The changing relation between the NREN and the government in Hungary Bálint Lajos, NIIF Institute TERENA TF-MSP meeting Alcala de Henares, 6-7 May 2013
Nemzeti Információs Infrastruktúra Fejlesztési Intézet NIIFI and the government TF-MSP 6-7 May 2013 Alcala 2 Contents NIIFI & Hungarnet status and history Embedding and wider environment Recent overall changes in Hungary Recent overall changes in NREN roles / functions Warning signals to NRENs in Europe The bomb in Hungary at late 2010 NIIFI’s fight for freedom and liberty Final (?) outcome early 2013 Advantages and disadvantages Lessons to learn
Nemzeti Információs Infrastruktúra Fejlesztési Intézet NIIFI and the government TF-MSP 6-7 May 2013 Alcala 3 NIIFI & HungarNet status and history NIIF Institute o top-down hierarchy o government control, funding (100 % … 50 %) o independent execution (development & operation) HungarNet o bottom-up hierarchy o membership control, no funding o independent representation of user interest status o independent legal entities o close cooperation, joint actions history periodic fighting for survival (changing governments …) alternate focus on NIIFI or HungarNet – depending on risks
Nemzeti Információs Infrastruktúra Fejlesztési Intézet NIIFI and the government TF-MSP 6-7 May 2013 Alcala 4 Embedding and wider environment Government control and funding of NIIFI Changing umbrella ministry in every 4 year (Education, Industry, Economy … Academy … Development) Repeated informal govt. testing of NIIFI loyalty and fairness Repeated trial of discontinuing / commercialising / merging NIIFI Central funding increased until late 90’s, decreasing since then Changing relations to commercial operators (partnership / competition) Technology and macro market (since TEN-34) Micro market (10K … 700K … 2500K users) Good luck: Definite continuous willingness of keeping political neutrality Single organisation (NIIFI) comprising complete e-Infrastructure (networking, grids, clouds, HPC, VRC, data …)
Nemzeti Információs Infrastruktúra Fejlesztési Intézet NIIFI and the government TF-MSP 6-7 May 2013 Alcala 5 Recent overall changes Recent overall changes in Hungary o General elections every 4 years (latest: Mid-2010, abs.majority) o Intention of increasing government control o Deprivatisation, mergers … decreasing freedom in operations Recent overall changes in NREN roles / functions Vertical opening (new e-Infrastructure functions, wider portfolio) Horizontal opening (widening user community: govt., health, PPP) Changing attitude / habit (focus on innovation, friendliness …) Changing priorities (sustainability, stability, business models) Warning signals to NRENs in Europe RoEduNet, FuNet, FCCN … (govt. reactions to crisis etc.) different responses (from fighting to resignation …)
Nemzeti Információs Infrastruktúra Fejlesztési Intézet NIIFI and the government TF-MSP 6-7 May 2013 Alcala 6 The late 2010 bomb in Hungary Draft Government Decree 346/2010: Intention of integrating all public ICT functions (govt., taxation, army, police, fire brigade, ambulance, …) NIIFI among the involved organisations (!) Fight for jointly acceptable / agreeable solution (freedom & liberty): Immediate start early 2011 NIIFI not alone trying to escape Dozens of actions during : o letters, discussions o modification requests, suggested alternative text versions Our major weapons (references): International relations (eligibility), projects (contracts), funds (eg.SF) Internal responsibilities (research, education), risks (degradation) HungarNet in the background
Nemzeti Információs Infrastruktúra Fejlesztési Intézet NIIFI and the government TF-MSP 6-7 May 2013 Alcala 7 Final (?) outcome early 2013 Background parallel happenings: Discontinued ICT support by incumbent (govt. intention) Plans for separate govt.network on MVM DF background (el.comp.) NIIFI discussions with MVM on DF IRU Outcome: NIIFI CEF DWDM optical backbone on MVM DF NIIFI equipment + NIIFI mgmt. – free capacity (60%) offered to MVM MVM free capacity (managed by NIIFI) offered to govt. (expertise!) Independent NIIFI operation, limited contribution to govt.backbone Additional elements of the early 2013 solution: Schoolnet (Sulinet in Hungary) overtaken by NIIFI (5000 / 1,8M) Community net (Koznet in Hungary) of libraries, e-Hungary nodes too Modified 346/2010 (on govt.networks) govt.decree approved Modified 5/2011 (on NIIFI) govt.decree approved
Nemzeti Információs Infrastruktúra Fejlesztési Intézet NIIFI and the government TF-MSP 6-7 May 2013 Alcala 8 Advantages and disavantages + Lessons Of course nothing is perfect … Advantages: o stable e-Infrastructure o promising sustainability Disadvantages: o staff shortage o Jolly Joker functions o horizontal opening questionable (children rather than innovators) Lessons learned / to learn: ”never give up” ”be continuously alerted” ”act/react immediately” and ”apply your weapons” ”try to keep political independence”
Nemzeti Információs Infrastruktúra Fejlesztési Intézet NIIFI and the government TF-MSP 6-7 May 2013 Alcala 9 Here we are at the moment … Challenging but difficult … Difficult but challenging …