Investigating Macroeconomic Determinants of Happiness in Transition Countries: How Important is Government Expenditure? Lena Malešević Perović and Silvia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Labour quality and ICT capital skill complementarity: International comparisons Mary OMahony NIESR.
Advertisements

The Effect of Disability on Personal Quality of Primary Care Received by Older Adults Chun-Ju Hsiao, PhD, MHS AcademyHealth Disability Research Interest.
SHAPING TODAY THOSE WHO WILL SHAPE TOMORROW. Differentiation in Higher Education: Does a Background in Economics improve performance? Dr Chris Jones &
Inequality, Poverty and Globalisation in OIC Countries: A Dynamic Comparative Analysis Muhammad Tariq Majeed PhD Student University of Glasgow, UK
Division of Domestic Labour and Women s Human Capital ESRC Gender Equality Network Project 4: Gender, Time Allocation and the Wage Gap Jonathan Gershuny.
Household Savings and Wealth Effect: Evidence from Great Britain.
Explaining exits from unemployment in the UK, Labour Force User Meeting - 2 nd December 2010 Peter Stam Household Labour Market and Developments.
What would you use the data for? Straightforward secondary analysis –To assess theoretical accounts –To quantify characteristics or behaviours –To challenge.
FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPOBLIC OF ETHIOPIA CENTRAL STATISTICAL AGENCY GENDER STATISTICS HANDBOOK 2005/2012.
European Integration and Economic Growth: A Counterfactual Analysis
Tertiary Education The State of Education Series March 2013 A Global Report.
ACHPER NSW OPTION 3 INDIVIDUALS AND WORK 2009.
Micro-perspectives on Immigrant Welfare in Greece: a case study Dr. Effie Fokas 15 January 2008.
Investigating Macroeconomic Determinants of Happiness in Transition Countries: How Important is Government Expenditure? by L. M. Perovic and S. Golem Discussant:
Roma minority in Croatia today Josip Nakić Alfirević, prof. Open University Koprivnica Tallinn, X 2009.
Marriage, Money and Happiness By Ted Goertzel Rutgers University, Camden NJ Spring, 2004.
Eastern Europe: Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Russia, Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Macedonia, Albania, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Slovenia,
Young people in the Labour Market – Slovenia in the EU Perspective Milan Vodopivec (with Suzana Laporšek) Prepared for the Conference “Managing Macroeconomic.
International Telecommunication Union Employment and Productivity in the CEE Telecommunication Sector ITU Regional Workshop on HR Management Tools and.
Cross-national Differences in Public Consent to Divorce Effects of Cultural, Structural and Individual Factors Dr. John Gelissen Department of Methodology.
Hungary & the Czech Republic Kenny Watson May 17, 2005.
WPIX – Development of Scenarios for Health Expenditure in the Accession Economies, Stanisława Golinowska, Ewa Kocot, Agnieszka Sowa based on country reports.
Trends in educational homogamy in Central European Countries between 1976 and 2003 Tomáš Katrňák Faculty of Social Studies Masaryk University Brno
Environment and Happiness: New Evidence for Spain Juncal Cuñado Fernando Pérez de Gracia (University of Navarra) * Financial support from the Ministerio.
By Sanjay Kumar, Ph.D National Programme Officer (M&E), UNFPA – India
Presented By: Dr. Ehsan Latif School of Business and Economics Thompson Rivers University, BC, Canada.
1 Comparative overview of labour market characteristics: South Eastern Europe and the EU Alena Nesporova Regional Office for Europe ILO Geneva.
LABOUR INSTITUTE FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH Characteristics and labour market performance of East-European immigrants in Finland, Germany, the Netherlands and.
1 “Need for a Flexible Labor Market in Bulgaria” Annual National Forum of the Bulgarian Association for Management and Development of the Human Resources.
Facing the challenge of increasing women’s participation on the European labour market NEUJOBS WORKING PAPER NO. D16.2C Agnieszka Chłoń-Domińczak Agnieszka.
Academy of Economic Studies Doctoral School of Finance and Banking Determinants of Current Account for Central and Eastern European Countries MSc Student:
CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE Na padesátém 81, CZ Praha 10, Czech Republic Bled, 29 – 30 June 2006 Czech Statistical Office Prague, Czech.
Larry Chavis, Kenan-Flagler Business School, UNC Chapel Hill Leora Klapper, The World Bank Inessa Love, The World Bank Entrepreneurial Finance around the.
