Study of Teacher Induction in MSPs Edward (Ted) Britton, PI WestEd Tania Madfes, Sr. Researcher WestEd Ralph Putnam, Sr. Researcher Michigan State U

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Commission: Mentoring and Induction Progress and Dissemination of Commission Sandra J. Odell, Professor (Commission Chair) University of Nevada Las Vegas.
Advertisements

Perspectives on Learning Seminar Myra A Pearson Head of School of Education 18 March 2008.
Pedagogic Research The Nature of Cross-Cultural Teaching and Learning
Research on Effective Professional Development Iris Weiss.
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/18/2008 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.
GEAR UP Idaho  GEAR UP Idaho is a federal grant program that provides comprehensive, early intervention college access programming to selected Idaho.
EU Schools Policy focuses on: Equity, Learner Competences, Staff.
Preparing Teachers: Building Evidence for Sound Policy.
Math and Science Partnership National Science Foundation FY’06 Institute Partnerships  Focus on:  Development of school-based intellectual leaders and.
Building the Continuum: Beginning Teacher Research Julie Luft Arizona State University.
Center For Technology in Learning SRI International Investigating the Cumulative Impacts of Educational Technology Barbara Means, Mary Wagner, Geneva Haertel.
Simmons/NCTAF; March 27, 2007 Designing Comprehensive Induction: Subject-Specific, US and International Examples Edward (Ted) Britton, WestEd; Lynn Paine,
An Example of a Large Induction Project: The Minnesota Career and Technical Education Teacher Induction Program (CTE-TIP): A Pilot Project for the ‘06-’07.
2011 Proposal Writing Workshop Part II: Features of Effective Proposals.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
This work was supported in part by MSP grant # through the National Science Foundation. Opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily.
Major Issues in Science Education—2005 Michael Padilla President, National Science Teachers Association
COMMON CORE Standards and Strategies Flip Chart
Developing the Next Generation Science Standards.
1 Developing an Evaluation Plan _____________________ The Mathematically- Connected Communities MSP Developed for the February, MSP Conference Dr.
ABLE State Update Jeff Gove, State ABLE Director.
Insights from the ASMS experience – 10 years of innovation in a new learning environment Graeme Oliver & Jayne Heath.
1 Tennessee Board of Regents Teacher Education Redesign: The University Teaching Residency.
The National Science Foundation’s Math and Science Partnership (MSP) Program James E. Hamos, Ph.D., Elizabeth VanderPutten, Ph.D., Kathleen Bergin, Ph.D.
Professional Learning Communities in STEM Teaching 2009 DRK-12 PI Conference November 9, :45pm – 3:00pm Kathleen Fulton, NCTAF Ted Britton, West.
Enhancing your Teaching and Developing New Leadership: Impact of the On the Cutting Edge Professional Development Program Ellen Iverson, Cathy Manduca,
Examining the Induction of Middle School Mathematics Teachers Kristin L. McGraner Research Associate Peabody College, Vanderbilt University Supported by.
RESEARCH EDUCATION OUTCOME AND CAPABILITIES Results of groupwork, point 5 on the agenda.
To support the improvement of research, evaluation and development in STEM education; and To move forward the goals of the NSF and its DR K–12 program.
The Integrated STEM Experience The Science 120 Learning Community.
Research Indicators for Sustaining and Institutionalizing Change CaMSP Network Meeting April 4 & 5, 2011 Sacramento, CA Mikala L. Rahn, PhD Public Works,
Issues for Researchers Allan Feldman, UMass Amherst Jodie Galosy, Michigan State U Carole Mitchener, U of Illinois Chicago STEM Alternative Certification.
Michigan MSPs June 2007 Wendy Tackett, PhD, iEval
1 Early career teacher induction: Literacy middle years Workshop 2 Literacy teaching and the four resources framework Workshop 2 Early career teacher induction:
The Growing Need for Beginning Teacher Induction Richard M. Ingersoll Professor of Education and Sociology University of Pennsylvania and Consortium for.
Program Evaluation Update. Program Impact Campuses Served by TRC.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Preparing Every Child for the 21 st Century: What can teachers do? Partnership for 21 st Century Skills Nevada Department of Education Stateline, Nevada.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships, Title II, Part B, NCLB.
1 August 22, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D, Assistant Commissioner Division of Educational Standards and Programs SURVEY RESULTS OF THE HIGHLY QUALIFIED.
Meeting the Teacher Quality Imperative: New Evidence on Teacher Induction and Professional Development ————————— October 30, 2008 Charles Sumner School.
Hong Qian, PhD Student Peter Youngs, Associate Professor Michigan State University Presentation to Global Education Group February 16, 2011 The Influence.
Math and Science Partnership Program Approaches to State Longitudinal Evaluation March 21, 2011 San Francisco MSP Regional Meeting Patty O’Driscoll Public.
TLPL 101 (Step 1) & Terrapin Teachers terrapinteachers.umd.edu © UM Terrapin Teachers.
Using Data to Guide Decision-Making and Continuous Improvement.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships program U.S. Department of Education Regional Conferences February - March, 2006.
Secondary Teacher Education in Chile An assessment in the light of demands of the knowledge society.
Sharon M. Livingston, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Director of Assessment Department of Education LaGrange College LaGrange, GA GaPSC Regional Assessment.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Leveraging Federal Resources: Teacher Quality, Research, and Program Improvement Peggi Zelinko Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII) Robert Ochsendorf.
York St John University | School Direct one year on: implementation and evaluation Keither Parker.
Special Education Teacher Preparation Program Improvement Grants (325T) Bonnie D. Jones, Ed. D. Education Program Specialist Office of Special Education.
Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why teach middle school math or elementary school with a math emphasis? Young people need teachers who help them conceptualize.
Moving on from Carter: the content, level and coverage of ITE programmes UCET conference 2015.
Archived Information. © 2003 NCEE 2 What is the America’s Choice School Design? Comprehensive —Includes all elements that affect student learning Research-Based.
World Bank (Department of Education) Teacher Policies: Supply, Training, Professional Development, Incentives Juan Manuel Moreno The World Bank Regional.
1 Presentation to the MDE Teacher Evaluation Work Group June 28, 2012 December 6, 2011.
SC ATE Center of Excellence and National Resource Center for Expanding Excellence in Technician Education Florence-Darlington Technical College.
Evaluation Questions 1.How did the professional development training workshops impact teachers’ knowledge-base and pedagogy in the classroom? 2.How did.
立足学生认知 实 实现知识转化 永嘉中学 肖飞燕. 困惑 1 困惑 1 ：听懂 不会做 困惑 2 困惑 2 ：物理越教越难教 ●教学的困惑 立足学生认知 进行有效教学.
Meeting the highly qualified teacher challenge. USDOE - Continued emphasis on equitable distribution OESE priority (of 3): Teacher quality, equity and.
1 Teaching Teachers Mathematics May 30 - June 1, 2007 Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Workshop sponsored by Mathematical Sciences Research Institute,
The Work of the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership DeAnn Huinker Kevin McLeod UW-Milwaukee Ningbo University (China) Delegation Higher Education Workshop.
Stimulating Research and Innovation for Preservice Education of STEM Teachers in High-Need Schools W. James Lewis Deputy Assistant Director, Education.
Induction and Mentoring
A Systematic Review of Discourse’s Outcomes
Teacher Development Group discussion.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
EADM 730 Politics, Legislative Action and Educational Change
Presentation transcript:

Study of Teacher Induction in MSPs Edward (Ted) Britton, PI WestEd Tania Madfes, Sr. Researcher WestEd Ralph Putnam, Sr. Researcher Michigan State U

Overarching Questions What are the subject-specific needs of beginning mathematics and science teachers (versus those of secondary teachers in other subject areas?) How can teacher induction programs address such needs, and to what effect? MSP Key Feature: teacher quality, quantity, diversity

Research Plan Longitudinal field-work at MSPs that address teacher induction; Focus on about 6 MSPs in Cohorts 1 and 2 (and maybe one in Cohort 3) Includes a case study of e-mentoring of novice science teachers (MSP grant of NSTA w/ Montana State and UC Santa Cruz) Teacher quality, quantity, diversity

Research Plan (cont’d) Address emerging hypothesis about subject- specific aspects of teacher induction Includes emphasis on impacts of programs For example: teacher retention teacher knowledge (content, pck) teacher practices student outcomes Teacher quality, quantity, diversity

Synergistic Activities

Math and Science Teacher Induction in Five Countries 1.France 2.Japan 3.New Zealand 4.Shanghai 5.Switzerland

Comprehensive Teacher Induction: Systems for Early Career Learning Britton, E., Paine, L., Pimm, D. and Raizen, S. Kluwer Academic Publishers and WestEd

Design Framework for Math and Science Teacher Induction in the U.S. WestEd Edward Britton, PI Tania Madfes Michigan State Lynn Paine, Co-PI Steve Ryan Suzanne Wilson Based on case studies of 7 U.S. teacher induction programs

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.