Teacher Empowerment Exploring alternate evaluation paradigms. Or are we “locked out” of meaningful change?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The E-Mentee Guide to Beginning Teaching Success Welcome to the Project REACH E-Mentorship.
Advertisements

Sam Redding Center on Innovation & Improvement DRILLING DOWN ON LEADERSHIP AND INSTRUCTION.
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
PACESetters! Alternative Teacher Evaluation
Developing the Learning Contract
TEACHER EVALUATIONS TEACHER EVALUATIONS An Orientation/Training Guide to the Eight Performance Appraisal Job Context Service Headings August, 2008.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Strand C – In Depth. Competencies 8 and 9: The teacher demonstrates a willingness to examine and implement change, as appropriate. The teacher works productively.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
Who Put “Instructional Monitoring” On My To Do List? Suggestions for Principals M. Ann Levett, Ed.D.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Effective Management of Teaching and Learning
McRel’s Evaluation System Training Session 1 May 14, 2013 Herbert Hoover Middle School.
California Standards for the Teaching Profession
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
Mathematics Strategy: Grades Primary–6 Mathematics: Home-School Communication Resource.
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
What should be the basis of
1 SESSION 1 using The New Performance Standards and New VDOE Requirements
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Principles of Assessment
Jack C Richards Professional Development for Language Teachers: Strategies for Teacher Learning Jack C Richards & Thomas.
Clinical Teaching/Student Teaching
Iowa Teaching Standards, Criteria and Evidence
Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.
Differentiated Supervision
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Collaborative Instructional Leader Becoming a collaborative instructional leader.
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition Forrest W. Parkay Chapter 13 Becoming a Professional Teacher Parkay ISBN: © 2013, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education,
Math Liaison Meeting September 2014 Presenter: Simi Minhas, Math Achievement Coach Network 204.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Siena Heights University Graduate Teacher Education REFLECTIVE PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO OF CONTINUOUS PROGRESS for Ima Student Last updated: Fall 2009.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
DEVELOPING PORTFOLIOS in the Concurrent Practicum Program.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Activity Planning and Assessment
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 Lesson Study Presented by: Darliny G. Katz, Instructional Reading Specialist Florida.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
ALYSSA HOLZHAUSEN EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP 325 SPRING 2013 IT Portfolio.
Standard 1 School Library Media Coordinators Demonstrate Leadership Staff development documentation Newsletters Conference documentation Websites School.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
College of Education Graduate Programs
What Are the Characteristics of an Effective Portfolio? By Jay Barrett.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Pioneer Career and Technology Center, Shelby, Ohio Targeted Training For Master Teacher Criteria.
Inclusive Practices: Co- Teaching Indiana IEP Resource Center.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Office of Service Quality
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
College of Education Graduate Programs Portfolio Workshop.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.
School Library Management Sunil MV SDM Institute for Management Development
1 Expanded ADEPT Support and Evaluation System Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty.
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
FEAPs (Florida Educator Accomplished Practices)
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Empowerment Exploring alternate evaluation paradigms. Or are we “locked out” of meaningful change?

Stop! Is there a better paradigm?

Question: Why do we evaluate?

Monitor School Quality? Yes “Weed out” incompetents? No! Promote Teacher Quality Yes!

Sounds like “motherhood and apple pie” to me OK, describe a “good” teacher.

Possesses the “Gift.” Some are born with the gift of teaching. NO Knows The Subject Matter Teachers should come credentialed and prepared NO Possesses Teaching Skills Teachers who can practice the craft Yes If evaluator knows how to effectively coach and mentor.

Has Productive Attitudes Teachers who possess the following: –Self-efficacy (“can do” attitude) –Collaborative spirit –Willingness –Enthusiasm –Other Can evaluation help? Good Question!!

The Teacher Empowerment Paradigm  Empower teachers to self-supervise.  Empower teachers to be responsible for their own evaluation.  Is this possible and still maintain accountability?

