Michigan-California Timber Company

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Quality in the Caddo Lake Watershed Caddo Lake Water Quality Cypress Creek Clean Rivers Program.
Advertisements

Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Sequential Logic Design
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 116.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 107.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 40.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 44.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 29.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 101.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 58.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 112.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 75.
Disability status in Ethiopia in 1984, 1994 & 2007 population and housing sensus Ehete Bekele Seyoum ESA/STAT/AC.219/25.
OPTN Modifications to Heart Allocation Policy Implemented July 12, 2006 Changed the allocation order for medically urgent (Status 1A and 1B) patients Policy.
The Central Washington Landscape Assessment (CWLA) project update and discussion.
INFLUENCE OF COMMERCIAL THINNING OF DOUGLAS-FIR FORESTS ON POPULATION PARAMETERS OF NORTHERN FLYING SQUIRRELS AND TOWNSENDS CHIPMUNKS Robert G. Anthony.
Dietary Overlap between Northern Spotted Owls and Barred Owls in Western Oregon J. David Wiens USGS Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center U.S.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
Construction Fatalities (Workers, Jan 1981 to March 2007 )
Improving the commercial sectors access to government data Visiting Professor Birkbeck College University of London SUF Users Forum 18 th February 2007.
Sampling in Marketing Research
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
This module: Telling the time
The basics for simulations
Humboldt Redwood Company Northern Spotted Owl Habitat Conservation Plan Sal Chinnici Forest Science Manager Office:
1 Mental Health Outcomes Contract Exhibit D/Performance Outcomes STABLE HOUSING Outcome – Percent of (individuals in specified population group) who live.
The Pecan Market How long will prices stay this high?? Brody Blain Vice – President.
Rich Klug: Approximately 175,000 acres total with 110,000 acres within the range of the NSO Uneven-age management until.
Remember that of means multiply in mathematics. of = x.
1 Prediction of electrical energy by photovoltaic devices in urban situations By. R.C. Ott July 2011.
Faster IS Better: Accelerating to Success Kay Teague And Michael Warren.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Sprayer Economics Gary Schnitkey University of Illinois.
1 Core Segments: Price Value Shoppers : Very much focused on getting the best value for their money, Price Value Shoppers love to shop, and take pride.
Comparison of X-ray diffraction patterns of La 2 CuO 4+   from different crystals at room temperature Pia Jensen.
TCCI Barometer September “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
New Hope Baptist Church Sunday, January 29, 2012.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
Weisburd, Lawton, Ready, Rudes, Cave, and Nelson Presented by Breanne Cave 1.
Age Biased Technical and Organisational Change, Training and Employment Prospects of Older Workers Luc Behaghel, Eve Caroli and Muriel Roger Paris School.
Clock will move after 1 minute
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Student Goals, Engagement and Outcomes: The Path to Success
RISK ASSESSMENT & SPOTTED OWL RESPONSE TO SILVICULTURE In MIXED-CONIFER FORESTS LARRY L. IRWIN DENNIS F. ROCK SUZANNE L. ROCK NCASI.
Principles of Genetic Epidemiology Kirsten Ohm Kyvik.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Timber Products Company Bioforestry: Measurement of forest structures within intensively managed forestlands. Stuart Farber & Geoff Kaberle Timber Products.
California Spotted Owl Module: 2008 Overview l John Keane, Sierra Nevada Research Center, PSW. Field Project Leaders &: GIS Analysis: Claire Gallagher,
GIS Study of the Kelsey-Whisky Logging Plan Jared Chapiewsky Matthew Bloch U of Wisconsin, Madison.
Development, implementation and lessons learned from the Northwest Forest Plan Michael W. Collopy Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Science.
Fifth Annual Survey of the Endangered Kirtland’s Warbler in Wisconsin Kim Grveles, WI Dept. of Natural Resources Partners: Natural Resources Foundation.
Summary of Implementation and Findings for the Green Diamond NSO HCP Since Program 2.Status of Surveys 3.Demographic/Density Studies 4.Data Available.
Provisions of the Spotted Owl CHU Rule: How Are We Interpreting What It Says? And How Does it Integrate with the NWFP? Bruce Hollen (BLM) and Brendan White.
Population Dynamics of the Northern Spotted Owl Reasons for Listing, Current Status, and Recovery Strategy May 8, 2014.
Terrestrial Resources Working Group June 3, 2008.
North Coast Forest Conservation Program Northern Spotted Owl Status Overview Madison Thomson (707)
Rob DiPerna, Industrial Forestry Reform Advocate Environmental Protection Information Center
Predictive Modeling of Northern Spotted Owl Home Ranges Presented by Elizabeth Willy USFWS File Photo.
What Does it Mean When >80 Equals Spotted Owl Habitat?
Recap from the 2005 workshop, “Managing Northern Spotted Owl Habitat in Dry Forest Ecosystems” Silvicultural Practices Supporting Northern Spotted Owl.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Implementing a Dry Forest Strategy in Late-Successional Reserves: the Wenatchee Experience Bill Gaines, USFS And Jeff Krupka, USFWS.
A Snapshot of Northern Spotted Owl Data on Small Non Industrial Landowners Presentation to the Department of Fish and Wildlife and California Forestry.
Presentation transcript:

Michigan-California Timber Company DIRK EMBREE (530) 842-2310 dembree@timberproducts.com

MCTC BACKGROUND MCTC is an affiliate of Timber Products TP has eight mills in four states TP is headquartered in Springfield, OR Employ approximately 960 MCTC manages the timberlands MCTC is headquartered in Yreka, CA

NSO Range and MCTC Ownership

MCTC Vicinity Map

MCTC OVERVIEW Approximately 114,000 acres Acquired in 1994 Checkerboard pattern Located on the edge of the NSO’s range Elevations range from around 2000’ to over 8,000’ above sea level Timbered stands are mostly Klamath mixed conifer, ponderosa pine, and true fir

HISTORY Railroad land grants Multiple owners Logging began in the 1930’s Heavy logging in the 40’s, 50’s and 60’s Several large wildfires

CURRENT MANAGEMENT Sustainably managed under Option A (CCR 933.11) Utilize both even and unevenaged management Retain bioforestry patches in evenaged units Retain key habitat elements Manage for a variety of wildlife, fish and plant species Ownership supports a wealth of natural resources

NSO REGULATORY COMPLIANCE Spotted Owl Management Plan (939.9(e)) Updated and Reauthorized March 29, 2013 Valid for five years

HABITAT CONSERVATION Modified version of the FWS habitat standard Implement 0.5 mile core areas around AC’s Retain designated NSO habitat in abiotically favorable locations within core areas and watershed Implement standard seasonal restrictions and disturbance buffers for nesting birds

NSO SURVEYS Annual surveys completed since early 90’s Annually complete over 1200 station visits Completed 1,344 station visits in 2013

SURVEY PROTOCOL Adhere to the 2012 Survey Protocol Conduct six-visits out to 1.3 miles Conduct walk-ins to known Activity Centers Conduct follow-ups to determine location of nest or roost sites, and breeding status Determine reproductive output of our monitoring birds

SURVEY EFFORT Surveys are completed by in-house staff Two biologists and one technician All with relevant four-year degrees Over 25 years combined experience

OWL NUMBERS 55 known AC’s located within 0.5 miles of the ownership

NSO ACTIVITY CENTERS WITHIN 1.3 MILES OF MCTC

OWL NUMBERS - Cont. In 2012, we reviewed all available NSO data for the 55 AC’s dating back to 2000 Included review of all NSO data forms, the State database, our in-house GIS database, and data provided by adjacent landowners Compiled data into a matrix, showing the status of each AC by year, if it was surveyed

OWL NUMBERS – Cont. Excluded data for an AC for a given year under the following circumstances: Single nighttime only detections Sites where barred owls were detected Sites where data was not provided Sites that were not surveyed

OWL NUMBERS – Cont. Occupancy data of the 55 owl sites located within 0.5 miles of the MCTC ownership between 2000 and 2013.  YEAR    00  01  02  03  04  05  06  07  08  09 10   11  12 13 Mean # of Sites Surveyed 31 35 34 33 28 30 29 25 26 32 24 29.85 # of confirmed adult owls 21 36 27 15 23 22 18 Mean #owls/site surveyed 0.68 1.17 1.16 0.79 0.77 0.88 0.89 0.83 0.60 0.72 0.92 .72 0.86 # of sites occupied by ≥1 owls 11 20 17 16 14 8 12 % of sites surveyed occupied by ≥1 owls  35% 67% 65% 50% 43% 48% 46% 47% 32% 52%

MONITORING BIRDS Six original monitoring birds specified in the 2007 SOMP Nine monitoring birds in the 2013 SOMP All but one are located on MCTC Survey and obtain reproductive status on at least 5 each year

MCTC MONITORING SITES CAID 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 *SK012 NS 2 SK051 NT SK152 NCASI 1 unk SK391 SK493 SK541 SK542 SK549 BO SK553 # of NSO's 8 11 14 12 13 16 10 2= pair, 1 = single, 0 = no owls detected, NT = nighttime detection only, BO = barred owl NS = not surveyed, NCASI = NCASI telemetry study, UNK = unknown strix *SK012 is not located on the MCTC Ownership

SUMMARY Based on review of available data associated with the 55 known activity centers located within 0.5 miles of the MCTC ownership, we have concluded that our owl population is dynamic, yet stable. Specific site occupancy is variable for some sites, while others show high levels of consistency Barred owls have displaced one of our monitoring sites, forcing the NSOs to relocate further up the drainage.