Preparing for 2014-2015. Learning Objectives Review the TAPS component of the Cobb Keys for Teacher Effectiveness Explore the Teacher Performance Standards.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Form of Our Own: Guidelines-Based Assessment of Teacher-Librarians
Advertisements

SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
The Teacher Work Sample
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System
The SCPS Professional Growth System
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
“RACE TO THE TOP” UPDATE – TKES/LKES & THE G.O.L.D. ACADEMY SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 BOE STUDY SESSION Dan Ray, Ed.S. Director – “Race to the Top” Henry County.
1 SESSION 3 FORMAL ASSESSMENT TASKS CAT and IT ASSESSMENT TOOLS.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System 0 August 2012.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
McRel’s Evaluation System Training Session 1 May 14, 2013 Herbert Hoover Middle School.
Day 2: Learning and Teaching Session 2: Recording Evidence NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Marzano Causal Model: A Framework for Teaching and Learning
Student Learning Objectives Overview. Defining SLOS A vital component of the Teacher Keys and Leader Keys Effectiveness System is Student Growth and Academic.
Integration: LDC/MDC Strategies & the Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) SREB August 26, 2013 KDE Effectiveness Coaches, Rebecca.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Connections to the TPGES Framework for Teaching Domains Student Growth Peer Observation Professional Growth Planning Reflection.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
New Teacher Performance Evaluation Program
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Differentiated Supervision
TEACHER KEYS EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM (TKES). WHY TKES? HOUSE BILL 244 Passed during 2013 legislative session Mandates use of single, state-wide evaluation.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Document Review STANDARDEVIDENCE Standard 1 - Professional KnowledgeDocumentation and Observation Standard 2 - Instructional PlanningDocumentation and.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits Simulation.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
The Danielson Framework ….how does this change things?
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Overview.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Performance Evaluation System Data Sources.
Primary Purposes of the Evaluation System
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC  Uniform evaluation system for teachers, educational.
Summative Jeopardy Summing Up Summative Decision- Making.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Write on sticky note, how you implemented the exit slip strategy. What does this tell you about your students?
Candidate Assessment of Performance CAP The Evidence Binder.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Teacher Orientation Training for teachers FY15 July 28,
Simulation 1 – Elementary School Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits.
Pre-Evaluation Conference Conducted August 18, 2015 STING Schedule.
Oconee Keys Training September, Oconee Keys is designed to: Evaluate classroom teachers using qualitative rubrics to assess instructional practices.
TKES and SLO assessments
Teacher Practice Instruments
Presentation transcript:

Preparing for

Learning Objectives Review the TAPS component of the Cobb Keys for Teacher Effectiveness Explore the Teacher Performance Standards Examine the rubric associated with each standard Discuss acceptable evidence for a proficient level of performance for each standard Review the use of Student Surveys of Instructional Practice

State of GeorgiaCobb County School District Teacher Keys Effectiveness System (TKES) Cobb Keys for Teacher Effectiveness (Cobb Keys) Leader Keys Effectiveness System (LKES) Cobb Keys for Leader Effectiveness (Cobb Keys)

Teacher Effectiveness System (Generates a Teacher Effectiveness Measure Score) Teacher Assessment on Performance Standards Data sources include observations, documentation and student perception surveys Student Growth and Academic Achievement Teachers of Tested Subjects Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Teachers of Non-Tested Subjects Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)

Teacher Effectiveness System (Generates a Teacher Effectiveness Measure Score) Teacher Assessment on Performance Standards Data sources include observations, documentation and student perception surveys Student Growth and Academic Achievement Teachers of Tested Subjects Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Teachers of Non-Tested Subjects Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) TAPS

TAPS TA PS TAPS T eacher A ssessment on P erformance S tandards Consists of ten teacher performance standards Requires two 30 minute observations/formative assessments Requires four 10 minute walk-throughs Requires student surveys of instructional practice in grades 3-12 Requires one summative assessment

Teacher Performance Standards PLANNING 1. Professional Knowledge 2. Instructional Planning INSTRUCTIONAL DELIVERY 3. Instructional Strategies 4. Differentiated Instruction ASSESSMENT OF AND FOR LEARNING 5. Assessment Strategies 6. Assessment Uses LEARNING ENVIRONMENT 7. Positive Learning Environment 8. Academically Challenging Environment PROFESSIONALISM AND COMMUNICATION 9. Professionalism 10. Communication 7 5 Domains 10 Standards