WHY Hungary? WHAT in Hungary? Gergely Mikola Chairman, British Chamber of Commerce in Hungary Director of Corporate and Regulatory Affairs in CEE, BAT.
Evaluating Economic Performance after Twenty Years of Transition in Central and Eastern Europe Andrew Harrison Teesside University Business School.
Old, Sick and Alone ? Living arrangements, health and well- being among older people RGS-IBG Annual International Conference London, 2006 Harriet Young.
MEDIA Salles an initiative of the MEDIA Programme of the European Union with the support of the Italian Government “The economic potential of the cinema.
European Integration, Productivity Growth and Real Convergence: Evidence from the New Member States Ali M. Kutan and Taner M. Yigit Kutan – Southern Illinois.
A Test Of Okun’s Law for 10 Eastern European Countries London Metropolitan University Department of Economics, Finance and International Business Tom Boulton.
Living arrangements, health and well-being: A European Perspective UPTAP Meeting 21 st March 2007 Harriet Young and Emily Grundy London School of Hygiene.
GENDER SPECIFICITY AND GENDER BUDGETING IN BULGARIA: SOCIO AND ECONOMIC ASPECTS GENDER SPECIFICITY AND GENDER BUDGETING IN BULGARIA: SOCIO AND ECONOMIC.
Odds and Ends for Girls ENWISE report Statistics on Higher Education.
Determinants of household wealth and indebtedness in Slovakia Teresa Messner & Tibor Zavadil National Bank of Slovakia 11 June 2014 NBS research seminar.
EASTERN EUROPE Dominated by the USSR until 1990 Europe’s Poorest Region Influenced by Russia political and economic instability common.
1 Development of total loans (in % of GDP) Year-end figures, * forecast Source: BA-CA Economics Department % CEE*... excl. Russia and Ukraine CEE total...
Living arrangements, health and well-being: A European Perspective UPTAP-ONS Meeting Southampton University 19 th December 2007 Harriet Young and Emily.
Ivan MiklošOktóber 2007 Slovakia: A story of reforms.
EU Countries with Flat tax system Lithuania24% Latvia25% Estonia22% Slovakia19% Bulgaria(from 1 January)10% Romania16%
THE SIZE AND DETERMINANTS OF THE UNOFFICIAL ECONOMY IN CROATIA Prepared by Davor Mikulić Zagreb, Semptember
Is it Worth to Study Two Majors? The Case of Poland Dominik Buttler Education and Work: (Un-) equal Transitions Sofia, September 2015.
… if not us, then who? With special thanks to Jakub Zowczak for inputs and Monika Swaczyna for comments Transition in CEE – a comparative analysis Kamil.
Computer Class – Summer 20092/21/2016 3:45 AM European Countries Albania Andorra Austria Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Czech.
Bosnia & Herzegovina Gap Analysis Monitoring Country Progress Team Strategic Planning and Analysis Division Program Office E&E Bureau December 2015.
Determinants of women’s labor force participation and economic empowerment in Albania Juna Miluka University of New York Tirana September, 14, 2015.
ЗДОРОВЪЕ SHENDET здоров'я ЗДРАВЉЕ ZDRAWIE ZDRAVLJE ZDRAVÍ ЗДОРОВЪЕ Pregnancy Outcomes Among Immigrant Women from Eastern Europe and the CIS in New York.
Statistical data on women entrepreneurs in Europe Jacqueline Snijders 11 October 2014.
Lena Malesevic Teaching assistant at the Faculty of Economics Split, Croatia PhD student at Staffordshire University, UK Investigating non-linearities.
Notes: aEmerging Europe here includes the Baltics (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania) and central and eastern Europe (the Czech Republic, Hungary,
Tax Reform in Croatia Mark Gallagher.
The big enlargement: healing the division of Europe
Arsena Gjipali, PhD Faculty of Business and Economics
Kenneth Nelson Professor of sociology
The European Parliament – voice of the people
The European Parliament – voice of the people
Eastern Europe and Central Asia Brain Drain – Patterns and Issues
EU: First- & Second-Generation Immigrants
Global Summit of Women Warsaw, Poland
Red to Gray. Red to Gray % Population Decrease, million 17 million 12 million.
FIGURE 11.1 GDP and the Circular Flow
The big enlargement: uniting east and west
Presentation transcript:

Investigating Macroeconomic Determinants of Happiness in Transition Countries: How Important is Government Expenditure? Lena Malešević Perović and Silvia Golem University of Split, Faculty of Economics Dubrovnik, 24 June 2009

Introduction - happiness functions “Taking all things together, would you say you are: 1 – very happy, 2 – quite happy, 3 – not very happy, 4 – not at all happy”. General form:

Literature review - micro variables Happiness is higher for: women; married people; more educated people; those with higher income; the young and the old (U-shaped in age) and the self-employed.