Two dimensions  Formative (classroom observations)  Summative (year-end evaluations)

Classroom Observations and Teacher Empowerment

Guidelines 1. Collaborate with Teacher 2. Establish Purpose or Focus 3. Determine Method Teacher driven Supervisor driven

The Video During filming, concentrate on In the critique, concentrate on focus or goal

Teacher driven video episode 1. Teacher may be in charge of self- videoing: Use tripod Another individual records the video (student or adult volunteer) Teacher sends a copy of video and self- critique form to the evaluator

Scenarios  Traditional supervisor observation  Supervisor makes video – collaborative critique  Teacher makes video –Remakes? –Sends to supervisor?

Formalizing a Video Episode 1. Teacher views video and responds on self- critique form 2. Supervisor views video that has been copied and mailed 3. Supervisor critiques focused objective 4. When Critique form arrives, evaluator compares his/her notes with teacher’s and finalizes comments on the focused objective to add to the summative evaluation for that year.

Some examples

Summative Evaluation and Teacher Empowerment

Professional Portfolio Teachers will provide documentation showing their attainment of the performance standards.

ACCOUNTABILITY Accountability has to be a part of a system. The basis for accountability are Performance Standards Every employing organization should have in place a set of expected professional performance standards for all teachers

The SYSTEM  Administrator and teacher collaboratively develop: –Professional development plan for the year –Plan for the collection of appropriate documented evidence  Teacher collects and organizes the portfolio  Culminating opportunity for each teacher to showcase his/her portfolio

System overview School Term Planning Phase Professional goals Professional Plans Evidence to be collected Formative Phase Evidence Professional Activities Organization of Evidence (Portfolio) Summative Phase Portfolio Presentation Summary Documents

Evaluation Models - Applications  Professional Teacher –Teacher-empowerment paradigm  Teacher with specific needs. –Teacher-empowerment paradigm; plan for professional goals and documentation developed collaboratively  New teacher; Teacher with difficulties –Traditional “top-down” evaluation; teacher begins portfolio development

Culmination Activity Summative Evaluation  Teacher Fair  Each teacher with booth and exhibits  Opportunity for teachers to learn from each other  Invite parents? board?

Portfolio Document Ideas:  Bullock, A. and Hawk, P. (2001). Developing a teaching portfolio. Prentice-Hall.C  Campbell, D. and others (1997). How to develop a professional portfolio. Allyn and Bacon.   tips.phtml/43

National Board Certification  Teacher’s Guide to National Board Certification. –Unpacking the standards  National Board Certification Workbook. –How to prepare your portfolio.

 Ileana Espinosa, Associate Superintendent Examples

Dimensions of Performance Standards 1. Instruction 2. Environment 3. Curriculum 4. Professionalism 5. Community Relations 6. Other responsibilities 7. More?

 Copies of lesson plans demonstrating (a) higher level thinking, (b) varieties of instructional strategies, (c) cooperative learning, (d) multiple intelligences  Samples of student work  Sample of teacher feedback  Photos of learning activities/field trips  Student projects (group and individual)  OTHER?

2 Environment  Photos of classroom, bulletin boards, etc.  Notes from parents, students, others.  Copies of classroom management documents. Rules, discipline plan, etc.  Copies of documents produced by students related to student government  Copy of discipline philosophy  OTHER?

3 Curriculum  Copies of instructional plans, (a) daily, (b) unit, (c) yearly  Copies of grading rubrics used  Samples of tests  Information about parent-conferences  Copies of I.E.P’s and policies regarding S.S.T’s  Student portfolios  OTHER?

4 Professionalism  Materials from conferences or conventions attended  Documents demonstrating professional memberships  Evidence of participation in school leadership projects  Copy of personal mission statement  Letters from colleagues, administrators  Copies of articles published or convention presentations  OTHER?

5 Community Relations  Documents or photos illustrating church related projects  Newsletters published  Samples of letters used for parent communication  Products from committees served or led  Letter(s) from local pastor(s) or community leaders  Photos from church or other community projects  OTHER?

Thanks!!! A blue ribbon for forward thinking

Thanks!!! A blue ribbon for forward thinking