PLANNING Performance Standard 1: Professional Knowledge The teacher demonstrates an understanding of the curriculum, subject content, pedagogical knowledge, and the needs of students by providing relevant learning experiences. Sample Performance Indicators Examples may include, but are not limited to: The teacher: 1.1Addresses appropriate curriculum standards and integrates key content elements. 1.2Facilitates students’ use of higher-level thinking skills in instruction. 1.3Demonstrates ability to link present content with past and future learning experiences, other subject areas, and real-world experiences and applications. DOMAIN PERFORMANCE STANDARD PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Exemplary* In addition to meeting the requirements for Proficient… Proficient Proficient is the expected level of performance. Needs DevelopmentIneffective The teacher continually demonstrates extensive content and pedagogical knowledge, enriches the curriculum, and guides others in enriching the curriculum. (Teachers rated Exemplary continually seek ways to serve as role models or teacher leaders.) The teacher consistently demonstrates an understanding of the curriculum, subject content, pedagogical knowledge, and the needs of students by providing relevant learning experiences The teacher inconsistently demonstrates understanding of curriculum, subject content, pedagogical knowledge, and student needs, or lacks fluidity in using the knowledge in practice. The teacher inadequately demonstrates understanding of curriculum, subject content, pedagogical knowledge and student needs, or does not use the knowledge in practice. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RUBRIC 8 Crosswalk Activity

9 1.Work in PAIRS to identify similarities and differences between the new Teacher Performance Standards and our current Cobb Keys. 2. SHARE your conclusions with another pair.

Divide into groups: – GROUP A : Standards 1 & 2 – GROUP B : Standards 3 & 4 – GROUP C : Standards 5 & 6 – GROUP D : Standards 7 & 8 – GROUP E : Standards 9 & 10

Facilitating discussion: – Person with the shortest hair Recording on poster paper: – Person with the most buttons on his/her shirt Reporting out to group: – Person with the closest birthday (to today!)

 Examine your group’s assigned standard(s) and appraisal rubric  Identify and discuss the shifts in the levels of performance and underline those words/phrases that differentiate the levels STEP ONE:

List evidence would reflect a teacher assessment at the Proficient level for your group’s assigned standard(s). Examples of tangible or concrete documentation Examples of what you would SEE or HEAR during an observation _____ STEP TWO:

Compare your group’s generated list of evidence to the list of Performance Indicators:  Which ones are the same?  What did your group think of that is not included on the list of indicators?  What would you add to your list? STEP THREE:

Working collaboratively to create a ONE- PAGER around your group’s standard: name the standard list evidence of Proficient level that includes both observational data and concrete documentation include a visual image, symbol, or representation of the central idea of the standard STEP FOUR:

20 minutes to work in groups 10 minutes to report out – 1 minute per standard

Examine your standard and rubric. Underline the words that differentiate the levels on the rubric. Discuss! STEP ONE: STEP TWO: STEP THREE: STEP FOUR: List evidence of a teacher assessment at the Proficient level. What would you see/hear? What documentation? Compare your group’s list of evidence to the list of Performance Indicators. What’s the same? What’s different? Work collaboratively to create a 1 page organizer around your group’s standard(s).

Grades 3-5 Grades 6-8 Grades 9-12

Survey data informs Standards 3, 4, 7, 8

Provide student perception of the teacher’s practice as an additional source of documentation of teacher performance Reflect the direct experience of students in classrooms

Are completed anonymously to promote honest feedback Are administered by a certified professional, other than the teacher of the surveyed student/students Are administered with all appropriate accommodations made for students with disabilities and English Language Learners

Putting it all Together Teacher Self-Assessment Pre-conference Two walk-throughs (10 min.) One observation (formative; 30 min.) Mid-year conference Two walk-throughs (10 min.) One observation (formative; 30 min.) Complete Evaluation (summative) Summative Conference (totality of evidence)

Crosswalk document Fact Sheets and Quick Guides Teacher Resource Bundles Available at:

Teacher Effectiveness System (Generates a Teacher Effectiveness Measure Score) Teacher Assessment on Performance Standards Data sources include observations, documentation and student perception surveys Student Growth and Academic Achievement Teachers of Tested Subjects Student Growth Percentile (SGP) Teachers of Non-Tested Subjects Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) TAPS

Preparing for