Literature review - macro variables Rarely analysed; Usually included variables: inflation, GDP, unemployment, government expenditure; Di Tella et al. (2001) find that people would trade-off a 1 percentage point increase in the unemployment rate for a 1.7 percentage point decrease in the inflation rate.

Literature review - government expenditure Bjornskov et al. (2007): find a negative relationship between life satisfaction and government consumption spending in a cross-section of 74, mainly developed, countries. Kacapyr (2008): finds that the ratio of government spending to GDP is statistically insignificant determinant of life satisfaction in the cross-country sample of 63 countries. Ram (2009): finds a positive relationship between government consumption and happiness employing a broad(er) cross-country sample of transition, developed, African and Latin American countries.

Our approach to including macro variables in happiness equation Unemployment; Inflation; GDP; Government expenditure.

Empirical analysis Analysed countries: Albania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Macedonia (Central and Eastern European Countries). Micro data: World Values Survey - waves 3, 4 and 5; Macro data: World Development Indicators; The model we use is:

The results - general 0.00079* Inflation (0.095) -0.0014 Unemployment Education No formal education Reference Incomplete primary school -0.0046 (0.528) Complete primary school 0.0114 (0.317) Incomplete secondary school 0.0022** (0.050) Complete secondary school 0.0375*** (0.004) Some university-level education without degree 0.0635*** (0.000) University-level education with degree 0.0855*** (0.001) Employment status Full time Part time -0.0042 (0.522) Self employed -0.0026 (0.690) Unemployed -0.0399*** Out of the labour force (OLF) -0.0083* (0.056) Scale of income 1 or 2 3 or 4 0.0063 (0.320) 5 or 6 0.0158 (0.127) 7 or 8 0.021 (0.109) 9 or 10 0.039** (0.033) Country dummies  Wave dummies Variable Marginal effects Inflation 0.00079* (0.095) Unemployment -0.0014 (0.483) GDP per capita -5.49e-06 (0.202) General government expenditure 0.0093** (0.013) General government expenditure squared -0.00021** (0.021) Demographic variables Male dummy -0.0082*** (0.002) Age -0.0069*** (0.000) Age squared 0.0005*** Marital status Married Reference Divorced -0.0540*** Separated -0.0492*** Widowed -0.0475*** Single -0.0332***

Marginal effect on macroeconomic variables in different combinations 1 2 3 Inflation 0.00048 (0.279) Unemployment -0.00036 (0.852) GDP per capita -1.45e-07 (0.971) General government expenditure 0.0105*** (0.007) 0.01044** (0.027) 0.01051** General government expenditure squared -0.00023** (0.018) -0.00022* (0.063) (0.058) Socio-demographic variables  Country dummies Wave dummies

Marginal effects for different values of macro and micro variables Macro variables at sample mean Macro variables at 2007 averages Successful woman + 2007 averages Unsuccessful man + 2007 averages Inflation 0.00079* (0.095) 0.00041* (0.090) 0.00232* (0.075) 0.00006* (0.088) Unemployment -0.0014 (0.483) -0.00071 (0.500) -0.0041 (0.487) -0.00010 (0.495) GDP per capita -5.49e-06 (0.202) -2.84e-06 (0.149) -0.000016 (0.171) -4.19e-07 (0.136) General government expenditure 0.0093** (0.013) 0.0048*** (0.005) 0.0274** (0.011) 0.00071*** (0.008) General government expenditure squared -0.00021** (0.021) -0.00011** (0.009) -0.00062** (0.016) -0.00001** (0.015) Socio-demographic variables  Country dummies Wave dummies

Conclusion Government expenditure significantly and non-linearly influences happiness in transition countries; Successful women vs. unsuccessful men;