that were needed to account for all changes in the visible world. These properties, called “physical properties” were considered to be “objective”, in contrast to the “subjective” properties”, which are “dependent in one way or another on the perceiver.”

Classically Conceived Matter Cannot be Ultimate! Even if, as claimed by the 17 th, 18 th, and 19 th century classical physics, the (physical) properties of matter of could explain all of the changes in visible properties, that would not make it ultimate. What fixes the initial conditions? What fixes the physical laws that matter obeys? How do our subjective experiences of the visible properties emerge from the causally and conceptually self-sufficient material/physical aspect of reality?

The properties of actual (quantum mechanical) matter: Are they counterintuitive? McMullin calls the quantum conception of matter “problematic” and “counter-intuitive.” Seth Lloyd calls the quantum mechanical properties of matter “counter-intuitive” and “weird”. Actually, it is the classical properties that are counter-intuitive, problematic, and weird. The quantum properties are the natural and intuitive ones. They appear weird only when viewed from the problematic classical standpoint

The Classical-Physics Conception of Matter is Counter-intuitive and Problematic The deepest human intuition is that ones’ own conscious subjective efforts can influence ones’ own bodily actions. Any conception of nature that claims this deep intuition to be an illusion is counter-intuitive. Any conception of reality that cannot naturally explain how our bodily actions are caused, at least in part, by our conscious thoughts, ideas, and feelings is problematic.

The Classical-Physics Idea of the Nature of the Physical World is not Innately Intuitive to Minds Untutored in Classical Physics McMullin’s account of the two millennia of wonderings by philosophers from Thales to Newton confirm this. School children need to be taught that the solid- looking table is “really” mostly empty space, in which tiny particles are buzzing around. The tight causal connectedness of mind and matter is deeply intuitive: hence The classical-physics conception of matter is a counter-intuitive theoretical construct.

The Rehabilitation of Intuition by Quantum Mechanics. The original Copenhagen interpretation of quantum theory was pragmatic and epistemological: it eschewed ontology; it avoided commitments about what really exists! Von Neumann’s formulation (called “orthodox” by Wigner) prepared the way for an imbedding ontology. The quantum conception of reality is built around “events”. Each such event has a physically described aspect and a psychologically described aspect.

Quantum psycho-physical events are the building blocks of reality Heisenberg: “The probability function does not in itself represent a course of events in time. It represents a tendency for events and our knowledge of events. “(1958. p.46) “The observation… enforces the description in space and time but breaks the determined continuity by changing our knowledge.” (ibid, p )

Quantum psycho-physical events are the building blocks of reality, cont. “The observation itself…selects of all possible events the actual one that has taken place. Since through the observation our knowledge of the system has changed discontinuously its mathematical representation has undergone a discontinuous change and we speak of a ‘quantum jump’.” (ibid. p. 54)

Psycho-physical events are the building blocks of reality, cont. “The transition from the ‘possible’ to the ‘actual’ takes place during the act of observation. If we want to describe what happens …we have to realize that the word ‘happens’ can apply only to the observation, not to the state of affairs between two observations.” (ibid, p. 54)

Reality is built of psycho-physical events and objective tendencies (potentia) for such events to occur. “The probability function combines objective and subjective elements. It contains statements about possibilities or better tendencies (‘potentia’ in Aristotelian philosopy), and these statements are completely objective, they do not depend on any observer; and it contain statements about our knowledge of the system, which of course are subjective, in so far as they may be different for different observers.

Human Beings as Players “As Bohr put it…in the drama of existence we ourselves are both players and spectators. …our own activity becomes very important…” (ibid, p. 58) “The probability function can be connected to reality only if one essential condition is fulfilled: if a new measurement is made to determine a certain property of the system. (ibid, p. 48, my italics)

Human Beings as Players Bohr: “The freedom of experimentation …corresponds to the free choice of experimental arrangement for which the mathematical structure of the quantum mechanical formalism offers the appropriate latitude.” (Bohr, 1958, p.73) This “choice on the part of the ‘observer’ ” is represented in the mathematical formalism by von Neumann’s “process 1” intervention (von Neumann, 1932/1952, p. 351, 418)

How freely chosen conscious intent can naturally cause the appropriate brain/bodily action to occur. The neural correlate of the conscious intent is a “template for action”. A “template for action” is a macroscopic (brain sized) pattern of neural activity that if held in place long enough will tend to cause the intended action to occur.

How freely chosen conscious intent can naturally cause the appropriate brain/bodily action to occur. Cont. The timing of when a particular process 1 occurs is not specified by the orthodox quantum mathematical formalism: it is part of the observer’s “free choice”. Effortful intention intensifies the experience. So I conjecture that application of effort increases the rapidity of the associated process 1 events.

The quantum Zeno effect. If the rapidity of the process 1 events associated with a given intent is great enough then the neural correlate of that intent will become almost frozen in place by the orthodox laws of physics. Hence the associated template for action will be held in place. Hence the brain/body action associated with that intent will tend to occur.

The Whitehead/Quantum ontology is rationally coherent, not-counter-intuitive, not-weird, and not-problematic. Whitehead deals with the anthropocentric character of the Copenhagen epistemological position by making the human-brain based quantum events into special cases of a non- anthropocentric general ontology, without violating the pragmatic success of the Copenhagen-von Neumann epistemology.

Not-counter-intuitivitive, continued. McMullin says: “Their properties were entangled with one another in ways quite counter-intuitive.” Only if one starts from the false classical conception of particles, as tiny versions of visible rocks and stones. Once one recognizes that reality is built out of psycho-physical events, an idea that is in close accord with our intuition that the events in our streams of consciousness are counterparts of events in the physical world, and out of objective tendencies for these events to occur, there is no conflict with intuition.

Entanglement in not counter-intuitive. The objective tendency for a quantum of energy to appear in one place naturally vanishes when that energy turns up in another place. And quantum theory shows that correlations in objective tendencies can have logical consequences that go beyond what can be achieved with correlations among realities.

Entanglement in not weird or problematic. The faster-than-the-speed-of-light transmissions of information that orthodox quantum mechanics allows, and indeed entails, is not problematic: it permits no signal (controllable message) to be sent faster than the speed of light. Entanglement is weird only insofar as one tries to impose, unjustifiably, a classical-physics ontology on invisible things.

. Fixed Past Time Open Future