Arguments for The Existence of God Ontological Cosmological Teleological Ontological Cosmological Teleological.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
God A Priori Arguments. Classical Theism Classical conception of God: God is Classical conception of God: God is Omnipotent Omnipotent Omnipresent Omnipresent.
Advertisements

Cosmological Argument What is it?. Cosmological Argument The simple starting point is that we know the universe exists (a posteriori) The simple starting.
The ontological argument is based entirely upon logic and reason and doesn’t really try to give a posteriori evidence to back it up. Anselm would claim.
Is Religion Reasonable? Are religious beliefs (about the universe’s relation to the supernatural) reasonable? Faith seeking understanding: ontological,
Philosophy and the proof of God's existence
ALL (E GRADE): Will be able to summarise the Cosmological and Ontological Arguments MOST (C GRADE): Will be able to explain the Cosmological and Ontological.
Plantinga’s ontological argument
Phil 1000 Bradley Monton Class 3 The Argument From Design.
The Ontological Argument. Anselm’s Argument So the fool has to agree that the concept of something than which nothing greater can be thought exists in.
The ontological argument
Ontological Argument for God Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.
Descartes’ cosmological argument
The Ontological Argument
The Ontological Proof For around a thousand years, various proofs for the existence of God have gone by the name ‘The Ontological Proof.’ The first person.
The Ontological Argument
Phil 1000 Bradley Monton Class 2 The Cosmological Argument.
Is Religion Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding The ontological argument The cosmological argument The teleological argument (from design)
Ontological arguments Concept of God: perfect being –God is supposed to be a perfect being. –That’s just true by definition. –Even an atheist can agree.
Is Belief in God Reasonable? Faith Seeking Understanding A posteriori arguments (based on experience): The teleological argument (from design) The cosmological.
A Meaning for Existence
God Ronald F. White, Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy College of Mount St. Joseph.
Perspectives on Religious Belief: Evidentialism-1  Definition: belief in God must be supported by objective evidence  Natural theology: attempt to prove.
Philosophy of Religion Foundation. Plato and Aristotle Analogy of the Cave Concept of the Forms, especially the Form of the Good Concept of Body/Soul.
Philosophy of Religion What is religion? “Religion is the state of being grasped by an ultimate concern, a concern which qualifies all other concerns as.
 Born to a noble family in Italy  As a young man, joins the Benedictine Order in Normandy, France, residing in the monastery there for 30 years – 15.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
God and the Enlightenment Mr. Bach Accelerated World History.
Pages 420 to 433 IDEAS ON THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. PHILOSOPHIC REASONING ABOUT GOD There is value in discussing God’s existence Three basic positions: Teleological.
Ontological Argument. Teleological argument depends upon evidence about the nature of the world and the organisms and objects in it. Cosmological argument.
Arguments for God’s existence.  What are we arguing for?
Introduction to Humanities Lecture 11 Anselm & Aquinas By David Kelsey.
PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION  Preliminary Issues:  Agreement vs. Tolerance  Different Religions ARE Incompatible  Religious Claims Aren’t True FOR Individuals.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 5 The Ontological Argument By David Kelsey.
Proof By Contradiction Chapter 3 Indirect Argument Contradiction Theorems and pg. 171.
Arguments for The Existence of God Ontological Cosmological Telelogical Ontological Cosmological Telelogical.
Just Looking … What Evidence is there for the Existence of God?
Anselm’s Ontological Argument STARTER TASK: ‘Fools say in their hearts, “There is no God”’ Psalm 14:1 Copy this statement down. What do you think it is.
5-5 Indirect Proof. Indirect Reasoning: all possibilities are considered and then all but one are proved false. The remaining possibility must be true.
WEEK 3: Metaphysics Natural Theology – Anselm’s Ontological Argument.
The Ontological Argument
Philosophy of Religion What is religion? “Religion is the state of being grasped by an ultimate concern, a concern which qualifies all other concerns as.
Ontological Argument (Ontological is from the Greek word for being, named by Kant) Learning Objectives To know the specification content To know the meaning.
Introduction to Humanities Lecture 11 Anselm & Aquinas By David Kelsey.
Philosophy of Religion Ontological Argument
OA: Faith and Reason What difference does the argument make
The ontological argument
Arguments for The Existence of God
Unit 2: Arguments relating to the existence of God.
Philosophy of Religion
Challenges to the OAs The different versions of OA are challenged by:
The existence of God: introduction
The Ontological Argument
O.A. so far.. Anselm – from faith, the fool, 2 part argument
Norman Malcolm American philosopher. 11 June 1911 – 4 August 1990.
Lecture 18: God and Reason
The Ontological Argument: An Introduction
Leibniz’s reformulation of the Ontological Argument
Kant’s objection to ontological arguments
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Explore key ideas in the ontological argument. (8 marks)
Explore the use of a’priori reasoning in the ontological argument
The Big Picture Deductive arguments - origins of the ontological argument Deductive proofs; the concept of ‘a priori’. St Anselm - God as the greatest.
The Ontological Argument
The Ontological Argument
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Ontological Argument – challenges against
Arguments for The Existence of God
Explore the weaknesses of the ontological argument. (8 marks)
Clarify the key ideas Logic Definition Premises Outline opinion Flawed
Presentation transcript:

Arguments for The Existence of God Ontological Cosmological Teleological Ontological Cosmological Teleological

God’s Existence  Not subjective  Not unprovable in principle  Natural Theology: Knowing God through reason  Biblical Theology: Knowing God through revelation  Not subjective  Not unprovable in principle  Natural Theology: Knowing God through reason  Biblical Theology: Knowing God through revelation

The Ontological Argument  A priori (vs. a posteriori)  God exists by definition  If you think about the concept of God hard enough, you’ll see that he must exist  A priori (vs. a posteriori)  God exists by definition  If you think about the concept of God hard enough, you’ll see that he must exist

Descartes’ Version  God is a perfect being  A perfect being must contain all perfections  Existence is a perfection.  God exists.  God is a perfect being  A perfect being must contain all perfections  Existence is a perfection.  God exists.

Anselm’s Version  Reductio ad absurdum  Indirect proof - show that atheism leads to a contradiction, so theism must be true  Reductio ad absurdum  Indirect proof - show that atheism leads to a contradiction, so theism must be true

Anselm’s Version  Assume God doesn’t exist  God exists only in the mind  The Greatest Conceivable Being (GCB) exists only in the mind  But this can’t be true because there is a greater being, which exists not only in the mind but in reality as well  Assume God doesn’t exist  God exists only in the mind  The Greatest Conceivable Being (GCB) exists only in the mind  But this can’t be true because there is a greater being, which exists not only in the mind but in reality as well

Anselm’s Version  The GCB exists ONLY in the mind  The GCB isn’t the GCB  A is not A <-- Contradiction  Atheism leads to a contradiction  Atheism is false  It’s not true that God doesn’t exist  God exists  The GCB exists ONLY in the mind  The GCB isn’t the GCB  A is not A <-- Contradiction  Atheism leads to a contradiction  Atheism is false  It’s not true that God doesn’t exist  God exists

Anselm’s Version  Assume not-G.  If not-G, then GCB = not-GCB  Not-not-G  G  Assume not-G.  If not-G, then GCB = not-GCB  Not-not-G  G

Gaunillo’s Objection  The Greatest Conceivable Island Objection (Perfect Island, Lost Island)  Assume the GCI exists only in the mind.  If the GCI exists only in the mind, then a greater island can be imagined, which exists not only in the mind but in reality  The GCI isn’t really the GCI (contrad.)  The GCI must exist.  The Greatest Conceivable Island Objection (Perfect Island, Lost Island)  Assume the GCI exists only in the mind.  If the GCI exists only in the mind, then a greater island can be imagined, which exists not only in the mind but in reality  The GCI isn’t really the GCI (contrad.)  The GCI must exist.

Gaunillo’s Objection  Anselm: My argument doesn’t work for the greatest conceivable kind of type of being, just the greatest conceivable being in general.  Once the limiting, imperfect particulars of the island are eliminated, the Island starts to look like God.  Anselm: My argument doesn’t work for the greatest conceivable kind of type of being, just the greatest conceivable being in general.  Once the limiting, imperfect particulars of the island are eliminated, the Island starts to look like God.

Kant’s Objection  Existence isn’t a property (real predicate)  The concept of a real $100 is the same as an imaginary $100; it’s just that one is instantiated.  Existence applies to a thing and it’s properties together; it is not itself a property.  Existence isn’t a property (real predicate)  The concept of a real $100 is the same as an imaginary $100; it’s just that one is instantiated.  Existence applies to a thing and it’s properties together; it is not itself a property.

Malcolm’s Modal Version  God is a necessary being.  If God’s existence is possible, then it’s actual.  God’s existence is possible.  God must exist.  Objection: Maybe God’s existence isn’t possible  God is a necessary being.  If God’s existence is possible, then it’s actual.  God’s existence is possible.  God must exist.  Objection: Maybe God’s existence isn’t possible

Other Objections  God doesn’t’ exist in the mind.  Exist “in the mind” equivocates on the term “exists.”  The terms “greater” and “greatest” are vague, value-laden or assume a Platonic metaphysics with degrees of reality.  Which is greater Jupiter or the DNA molecule?  God doesn’t’ exist in the mind.  Exist “in the mind” equivocates on the term “exists.”  The terms “greater” and “greatest” are vague, value-laden or assume a Platonic metaphysics with degrees of reality.  Which is greater Jupiter or the DNA molecule?